Re: Thank you to all of the candidates

[Sam Hartman]

> "Russ" == Russ Allbery  writes:

Russ> It was a little worrying that we passed the first nomination
Russ> period without anyone volunteering to run for Debian Project
Russ> Leader, so it has been both relieving and quite exhilarating
Russ> that such a strong set of candidates came forward and we've
Russ> had such an excellent discussion here.

Russ> I think this is one of the strongest slates of candidates
Russ> we've had for DPL in years.  Voting is going to be extremely
Russ> difficult for me for the best reasons possible.  I think all
Russ> of the candidates would do an excellent job as DPL in their
Russ> own ways; personally, I kind of want to pick all of them.  :)


I agree.  The discussion we had here was very helpful to me in refining
my goals and getting an understanding of where we as a project are and
where we would like to go.  Obviously debian-vote isn't everyone and we
have discussions ahead (we're Debian; we always have discussions ahead)

Beyond that, it was amazing fun.  I am so proud to be part of this
community and am nervous but excited as I look at stepping into the DPL
role.

I've already reached out to all the other candidates to thank them
personally and to talk about ways we could work together.  I want to
publicly thank the candidates and say that I'm eager to help facilitate
the great ideas we came up with during the discussion here.

Once the election results are official my first priority will be
transition tasks including reaching out to teams to connect with them
and understand where they are.  Expect a bits mail before the end of
April talking more about trying to move forward on ideas here.

--Sam
Who might some day soon be DPL.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

DPL vote results

[Kurt Roeckx]

Hi,

It seems that the automatic mail didn't get send. The winner is
Sam Hartman. I will send an official mail later.


Kurt



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Results for Debian Project Leader 2019 Election

[devotee]

Greetings,

This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
 Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary

This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
 I remain, gentle folks,

Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Starting results calculation at Sun Apr 21 00:00:04 2019

Option 1 "Joerg Jaspert"
Option 2 "Jonathan Carter"
Option 3 "Sam Hartman"
Option 4 "Martin Michlmayr"
Option 5 "None Of The Above"

In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.

  Option
  1 2 3 4 5 
===   ===   ===   ===   === 
Option 1  169   128   169   319 
Option 2166 109   172   323 
Option 3217   206 202   336 
Option 4180   174   134 324 
Option 5 51372635   



Looking at row 2, column 1, Jonathan Carter
received 166 votes over Joerg Jaspert

Looking at row 1, column 2, Joerg Jaspert
received 169 votes over Jonathan Carter.

Option 1 Reached quorum: 319 > 45.0249930594109
Option 2 Reached quorum: 323 > 45.0249930594109
Option 3 Reached quorum: 336 > 45.0249930594109
Option 4 Reached quorum: 324 > 45.0249930594109


Option 1 passes Majority.   6.255 (319/51) >= 1
Option 2 passes Majority.   8.730 (323/37) >= 1
Option 3 passes Majority.  12.923 (336/26) >= 1
Option 4 passes Majority.   9.257 (324/35) >= 1


  Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 169 -  166) =3 votes.
  Option 3 defeats Option 1 by ( 217 -  128) =   89 votes.
  Option 4 defeats Option 1 by ( 180 -  169) =   11 votes.
  Option 1 defeats Option 5 by ( 319 -   51) =  268 votes.
  Option 3 defeats Option 2 by ( 206 -  109) =   97 votes.
  Option 4 defeats Option 2 by ( 174 -  172) =2 votes.
  Option 2 defeats Option 5 by ( 323 -   37) =  286 votes.
  Option 3 defeats Option 4 by ( 202 -  134) =   68 votes.
  Option 3 defeats Option 5 by ( 336 -   26) =  310 votes.
  Option 4 defeats Option 5 by ( 324 -   35) =  289 votes.


The Schwartz Set contains:
 Option 3 "Sam Hartman"



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The winners are:
 Option 3 "Sam Hartman"

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The total numbers of votes tallied = 378
-- 
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
  ranksep=0.25;
 "Joerg Jaspert\n6.25" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10  ];
 "Joerg Jaspert\n6.25" -> "Jonathan Carter\n8.73" [ label="3" ];
 "Joerg Jaspert\n6.25" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="268" ];
 "Jonathan Carter\n8.73" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10  
];
 "Jonathan Carter\n8.73" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="286" ];
 "Sam Hartman\n12.92" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg, 
fontcolor="NavyBlue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10  ];
 "Sam Hartman\n12.92" -> "Joerg Jaspert\n6.25" [ label="89" ];
 "Sam Hartman\n12.92" -> "Jonathan Carter\n8.73" [ label="97" ];
 "Sam Hartman\n12.92" -> "Martin Michlmayr\n9.26" [ label="68" ];
 "Sam Hartman\n12.92" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="310" ];
 "Martin Michlmayr\n9.26" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10  
];
 "Martin Michlmayr\n9.26" -> "Joerg Jaspert\n6.25" [ label="11" ];
 "Martin Michlmayr\n9.26" -> "Jonathan Carter\n8.73" [ label="2" ];
 "Martin Michlmayr\n9.26" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="289" ];
 "None Of The Above" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red", 
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10  ];
}


pgpK_WDBpXC4t.pgp
Description: PGP signature