Re: which version of the ssh daemon is more secure?

2004-10-12 Thread Leandro Guimaraens Faria Corsetti Dutra 
Em Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:20:09 +0200, Anonymous escreveu:

> it safer to run
> the stable ssh (1:3.4p1-1.woody.3) or the unstable one (1:3.8.1p1-8)?

Stable is more mature, with unstable we never know what errors
may be yet lurking...

-- 
Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corcete Dutra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MaringÃ, PR, BRASIL+55 (44) 3025 6253
http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/ +55 (44) 8803 1729
Soli Deo Gloria!   +55 (11) 9406 7191


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: which version of the ssh daemon is more secure?

2004-10-12 Thread Rob Weir 
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 02:00:17PM +0200, Anonymous said
> I'm running an "unstable" system and I need remote access by
> ssh. "Stable" is considered better for servers (but I need
> unstable for newer versions of a lot of packages on my
> workstation), "testing" gets security updates last, but
> "unstable" has a higher version number of ssh. it safer to
> run the stable ssh (1:3.4p1-1.woody.3) or the unstable one
> (1:3.8.1p1-8)?

Neither have any known vulnerabilities at the moment.

-rob

-- 
Words of the day: eternity server AGT. AMME Syria Semtex FIPS140 kilo class


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

which version of the ssh daemon is more secure?

2004-10-12 Thread Anonymous 
I'm running an "unstable" system and I need remote access by
ssh. "Stable" is considered better for servers (but I need
unstable for newer versions of a lot of packages on my
workstation), "testing" gets security updates last, but
"unstable" has a higher version number of ssh. it safer to
run the stable ssh (1:3.4p1-1.woody.3) or the unstable one
(1:3.8.1p1-8)?

Thank you.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]