Re: traffic stats wan-lan - ntop or better?
On 2004-12-19 @ 07:42:32 (week 51) Joao Clemente wrote: I decided to get some tool to analize network traffic so that I can understand what am I paying for... I have the feeling that ntop is the tool to use, but has someone a better suggestion? We use ntop in our network and even though I think it is a very good tool I also think it is overkill for what you want. If you are using a box with iptables on it then ipac-ng or ulog-acctd will probably be more what you're looking for. I am using ipac-ng, but I am considering switching to ulog-acctd because I am getting second thoughts with ipac-ng. (I have reason to believe it is not 100% accurate, but am still trying to verify that.) Grx HdV -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
traffic stats wan-lan - ntop or better?
I had a look at my ISP billing page today and I got somewhat suspicious of something wrong with the reported traffic... I had just finished looking to my calamaris report and the calamaris report had 1/3 of the traffic reported in the ISP billing page... I decided to get some tool to analize network traffic so that I can understand what am I paying for... I have the feeling that ntop is the tool to use, but has someone a better suggestion? My setup is ADSL Router MyServer/Proxy \- hub -- Other Lan Machines so altough my server is not the gateway, I think ntop analises everything that gets to the machine interface (promiscuous mode) Any other suggestions? Thanks Joao Clemente -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
