xfce4 related questions
I have this issue, I test xfce the version that comes with woody and I like it very much, so right now I am planning to upgrade to xfce4 then the questions are the following: 1. The latest version is enough stable to install in a production server?, right now I have woody on it. 2. I should have kde and gnome in order that xfce works?. I will appreciate any advice. Thanks in advance. -- Sergio Basurto J. If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. (Isaac Newton) -- -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xfce4 related questions
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:37:43 -0700 (PDT), Sergio Basurto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. The latest version is enough stable to install in a production server?, right now I have woody on it. The latest version of XFCE is marked as beta and I find it runs fine on my Sarge laptop. The latest stable version is pretty stable. However, I wouldn't want to put an X11 server (ditto most X11 clients - including XFCE) on any machine I termed server though. 2. I should have kde and gnome in order that xfce works?. No. XFCE depends on some stuff that Gnome also depends on, but not Gnome itself. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.ukhttp://blog.dorward.me.uk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xfce4 related questions
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 04:07:45PM +0100, David Dorward wrote: On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:37:43 -0700 (PDT), Sergio Basurto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. The latest version is enough stable to install in a production server?, right now I have woody on it. The latest version of XFCE is marked as beta and I find it runs fine on my Sarge laptop. The latest stable version is pretty stable. However, I wouldn't want to put an X11 server (ditto most X11 clients - including XFCE) on any machine I termed server though. The latest version of xfce4 in testing and unstable is the stable branch of xfce4 and isn't the 4.2 beta release. It should be production quality (though I've some bug triaging and sending upstream I need to do - volunteers welcome). If you see any issues with it please report them as Debian bugs. Simon. -- oOoOo I'm gonna eat you, little fishy! - The Cat oOoOo oOoOooOoOo oOoOo oOoOo htag.pl 0.0.22 ::: http://www.earth.li/~huggie/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xfce4 related questions
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:11:00 +0100, Simon Huggins wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 04:07:45PM +0100, David Dorward wrote: On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:37:43 -0700 (PDT), Sergio Basurto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. The latest version is enough stable to install in a production server?, right now I have woody on it. The latest version of XFCE is marked as beta and I find it runs fine on my Sarge laptop. The latest stable version is pretty stable. However, I wouldn't want to put an X11 server (ditto most X11 clients - including XFCE) on any machine I termed server though. The latest version of xfce4 in testing and unstable is the stable branch of xfce4 and isn't the 4.2 beta release. It should be production quality (though I've some bug triaging and sending upstream I need to do - volunteers welcome). If you see any issues with it please report them as Debian bugs. Simon. Ok I got it, thanks :) -- Sergio Basurto J. If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. (Isaac Newton) -- -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xfce4 related questions
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:11:00 +0100, Simon Huggins wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 04:07:45PM +0100, David Dorward wrote: On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:37:43 -0700 (PDT), Sergio Basurto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. The latest version is enough stable to install in a production server?, right now I have woody on it. The latest version of XFCE is marked as beta and I find it runs fine on my Sarge laptop. The latest stable version is pretty stable. However, I wouldn't want to put an X11 server (ditto most X11 clients - including XFCE) on any machine I termed server though. The latest version of xfce4 in testing and unstable is the stable branch of xfce4 and isn't the 4.2 beta release. It should be production quality (though I've some bug triaging and sending upstream I need to do - volunteers welcome). If you see any issues with it please report them as Debian bugs. Simon. Ok I got it, thanks :) -- Sergio Basurto J. If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. (Isaac Newton) -- -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xfce4 related questions
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:11:00 +0100, Simon Huggins wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 04:07:45PM +0100, David Dorward wrote: On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:37:43 -0700 (PDT), Sergio Basurto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. The latest version is enough stable to install in a production server?, right now I have woody on it. The latest version of XFCE is marked as beta and I find it runs fine on my Sarge laptop. The latest stable version is pretty stable. However, I wouldn't want to put an X11 server (ditto most X11 clients - including XFCE) on any machine I termed server though. The latest version of xfce4 in testing and unstable is the stable branch of xfce4 and isn't the 4.2 beta release. It should be production quality (though I've some bug triaging and sending upstream I need to do - volunteers welcome). If you see any issues with it please report them as Debian bugs. Simon. Ok I got it, thanks :) -- Sergio Basurto J. If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. (Isaac Newton) -- -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
