Re: How to get a new ballot?
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 22:36:18 +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: Hi, according to the original mail at http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2010/10/msg4.html I should be able to get a fresh ballot by sending a mail to bal...@vote.debian.org with the subject gr_nonpackagers (At least that's how I understand it. If I'm wrong, I'm happy to be pointed to additional documentation. Thanks in advance.) Anyway, here's what I got: snip bal...@vote.debian.org: 70.103.162.29_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_550_no_vote_is_currently_running/Giving_up_on_70.103.162.29./ /snip I think Neil fixed this yesterday. Try again? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: How to get a new ballot?
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:35:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 22:36:18 +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: Anyway, here's what I got: snip bal...@vote.debian.org: 70.103.162.29_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_550_no_vote_is_currently_running/Giving_up_on_70.103.162.29./ /snip I think Neil fixed this yesterday. Try again? Works now, thanks. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101012211735.gb21...@atlan
Re: Naming of non-uploading DDs (Was: GR: welcome non-packaging contributors as Debian project members)
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: Kurt, my inclination was to consider this change as falling under Constitution §A.1.3 as a change that does not alter the meaning of the proposal. Since you don't actually need seconders under §4.2.1, and you are the proposer of the original option, I don't think it's necessary (unless a seconder wants to propose the original proposal as a second amendment.) And in any case, any change is allowed by the original proposer of a particular amendment; it just resets the discussion period unless it meets A.1.6. [Though one of these days, we probably should fix up A.1; it's language doesn't properly promote amendments to resolutions (options?) to be voted on.] Don Armstrong -- The sheer ponderousness of the panel's opinion [...] refutes its thesis far more convincingly than anything I might say. The panel's labored effort to smother the Second Amendment by sheer body weight has all the grace of a sumo wrestler trying to kill a rattlesnake by sitting on it---and is just as likely to succeed. -- Alex Kozinski, Dissenting in Silveira v. Lockyer (CV-00-00411-WBS p5983-4) http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100916171006.gn28...@teltox.donarmstrong.com
