Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-05 Par sujet Laurent Pelecq 
Charles Goyard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 J'avais trouvé un petit client POP nommé POPPY, écrit en Perl. Je
 l'avais modifié (très simplement) pour qu'il fasse du filtrage de
 message sur le serveur. Je pouvais effacer les messages en fonction du
 contenu des en-têtes avant de les télécharger.

C'est ce que fait mailfilter il me semble. C'est en paquet Debian sous
woody/sid (au moins).

Laurent

Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet Régis Grison 

Faites comme moi :
un petit mail à [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(et puis j'oubliais [EMAIL PROTECTED] et [EMAIL PROTECTED])


On peut supposer qu'ils vont vite réagir :)

Régis.

Amaury Amblard-Ladurantie wrote:


bruit supplémentaire

autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: 
autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: Re: woody ou sid ?




superbe
/bruit supplémentaire

Amaury

Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet Régis Grison 

Je me réponds moi-même pour ajouter que j'ai reçu ça en écrivant à abuse :

Cher Client,
Afin de traiter votre demande au plus vite, veuillez dès à présent
(y compris pour la présente question) utiliser l'adresse suivante. De
cette façon, votre demande sera traitée immédiatement par un
collaborateur francophone.

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Régis Grison wrote:


Faites comme moi :
un petit mail à [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (et puis j'oubliais [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
et [EMAIL PROTECTED])


On peut supposer qu'ils vont vite réagir :)

Régis.

Amaury Amblard-Ladurantie wrote:


bruit supplémentaire

autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: 
autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: Re: woody ou sid ?




superbe
/bruit supplémentaire

Amaury

Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet Amaury Amblard-Ladurantie 
 Faites comme moi :
 un petit mail à [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (et puis j'oubliais [EMAIL PROTECTED] et [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Non, ca ne sert à rien de les spammer. Tu as envoyé un mail, ca devrait 
suffir.

cat ~/.procmailrc
(snip)

:0:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/dev/null

(snip)

 On peut supposer qu'ils vont vite réagir :)

Mais pas la peine de les bombarder de mail.

Amaury

autoreply: autoreply: Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet ya 
Hi,

As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Youri Albinovanus

autoreply: autoreply: Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet ya 
Hi,

As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Youri Albinovanus

autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet ya 
Hi,

As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Youri Albinovanus

autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet ya 
Hi,

As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Youri Albinovanus

autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet ya 
Hi,

As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Youri Albinovanus

autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet ya 
Hi,

As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Youri Albinovanus

autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet ya 
Hi,

As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Youri Albinovanus

autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet ya 
Hi,

As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Youri Albinovanus

autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet ya 
Hi,

As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Youri Albinovanus

autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet ya 
Hi,

As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Youri Albinovanus

autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet ya 
Hi,

As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Youri Albinovanus

autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet ya 
Hi,

As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Youri Albinovanus

autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet ya 
Hi,

As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Youri Albinovanus

autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet ya 
Hi,

As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Youri Albinovanus

autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet ya 
Hi,

As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Youri Albinovanus

autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: autoreply: Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet ya 
Hi,

As of 1 july 2001, I am not longer working for Tiscali.
Please send your mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For personal matters please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Youri Albinovanus

Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet Fabien Penso 

Amaury a écrit : 

  Faites comme moi :
  un petit mail à [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (et puis j'oubliais [EMAIL PROTECTED] et [EMAIL PROTECTED])

  Non, ca ne sert à rien de les spammer. Tu as envoyé un mail, ca devrait 
  suffir.

Voici une solution plus radicale :

,[ /etc/postfix/header_checks ]
| /^Subject: ILOVEYOU/ REJECT 
| /^From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ REJECT
| /^Subject: Auto Reply to your message .../ REJECT
| /^Subject: AUTO-REPLY/ REJECT
| /^Subject: Automated Reply from / REJECT
| /^Subject: Autoreply: / REJECT
| /^Subject: cc:Mail Link to SMTP Undeliverable / REJECT
| /^Subject: MFR: Notification de repondeur/ REJECT
| /^Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: / REJECT
| /^Subject: .+ponse automatique d'absence du bureau :/ REJECT
| /^Subject: Yahoo! Auto Response/ REJECT
| /^Subject: R.+p. : Resultats de vos commandes (Absence)/ REJECT
| /^Subject: Abwesenheitsnotiz: / REJECT
| /^Subject: .* est absent(e)/ REJECT
| /^Subject: Fuori sede - Risposta automatica:/ REJECT
| /^Subject: .* out of the office/ REJECT
| /^Subject: .* out of the office\./ REJECT
| /^X-FC-MachineGenerated: true/ REJECT
| /^Subject: Respuesta autom/ REJECT
| /^Subject: I liked your site/ REJECT
| /^X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-Tnef-Correlator:/ REJECT
`



-- 
Fabien Penso [EMAIL PROTECTED] | LinuxFr a toujours besoin de :
http://perso.LinuxFR.org/penso/  | http://linuxfr.org/dons/



pgpTtvgWsIyKu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet Phil 
salut à toutes et à tous  ;-)

On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 12:16:00PM +0100, Amaury Amblard-Ladurantie wrote:
[...]
 cat ~/.procmailrc
 (snip)
 
 :0:
 * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 /dev/null

procmail, c'est bien. Mais...
en RTC, ça n'empêche pas la facture d'augmenter !
A moins de l'utiliser sur le serveur, mais, chez Free, je ne sais
pas faire  :-(
Comme en plus, c'est un problème que je rencontre ailleurs, j'ai
un petit peu cherché, et voici ce que j'ai trouvé de plus
satisfaisant :
- = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = -  
URL: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12525.html

Re: too many Out of Office AutoReply
 _

 * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 * Subject: Re: too many Out of Office AutoReply
 * From: Michael H. Warfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 * Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:13:25 -0400
 * Cc: A James Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 * In-Reply-To:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED];from
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 02:14:15PM -0400
 * References:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 * User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.2i
 _

On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 02:14:15PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:44:41 BST, A James Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]  said:
  I notice also that ALL of the autoresponder messages come from Internet
  Mail Service Microsoft software No surprises there then!

 I used to send a canned note to people who did that, explaining that it
 was poor netiquette, but gave up when I noticed that:

 (a) 99% of the offenders were using that software
 (b) I have *yet* to find somebody who can tell me how to configure said
 software to not reply to mail that comes from owner-* or *-request addresses.

 If somebody has a choose this tab, select that, type this cookbook, please
 let me know

I went round and round with our people about this (we have over
70 lists with over 50,000 subscribers at Internet Security Systems).
Someone was finally able to tell me that recent versions of Exchange
will not autorespond to messages with Precedence set to bulk but will
autorespond to messages with no Precedence setting or with a Precedence
setting of list.  They are keying on the string, not the numeric
value.  All of our list messages now go out with the Precedence: bulk
header to eliminate that much.

Of the remainder (older versions of Outlook and Exchange), many
violate SEVERAL rules of autoresponders such as never autoresponding
to an autoresponder an responding more that once to a given address.
If you think about it, this is a DoS attack waiting to happen.  Just get
a few of these and spoof messages them from each of them.  :-)  Fundamentally
evil and fundamentally SIMPLE.  And, yes, I know of one individual who
actually got fed up with two particular others and did that to them.  They
had been warned and they set up the autoresponders anyway.  They came
back to over 8,000 messages and mailboxes overlimit.  They blamed each other,
of course, and they were right...  Just for the wrong reasons.  :-)
And, no, it wasn't me that done that.

Recent versions of Outlook, Outlook Express, and Exchange avoid
both of those damaging misbehaviors as well, so it's only chumps^H^H^H^H^H^H
victims^H^H^H^H^H^H^Husers with software that is overdue for an update.

 --
   Valdis Kletnieks
   Operating Systems Analyst
   Virginia Tech

Mike
--
 Michael H. Warfield|  (770) 985-6132   |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (The Mad Wizard)  |  (678) 463-0932   |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
  NIC whois:  MHW9  |  An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471|  possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!
 _

- = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = -  

1) la solution est-elle de mettre le champ Precedence à bulk ?
Ici, il est à list.

2) et si l'admin de la liste ne veut pas le faire (expérience vécue),
comment peut-on indiquer (dans les entêtes) qu'on ne veut pas
recevoir ces messages *non sollicités* et sans intérêt sur les listes ?
Le mettre à bulk ne sert à rien car le gestionnaire de liste
l'écrase alors, pour le mettre à la valeur qu'il veut (list).
J'ai testé !
-- 
Philippe BOURCIER  http://bourcier.philippe.online.fr

Re: [BRUIT] autoreply

2001-12-04 Par sujet Charles Goyard 
Ainsi parlait Phil :
 procmail, c'est bien. Mais...
 en RTC, ça n'empêche pas la facture d'augmenter !
 A moins de l'utiliser sur le serveur, mais, chez Free, je ne sais
 pas faire  :-(

J'avais trouvé un petit client POP nommé POPPY, écrit en Perl. Je
l'avais modifié (très simplement) pour qu'il fasse du filtrage de
message sur le serveur. Je pouvais effacer les messages en fonction du
contenu des en-têtes avant de les télécharger.

-- 
Charles