Bug#171103: give up

2002-11-29 Thread Robert Millan
retitle 171103 RFP: kaffe-oji-plugin -- free Open Java Interface plugin for 
Mozilla/Kaffe
thanks

After adding a mozilla-config line to the Makefile to do
proper linking it seems that the Mozilla API change broke this.

I don't have time to fix this, so i give up the ITP.

The line for the Makefile is:

$(shell mozilla-config --cflags plugin java xpcom oji caps pref string 
liveconnect)

IMPORTANT: see bug #150490 first

-- 
Robert Millan

"5 years from now everyone will be running
free GNU on their 200 MIPS, 64M SPARCstation-5"

  Andrew S. Tanenbaum, 30 Jan 1992



Processed: give up

2002-11-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 171103 RFP: kaffe-oji-plugin -- free Open Java Interface plugin for 
> Mozilla/Kaffe
Bug#171103: ITP: kaffe-oji-plugin -- free Open Java Interface plugin for 
Mozilla/Kaffe
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Bug#171208: ITP: tlpr -- a Trivial LPR client

2002-11-29 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 12:18:07AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Sory, but why not simply use "cat foo | lpr" ?
> > 
> > I do not see a need for this package.
> > 
> > Maybe you can enlighten me?
> 
> Hmm. After thinking about it more, I see:
> 
> cat foo | lpr does not work for raw data (e.g. PS files for PS
> printers).
> 
> echo foo > /dev/lp0 does.
> 
> Am I right?

Ah, yes, you're right. I didn't even think about that ;-)

-- 
wouter at grep dot be

"Human knowledge belongs to the world"
  -- From the movie "Antitrust"



Bug#171208: ITP: tlpr -- a Trivial LPR client

2002-11-29 Thread Alan Shutko
Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> cat foo | lpr does not work for raw data (e.g. PS files for PS
> printers).

Huh?  It works fine, depending on how you set up your filters.

-- 
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
Parents have eyes in the backs of their heads.



Bug#171208: ITP: tlpr -- a Trivial LPR client

2002-11-29 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 12:11:21AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > tlpr is a trivial line printer client that will send a file to a
> > remote printer. It does not know the concept of a configuration file,
> > an input filter, or any other form of complexity; instead, it is the
> > LPR-equivalent of 'cat foo >/dev/lp0'.
> 
> Sory, but why not simply use "cat foo | lpr" ?
> 
> I do not see a need for this package.
> 
> Maybe you can enlighten me?

* It's small. The whole of C code in this package is less than 6k.
  That's three pages.
* it does not require a /etc/printcap (which, IMHO, is written in the
  most horrible format ever invented)
* it does not use spool files, so still works when the file system is
  mounted read-only.
* it's safer, as it doesn't require a daemon on the local machine to
  run. It just opens a connection, sends it away, and exits. Of course,
  that also implies that you can't use it to print to local printers.
* It does not try to be 'smart', fucking up your already-filtered input
  file (which happened to me once too many).
* ... maybe other things.

That said, the version number may suggest you that I don't see this as
finished code. It works, I'm sure it has some uses already, and it will
have more in the future.

Convinced?

-- 
wouter at grep dot be

"Human knowledge belongs to the world"
  -- From the movie "Antitrust"



Bug#171208: ITP: tlpr -- a Trivial LPR client

2002-11-29 Thread Alan Shutko
Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Sory, but why not simply use "cat foo | lpr" ?

Or "rlpr", if you don't want to set up a printcap.

-- 
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
Something came out of my.BUTT!



Bug#171208: ITP: tlpr -- a Trivial LPR client

2002-11-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi Amaya,

Amaya wrote:
> Rene Engelhard dijo:
> > echo foo > /dev/lp0 does.
> 
> Can you easily do that on a remote printer?

Of yourse you can't. I was trying to regognize why this package makes
sense...

At least for local printers (PS raw to ps printers) this may make
sense.

Regards,

Rene
-- 
 .''`.  Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73


pgpG2lQdFmoFX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#171208: ITP: tlpr -- a Trivial LPR client

2002-11-29 Thread Amaya
Rene Engelhard dijo:
> echo foo > /dev/lp0 does.

Can you easily do that on a remote printer?


-- 
 .''`.I'd like to fly, but my wings have been so denied...
: :' :Sand rains down and here I sit - Alice in Chains
`. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid + 2.4.19 + Ext3)
  `-www.amayita.com  www.malapecora.com  www.chicasduras.com



Bug#171208: ITP: tlpr -- a Trivial LPR client

2002-11-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Sory, but why not simply use "cat foo | lpr" ?
> 
> I do not see a need for this package.
> 
> Maybe you can enlighten me?

Hmm. After thinking about it more, I see:

cat foo | lpr does not work for raw data (e.g. PS files for PS
printers).

echo foo > /dev/lp0 does.

Am I right?

Regards,

Rene

-- 
 .''`.  Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73


pgpnp0o0Y9qls.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#171208: ITP: tlpr -- a Trivial LPR client

2002-11-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi,

Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-29
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> * Package name: tlpr
>   Version : 0.1
>   Upstream Author : me
> * URL : none (yet)
> * License : GPL
>   Description : a Trivial LPR client
> 
> tlpr is a trivial line printer client that will send a file to a
> remote printer. It does not know the concept of a configuration file,
> an input filter, or any other form of complexity; instead, it is the
> LPR-equivalent of 'cat foo >/dev/lp0'.

Sory, but why not simply use "cat foo | lpr" ?

I do not see a need for this package.

Maybe you can enlighten me?

Regards,

Rene

-- 
 .''`.  Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73


pgpA5QdjiMM4L.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#171208: ITP: tlpr -- a Trivial LPR client

2002-11-29 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-29
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: tlpr
  Version : 0.1
  Upstream Author : me
* URL : none (yet)
* License : GPL
  Description : a Trivial LPR client

tlpr is a trivial line printer client that will send a file to a
remote printer. It does not know the concept of a configuration file,
an input filter, or any other form of complexity; instead, it is the
LPR-equivalent of 'cat foo >/dev/lp0'.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux rock 2.4.19 #2 di okt 1 01:06:59 CEST 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=nl_BE, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE




Processed: merge ref forgotten

2002-11-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 156614 =
Bug#156614: ITP: heroine -- Complete audio and video production environm=
Bug#75400: ITP: bcast -- Video/Audio editing and production tool
Bug#78209: ITP: cinelerra (used to be Broadcast 2000)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> reopen 75400 =
Bug#75400: ITP: bcast -- Video/Audio editing and production tool
Bug is already open, cannot reopen.

> reopen 78209 =
Bug#78209: ITP: cinelerra (used to be Broadcast 2000)
Bug is already open, cannot reopen.

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Free Check Recovery

2002-11-29 Thread NSF
Title: NSF_Mass




	

 
	
	

 
	
	

 
	
	

 

 
	
	

 
	




Bug#171125: ITP: cdw -- A console tool for burning CD's CDW is an ncurses-base frontend for cdrecord and mkisofs.

2002-11-29 Thread David B Harris
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 06:56:12 +0100
Robert Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  CDW is an ncurses-base frontend for cdrecord and mkisofs.
>  This is the best choise for console users.
>  it can handle audio and data CD burning, through a CD image or
>  directly from the files.

Change this description, please.

Unless you've gone to each and every console user in existence, and made
a list of everything they need and want, and that list has no
conflicting requests, you've no right to say it's "the best" for
whatever reason.


pgp3dt1mdiO0O.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Processed: retitle

2002-11-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 171103 ITP: kaffe-oji-plugin -- free Open Java Interface plugin for 
> Mozilla/Kaffe
Bug#171103: RFP: kaffe-oji-plugin -- free Open Java Interface plugin for 
Mozilla/Kaffe
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Bug#155923: DOSBOX for Debian

2002-11-29 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 02:19:55PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Robert Millan wrote:
> 
> > lintian's sid version does. it's just a matter of replacing
> > "Author(s)" with "Authors"
> I hope lintian / debhelper of sid are also fixed this way that
> 
>  W: dosbox: postinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link
>  W: dosbox: postinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link

well that doesn't seem important..

> vanishes.  This is the only issue the packages caused at my
> Sarge-Laptop.  So I would say:  The package is fine for
> 
>a) stable
>b) testing

it has to go into unstable first so one should check that too :)

-- 
Robert Millan

"5 years from now everyone will be running
free GNU on their 200 MIPS, 64M SPARCstation-5"

  Andrew S. Tanenbaum, 30 Jan 1992



Bug#155923: DOSBOX for Debian

2002-11-29 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Robert Millan wrote:

> lintian's sid version does. it's just a matter of replacing
> "Author(s)" with "Authors"
I hope lintian / debhelper of sid are also fixed this way that

 W: dosbox: postinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link
 W: dosbox: postinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link

vanishes.  This is the only issue the packages caused at my
Sarge-Laptop.  So I would say:  The package is fine for

   a) stable
   b) testing

> IIRC that default was changed in Sid. I'd suggest to use
> a Sid system for packaging and developement as you always
> get the latest versions.
Well, there was a discussion on debian-devel whether you should
compile under testing or unstable.  I for myself draw the
consequence to use testing because I want my new package to
go into testing.

For sure - the manpage example could be taken from unstable ... ;-)

Kind regards

Andreas.




Bug#155923: DOSBOX for Debian

2002-11-29 Thread H.P. Veenstra
Hi Robert,
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> I had a look at your package, and the overall is very
> good. I have
> these comments:
> 
>   you should close the ITP entry in your chengelog,
>   eg * Initial Release. (Closes: #155923)
Done that 
> 
>   the build-depends says it can only build with
> libstdc++2.10-dev,
>   have you tried if there's any problem with
> libstdc++5-dev?

Changed that line to libstdc++-dev (Don't care which
gcc/libstc++ is used. works on 2.95 and 3.1 and 3.2 )
> 
>   the copyright should say "Upstream Authors" (lintian
> will complain
>   on that). also you might want to add a -2002 year to
> the (c) line.
A thanks The copyright is actually only 2002 in our files.

I presume you mean the upstream author(s) -> authors 
and not DOSBox-Team -> upstream authors

> 
>   it'd be better if the manpage said "for the Debian
> system", because
>   there are other, non-Linux ports in debian.
Done too. 


I refreshed the sourcepackages. If You want you could take a
look at it again. They're still on
http://pcnwstage.phys.rug.nl

Glad We are getting there! 
Thanks a lot for your help!

Peter




Bug#155923: DOSBOX for Debian

2002-11-29 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 01:37:24PM +0100, H.P. Veenstra wrote:
> I ddidn't get this email from Robert.
> 
> > >   the build-depends says it can only build with
> > libstdc++2.10-dev,
> > >   have you tried if there's any problem with
> > libstdc++5-dev?
> Is that the one shipped with gcc3.2 ? if so there is no
> problem with it. But i don't know how to express that as
> there isn't a package like libstdc++-dev (<< 2.10) 
> or is there ? 

All libstdc++*-dev packages provide libstdc++-dev 
(apt-cacheo show libstdc++5-dev | grep Provides), but the
2.10 in brackets applies to the version not the soname
(which is 1:2995.4-15). then if you want to say you need
a libstdc++-dev of any soname, but preferably soname 5,
that'd be:

libstdc++5-dev | libstdc++-dev

> > >   the copyright should say "Upstream Authors" (lintian
> > will complain
> > >   on that).
> > Uhmm, Woody lintian does not ... strange.
> Is it wise to change then ? 
> and should upstream authors be in " " or is that just to
> express the term ? 
> My lintian doesn't complain either. 

lintian's sid version does. it's just a matter of replacing
"Author(s)" with "Authors"

> > >   it'd be better if the manpage said "for the Debian
> > system", because
> > >   there are other, non-Linux ports in debian.
> > ... or as I said - just ship it upstream.
> Eventually it will be shipped with the upstream. 
> Hmm I have no idea if it will run on hurd :) 

Sure it will run on GNU/Hurd, at most it just needs porting :)

The most common problem are assumptions that MAXPATHLEN
and MAXHOSTNAMELEN are defined, which is not true for GNU.

If you care about portability, you can take a look at
common porting issues we encounter and try to avoid them:

http://hurd.gnufans.org/bin/view/Hurd/PortingIssues

> But I agree with you on it. I will change it. (I used the
> default page for it. So weird if it isn't completely right.

IIRC that default was changed in Sid. I'd suggest to use
a Sid system for packaging and developement as you always
get the latest versions.

please keep the CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Robert Millan

"5 years from now everyone will be running
free GNU on their 200 MIPS, 64M SPARCstation-5"

  Andrew S. Tanenbaum, 30 Jan 1992



Bug#171103: verified license

2002-11-29 Thread Robert Millan

Hi,

I just verified the license is MPL 1.1 for all source files,
except some whose license is not specified.

The full text for MPL 1.1 can be found here:

http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.1.txt

-- 
Robert Millan

"5 years from now everyone will be running
free GNU on their 200 MIPS, 64M SPARCstation-5"

  Andrew S. Tanenbaum, 30 Jan 1992



Bug#155923: DOSBOX for Debian

2002-11-29 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:29:52PM +0100, H.P. Veenstra wrote:
> 
> I hope that one of you 2 would want to take a look at it. 
> It's just that I know you 2. 
> the sourcepackage is at 
> http://pcnwstage.phys.rug.nl
> 
> I kept everything as small as possible so it should be easy
> to check. I believe I got all the dependencies right. ( that
> is actually the part I'm the least sure off) I also would
> like to know if my copyright is okay )as dosbox is
> programmed by a team. I personnaly think that the others
> things are allright.

Hi Peter,

I had a look at your package, and the overall is very good. I have
these comments:

  you should close the ITP entry in your chengelog,
  eg * Initial Release. (Closes: #155923)

  the build-depends says it can only build with libstdc++2.10-dev,
  have you tried if there's any problem with libstdc++5-dev?

  the copyright should say "Upstream Authors" (lintian will complain
  on that). also you might want to add a -2002 year to the (c) line.

  it'd be better if the manpage said "for the Debian system", because
  there are other, non-Linux ports in debian.

-- 
Robert Millan

"5 years from now everyone will be running
free GNU on their 200 MIPS, 64M SPARCstation-5"

  Andrew S. Tanenbaum, 30 Jan 1992



Bug#155923: DOSBOX for Debian

2002-11-29 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 01:13:38PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I hope that one of you 2 would want to take a look at it.
> > It's just that I know you 2.
> > the sourcepackage is at
> > http://pcnwstage.phys.rug.nl
> Robert, would you like to have a look at it. If I look at the list
> of your packages which are quite "emulator-centric" I guess you are
> the more skilled person in this field.  Just drop me a note if you
> are not able to spend enough time on this package.

I'm doing that now :)

uhm i hit this error continously:

g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../..  -I../../include   -g -O2 
-I/usr/include/SDL -D_REENTRANT -c -o slow_16.o `test -f 'slow_16.cpp' || echo 
'./'`slow_16.cpp
slow_16.cpp: In function `Bitu CPU_Real_16_Slow_Decode(int)':
slow_16.cpp:79: Internal compiler error:
slow_16.cpp:79: virtual memory exhausted

I'm using g++ 2.95.4. It might be a problem of my system, so i wouldn't
pay much attention as long it works for others.

-- 
Robert Millan

"5 years from now everyone will be running
free GNU on their 200 MIPS, 64M SPARCstation-5"

  Andrew S. Tanenbaum, 30 Jan 1992



Did the Satie fire break WNPP updates?

2002-11-29 Thread Andrew Lau
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 11:22:07AM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> there are now two open ITP's for the tsclient program. Are they
> different?

> * #170400: ITP: tsclient -- Terminal Server Client - GNOME 2
rdesktop frontend
> * #171116: ITP: tsclient -- GNOME2 frontend for rdesktop

Dear Thorsten,
No wonder I had a sense of deja vu when I filed #171116 today!
They're the same thing and in fact, I filed them both. Thanks for
spotting the duplication.

No wonder I had filed it twice. I must have panicked today when I
didn't see tsclient on WNPP.


Last Modified: Sat, Nov 9 03:28:23 UTC 2002

Hmm, WNPP seems be lagging heavily behind the BTS. Did the update
mechanism for WNPP get affected by the Satie fire? If so, someone's
forgotten to repair it.

Yours sincerely,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau

-- 
---
* Andrew "Netsnipe" LauComputer Science & Student Representaive, UNSW *
*   # apt-get into it Debian GNU/Linux Package Maintainer *
**
* GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1  9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD *
---


pgp57Zv3VOzGn.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#171125: Acknowledgement (ITP: cdw -- A console tool for burning CD's CDW is an ncurses-base frontend for cdrecord and mkisofs.)

2002-11-29 Thread Robert Nagy
Ok. the perms are ok now. I have a DD who will sponsor this package,
but you can check it. Thanks for the mail.

Regards
-- 
 .''`.   /__\
: :' :   |   Robert Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   |
`. `'|  deb http://ers.linuxforum.hu/debian/ ./ |
  `- |  |
apt-get  |   Real Bad Boys can't stop Thug Life |
into it  \__/


pgpzOoEZFO6lu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#170431: Private packages

2002-11-29 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

just read your rfp.
You can find my personal packages of gringotts at
http://people.debian.org/~calvin/debian/

Before uploading though I want to test and review this thing a little more,
as its storing sensitive data.

Cheers, Bastian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE950pLeBwlBDLsbz4RApU+AJ0SpufnPquYK7bz05H9qAkSOOYbsgCdGWNt
9KKa8KBZV04It3MffhCOVik=
=9Min
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Bug#156614: marked as done (ITP: heroine -- Complete audio and video production environm=)

2002-11-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:26:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bcast2000c already packaged and in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2002 06:20:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 14 01:20:12 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from augsburg.bund.de [194.95.179.209] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17erVs-00056o-00; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 01:20:12 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by Augsburg.bund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA07571
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:19:34 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RFP: heroine -- Complete audio and video production environment
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:18:40 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: heroine -- Complete audio and video production environment
Thread-Index: AcJDWoGiWHEWNawwEda9cwCAX9QDhg==
From: "Andreas Tille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-14
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: heroine
  Version : 1.0.0
  Upstream Author : Heroinewarrior 
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/heroines/
* License : GPL
  Description : Complete audio and video production environment

Turn your Linux box into a complete audio and video production
environment. This is the developer resource for all things
related to the system.

At Heroine Virtual, every supporting library and utility is somehow
related to Cinelerra; therefore, everything is distributed in one=20
huge package. The huge package contains the latest versions of=20
everything and is version numbered after Cinelerra.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux wr-linux02 2.4.17 #1 Mit Jan 23 14:00:21 CET 2002 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 75400-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2002 08:43:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 29 02:43:22 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rly-ip02.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.160] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Hgk6-0003XG-00; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 02:43:22 -0600
Received: from  logs-we.proxy.aol.com (logs-we.proxy.aol.com [205.188.195.5]) 
by rly-ip02.mx.aol.com (v83.35) with ESMTP id RELAYIN2-1129034316; Fri, 29 Nov 
2002 03:43:16 -0500
Received: from argos.server.maison (ACAFE58C.ipt.aol.com [172.175.229.140])
by logs-we.proxy.aol.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id gAT8fRr373968
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 03:41:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from prahal by argos.server.maison with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18HgTt-00050P-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:26:37 +0100
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:26:36 +0100
From: Alban Browaeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bcast2000c already packaged and in sid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Apparently-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

this wnpp is old (may 2001) and another bcast2000c is already in Sid
maintenaid by [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Greetings
Alban



Bug#75400: marked as done (ITP: bcast -- Video/Audio editing and production tool)

2002-11-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:26:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bcast2000c already packaged and in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2000 14:01:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 23 09:01:09 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (gige) [:::62.116.9.27] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13niA0-0001Ta-00; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:01:09 -0500
Received: by epy.co.at
via sendmail from stdin
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.111)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 16:02:42 +0200 (CEST) 
From: Guenter Geiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 16:02:42 +0200 (CEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ITP:bcast -- Video/Audio editing and production tool
X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 10) "Capitol Reef" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

Broadcast 2000 is a video and audio editing tool. Video can be
captured form screen, tv cards or firewire devices. Video and
Audio are presented in several tracks
Copyright is GPL,
downloadable form:



Guenter

---
Received: (at 75400-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2002 08:43:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 29 02:43:22 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rly-ip02.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.160] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Hgk6-0003XG-00; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 02:43:22 -0600
Received: from  logs-we.proxy.aol.com (logs-we.proxy.aol.com [205.188.195.5]) 
by rly-ip02.mx.aol.com (v83.35) with ESMTP id RELAYIN2-1129034316; Fri, 29 Nov 
2002 03:43:16 -0500
Received: from argos.server.maison (ACAFE58C.ipt.aol.com [172.175.229.140])
by logs-we.proxy.aol.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id gAT8fRr373968
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 03:41:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from prahal by argos.server.maison with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18HgTt-00050P-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:26:37 +0100
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:26:36 +0100
From: Alban Browaeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bcast2000c already packaged and in sid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Apparently-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

this wnpp is old (may 2001) and another bcast2000c is already in Sid
maintenaid by [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Greetings
Alban



Bug#78209: marked as done (ITP: cinelerra (used to be Broadcast 2000))

2002-11-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:26:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bcast2000c already packaged and in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2000 06:43:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 28 00:43:13 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zen.via.ecp.fr [138.195.130.71] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 140eTx-00083W-00; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 00:43:13 -0600
Received: by zen.via.ecp.fr (Postfix, from userid 10072)
id 8E00E80; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 07:43:11 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 07:43:11 +0100
From: Samuel Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ITP: broadcast2000 (an MPEG2 authoring tool)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

Package: broadcast2000
Homepage: http://heroine.linuxave.net/
License: GPL
Description: an MPEG2 authoring tool

-- 
Sam.

---
Received: (at 75400-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2002 08:43:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 29 02:43:22 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rly-ip02.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.160] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Hgk6-0003XG-00; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 02:43:22 -0600
Received: from  logs-we.proxy.aol.com (logs-we.proxy.aol.com [205.188.195.5]) 
by rly-ip02.mx.aol.com (v83.35) with ESMTP id RELAYIN2-1129034316; Fri, 29 Nov 
2002 03:43:16 -0500
Received: from argos.server.maison (ACAFE58C.ipt.aol.com [172.175.229.140])
by logs-we.proxy.aol.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id gAT8fRr373968
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 03:41:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from prahal by argos.server.maison with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18HgTt-00050P-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:26:37 +0100
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:26:36 +0100
From: Alban Browaeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bcast2000c already packaged and in sid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Apparently-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

this wnpp is old (may 2001) and another bcast2000c is already in Sid
maintenaid by [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Greetings
Alban



Bug#171125: ITP: cdw -- A console tool for burning CD's CDW is an ncurses-base frontend for cdrecord and mkisofs.

2002-11-29 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include 
* Robert Nagy [Fri, Nov 29 2002, 06:56:12AM]:

>  My apt lines are:
>  deb http://ers.linuxforum.hu/debian/ ./
>  deb-src http://ers.linuxforum.hu/debian/ ./

Failed to fetch http://ers.linuxforum.hu/debian/./cdw_0.1.4.orig.tar.gz  403 
Forbidden

Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
-- 
Air DOS:
Die Fluggäste schieben das Flugzeug an, bis es schnell genug ist und
gleitet. Dann springen alle auf und fliegen, bis es wieder landet. Danach
schiebt man es wieder an, etc. etc.



Bug#171125: ITP: cdw -- A console tool for burning CD's CDW is an ncurses-base frontend for cdrecord and mkisofs.

2002-11-29 Thread Robert Nagy
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-29
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: cdw
  Version : 0.1.4
  Upstream Author : Balazs Varkonyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cdw.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
  Description : A console tool for burning CD's.

 CDW is an ncurses-base frontend for cdrecord and mkisofs.
 This is the best choise for console users.
 it can handle audio and data CD burning, through a CD image or
 directly from the files.
 
 My apt lines are:
 deb http://ers.linuxforum.hu/debian/ ./
 deb-src http://ers.linuxforum.hu/debian/ ./

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux thuglife.homelinux.org 2.4.19 #19 Wed Nov 27 23:18:19 CET 2002 
i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US