Re: no change - why? Re: please rebuild mgltools-sff
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 21:58 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 08:46:57PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mgltools-bhtree > > but all I get is > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mgltools-sff > > Yes, I was actually expecting that. > > It doesn't say "build-dep", it says "BD-Uninstallable". That's an > automated process which checks build-dependencies for installability. > > Why it's claiming that, though, I couldn't tell. A quick check does show > that mgltools-bhtree is available (in non-free) for powerpc, yet when I > add non-free to a sources.list file on a powerpc sid chroot, it doesn't > even find it (though it does find the source). > > I'm probably missing something. Adding wb-team to Cc, maybe they've got > a clue? Unless something's changed quite recently, non-free buildd chroots don't include non-free binary packages files so non-free sources that have non-free build-dependencies won't get auto-built. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1345321076.31960.119.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: no change - why? Re: please rebuild mgltools-sff
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 08:46:57PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > On 08/18/2012 08:28 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 07:45:00PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > >>> The formerly missing dependency mgltools-bhtree should just be fine. > >>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mgltools-sff.html > >> > >> Done. > > > > That is, given back. It should be built some time soon. > > > Here it is > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mgltools-bhtree > but all I get is > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mgltools-sff Yes, I was actually expecting that. It doesn't say "build-dep", it says "BD-Uninstallable". That's an automated process which checks build-dependencies for installability. Why it's claiming that, though, I couldn't tell. A quick check does show that mgltools-bhtree is available (in non-free) for powerpc, yet when I add non-free to a sources.list file on a powerpc sid chroot, it doesn't even find it (though it does find the source). I'm probably missing something. Adding wb-team to Cc, maybe they've got a clue? -- The volume of a pizza of thickness a and radius z can be described by the following formula: pi zz a -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120818195802.gc25...@grep.be
Re: Why did afio get autobuilt?
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 11:51:01AM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > 2012/8/18 Philipp Kern : > > 20120818015518|check-overrides|dak|removing unused > > override|unstable|main|dsc|afio|source|utils| > > We're only as good as the overrides. It's possible that they wrote out main > > to > > the files we read. After that got dropped it was immediately removed from > > the > > database > I see (also from buildd.d.o page). Thanks for the clarification! > Would it be preferable if we removed wrongly autobuilt binaries from unstable? Probably, given that they wouldn't be rebuilt anyway on the next upload and go out-of-date. On the buildds the possible harm is already done. (I didn't review the license, though. Given that it was in main, I expect silly changes that don't affect buildd sponsors.) Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Why did afio get autobuilt?
2012/8/18 Philipp Kern : > 20120818015518|check-overrides|dak|removing unused > override|unstable|main|dsc|afio|source|utils| > > We're only as good as the overrides. It's possible that they wrote out main to > the files we read. After that got dropped it was immediately removed from the > database I see (also from buildd.d.o page). Thanks for the clarification! Would it be preferable if we removed wrongly autobuilt binaries from unstable? Cheers, Luca -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CADk7b0NzDHcp=fbchcrdymbc24tmwqo8t3ofc69rjsit8c1...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Why did afio get autobuilt?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 04:57:09PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > afio has been recently moved to non-free [0], but looking at the > buildd pages, it seems it got autobuilt nevertheless [1]. > Package doesn't have XS-Autobuild flag (and I think this is a required > condition in order for packages to be autobuilt), so it shouldn't have > been picked up. > Is it because of an older source still available in main, or due to a > bug in the build network? Because the archive sucked, I guess: 20120818015518|check-overrides|dak|removing unused override|unstable|main|dsc|afio|source|utils| We're only as good as the overrides. It's possible that they wrote out main to the files we read. After that got dropped it was immediately removed from the database: merge-v3 2012 Aug 18 03:25:43 afio_2.5.1.20120205+git0c14fb9-1 (armhf, sid, previous: Installed): deleted from database merge-v3 2012 Aug 18 03:25:43 afio_2.5.1.20120205+git0c14fb9-1 (i386, sid, previous: Installed): deleted from database merge-v3 2012 Aug 18 03:25:43 afio_2.5.1.20120205+git0c14fb9-1 (armel, sid, previous: Installed): deleted from database merge-v3 2012 Aug 18 03:25:43 afio_2.5.1.20120205+git0c14fb9-1 (amd64, sid, previous: Installed): deleted from database merge-v3 2012 Aug 18 03:25:43 afio_2.5.1.20120205+git0c14fb9-1 (mips, sid, previous: Installed): deleted from database merge-v3 2012 Aug 18 03:25:43 afio_2.5.1.20120205+git0c14fb9-1 (powerpc, sid, previous: Installed): deleted from database merge-v3 2012 Aug 18 03:25:43 afio_2.5.1.20120205+git0c14fb9-1 (mipsel, sid, previous: Installed): deleted from database merge-v3 2012 Aug 18 03:25:43 afio_2.5.1.20120205+git0c14fb9-1 (ia64, sid, previous: Installed): deleted from database merge-v3 2012 Aug 18 03:27:26 afio_2.5.1.20120205+git0c14fb9-1 (hurd-i386, sid, previous: Failed): deleted from database merge-v3 2012 Aug 18 03:27:26 afio_2.5.1.20120205+git0c14fb9-1 (s390, sid, previous: Installed): deleted from database merge-v3 2012 Aug 18 03:27:26 afio_2.5.1.20120205+git0c14fb9-1 (kfreebsd-amd64, sid, previous: Build-Attempted): deleted from database merge-v3 2012 Aug 18 03:27:26 afio_2.5.1.20120205+git0c14fb9-1 (s390x, sid, previous: Installed): deleted from database merge-v3 2012 Aug 18 03:27:26 afio_2.5.1.20120205+git0c14fb9-1 (kfreebsd-i386, sid, previous: Build-Attempted): deleted from database merge-v3 2012 Aug 18 03:27:26 afio_2.5.1.20120205+git0c14fb9-1 (sparc, sid, previous: Installed): deleted from database Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
