Bug#171496: marked as done (ITP: ggi-doc -- General Graphics Interface Documentation)
Your message dated Sat, 07 Dec 2002 22:46:57 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#171496: fixed in ggi-doc 0.0.20021207-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2002 22:38:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 02 16:38:37 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18IzD3-0003fP-00; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 16:38:37 -0600 Received: (qmail 5294 invoked by uid 0); 2 Dec 2002 22:38:05 - Received: from pd956454e.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO eisbox.eis) (217.86.69.78) by mail.gmx.net (mp017-rz3) with SMTP; 2 Dec 2002 22:38:05 - Received: from lovemachine.eis ([192.168.0.6]) by eisbox.eis with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18Iz4G-00089B-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 23:29:32 +0100 Received: from tim by lovemachine.eis with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18Iz4c-0006tB-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 23:29:54 +0100 From: Martin Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: ggi-doc -- General Graphics Interface Documentation X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 23:22:40 +0100 X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-02 Severity: wishlist * Package name: ggi-doc Version : 0.0.20021202 Upstream Author : Julin, Egger, Faurot, Cheng * URL : http://www.ggi-project.org/ * License : see below Description : General Graphics Interface Project Documentation This is the complete HTML documentation to various aspects and libraries of the GGI project as it can be found on their website. Some of the libraries have already been packaged (libgii, libggi, libggimisc), some are yet to come ... ;) License Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux lovemachine 2.4.18 #1 Fri Jun 28 16:40:03 UTC 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 171496-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2002 03:54:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 07 21:54:32 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18KsWW-0008AY-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 21:54:32 -0600 Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18KsPB-0003qx-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 22:46:57 -0500 From: Martin Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $ Subject: Bug#171496: fixed in ggi-doc 0.0.20021207-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 22:46:57 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ggi-doc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ggi-doc_0.0.20021207-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/ggi-doc/ggi-doc_0.0.20021207-1.diff.gz ggi-doc_0.0.20021207-1.dsc to pool/main/g/ggi-doc/ggi-doc_0.0.20021207-1.dsc ggi-doc_0.0.20021207-1_all.deb to pool/main/g/ggi-doc/ggi-doc_0.0.20021207-1_all.deb ggi-doc_0.0.20021207.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/ggi-doc/ggi-doc_0.0.20021207.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Martin Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sup
Bug#170559: marked as done (ITP: fontconfig -- Font configuration and customization library)
Your message dated Sat, 07 Dec 2002 22:48:55 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#170559: fixed in fontconfig 2.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2002 17:42:37 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 24 11:42:36 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pool-151-203-197-117.bos.east.verizon.net (darth.ns) [151.203.197.117] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18G0mC-0005ZZ-00; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 11:42:36 -0600 Received: from ari by darth.ns with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18G0mB-0003KY-00; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 12:42:35 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: ITP: fontconfig -- Font configuration and customization library X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9 Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 12:42:35 -0500 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=PGP_SIGNATURE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-24 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: fontconfig Version : 2.1 Upstream Author : Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.fontconfig.org * License : MIT/X-style Description : Font configuration and customization library Will be split into 4 packages - libfontconfig1, libfontconfig-dev, libxft2, and libxft-dev. Fontconfig is designed to locate fonts within the system and select them according to requirements specified by applications. This package also includes a more modern verson of Xft, aptly named Xft2. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux darth 2.4.19 #1 Sat Sep 14 13:32:41 EDT 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE94Q+LwO+u47cOQDsRAu5xAKCXJey6iJCF1PLDkHG66EDyUeWoXQCeMY3d n/wIy1wJtClmXAKCKgXCmPQ= =PPaf -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 170559-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2002 03:53:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 07 21:53:06 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18KsV7-0007uI-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 21:53:05 -0600 Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18KsR5-00049J-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 22:48:55 -0500 From: Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $ Subject: Bug#170559: fixed in fontconfig 2.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 22:48:55 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fontconfig, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fontconfig_2.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/f/fontconfig/fontconfig_2.1-2.diff.gz fontconfig_2.1-2.dsc to pool/main/f/fontconfig/fontconfig_2.1-2.dsc fontconfig_2.1-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/f/fontconfig/fontconfig_2.1-2_powerpc.deb fontconfig_2.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/f/fontconfig/fontconfig_2.1.orig.tar.gz libfontconfig1-dev_2.1-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/f/fontconfig/libfontconfig1-dev_2.1-2_powerpc.deb libfontconfig1_2.1-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/f/fontconfig/libfontconfig1_2.1-2_powerpc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated fontconfig package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 0
Bug#171958: marked as done (ITP: startup-notification --- library for program launch feedback)
Your message dated Sat, 07 Dec 2002 22:35:09 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#171958: fixed in startup-notification 0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 2002 08:52:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 06 02:52:58 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mx-outgoing.verbum.org (monk.verbum.org) [216.226.142.159] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18KEEE-0002tm-00; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 02:52:58 -0600 Received: from space-ghost.verbum.private (dhcp024-208-189-249.columbus.rr.com [24.208.189.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "space-ghost.verbum.org", Issuer "verbum.org CA" (verified OK)) by monk.verbum.org (Postfix (Debian/GNU)) with ESMTP id 99EC174002D4; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 03:52:57 -0500 (EST) Received: by space-ghost.verbum.private (Postfix (Debian/GNU), from userid 1000) id 51A0793E67; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 03:48:25 -0500 (EST) Subject: ITP: startup-notification --- library for program launch feedback From: Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: The Debian Project Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 Date: 06 Dec 2002 03:48:25 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=NOSPAM_INC,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-05 Severity: wishlist * Package name: startup-notification Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.freedesktop.org/software/startup-notification/ * License : LGPL Description : library for program launch feedback startup-notification is a library which allows programs to give the user visual feedback that they are being launched; this is typically implemented using a busy cursor. This library is currently used by GNOME programs, but is part of the freedesktop.org suite of cross-desktop libraries. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux space-ghost 2.4.19+xfs+ipsec #1 Tue Aug 27 19:31:56 EDT 2002 ppc Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE= --- Received: (at 171958-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2002 03:39:17 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 07 21:39:17 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18KsHk-0005dR-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 21:39:16 -0600 Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18KsDl-00030o-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 22:35:09 -0500 From: Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $ Subject: Bug#171958: fixed in startup-notification 0.4-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 22:35:09 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of startup-notification, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libstartup-notification0-dev_0.4-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/s/startup-notification/libstartup-notification0-dev_0.4-1_powerpc.deb libstartup-notification0_0.4-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/s/startup-notification/libstartup-notification0_0.4-1_powerpc.deb startup-notification_0.4-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/startup-notification/startup-notification_0.4-1.diff.gz startup-notification_0.4-1.dsc to pool/main/s/startup-notification/startup-notification_0.4-1.dsc startup-notification_0.4.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/startup-notification/startup-notification_0.4.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated startup-notification package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administ
Bug#170939: marked as done (RFA: linbot -- WWW site link checker)
Your message dated Sat, 07 Dec 2002 22:37:39 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#170939: fixed in webcheck 1.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Nov 2002 14:41:48 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 27 08:41:47 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gadolinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.111] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18H3Nq-0002Nh-00; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:41:46 -0600 Received: from host217-35-41-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.35.41.25] helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by gadolinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #16) id 18H3Np-0006es-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:41:45 + Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 18H3No-NM-00; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:41:44 + Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:41:44 + From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RFA: linbot -- WWW site link checker Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: normal I'm looking for a new maintainer for linbot. The new upstream version is called webcheck and needs to be packaged, but there are a few problems here, mostly linbot-specific .png files that need to be refreshed for webcheck (I'll give details to whoever wants to take over). I have too much else to do and just haven't had the time to get this sorted out. It would help if the new maintainer's knowledge of Python was better than mine (not hard) in order to fix some code problems in coordination with upstream. Package: linbot Priority: extra Section: web Installed-Size: 316 Maintainer: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: all Version: 1.0.0-8 Depends: python (>= 2.2), python (<< 2.3) Suggests: www-browser, httpd Filename: pool/main/l/linbot/linbot_1.0.0-8_all.deb Size: 66042 MD5sum: 4407d81a7c9757feb401d156761a1d12 Description: WWW site link checker linbot is a python program that allows webmasters to: view the structure of a site; track down broken links; find potentially outdated HTML pages; list links pointing to external sites; view portfolio of inline images; and do all this periodically and without user intervention. Results are displayed in a set of HTML pages. Please contact me before adopting this package. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 170939-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2002 03:38:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 07 21:38:03 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18KsGY-0004lv-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 21:38:02 -0600 Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18KsGB-0003Gc-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 22:37:39 -0500 From: Bastian Kleineidam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $ Subject: Bug#170939: fixed in webcheck 1.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 22:37:39 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of webcheck, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: webcheck_1.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/w/webcheck/webcheck_1.0-1.diff.gz webcheck_1.0-1.dsc to pool/main/w/webcheck/webcheck_1.0-1.dsc webcheck_1.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/w/webcheck/webcheck_1.0-1_all.deb webcheck_1.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/w/webcheck/webcheck_1.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bastian Kleineidam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of upda
Bug#171935: marked as done (ITP: mozilla-locale-da -- Mozilla danish language package)
Your message dated Sat, 07 Dec 2002 22:22:17 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#171935: fixed in mozilla-locale-da 1.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 2002 03:43:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 05 21:43:13 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (auryn.jones.dk) [62.79.77.233] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18K9OT-0003v4-00; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 21:43:13 -0600 Received: by auryn.jones.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 350FC26B27; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 04:42:38 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: ITP: mozilla-locale-da -- Mozilla danish language package Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9 Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 04:42:38 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-06 Severity: wishlist * Package name: mozilla-locale-da Version : 1.21 Upstream Author : Robert Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Henrik Lynggaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/l10n/lang/moz1.21/ * License : GPL, LGPL and MPL 1.1 Description : Mozilla danish language package Danish menu/message resource package for Mozilla. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux auryn 2.4.20-rc4ben20021128+ck+vartimeslice+rmap #1 lør nov 30 22:34:22 CET 2002 ppc Locale: LANG=da_DK, LC_CTYPE=da_DK --- Received: (at 171935-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2002 03:23:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 07 21:23:02 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Ks22-0001W3-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 21:23:02 -0600 Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18Ks1J-000203-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 22:22:17 -0500 From: Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $ Subject: Bug#171935: fixed in mozilla-locale-da 1.2.1-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 22:22:17 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mozilla-locale-da, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: mozilla-locale-da_1.2.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mozilla-locale-da/mozilla-locale-da_1.2.1-1.diff.gz mozilla-locale-da_1.2.1-1.dsc to pool/main/m/mozilla-locale-da/mozilla-locale-da_1.2.1-1.dsc mozilla-locale-da_1.2.1-1_all.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-locale-da/mozilla-locale-da_1.2.1-1_all.deb mozilla-locale-da_1.2.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/m/mozilla-locale-da/mozilla-locale-da_1.2.1.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated mozilla-locale-da package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 03:37:19 +0100 Source: mozilla-locale-da Binary: mozilla-locale-da Architecture: source all Version: 1.2.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: mozilla-locale-da - Mozilla danish language add-on Closes: 171935 Changes: mozilla-locale-da (1.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release (based on mozilla-locale-gl-es). Closes: #171935. Files: 738662b480c8fef8ca8bec5c11104d65 617 web optional mozilla-locale-da_1.2.1-1.dsc 6c138c4b110ca7dcc7a8bbbe913abf0d 551015 we
Bug#172158: marked as done (ITP: rsxs -- Really Slick X Screensavers)
Your message dated Sat, 07 Dec 2002 17:51:50 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2002 22:11:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 07 16:11:39 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pool-151-203-197-138.bos.east.verizon.net (darth.ns) [151.203.197.138] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18KnAg-0003HS-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 16:11:39 -0600 Received: from ari by darth.ns with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18KnAd-0004Oh-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 17:11:35 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: ITP: rsxs -- Really Slick X Screensavers X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9 Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 17:11:34 -0500 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=PGP_SIGNATURE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-07 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: rsxs Version : 0.6 Upstream Author : Michael Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://rsxs.sourceforge.net * License : GPLv2 Description : Really Slick X Screensavers Prerelease packages will be found (in about 20 minutes after this is sent) at: http://people.debian.org/~ari/unstable Really Slick XScreenSavers (rsxs) is an X11 port of the Really Slick Screensavers collection by Terry Welsh (http://www.reallyslick.com/). Written in C++, this package uses OpenGL (via the GLX library) for graphics output. One aim is for this project to compile and run on any GL-capable X11 system. Additionally, the individual screensavers can run as stand-alone applications or can be integrated into XScreenSaver's list of active screensavers. . rsxs contains the following eye-candy: * rs-plasma: Draws gooey colourful plasma stuff. Crank up the speed and make it psychadelic! * rs-cyclone:Simulates tornadoes on your computer screen. * rs-fieldlines: A simulation of electric field lines between charged particles. Zap! * rs-helios: Particles explode onto the screen through smooth Helion surfaces. * rs-euphoria: Don't look at this if you suffer from motion sickness. * rs-lattice:Fly through an infinite lattice of interlocking rings. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux darth 2.4.20 #1 Fri Nov 29 15:07:08 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE98nIWwO+u47cOQDsRAplYAJ4oupqLzsJ20C7nxvemcZK4ezfPwgCePYIm VnEalSnoNbmEBmeE+9ZN+4k= =ZuJU -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 172158-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2002 22:51:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 07 16:51:55 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.alienhosting.com [66.216.78.56] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Knnf-0007Qd-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 16:51:55 -0600 Received: (qmail 14490 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2002 22:51:52 - Received: from pool-151-203-197-138.bos.east.verizon.net (HELO aripollak.com) (151.203.197.138) by mail.alienhosting.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2002 22:51:52 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 17:51:50 -0500 From: Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021204 MultiZilla/v1.1.22 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, he MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (no subject) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA, X_ACCEPT_LANG version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Eh, I changed my mind. There's no way to make this play nice with XScreensaver as long as it uses an xrdb-type configuration file.
Bug#172158: ITP: rsxs -- Really Slick X Screensavers
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-07 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: rsxs Version : 0.6 Upstream Author : Michael Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://rsxs.sourceforge.net * License : GPLv2 Description : Really Slick X Screensavers Prerelease packages will be found (in about 20 minutes after this is sent) at: http://people.debian.org/~ari/unstable Really Slick XScreenSavers (rsxs) is an X11 port of the Really Slick Screensavers collection by Terry Welsh (http://www.reallyslick.com/). Written in C++, this package uses OpenGL (via the GLX library) for graphics output. One aim is for this project to compile and run on any GL-capable X11 system. Additionally, the individual screensavers can run as stand-alone applications or can be integrated into XScreenSaver's list of active screensavers. . rsxs contains the following eye-candy: * rs-plasma: Draws gooey colourful plasma stuff. Crank up the speed and make it psychadelic! * rs-cyclone:Simulates tornadoes on your computer screen. * rs-fieldlines: A simulation of electric field lines between charged particles. Zap! * rs-helios: Particles explode onto the screen through smooth Helion surfaces. * rs-euphoria: Don't look at this if you suffer from motion sickness. * rs-lattice:Fly through an infinite lattice of interlocking rings. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux darth 2.4.20 #1 Fri Nov 29 15:07:08 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE98nIWwO+u47cOQDsRAplYAJ4oupqLzsJ20C7nxvemcZK4ezfPwgCePYIm VnEalSnoNbmEBmeE+9ZN+4k= =ZuJU -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#157916: RSBAC support in Debian
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:29, Christoph Martin wrote: > In http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-nexttime.html it says that work on > RSBAC support in Debian is in progress. I have not seen any discussion > of it on the list. However there is an RFP: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=157916 > > Is anybody working on this? I have built some kernel packages for RSBAC and put them online on http://www.coker.com.au/rsbac/ . Please check them out, if people think that they are OK then I'll upload them. I don't want to maintain these packages long-term as I have no plans to use RSBAC. After getting through the configuration phase I decided that I don't like it as much as SE Linux, grsec, and OpenWall. The packages on my site work well enough to produce a kernel package with make-kpkg. I have not tried booting from such a package as I don't have the user-space tools (or the time to spare). Even though I don't plan to use RSBAC myself I think it's a worthy thing to have in Debian, so I'm happy to maintain the kernel packages for a while (sans proper testing) to help kick-start the Debian/RSBAC project. Russell Coker
Bug#172141: ITP: pts -- Tetrinet Server Written in Perl
Hi I really do not think pts is a good name in Debian. It should be named perl-tetrinet-server or something like that. What I first thought was that you were about to package the package tracking system. :) Regards, // Ola On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 07:23:15PM +0100, Teófilo Ruiz Suárez wrote: > El 7-Dec-2002 a las 12:00:40, Steve Langasek escribió: > > Hello, > > Hi, > > > On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 06:44:30PM +0100, Teófilo Ruiz Suárez wrote: > > > > > * Package name: pts > > > Version : 0.20 > > > Upstream Author : INOUE Kenji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * URL : http://ptns.sourceforge.net > > > * License : GPL > > > Description : Tetrinet Server Written in Perl > > > > > Perl TetriNET Server is a Tetrinet compatible server written in Perl. > > > It supports channels, encrypted passwords, sudden death, game types > > > and a bunch of other configurable parameters of gameplay. > > > > What are the differences between this server and the tetrinetx package > > already in the archive? If ptns is added to the archive, should > > tetrinetx be removed? > > tetrinetx is written in C, and pts in Perl as you know, anyway, I don't > think that tetrinetx should be removed. I don't know if it must be a > conflict, or not. I CC to the tetrinetx maintainer. > > > Should the package name really be 'ptns' (you have 'pts' listed above)? > > The package is named "pts", I think that ptns is just the subdomain in > SF, may be because pts was in other project. > > Cheers, > > PS: I am already in NM, so if I don't pass the process soon, an uploader > will upload my package after my AM have checked it, of course. > > -- > Teófilo Ruiz Suárez ||(teo)|| Sevilla, España > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <-> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > GnuPG Key ID: 420718E6 > FPR: 0280 862C 064B FA76 9A1C EB64 5755 A66C 4207 18E6 > -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / ---
Bug#172141: ITP: pts -- Tetrinet Server Written in Perl
El 7-Dec-2002 a las 12:00:40, Steve Langasek escribió: > Hello, Hi, > On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 06:44:30PM +0100, Teófilo Ruiz Suárez wrote: > > > * Package name: pts > > Version : 0.20 > > Upstream Author : INOUE Kenji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * URL : http://ptns.sourceforge.net > > * License : GPL > > Description : Tetrinet Server Written in Perl > > > Perl TetriNET Server is a Tetrinet compatible server written in Perl. > > It supports channels, encrypted passwords, sudden death, game types > > and a bunch of other configurable parameters of gameplay. > > What are the differences between this server and the tetrinetx package > already in the archive? If ptns is added to the archive, should > tetrinetx be removed? tetrinetx is written in C, and pts in Perl as you know, anyway, I don't think that tetrinetx should be removed. I don't know if it must be a conflict, or not. I CC to the tetrinetx maintainer. > Should the package name really be 'ptns' (you have 'pts' listed above)? The package is named "pts", I think that ptns is just the subdomain in SF, may be because pts was in other project. Cheers, PS: I am already in NM, so if I don't pass the process soon, an uploader will upload my package after my AM have checked it, of course. -- Teófilo Ruiz Suárez ||(teo)|| Sevilla, España [EMAIL PROTECTED] <-> [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG Key ID: 420718E6 FPR: 0280 862C 064B FA76 9A1C EB64 5755 A66C 4207 18E6 pgp9vtZOjKv0U.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#172141: ITP: pts -- Tetrinet Server Written in Perl
Hello, On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 06:44:30PM +0100, Teófilo Ruiz Suárez wrote: > * Package name: pts > Version : 0.20 > Upstream Author : INOUE Kenji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://ptns.sourceforge.net > * License : GPL > Description : Tetrinet Server Written in Perl > Perl TetriNET Server is a Tetrinet compatible server written in Perl. > It supports channels, encrypted passwords, sudden death, game types > and a bunch of other configurable parameters of gameplay. What are the differences between this server and the tetrinetx package already in the archive? If ptns is added to the archive, should tetrinetx be removed? Should the package name really be 'ptns' (you have 'pts' listed above)? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer pgp0ROxs5nnfy.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#172141: ITP: pts -- Tetrinet Server Written in Perl
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-07 Severity: wishlist * Package name: pts Version : 0.20 Upstream Author : INOUE Kenji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://ptns.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Description : Tetrinet Server Written in Perl Perl TetriNET Server is a Tetrinet compatible server written in Perl. It supports channels, encrypted passwords, sudden death, game types and a bunch of other configurable parameters of gameplay. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux periquito 2.4.19 #6 SMP lun oct 7 10:14:08 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set) -- Teófilo Ruiz Suárez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Sevilla, España Debian GNU/Linux 2.4.19 GnuPG Key ID: 420718E6 FPR:0280 862C 064B FA76 9A1C EB64 5755 A66C 4207 18E6 pgpQdtWeTEcK6.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#127696: marked as done (ITA: qt-embedded -- Embedded version of Qt)
Your message dated Sat, 07 Dec 2002 08:17:18 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#127696: fixed in qt-embedded 2.3.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2002 00:14:16 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 03 18:14:16 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16MI00-0007Ss-00; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 18:14:16 -0600 Received: from pool-63.50.169.192.dnvr.grid.net ([63.50.169.192] helo=tootie.covert.tdyc.com) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16MHzv-0008QW-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 19:14:11 -0500 Received: by tootie.covert.tdyc.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 84997230B8; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:14:10 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:14:10 -0700 From: "Ivan E. Moore II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: O: qt-embedded- Embedded version of QT Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp libqt2-emb and company -- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD --- Received: (at 127696-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2002 13:23:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 07 07:23:02 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Kev7-00051y-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 07:23:01 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18Kepa-0002jy-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 08:17:18 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ivan E. Moore II) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $ Subject: Bug#127696: fixed in qt-embedded 2.3.2-4 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 08:17:18 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of qt-embedded, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libqt-emb-dev_2.3.2-4_alpha.deb to pool/main/q/qt-embedded/libqt-emb-dev_2.3.2-4_alpha.deb libqt2-emb_2.3.2-4_alpha.deb to pool/main/q/qt-embedded/libqt2-emb_2.3.2-4_alpha.deb qt-emb-doc_2.3.2-4_all.deb to pool/main/q/qt-embedded/qt-emb-doc_2.3.2-4_all.deb qt-embedded_2.3.2-4.diff.gz to pool/main/q/qt-embedded/qt-embedded_2.3.2-4.diff.gz qt-embedded_2.3.2-4.dsc to pool/main/q/qt-embedded/qt-embedded_2.3.2-4.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ivan E. Moore II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated qt-embedded package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 01:36:00 -0700 Source: qt-embedded Binary: libqt2-emb qt-emb-doc libqt-emb-dev Architecture: source alpha all Version: 2.3.2-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Ivan E. Moore II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: libqt-emb-dev - Qt-Embedded GUI development headers, static libraries libqt2-emb - Qt-Embedded GUI Library (runtime version) qt-emb-doc - Tutorial and reference documentation and examples for Qt-Embedded Closes: 127696 Changes: qt-embedded (2.3.2-4) unstable; urgency=low . * Adopted (Closes: #127696) * Lintian cleanup Files: b30553b0fa688a7cc52ec99e96ddb204 713 libs optional qt-embedded_2.3.2-4.dsc 715529a22b1a55c560ed3cd22a93b324 5545 libs optional qt-embedded_2.3.2-4.diff.gz aacb443e8c6537f7b0fa4c12fddc7b5c 7774710 libs optional libqt2-emb_2.3.2-4_alpha.deb 812c431ddf450f1105e47d4c98710810 5068408 devel optional libqt-emb-dev_2.3.2-4_alpha.deb 5bdb51be314f55e6cdcbec594dfebd9e 4849024 doc optional qt-emb-doc_2.3.2-4_
Bug#172111: O: newsclipper -- Create HTML with dynamic information from the net
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-07 Severity: normal I intend to orphan the newsclipper package. The package description is: NewsClipper is an information integrator. It creates a custom web page from a template HTML file with special tags, replacing those tags with dynamic information acquired from the internet. It was previously known as DailyUpdate. No need to contact me... Just upload a new version when you're ready. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux astrobale 2.2.18pre21 #6 Wed Aug 28 01:14:55 EST 2002 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- Pascal Hakim 0411-283-060 [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Do not bend."
Bug#127697: marked as done (ITA: qt-embedded-free -- Embedded version of Qt)
Your message dated Sat, 7 Dec 2002 01:34:47 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line adopted has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2002 00:14:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 03 18:14:30 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16MI0E-0007T1-00; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 18:14:30 -0600 Received: from pool-63.50.169.192.dnvr.grid.net ([63.50.169.192] helo=tootie.covert.tdyc.com) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16MI0A-0004ZY-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 19:14:26 -0500 Received: by tootie.covert.tdyc.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5CDAC230B8; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:14:25 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:14:25 -0700 From: "Ivan E. Moore II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: O: qt-embedded-free Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp libqt3-emb and company -- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD --- Received: (at 127697-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2002 08:34:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 07 02:34:50 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mclean.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.57] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18KaQE-0008N0-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 02:34:50 -0600 Received: from sdn-ap-022neomahp0485.dialsprint.net ([63.190.1.231] helo=tootie.covert.tdyc.com) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18KaQE-0007Iy-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 03:34:50 -0500 Received: by tootie.covert.tdyc.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ADDF38C0E2; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 01:34:47 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 01:34:47 -0700 From: "Ivan E. Moore II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: adopted Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,UPPERCASE_25_50, USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: This has been picked up -- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
Bug#124184: marked as done (ITA: kdoc -- C++ and IDL source documentation system)
Your message dated Sat, 07 Dec 2002 03:02:21 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#124184: fixed in kdoc 2.0a54-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Dec 2001 12:18:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 16 06:18:02 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16FaF0-x5-00; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 06:18:02 -0600 Received: from pool-63.50.169.185.dnvr.grid.net ([63.50.169.185] helo=tootie.covert.tdyc.com) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16FaEy-00017q-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 07:18:02 -0500 Received: by tootie.covert.tdyc.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4119A23793; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 05:17:59 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 05:17:59 -0700 From: "Ivan E. Moore II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: O: kdoc - C++ and IDL Source Documentation System Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Severity: normal This package has been orphaned. If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- retitle this bug from 'O:' to 'ITA:', fix the outstanding bugs and upload a new version with your name in the Maintainer: field and a * New maintainer (Closes: #thisbug) in the changelog so this bug is closed. Some information about this package: Package: kdoc Section: devel Description: C++ and IDL Source Documentation System KDOC creates cross-referenced documentation for C++ and CORBA IDL libraries directly from the source. Documentation can be embedded in special documents in the source. -- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD --- Received: (at 124184-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2002 08:02:24 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 07 02:02:23 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18KZup-0006Em-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 02:02:23 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18KZun-00028h-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 03:02:21 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ivan E. Moore II) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $ Subject: Bug#124184: fixed in kdoc 2.0a54-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 03:02:21 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kdoc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kdoc_2.0a54-1.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kdoc/kdoc_2.0a54-1.diff.gz kdoc_2.0a54-1.dsc to pool/main/k/kdoc/kdoc_2.0a54-1.dsc kdoc_2.0a54-1_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdoc/kdoc_2.0a54-1_all.deb kdoc_2.0a54.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kdoc/kdoc_2.0a54.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ivan E. Moore II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated kdoc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 00:41:00 -0700 Source: kdoc Binary: kdoc Architecture: source all Version: 2.0a54-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Ivan E. Moore II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: kdoc - C++ and IDL Source Documentation System Closes: 124184 Changes: kdoc (2.0a54-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Update version * taking package back since it hasn't been adopted. (Closes: #124184) Files: e5a5e40339245828c6949d31a53618b5 586 devel optional kdoc_2.0a54-1.dsc 6c96d53d2a7907a82948cd75484f05e1 78294 devel optional kdoc_2.0a54.orig.tar.gz 7
