Re: GR proposal - Restricted-media amendments to the DFSG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 06.04.2006 um 19:06 schrieb Sam Hocevar: As a special exception, the license may forbid use of technical measures to restrict access or use of the software itself, as long as the license author promises that such a clause will be rescinded real soon now. That is gum. What is promise? You cannot have such things in the DFSG. It is washing the DFSG out as the amendment would do. Before you make any change to the DFSG, you'd better discuss and vote about Accepting FDL needs/does not need a DFSG change. Vut in my point of view thsi question was already coverd by the GR. Looks like people wanting to have more software currently counted as non-free or contrib in main look for chance to wash DFSG out. Pleas think about the side effects, if DFSG is changed. Greetings Jutta - -- http://www.witch.westfalen.de http://witch.muensterland.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkQ1V7IACgkQOgZ5N97kHkdpKgCgpHiqA8DFJH2fRhvU6MWAgM8w oOcAoJdyETp/nak1MqNk+uw03O+byMO0 =hOUr -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: question for all candidates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 08.03.2006 um 15:34 schrieb Andreas Schuldei: - Stable security There was a security blackout during the summer of 2005, with repercussions in the press and public oppinion, hurting the project. Shouldn't it be more: Looking that there will be no new release without security support for it up and running? Security support for Sarge was not the only problem, when Sarge was released... greetings Jutta - -- http://www.witch.westfalen.de http://witch.muensterland.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkQQimIACgkQOgZ5N97kHkc3ywCfciTShC1Ohb+GooQFV/cm3MlK j5YAn06JqRMUjjrAVaoRE4l78Oi0byJN =VO1l -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Questions for all candidates: role models
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 02.03.2006 um 13:38 schrieb Anthony Towns: people knew Debian was exciting and growing thanks to his posts to -announce and -private when interesting things happened; More important for Debian were his posts to -announce and his visibility outside Debian than those in -private. He was that one of the leaders who might have done the most important promotion work to spread Debian around the world. cu Jutta - -- http://www.witch.westfalen.de http://witch.muensterland.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkQN5fwACgkQOgZ5N97kHkfjAwCfYXtXsrqNf8kUpNxCGInIwOrz 9EwAn13QxN7Fg+5NMJ1EwavVhvshkUI9 =W4CH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question for all candidates about their Plattform pages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 03.03.2006 um 19:23 schrieb Ted Walther: My platform was run through the HTML tidy program with the -asxml option. No warnings, errors, or complaints were output by the program, which declared it fully XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN compliant. Debian web pages are strict HTML and strict HTML does not allow font tags. Beside that especially for a DPL platform I see no sense in setting a font color, that makes content invisible in graphical browsers. And I think the colour used (nearly white on white pages) is no accident, is it? Jutta - -- http://www.witch.westfalen.de http://witch.muensterland.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkQOAVcACgkQOgZ5N97kHkerIwCaAlGmkhPKq+l/by9Dt32gcSQT 1HMAnidAiWEvIQoEUkUXl8mTxZJAl3BT =FlNN -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question for all candidates about their Plattform pages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Maybe, it is not right, asking here as I am not a DD at all, but I wonder about the web presentation of candidates. 1. One of the candidates uses pictures to illustrate his platform, but does not give an alternative description for lynx users and blind people - accident? 2. One of the candidates uses font tag (which is not valid HTML strict) and makes text not visible in graphical browsers due to the not noticible difference to the background. The hidden text is shown in lynx. - accident? In all other plattforms there are only minor validation problems that can be corrected easily without making a noticible difference. But as far as I can see, none of the pages really was valid HTML strict and none (or nearly none) uses semantic tags only, which would be better for people who can see only the text content. greetings Jutta - -- http://www.witch.westfalen.de http://witch.muensterland.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkQIGa4ACgkQOgZ5N97kHke5CACghwGYaJgZSX5wVRVIGJgANw5c hd8AnRq3/kQ14FZkEFXzT3oLO6ytZ8bn =5ObH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
