Re: Another proposal
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:17:42AM +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> I don't like the plethora of proposals that come up on -vote these days,
> but Loïc's proposed GR doesn't look acceptable to me.
I'd like to offer an amendment to this proposal.
Changes:
* Make it clear that this is a strongly neutral position ("neither
endorse nor oppose").
--- snip here ---
== Reaffirm support for Anthony Towns as the Project Leader ==
The Debian project reaffirms support to Anthony Towns as the Debian
- Project Leader. However, it doesn't endorse nor support any projects Mr
+ Project Leader. However, it doesn't endorse nor oppose any projects Mr
Towns may lead or participate in outside Debian.
--- snip here ---
I also would suggest cleaning up the wording (whether or not you accept
the above change):
--- snip here ---
The Debian project reaffirms its support of Anthony Towns as the
Debian project leader. However, it neither endorses nor supports
any projects that Mr Towns may lead or participate in outside
Debian.
--- snip here ---
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Another proposal
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:17:42AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > == Reaffirm support for Anthony Towns as the Project Leader == > > The Debian project reaffirms support to Anthony Towns as the Debian > Project Leader. However, it doesn't endorse nor support any projects Mr > Towns may lead or participate in outside Debian. seconded. Best regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Another proposal
Josselin Mouette wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > == Reaffirm support for Anthony Towns as the Project Leader == > > The Debian project reaffirms support to Anthony Towns as the Debian > Project Leader. However, it doesn't endorse nor support any projects Mr > Towns may lead or participate in outside Debian. > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFFHuyLrSla4ddfhTMRAp6VAKCUA5e9gXbZDaqbRCSsR8WmCIzkdQCfa2Ws > Gmm4ogtmOfbUBWHo7tCMVPY= > =Bddb > -END PGP SIGNATURE- Seconded -- ·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution : :' :-- Emma Goldman `. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature
FIRST CALL FOR VOTES FOR "DFSG #2 applies to all programmatic works"
FIRST CALL FOR VOTES FOR "DFSG #2 APPLIES TO ALL PROGRAMMATIC WORKS"
= === = === == === == === =
Voting period starts 00:00:01 UTC on Sunday,1st October, 2006
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Saturday, 14th October, 2006.
The following ballot is for voting on a General Resolution to clarify
the scope and applicability of item 2 of the Debian free software
guidelines (http://www.debian.org/social_contract). The vote is being
conducted in accordance with the policy delineated in Section A,
Standard Resolution Procedure, of the Debian Constitution.
The details of the general resolution can be found at:
http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_004
You may see the constitution at http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.
For voting questions contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HOW TO VOTE
First, read the full text of the GR and amendments, if any. The ballot
does not claim to be complete rendition of the proposal(s), or even
accurately depict the spirit of each proposal.
Do not erase anything between the lines below and do not change the
choice names.
In the brackets next to your preferred choice, place a 1. Place a 2 in
the brackets next to your next choice. Do not enter a number smaller
than 1 or larger than 2. You may skip numbers. You may rank options
equally (as long as all choices X you make fall in the range 1<= X <=
2).
Make sure you have read the proposal in detail.
To vote "no, no matter what" rank "Further discussion" as more
desirable than the unacceptable choices, or You may rank the "Further
discussion" choice, and leave choices you consider unacceptable
blank. Unranked choices are considered equally the least desired
choices, and ranked below all ranked choices. (Note: if the Further
Discussion choice is unranked, then it is equal to all other unranked
choices, if any -- no special consideration is given to the Further
discussion choice by the voting software).
Then mail the ballot to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Don't worry
about spacing of the columns or any quote characters (">") that your
reply inserts. NOTE: The vote must be GPG signed (or PGP signed) (or
encrypted) with your key that is in the Debian keyring.
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
22fc4edd-1f6c-454f-b204-6aa0bad0ce1d
[ ] Choice 1: DFSG #2 applies to all programmatic works
[ ] Choice 2: Further discussion
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
--
The responses to a valid vote shall be signed by the vote key created
for this vote. The public key for the vote, signed by the Project
secretary, is appended below.
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)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=Iczm
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
arch-tag: 1c14135a-7b23-45f7-b0d5-78e68b24d4f8
--
Remember that there is an outside world to see and enjoy. Hans Liepmann
Debian Project Secretary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: Another proposal
Le dim 1 octobre 2006 00:17, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > I don't like the plethora of proposals that come up on -vote these > days, but Loïc's proposed GR doesn't look acceptable to me. > > The text of the proposal is attached. == Reaffirm support for Anthony Towns as the Project Leader == The Debian project reaffirms support to Anthony Towns as the Debian Project Leader. However, it doesn't endorse nor support any projects Mr Towns may lead or participate in outside Debian. seconded -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpLvI07kPDiV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Another proposal
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote: > == Reaffirm support for Anthony Towns as the Project Leader == > > The Debian project reaffirms support to Anthony Towns as the Debian > Project Leader. However, it doesn't endorse nor support any projects Mr > Towns may lead or participate in outside Debian. Seconded. Sam. -- echo "creationism" | tr -d "holy godly goal" signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Another proposal
I don't like the plethora of proposals that come up on -vote these days, but Loïc's proposed GR doesn't look acceptable to me. The text of the proposal is attached. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 == Reaffirm support for Anthony Towns as the Project Leader == The Debian project reaffirms support to Anthony Towns as the Debian Project Leader. However, it doesn't endorse nor support any projects Mr Towns may lead or participate in outside Debian. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFHuyLrSla4ddfhTMRAp6VAKCUA5e9gXbZDaqbRCSsR8WmCIzkdQCfa2Ws Gmm4ogtmOfbUBWHo7tCMVPY= =Bddb -END PGP SIGNATURE- signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Re: Draft ballot "DFSG #2 applies to all programmatic works"
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 10:50:41AM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 11:35:48AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > Make sure you have read the proposal in detail. > > A little plea for the next GR discussion season: when people discuss a > GR, please keep in mind that the discussion will become material that > people would like to read before deciding what to vote. > > http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_004 says: > > Please note that this does not include preludes, prologues, any > preambles to the resolution, post-ambles to the resolution, abstracts, > fore-words, after-words, rationales, supporting documents, opinion > polls, arguments for and against, and any of the other important > material you will find on the mailing list archives. Please read the > debian-vote mailing list archives for details. > > I do not have time nor motivation to go through the huge debian-vote > mailing list archives of the last month. > > It would be useful if the main proponents of either result would work > together (offline? on the wiki?) on a single short text that would > summarise both positions in a way that they both think is fair. > > A few suggestions for trying to have a better list archive next time can > found in http://people.debian.org/~enrico/dcg/ , and more specifically > in http://people.debian.org/~enrico/dcg/ch02.html There will be a kernel team meeting this evening, where we will discuss these licencing issues, and try to come with a common text which the kernel team, the d-i team and the RM team can second. So, stay tuned for a new proposal tomorrow, which will obsolet all or most others. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Draft ballot "DFSG #2 applies to all programmatic works"
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 11:35:48AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Make sure you have read the proposal in detail. A little plea for the next GR discussion season: when people discuss a GR, please keep in mind that the discussion will become material that people would like to read before deciding what to vote. http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_004 says: Please note that this does not include preludes, prologues, any preambles to the resolution, post-ambles to the resolution, abstracts, fore-words, after-words, rationales, supporting documents, opinion polls, arguments for and against, and any of the other important material you will find on the mailing list archives. Please read the debian-vote mailing list archives for details. I do not have time nor motivation to go through the huge debian-vote mailing list archives of the last month. It would be useful if the main proponents of either result would work together (offline? on the wiki?) on a single short text that would summarise both positions in a way that they both think is fair. A few suggestions for trying to have a better list archive next time can found in http://people.debian.org/~enrico/dcg/ , and more specifically in http://people.debian.org/~enrico/dcg/ch02.html Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature
