Re: Questions for all candidates
#include hallo.h * Raphael Hertzog [Fri, Feb 21 2003, 12:48:11AM]: Ok, I'm tired, I'm sure I could have find dozen of other questions like those five ... but I'll let other people continue with questions like that if they like it. Okay, let me ask some other questions... 6. Many people complaint that the pool is too bloated, priorities too generic, too many packages to pick the right one from the list... [ ] making some packages be more important to others is bad and will make create some kind of elite and second class packages [ ] we need a way to priorize the packages, review them, set keywords on the package (desktop/edu/demudi/...) and setting the appropriate priority for the target user group [ ] the problem exists but I hope someone will fix it after my DPLship [ ] there is no problem, the current system is just right 7. There are lots of backport series for Woody environment because people do not want to wait two years for a simple update, eg. when their software is not supported by ancient versions in Woody... [ ] there are no problems with Woody! [ ] we should try to legalize such efforts and create a semi-automatic system, similar to Raphaels former Debian-Working concept [ ] those are not the users we want [ ] such people should shut up and wait a bit Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- Ich gehe davon aus, daß Adressen nur dann sinnvoll sind, wenn Adressen eingetragen sind. -- Oliver Zendel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Questions for Branden
Le Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 07:36:54PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies écrivait: I thought somebody would collect all questions and they would be aske/answered in one go? Well no, questions are collected and selected for the IRC debate, but direct questions on this list has always been the main way to discuss the project of each candidate. I do have some questions after reading the platforms, but I thought maybe I wait till after the rebuttal. Is this list to place to discuss the platforms? Looked to me more like a discussion on statistical theories recently... Heh, the discussion about the voting mechanism are not supposed to continue forever, one day we'll have resolved all problems related to that and this should never come again. :) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
Re: Questions for all candidates
#include hallo.h * Raphael Hertzog [Fri, Feb 21 2003, 12:48:11AM]: Ok, I'm tired, I'm sure I could have find dozen of other questions like those five ... but I'll let other people continue with questions like that if they like it. Okay, let me ask some other questions... 6. Many people complaint that the pool is too bloated, priorities too generic, too many packages to pick the right one from the list... [ ] making some packages be more important to others is bad and will make create some kind of elite and second class packages [ ] we need a way to priorize the packages, review them, set keywords on the package (desktop/edu/demudi/...) and setting the appropriate priority for the target user group [ ] the problem exists but I hope someone will fix it after my DPLship [ ] there is no problem, the current system is just right 7. There are lots of backport series for Woody environment because people do not want to wait two years for a simple update, eg. when their software is not supported by ancient versions in Woody... [ ] there are no problems with Woody! [ ] we should try to legalize such efforts and create a semi-automatic system, similar to Raphaels former Debian-Working concept [ ] those are not the users we want [ ] such people should shut up and wait a bit Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- Ich gehe davon aus, daß Adressen nur dann sinnvoll sind, wenn Adressen eingetragen sind. -- Oliver Zendel
Re: Questions for all candidates
#include hallo.h * Eduard Bloch [Fri, Feb 21 2003, 10:18:12AM]: their software is not supported by ancient versions in Woody... ...or hardware... Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- Atomkraft, strahlender Glanz ohne Abtrocknen.
