Re: suggestions for window manager

2007-05-12 Thread Raffaele Morelli

2007/5/10, Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


There are a lot of window managers available (too many to download and
test them all over a slow dial up link) and I'm looking for suggestions.

Here's what I want:


low-resource: box only has 64 MB available.
Most of the time, x apps are run via ssh to my main Athlon64
box.

Rock solid stable.  A focus on good design and being bug-free over
adding 'features'.

A little panel with a clock and buttons for frequently used apps
preferably with a little helper to set up or a very simple config file.

A place for minimized windows to go that displays their current title.
E.g. if Konquorer's download manager (all via ssh) is busy, it puts its
percent complete in the title.  Having a little panel for these makes it
easy to keep track of progress.

Window resizing, minimizing, maximizing, shading.

I used to use icewm but the configuration and menu-editing apps don't
seem to be in etch.  I've tried xfce4 but it seems to use too many
resources.  I've also had it die periodically.

Uses easy to read fonts.



icewm could still be your friend if you don't worry to edit a couple of text
file.

cheers
raffaele


Re: suggestions for window manager

2007-05-11 Thread Stefan Monnier
 low-resource: box only has 64 MB available.
 Rock solid stable.  A focus on good design and being bug-free over
 adding 'features'.

I recommend ctwm.
But you'll have to go through editing a config file.


Stefan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: suggestions for window manager

2007-05-11 Thread Javier Vasquez

On 5/10/07, Stefan Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 low-resource: box only has 64 MB available.
 Rock solid stable.  A focus on good design and being bug-free over
 adding 'features'.


This is pretty much a matter of taste.  For light WMs, the ones I've
tried and heard of are:

fluxbox
icewm
pekwm
fvwm(#)

I've read through this list fvwm is pretty light and manageable once
one learns how to configure it properly (fvwm2 was the default at
work, and for remote work I found fluxbox lighter, so I dropped fvwm,
it might have been not having the right configuration, and I didn't
like it that much to continue trying), however for out of the box
pretty light and easy tocustomize I'd say fluxbox is the one I prefer.
I tried icewm, but I got back to fluxbox since when compiling on
machines where I don't have root permissions it has less dependencies,
and I honestly liked it better.  I also tried pekwm, and I liked it at
the instant I used it, pretty light as well if not lighter, however it
doesn't natively include toolbar, so one needs to install a separate
toolbar application, which is OK, but then the combination might not
be as light as one integrated thing.

There are tons of other options (some already mentioned in this
thread), and you can find out only by trying them.  I've always gone
back to fluxbox though, :).


--
Javier


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




suggestions for window manager

2007-05-10 Thread Douglas Allan Tutty
There are a lot of window managers available (too many to download and
test them all over a slow dial up link) and I'm looking for suggestions.

Here's what I want:


low-resource: box only has 64 MB available.
Most of the time, x apps are run via ssh to my main Athlon64
box.

Rock solid stable.  A focus on good design and being bug-free over
adding 'features'.

A little panel with a clock and buttons for frequently used apps
preferably with a little helper to set up or a very simple config file.

A place for minimized windows to go that displays their current title.
E.g. if Konquorer's download manager (all via ssh) is busy, it puts its
percent complete in the title.  Having a little panel for these makes it
easy to keep track of progress.

Window resizing, minimizing, maximizing, shading.

I used to use icewm but the configuration and menu-editing apps don't
seem to be in etch.  I've tried xfce4 but it seems to use too many
resources.  I've also had it die periodically.

Uses easy to read fonts.

What I don't want is:
On one hand, gradients, graphics everywhere, tiny icons that 
I can't see, and bells and whistles.

On the other hand, something that needs keyboard commands I
can't remember, configuration only via a complicated config
file.

Questions this generates:

While a workstation/desktop can tolerate restarting X without much fuss,
someone running a cluster of computers from a main console with lots of
xterms needs a solid window manager.  IBM has is Hardware Management
Console (which I think runs either OS/2 or AIX) and Cray has Console
Workstation.  What do debian people use who need a solidly reliable X
setup?

Thanks for your ideas.

Doug.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: suggestions for window manager

2007-05-10 Thread didier gaumet
On Thu, 10 May 2007 12:45:16 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:


Hi Doug,

I have had roughly the same requirements for a lightweight wm on an old
laptop (Pentium 133 and 32MB ram, NetBSD 3.0). After having tried fluxbox,
blackbox, icewm and many others, I found that WindowMaker was not slower
but more user-friendly. XFCE is now gtk2-based and no more a low-consuming
resource environment.
 Talking about Icewm configuration tools, iceconf and icemc are
included in Etch:
http://packages.debian.org/stable/x11/iceconf
http://packages.debian.org/stable/x11/icemc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: suggestions for window manager

2007-05-10 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:45:16PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
 
 I used to use icewm but the configuration and menu-editing apps don't
 seem to be in etch.

My .icewm/preferences has 10 lines excluding comments. I never edit the 
menu because my main apps are in .icewm/toolbar which has a simple 
sintax:
prog Title icon command

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: suggestions for window manager

2007-05-10 Thread BartlebyScrivener
On May 10, 12:10 pm, Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 There are a lot of window managers available (too many to download and
 test them all over a slow dial up link) and I'm looking for suggestions.


Fluxbox?

http://fluxbox.sourceforge.net/

Certainly fills the rock solid bill. Don't know about memory
requirements.

rd


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: suggestions for window manager

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Pobega
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:45:16PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
 There are a lot of window managers available (too many to download and
 test them all over a slow dial up link) and I'm looking for suggestions.
 
 Here's what I want:
 
 
 low-resource: box only has 64 MB available.
   Most of the time, x apps are run via ssh to my main Athlon64
   box.
 
 Rock solid stable.  A focus on good design and being bug-free over
 adding 'features'.
 
 A little panel with a clock and buttons for frequently used apps
 preferably with a little helper to set up or a very simple config file.
 
 A place for minimized windows to go that displays their current title.
 E.g. if Konquorer's download manager (all via ssh) is busy, it puts its
 percent complete in the title.  Having a little panel for these makes it
 easy to keep track of progress.
 
 Window resizing, minimizing, maximizing, shading.
 
 I used to use icewm but the configuration and menu-editing apps don't
 seem to be in etch.  I've tried xfce4 but it seems to use too many
 resources.  I've also had it die periodically.
 
 Uses easy to read fonts.
 
 What I don't want is:
   On one hand, gradients, graphics everywhere, tiny icons that 
   I can't see, and bells and whistles.
 
   On the other hand, something that needs keyboard commands I
   can't remember, configuration only via a complicated config
   file.
 
 Questions this generates:
 
 While a workstation/desktop can tolerate restarting X without much fuss,
 someone running a cluster of computers from a main console with lots of
 xterms needs a solid window manager.  IBM has is Hardware Management
 Console (which I think runs either OS/2 or AIX) and Cray has Console
 Workstation.  What do debian people use who need a solidly reliable X
 setup?
 
 Thanks for your ideas.
 
 Doug.
 
 

WindowMaker should be able to handle this workload. It's pretty nice,
easy to configure (Granted you installed the wmakerconf package), and
all in all very fast. I've had no problems with it, and I've been using
it exclusively now for two months.

-- 
http://digital-haze.net/~pobega/ - My Website
If programmers deserve to be rewarded for creating innovative
programs, by the same token they deserve to be punished if they
restrict the use of these programs. 
 - Richard Stallman


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: suggestions for window manager

2007-05-10 Thread Douglas Allan Tutty
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:11:25PM -0700, BartlebyScrivener wrote:
 On May 10, 12:10 pm, Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  There are a lot of window managers available (too many to download and
  test them all over a slow dial up link) and I'm looking for suggestions.
 
 Fluxbox?
 
 Certainly fills the rock solid bill. Don't know about memory
 requirements.

Downloaded it tonight, will test tomorrow.  Its a small download.
fluxboxconf OTOH is 21MB.

Thanks,
Doug.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: suggestions for window manager

2007-05-10 Thread Martin Marcher

ion3 (ion2 is)

not in debian but just depends on lua-5.1

hth
martin

On 5/11/07, Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:11:25PM -0700, BartlebyScrivener wrote:
 On May 10, 12:10 pm, Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  There are a lot of window managers available (too many to download and
  test them all over a slow dial up link) and I'm looking for suggestions.

 Fluxbox?

 Certainly fills the rock solid bill. Don't know about memory
 requirements.

Downloaded it tonight, will test tomorrow.  Its a small download.
fluxboxconf OTOH is 21MB.

Thanks,
Doug.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
Martin Marcher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mycorners.com
https://www.xing.com/profile/Martin_Marcher
http://www.linkedin.com/in/martinmarcher
http://www.studivz.net/profile.php?ids=9f83ea8c5996b8ec
http://www.amazon.de/gp/registry/wishlist/3KDAGCL2NKOIM/ref=reg_hu-wl_goto-registry/302-4432803-5146435?ie=UTF8sort=date-added


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]