Re: Resolutions concerning dunc-tank

2006-09-29 Thread Peter van Rossum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 First resolution `We disapprove of dunc-tank':
  -8-
   BACKGROUND

   1. Anthony Towns, the current Debian Project Leader, has suggested
  funding the Debian Release Managers' living expenses during the
  forthcoming release.

   2. Following informal opposition during internal discussions, Anthony
  Towns has started soliciting, in a private capacity, donations for
  a non-Debian-controlled fund for this purpose.

   OPINIONS OF THE DEBIAN DEVELOPERS

   3. Firstly, we would like to thank the Release Managers and the Leader
  for their efforts.  We have no disagreement with the Release
  Managers.

   4. However, we, are of the opinion that (effectively) paying the
  Release Managers for their core Debian work devalues the work of
  other volunteers and is harmful to the project.

   DECISIONS AND REQUESTS

   5. Let it be known that Anthony Towns's plan does not have the support
  of the Debian Project, and that he is not authorised by Debian to
  take donations for this purpose.

   6. The Project requests that the Release Managers should not accept
  any funding for their core Debian activities without the consent of
  the Project.

   7. The Project requests that potential donors do not give to the fund,
  described in paragraph (2) above, set up by Anthony Towns.

   8. For the avoidance of any doubt, any decisions by the DPL or
  Delegates in pursuit of the plan described in paragraphs (1) and
  (2) above are overruled with immediate effect.

   9. Everyone is requested to interpret this resolution, and make any
  further decisions, as are necessary to give full effect to our
  wishes.
  -8-

 Second resolution `We approve of dunc-tank':
  -8-
   BACKGROUND

   1. Anthony Towns, the current Debian Project Leader, has suggested
  funding the Debian Release Managers' living expenses during the
  forthcoming release, as an experiment.

   2. Following internal discussions, Anthony Towns has started
  soliciting, in a private capacity, donations for a
  non-Debian-controlled fund for this purpose.

   OPINIONS OF THE DEBIAN DEVELOPERS

   3. Firstly, we would like to thank the Release Managers and the Leader
  for their efforts.

   4. The Project broadly approves of the experimental plan.

   DECISIONS AND REQUESTS

   5. Let it be known that Anthony Towns's experiment has the support of
  the Debian Project.

   6. The Release Managers and Donors are requested to cooperate with the
  experiment as seems reasonable and appropriate to them.

   7. The Project requests that after the release, the experiment will be
  evaluated by project and community, and that the Leader will
  formally report.  If it is thought broadly successful, processes of
  this nature should be established fully as an activity of the
  Debian Project.
 -8-

 Third resolution `We do not want to state an opinion':
 -8-
  1. The Developers note the existence and activities
 of the dunc-tanc project.

  2. We do not believe it appropriate for the Project as a whole to
 address dunc-tank in a General Resolution.
 -8-

Seconded (all three).

Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFHXWzYj5J4IdrJS8RAjffAJ0fgVAiQKVz0XmoaHEa5xDUrvZE5wCdFRz/
J28b5oWunwXEv0FDV55KpmU=
=pe2V
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section

2004-03-09 Thread Peter van Rossum
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 06:55:38PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
 - - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 [ 3 ] Choice 1: Cease active support of non-free [3:1 majority needed]
 [ 1 ] Choice 2: Re-affirm support for non-free
 [ 2 ] Choice 3: Further Discussion
 - - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free section

2004-03-08 Thread Peter van Rossum
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 06:55:38PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
 - - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 [ 3 ] Choice 1: Cease active support of non-free [3:1 majority needed]
 [ 1 ] Choice 2: Re-affirm support for non-free
 [ 2 ] Choice 3: Further Discussion
 - - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature