Processed: Re: Bug#174337: O: dhttpd -- Minimal secure webserver. No cgi-bin support!
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 174337 ITA: dhttpd -- Minimal secure webserver. No cgi-bin support! Bug#174337: O: dhttpd -- Minimal secure webserver. No cgi-bin support! Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Anyone can get chinese domains now at Yawadoo.US !
Title: Yawadoo.Us .COM.CN New .com.cn domains Businesses around the world will soon be able to establish a Chinese identity on the web. For the first time ever, .CN, the Internet address for China, will be made available to businesses outside of China under a new liberalized policy. No local presence required First come .. first served registration No special registration restrictions Demand expected to be very strong Trademark Holders There is NO Sunrise or IP Protection Period for com/net/org.cn. If you wish to protect your trademarks, you should pre-register your domains now to ensure submission the day .CN opens. To recoup a domain later you must go through China's Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. The Dot CN registry, responsible for the .com.cn offering, has set a launch date of Dec 16th. Yawadoo.Us will begin queuing pre-registrations for the .com.cn domain on a first come first serve basis, so be sure to get in the registration process early before the best domain names are taken. China's recent accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) is proof that the Chinese economy is taking great strides toward accessibility. Don't miss your opportunity to open the door on 1.1 billion potential customers. Pre-register your .com.cn today! To contact Yawadoo.Us email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright 2002 Yawadoo.Us All rights Reserved. xAddress-Sent:wnpp#debian.org From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 86241 O: clif -- C language interpreter Bug#86241: ITA: clif -- C language interpreter Changed Bug title. retitle 90313 O: tya -- JIT-compiler for Java Bug#90313: ITA: tya -- JIT-compiler for Java Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: The adopter didn't adopt the package... so orphan it again
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 123500 O: colorgcc -- Colorizer for GCC warning/error messages Bug#123500: ITA: colorgcc -- Colorizer for GCC warning/error messages Changed Bug title. retitle 123479 O: bnetd -- Battle.Net server for Unix like systems Bug#123479: ITA: bnetd -- Battle.Net server for Unix like systems Changed Bug title. retitle 123507 O: tcpreplay -- Tool to replay saved tcpdump files at arbitrary speeds Bug#123507: ITA: tcpreplay -- Tool to replay saved tcpdump files at arbitrary speeds Changed Bug title. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#161174: marked as done (ITP: gtkterm - A simple GTK+ serial port terminal.)
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:07 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Your ITP of gtkterm (#161174) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2002 12:50:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 17 07:50:06 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ametz-102-1-2-103.abo.wanadoo.fr (seb128) [80.13.212.103] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17rHnp-00024A-00; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 07:50:05 -0500 Received: from seb128 by seb128 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 17rHnp-RT-00; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:50:05 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wnpp: ITP: gtkterm - A simple GTK+ serial port terminal. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1 X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:50:05 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Version: N/A Severity: wishlist * Package name : gtkterm Version : 0.97 Upstream Author : Julien Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL: http://www.jls-info.com/julien/linux/ * License : GPL v2 Description : A simple GTK+ serial port terminal. gtkterm is a simple GTK+ terminal used to communicate with the serial port. Its features : * Serial port terminal window * Serial port setup (speed, parity, bits, stopbits, flow control) * Using the termios API * Possible to send a file (only RAW data, no protocol) * End of line delay while sending a file * Special character wait before next line while sending a file * Possible to toggle control lines manually (DTR, CTS) * Also reads the state of control lines (RTS, CD, DSR, RI) -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux seb128 2.4.19 #1 sam aoû 3 11:33:58 CEST 2002 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux --- Received: (at 161174-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 15:15:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 09:15:09 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.141] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SIg8-0002s5-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:15:08 -0600 Received: from localhost (ramstraat29.xs4all.nl [80.126.10.231]) by smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id gBSFF7oQ071484 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from bas by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18SIg7-0001RS-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:07 +0100 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Your ITP of gtkterm (#161174) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:07 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of gtkterm. The package gtkterm seems already to be in the archive. Therefore, I'm closing this bug. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#155879: marked as done (ITP: libcarp-assert-perl - Carp::Assert - executable comments for perl)
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:03 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Your ITP of libcarp-assert-perl (#155879) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2002 06:17:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 08 01:17:23 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from manifestresearch.com (server1.manifestresearch.com) [64.39.15.228] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17cgbp-0002Ip-00; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 01:17:21 -0500 Received: from boardwalk (bonci.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.218.16.15]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by server1.manifestresearch.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g786HKA24323 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:17:20 -0500 From: Jay Bonci [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: libcarp-assert-perl - Carp::Assert - executable comments for perl Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 02:17:11 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Version: N/A Carp::Assert - executable comments for perl Carp::Assert provides ANSI C assert.h style assertions for perl, useful for debugging and commenting Carp::Assert available on CPAN Packages ready and waiting on NMU at http://jay.bonci.com/debian --jay --- Received: (at 155879-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 15:15:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 09:15:05 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.138] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SIg5-0002rG-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:15:05 -0600 Received: from localhost (ramstraat29.xs4all.nl [80.126.10.231]) by smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id gBSFF46v086024 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from bas by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18SIg3-0001RD-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:03 +0100 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Your ITP of libcarp-assert-perl (#155879) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:03 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of libcarp-assert-perl. The package libcarp-assert-perl seems already to be in the archive. Therefore, I'm closing this bug. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#154172: marked as done (ITP: limewire - a Java based gnutella servent)
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:57 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Your ITP of limewire (#154172) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jul 2002 18:02:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 24 13:02:38 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.lindows.com [130.94.123.204] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17XQT8-RG-00; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 13:02:38 -0500 Received: (qmail 17091 invoked by uid 507); 24 Jul 2002 18:08:07 - Received: from unknown (HELO lindows.com) (65.241.11.2) by 0 with SMTP; 24 Jul 2002 18:08:07 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:58:40 -0700 From: Michael Cardenas [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: limewire - a Java based gnutella servent Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-07-24 Severity: wishlist * Package name: limewire Version : 2.5 Upstream Author : Greg Bildson [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the LimeWire development team. * URL : http://www.limewire.org * License : GPL Description : a Java based gnutella servent Limewire is a servent for the gnutella network. It acts as both a client and a server. It is Java based, and very customizable. The gnutella network is a file sharing network for any types of files. Limewire features network searches for many types of metadata, automated requery for file hashes, and multiple simultaneous (swarm) download of files. Limewire also features supernodes, which shield the average gnutella network client from most network traffic. -- michael cardenas lead software engineer lindows.com . hyperpoem.net . Be the change you want to see in the world -Mahatma Gandhi -- michael cardenas lead software engineer lindows.com . hyperpoem.net . Be the change you want to see in the world -Mahatma Gandhi --- Received: (at 154172-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 15:14:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 09:14:59 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.138] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SIfz-0002pR-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:14:59 -0600 Received: from localhost (ramstraat29.xs4all.nl [80.126.10.231]) by smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id gBSFEwo9085970 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from bas by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18SIfx-0001Qo-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:57 +0100 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Your ITP of limewire (#154172) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:57 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of limewire. The package limewire seems already to be in the archive. Therefore, I'm closing this bug. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#149969: marked as done (RFP: java-gnome -- Java bindings for the GNOME and GTK libraries)
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:55 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Your ITP of java-gnome (#149969) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2002 13:29:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 14 08:29:43 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from green.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.57] (exim) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17Ir95-0007zS-00; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 08:29:43 -0500 Received: from pathfinderii.chu.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.203.177]) by green.csi.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.04) id 17Ir94-0001Y3-03 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 14:29:42 +0100 Received: from pathfinderii.chu.cam.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pathfinderii.chu.cam.ac.uk (8.12.4/8.12.4/Debian-2) with ESMTP id g5DDiIb3011599; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:44:24 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by pathfinderii.chu.cam.ac.uk (8.12.4/8.12.4/Debian-2) id g5DDi1Zr011565; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:44:01 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RFP: java-gnome -- Java bindings for the GNOME and GTK libraries From: Mark Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.39 Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:44:01 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-06-13 Severity: wishlist * Package name: java-gnome Version : 0.7.1 Upstream Author : Java-Gnome Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://java-gnome.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL Description : Java bindings for the GNOME and GTK libraries Java-GNOME is a set of Java bindings for the GNOME and GTK libraries that allow GNOME and GTK applications to be written in Java. The project consists of two libraries; java-gtk, a GTK-only binding, and java-gnome, a GTK and GNOME binding. Java-GNOME is not a Swing look-and-feel mimicking the GTK look, it is not a GTK/GNOME rewrite in Java, and it is not a set of GTK peers for AWT. It is a JNI layer that delegates the calls out to the native GTK or GNOME C libraries. Source tar.gz and src.rpm are currently available. These have the entire source for compiling the libraries (which have many dependencies in terms of compiling them). Additionally, the packages contain many example java programs (these are really useful for developers who are learning to use the java-gnome bindings); and sources for generating documentation (Javadoc API reference and tutorial) I would suggest that this is packaged as three separate packages: * binary bindings * Source bindings (including all relevant dependancies) * Developer package, including documentation and example programs -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux pathfinderii.chu.cam.ac.uk 2.4.18 #16 Mon Apr 22 11:33:37 BST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE= -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 149969-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 15:14:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 09:14:57 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.139] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SIfw-0002oa-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:14:56 -0600 Received: from localhost (ramstraat29.xs4all.nl [80.126.10.231]) by smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id gBSFEt96013221 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from bas by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18SIfv-0001Qe-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:55 +0100 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Your ITP of java-gnome (#149969) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:55 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of java-gnome. The package java-gnome seems already to be in the archive. Therefore, I'm closing this bug. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#154795: marked as done (ITP: webcheck -- WWW site link checker (linbot replacement))
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Your ITP of webcheck (#154795) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2002 00:33:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 29 19:33:52 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gadolinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.111] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17ZKxT-0005VH-00; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 19:33:51 -0500 Received: from host217-34-79-194.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.34.79.194] helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by gadolinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8) id 17ZKxS-0005nn-00; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 01:33:50 +0100 Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ZKxR-0007Y7-00; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 01:33:49 +0100 Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 01:33:49 +0100 From: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: webcheck -- WWW site link checker (linbot replacement) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50 X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Sender: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: webcheck Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.mired.org/webcheck/ * License : GPL Description : WWW site link checker (linbot replacement) This is really an intent to rename, per bug #154763. The control record for the old package, linbot, follows: Package: linbot Priority: extra Section: web Installed-Size: 316 Maintainer: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: all Version: 1.0.0-6 Depends: python (= 2.1), python ( 2.2) Suggests: www-browser, httpd Filename: pool/main/l/linbot/linbot_1.0.0-6_all.deb Size: 65856 MD5sum: bfde14e624e0fdafb4dead9521bce9e1 Description: WWW site link checker linbot is a python program that allows webmasters to: view the structure of a site; track down broken links; find potentially outdated HTML pages; list links pointing to external sites; view portfolio of inline images; and do all this periodically and without user intervention. Results are displayed in a set of HTML pages. I'll probably version the new package something like 1.0.0w-1 to avoid the need for an epoch; once I push the Debian changes upstream I hope there'll be a new upstream release anyway. I intend to provide a dummy linbot package to ease upgrades. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 154795-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 15:15:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 09:15:02 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.138] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SIg1-0002q3-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:15:01 -0600 Received: from localhost (ramstraat29.xs4all.nl [80.126.10.231]) by smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id gBSFF06v085994 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from bas by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18SIg0-0001Qy-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:00 +0100 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Your ITP of webcheck (#154795) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:00 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of webcheck. The package webcheck seems already to be in the archive. Therefore, I'm closing this bug. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#114631: marked as done (ITP: bubblefishymon -- A load meter for Window Maker that features a duck and fish)
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:48 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Your ITP of bubblefishymon (#114631) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2001 05:46:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 06 00:46:46 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (southpole) [212.28.141.118] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15pkIQ-0007ik-00; Sat, 06 Oct 2001 00:46:46 -0500 Received: from tar by southpole with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15pkIu-0003VR-00; Sat, 06 Oct 2001 07:47:16 +0200 From: tar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: bubblefishymon -- A load meter for Window Maker that features a duck and fish X-Reportbug-Version: 1.29 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.29 Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 07:47:16 +0200 X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: tar [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2001-10-06 Severity: wishlist * Package name: bubblefishymon Version : 0.3-1 Upstream Author : Pigeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.pigeon.net/bfm/ * License : (GPL) Description : A load meter for Window Maker that features a duck and fish -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux southpole 2.2.18 #1 Thu Dec 21 21:13:10 EST 2000 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 114631-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 15:14:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 09:14:50 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.139] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SIfq-0002nc-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:14:50 -0600 Received: from localhost (ramstraat29.xs4all.nl [80.126.10.231]) by smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id gBSFEm96013195 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from bas by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18SIfo-0001QA-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:48 +0100 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Your ITP of bubblefishymon (#114631) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:48 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of bubblefishymon. The package bubblefishymon seems already to be in the archive. Therefore, I'm closing this bug. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#174525: ITP: dar -- Disk ARchive: Backup directory tree and files.
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 08:28, Brian May wrote: - The Author recommends linking with -static, so restoration programs will work without extra libraries. I haven't decided if this is a good idea or not, if it needs to be applied to all binaries. lintian gets upset if my package contains static binaries. I suggest having a separate dar-restore-static package for that. - My version is compiled with ATTR (EA) support, however, DAR gets very verbose if the filesystem doesn't support ATTRs (IMHO errors of type Operation not supported need to be ignored). These warnings will disappear if the -Uu flags are used (don't archive ATTRs). Maybe you could patch it to check for ATTR support on backup at the start of each file system. If a file system does not support ATTR then display a single message File system /var does not support ATTR. and continue on with no further messages. Of course it's a bit more serious if you do a restore with ATTR support and the file system doesn't like it... - ssh can be used for backups (just pipe the data via ssh to the destination file), for incremental backups (generate catalog at server and send it to client first). However, I am not certain about restores (client requires 2 pipes to server, one in each direction; this makes me nervous about potential deadlocks). Shouldn't be a problem, just do ssh client restore-comand and then the client's stdin and stdout are the two pipes you need. Gotta test it first of course, but I expect it to work. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Bug#174494: ITP: debbug-gtk -- GTK applications for managing Debian bugs
Hi, Thanks to everyone for the off-list support. The screenshot url was wrong. It should of course have been: http://tildemh.com/tmp/debbuggtk/20021227.png. A lot of my efforts have been enhancing the Java-Gnome bindings (I am a member of the upstream development team). There have particularly been problems with free jre's not functioning properly (or at least not in the generally expected manner); and also Blackdown java (as used by the rest of the java-gnome team) not working in Debian at the moment. The bugwatcher application does function, however there are a number of issues with text entries which make them run incredibly slowly with kaffe (Apparently Blackdown 1.4.1 works fine; other free jvms don't work at all, mostly due to jni problems) I have been trying to make the code reusable as far as possible. In particular, the bug listing widget and bug report widget may be used wherever wanted - this is demonstrated by the separate buglister and bugviewer apps. Hopefully in the future it will be possible to use these in other places, possibly a graphical bug reporting tool. In terms of the code and bts interaction, all it does at the moment is download the web pages with bug reports in them and then parses them (in a very crude manner). My aims were to get something which works with the current system before looking into changes in the bts. Being able to change bug reports is quite far down on the list of todo items at the moment - I want a stable bugwatcher tool first. I have not contacted doogie regarding his work at rewriting debbugs, but I'll probably look into it now. I won't post tarballs or packages up at the moment - they depend on newer java-gnome libraries than what is currently available in the repository. java-gnome builds currently fail part way through due to problems in the libgnome-java section (it is still all under development), so I can't upload updated packages. I will do so in a few days, by which time java-gnome should be buildable and I will have also done more work on bugwatcher. Thanks for the support. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Renaming ITP of thoteditor (#112478)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 112478 RFP: thoteditor -- customizable editor for structured documents Bug#112478: ITP: thoteditor -- customizable editor for structured documents Changed Bug title. severity 112478 wishlist Bug#112478: RFP: thoteditor -- customizable editor for structured documents Severity set to `wishlist'. submitter 112478 debian-qa@lists.debian.org Bug#112478: RFP: thoteditor -- customizable editor for structured documents Changed Bug submitter. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Renaming ITP of xmlrpclib (#115368)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 115368 RFP: xmlrpclib -- Python implementation of the XML-RPC protocol Bug#115368: ITP: xmlrpclib -- Python implementation of the XML-RPC protocol Changed Bug title. severity 115368 wishlist Bug#115368: RFP: xmlrpclib -- Python implementation of the XML-RPC protocol Severity set to `wishlist'. submitter 115368 debian-qa@lists.debian.org Bug#115368: RFP: xmlrpclib -- Python implementation of the XML-RPC protocol Changed Bug submitter. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Renaming ITP of freeside (#97197)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 97197 RFP: freeside -- billing and account admin package for ISP's Bug#97197: ITP: freeside -- billing and account admin package for ISP's Changed Bug title. severity 97197 wishlist Bug#97197: RFP: freeside -- billing and account admin package for ISP's Severity set to `wishlist'. submitter 97197 debian-qa@lists.debian.org Bug#97197: RFP: freeside -- billing and account admin package for ISP's Changed Bug submitter. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Renaming ITP of netramet (#94371)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 94371 RFP: NeTraMet -- accounting meter Bug#94371: ITP: NeTraMet -- accounting meter Changed Bug title. severity 94371 wishlist Bug#94371: RFP: NeTraMet -- accounting meter Severity set to `wishlist'. submitter 94371 debian-qa@lists.debian.org Bug#94371: RFP: NeTraMet -- accounting meter Changed Bug submitter. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Renaming ITP of loop-aes (#111167)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 67 RFP: loop-aes -- AES cipher loadable Linux kernel module Bug#67: ITP: loop-aes -- AES cipher loadable Linux kernel module Changed Bug title. severity 67 wishlist Bug#67: RFP: loop-aes -- AES cipher loadable Linux kernel module Severity set to `wishlist'. submitter 67 debian-qa@lists.debian.org Bug#67: RFP: loop-aes -- AES cipher loadable Linux kernel module Changed Bug submitter. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Renaming ITP of protux (#96103)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 96103 RFP: protux -- ProTools-like Digital Audio Workstation Bug#96103: ITP: protux -- ProTools-like Digital Audio Workstation Changed Bug title. severity 96103 wishlist Bug#96103: RFP: protux -- ProTools-like Digital Audio Workstation Severity set to `wishlist'. submitter 96103 debian-qa@lists.debian.org Bug#96103: RFP: protux -- ProTools-like Digital Audio Workstation Changed Bug submitter. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Renaming ITP of python-visual (#112118)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 112118 RFP: python-visual -- A Python library for 3d visualization Bug#112118: ITP: python-visual -- A Python library for 3d visualization Changed Bug title. severity 112118 wishlist Bug#112118: RFP: python-visual -- A Python library for 3d visualization Severity set to `wishlist'. submitter 112118 debian-qa@lists.debian.org Bug#112118: RFP: python-visual -- A Python library for 3d visualization Changed Bug submitter. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
wnpp ITP ping and cleanup
Hi! I've waded through some old (1y open) wnpp ITP bugs. I've retitled the following bugs to RFPs, because they were pinged and there was no response: 94371 RFP: NeTraMet -- accounting meter 96103 RFP: protux -- ProTools-like Digital Audio Workstation 97197 RFP: freeside -- billing and account admin package for ISP's 67 RFP: loop-aes -- AES cipher loadable Linux kernel module 112118 RFP: python-visual -- A Python library for 3d visualization 112478 RFP: thoteditor -- customizable editor for structured documents 115368 RFP: xmlrpclib -- Python implementation of the XML-RPC protocol The bugs below were pinged (pung?). If no response is recorded in the BTS in, say, a months from now, I'll also retitle them to RFPs. 68117 projex 68170 changesys 68171 wmx-4 68223 tclhttpd 68225 gtk-module-gle 68226 gtk-module-gspeech 68245 mupad 68256 tinymush 68269 kopi 68272 perlindex 68296 ncp 68709 roundup 69446 biomail 69763 fbmuck 69952 dict-de-it 71657 ricochet 72105 xfonts-silipa 72775 liblv-ruby 72776 libmhash-ruby 73036 siggen 75038 jazz++ 75078 imagej 75672 ofbis 76816 qtwvdialer 77075 kvoctrain 77705 asc 77944 libjtc 77945 orbacus 77982 libapache-mod-virgule 77983 xvl 78204 smaug 78205 papaya 78207 netsh 78208 narval 78210 mpeg2movie 78366 xmmp 78762 xmms-blursk 78824 epkg 79820 jakarta-taglibs 79966 batak 80213 kshowmail 80248 cpc4x 80261 gender 80278 wmfinder 81170 bigforth 81234 bakery 81980 mfmail 82091 ithought 82337 kvidmode 82614 lovecalc 82754 gale 82903 conf-isdn-account 83342 libnet-aolim-perl 83973 psiconv 84040 rlab 84395 z81 85382 phorum 85392 docbook-xmlschema 85581 hasas 85740 ipaudit 85783 fressh 86005 uf-view 86103 olympus 86675 nstx 86779 srp 87186 pvfs 87666 bigwig 87734 mined 87810 openrpg 88114 surf 88603 wavnorm 89554 rnmap 89910 skel 90503 vmail 90514 spread 90515 mod-log-spread 90663 simplefirewall 90892 xfuzzy 91999 jce1.1-cryptix 92248 xemacs-packages 92571 webmin-debconf 92917 alat-audit 93074 libtext-chasen-perl 93232 deadftp 93342 toutdoux 93367 oncelinux 93542 panelmm 93644 biabam 94223 libchasen-ruby 94308 mars-nwe 94731 libo-dbm-ruby 95111 metaruby 95388 hyperbuilder 95442 python-webware 95469 cgen 95687 opmake 95870 ardour 96323 qglviewer 97491 gmonsters 97672 kernel-image-harden 97673 kernel-patch-harden 97963 maks 98329 dkimap4 98362 s10sh 98597 fortunes-movies 98607 quick-dicts 98608 kquick 98703 ea 98921 gnomesensors 99156 e2salvage 99397 misterhouse 99793 tetris-queen 100081 amkcrypto 100299 igmt 100364 mp3sb-server 100544 cplant 100652 rfk 100864 libsite-db-perl 100876 spacearyarya 101118 fgetty 101246 hoverball and hoverware 101411 skkdic-conf 101521 multiseti 101740 lib-arbortext-java 102054 ccmath 102262 epson-utils 102373 authen::smb 102913 mixp 103601 libcrypt-gpg-perl 104385 wmmenu 105310 mysql++ 105521 gjukebox 105572 voicechat 105587 pcp 106840 w3m-m17n 106883 mjbworld 3d editor 107034 ptyopen 107035 tdiff 107108 rezrov 107407 twhttpd 107438 mojonation 107496 libgtkscintilla, python-gtkscintilla, moleskine 107703 atris 107772 procmail-sanitizer 108345 libfbx 108363 unixtree 108935 lib-resolver-java 108937 teixsl 108938 tei-lite dtd 108939 tei/p4 xml dtd 109041 simage1 109121 emu-tools 109961 kwintv 110047 firestorm 110316 undms 110537 smslink 110721 css-elisp 110785 libtk-filedialog-perl 110787 hrbuilder 110835 libmodem 85 libtie-perl 111560 mosml 111609 cathedral-book 112272 phorus 112699 librte0 112701 darkice 112958 muttprofile 113260 libnet-grpnetworks-perl 113304 intel-v92ham 113847 hogwash 113860 qed 114398 dbtcp 114399 pod2texi 114564 web-imap 14739 demish 114992 myricom gm message passing system 115609 razorback 115637 bash-scripting-guide 116121 gamp 116937 lkcd 117025 laml 117453 mosfet-liquid 118202 silc 118235 anjsp 118236 epojava 118532 openscep 119019 kdeedu 119911 alephone 120209 rox 120553 stlport 120556 dmake 120618 magicfilter-forcefilter 120705 prelink 121425 gxxcompat 121458 sgi-sysadm-base 122307 pixie 122453 jboss 122614 publicfile-installer 123250 mozilla-locale-es-es 123416 treecc 123920 anteater 124205 libcrypt-gpg-perl 124343 openmash 126037 scipy 126200 ethstatus 126498 spambouncer -- Kind regards, ++ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | || Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | ++
Bug#173443: marked as done (ITP: honeyd )
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:14 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Your ITP of honeyd (#173443) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2002 14:45:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 17 08:45:49 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from buzz.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.3] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18OIyf-0006Rf-00; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:45:45 -0600 Received: (qmail 27335 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2002 14:45:14 - Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Dec 2002 14:45:14 - Received: (qmail 27332 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2002 14:45:14 - Received: from avalon.dat.etsit.upm.es (138.100.17.73) by buzz.etsit.upm.es with SMTP; 17 Dec 2002 14:45:14 - Received: (qmail 12448 invoked by uid 1013); 17 Dec 2002 14:45:13 - Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:45:13 +0100 From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: honeyd Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=DISCLAIMER,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,PROFITS,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, UPPERCASE_25_50,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-16 Severity: wishlist Package name: honeyd Version : 0.4 Upstream author : Niels Provos URL : http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/honeyd/ License : DFSG-free (with advertisement clause, GPL-incompatible, see below) Description : Small daemon that creates virtual hosts simulating their = services and behaviour Long description: (From the freshmeat page: http://freshmeat.net/projects/honeyd) Honeyd is a small daemon that creates virtual hosts on a network. The hosts can be configured to run arbitrary services, and their TCP personality can be adapted so that they appear to be running certain versions of operating systems. Honeyd enables a single host to claim multiple addresses on a LAN for network simulation. It is possible to ping the virtual machines, or to traceroute them. Any type of service on the virtual machine can be simulated according to a simple configuration file. Instead of simulating a service, it is also possible to proxy it to another machine.=20 LICENSE: /* * Copyright 2002 Niels Provos [EMAIL PROTECTED] * All rights reserved. * * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions * are met: * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the *documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software *must display the following acknowledgement: * This product includes software developed by Niels Provos. * 4. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote products *derived from this software without specific prior written permission. * * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR * IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES * OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. * IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, * INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT * NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, * DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY * THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF * THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. */ =C5=BD Regards Javi --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type:
Bug#174555: O: cle -- Wrap any command-line driven tool with readline
Package: wnpp Severity: normal The current maintainer of cle, Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED], is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- retitle this bug from 'O:' to 'ITA:', fix the outstanding bugs and upload a new version with your name in the Maintainer: field and a * New maintainer (Closes: #thisbug) in the changelog so this bug is closed. Some information about this package: Package: cle Binary: cle Version: 0.4-1.2 Priority: optional Section: libs Maintainer: Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Build-Depends: debhelper (= 2.0.40), libncurses5-dev, libreadline4-dev Architecture: any Standards-Version: 3.1.1 Format: 1.0 Directory: pool/main/c/cle Files: 58202fbc0289645dd3c209b7964e1a94 574 cle_0.4-1.2.dsc 53e316e6d8dacc22985c26c4818e28af 374763 cle_0.4.orig.tar.gz c264e87e7af35775fd7c5b0164142c47 1945 cle_0.4-1.2.diff.gz Package: cle Priority: optional Section: libs Installed-Size: 96 Maintainer: Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: i386 Version: 0.4-1.2 Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.1-1), libreadline4 (= 4.3-1) Filename: pool/main/c/cle/cle_0.4-1.2_i386.deb Size: 13676 MD5sum: 1829ed61ed71ad8f25eb3972ac9377c2 Description: Wrap any command-line driven tool with readline This handy tool lets you use history and line-editing in any text oriented tool. This is especially usefully with third-party commercial tools that cannot be modified to use readline themselves. It's not perfect but it works pretty well. Justification: Has been inactive for several months, other packages have been hijacked; cle only had one MU (the initial upload) and two NMUs since then. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#127002: marked as done (ITP: gkrellm-bfm -- gkrellm bubble fishmon plugin)
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:50 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Your ITP of gkrellm-bfm (#127002) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2001 09:40:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 30 03:40:57 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (epsilon.donarmstrong.com) [138.23.90.252] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16KcSb-0005t1-00; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 03:40:53 -0600 Received: from epsilon.donarmstrong.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by epsilon.donarmstrong.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id fBU9gBf1024306 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 01:42:11 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by epsilon.donarmstrong.com (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id fBU9gBGI024305 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 01:42:11 -0800 Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 01:42:11 -0800 From: Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: gkrellm-bfm -- gkrellm bubble fishmon plugin Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package: gkrellm-bfm Version: 0.51 Homepage: http://pigeond.net/bfm/ Gkrellm plugin that displays a floating duck with fish, bubbles, analog clock, seaweed, and water to monitor various aspects of your system. (fish=network load, bubles=cpu load, water=memory level, water color=swap level). Packaging completed, getting upstream maintainer approval. Don Armstrong - Anylevel | .naidnE elttil etah I The Future by Design | http://www.anylevel.com | http://www.donarmstrong.com - --- Received: (at 127002-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 15:15:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 09:15:00 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.137] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SIg0-0002pU-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:15:00 -0600 Received: from localhost (ramstraat29.xs4all.nl [80.126.10.231]) by smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id gBSFEpNE073601 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from bas by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18SIfq-0001QK-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:50 +0100 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Your ITP of gkrellm-bfm (#127002) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:50 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of gkrellm-bfm. The package gkrellm-bfm seems already to be in the archive. Therefore, I'm closing this bug. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#155782: marked as done (ITP: libnet-telnet-cisco-perl -- Additional functionality to Net::Telnet to access Cisco devices)
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:01 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Your ITP of libnet-telnet-cisco-perl (#155782) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2002 13:36:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 07 08:36:01 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from buzz.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.3] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17cQyn-0007SF-00; Wed, 07 Aug 2002 08:36:01 -0500 Received: (qmail 19344 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2002 13:34:43 - Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Aug 2002 13:34:43 - Received: (qmail 19340 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2002 13:34:43 - Received: from avalon.dat.etsit.upm.es (138.100.17.73) by buzz.etsit.upm.es with SMTP; 7 Aug 2002 13:34:43 - Received: (qmail 11661 invoked by uid 1013); 7 Aug 2002 13:35:29 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pena [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: libnet-telnet-cisco-perl -- Additional functionality to Net::Telnet to access Cisco devices X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 15:35:29 +0200 X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-07 Severity: wishlist Package name: libnet-telnet-cisco-perl Version : 1.10 Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://cpan.perl.org also http://NetTelnetCisco.sourceforge.net/ License : Free software (Perl license) Description : Additional functionality to Net::Telnet to access Cisco devices This package provides more functionality (needed by rat) to access Cisco devices (mainly routers) using Perl. Javi -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux avalon 2.4.18 #1 SMP mié abr 3 12:47:49 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 155782-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 15:15:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 09:15:03 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.138] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SIg2-0002qg-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:15:02 -0600 Received: from localhost (ramstraat29.xs4all.nl [80.126.10.231]) by smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id gBSFF16v086013 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from bas by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18SIg1-0001R3-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:01 +0100 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Your ITP of libnet-telnet-cisco-perl (#155782) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:01 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of libnet-telnet-cisco-perl. The package libnet-telnet-cisco-perl seems already to be in the archive. Therefore, I'm closing this bug. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#124308: marked as done (ITP: db4 -- Berkeley DB release 4.0.14)
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 18:32:55 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Your ITP of db4 (#124308) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2001 07:24:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 17 01:24:51 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk (www.linux.org.uk) [195.92.249.252] (exim) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16Fs8o-00060q-00; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 01:24:51 -0600 Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.33 #5) id 16Fs8n-0004nq-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 07:24:49 + Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 07:24:49 + From: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: db4 -- Berkeley DB release 4.0.14 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Sleepycat have released version 4.0.14 of Berkeley db. Looking it over, it will probably require being a new package :-(. So consider yourselves warned. I intend to work with Sleepycat so we don't have to create new packages every time. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support. --- Received: (at 124308-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 17:32:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 11:32:57 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.138] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SKpV-0004dI-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 11:32:57 -0600 Received: from localhost (ramstraat29.xs4all.nl [80.126.10.231]) by smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id gBSHWuvp002792 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 18:32:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from bas by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18SKpT-0001VU-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 18:32:55 +0100 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Your ITP of db4 (#124308) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 18:32:55 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of db4. The package db4 seems already to be in the archive. Therefore, I'm closing this bug. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#149336: marked as done (ITP: ELinks -- split from links{,-ssl} (after current Debian gets released))
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:54 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Your ITP of elinks (#149336)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2002 19:52:51 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 07 14:52:51 2002
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.interware.hu [195.70.32.130]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17GPn1-0005Vr-00; Fri, 07 Jun 2002 14:52:51 -0500
Received: from kualalumpur-22.budaors.interware.hu ([195.70.62.150]
helo=sanctuary.grin.hu)
by mail.interware.hu with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 17GPmu-0005hL-00; Fri, 07 Jun 2002 21:52:45 +0200
Received: from grin by sanctuary.grin.hu with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17GPGD-00049D-00; Fri, 07 Jun 2002 19:18:57 +
From: Peter Gervai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wnpp: ITP: ELinks (after current Debian gets released) - split from
links{,-ssl}
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: grin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 19:18:57 +
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(This is really an Intent To Package [ITP] 'links', Intent To Rename [ITR]
'links' to 'elinks', Intent To Get Rid [ITGR] of 'links-ssl' and Intent To
Figure Out Whether 'links' with SSL Could Be Included Into Main
[ITFOWCBIIM].)
I'm the maintaner of the packages links{,-ssl}, which is a text mode browser
(as probably many of you already noticed) supporting plenty of interesting
stuff like colors, tables, frames, and so on. (Not ncurses, though, as some
around think.)
A while ago there were a fork from the original 'links' tree because the
development virtually stopped, bugs were not getting fixed, new features
were not included (despite the patches people submitted). I waited a while
but nothing happened (and the open bugs accumulated), so I decided to switch
over the fork which contained fixes and features, and what was named in the
meantime as 'ELinks' (enhanced links).
The 'links' development seem to be okay-like now, bugs actually get fixed.
In a recent discussion with ELinks' author we concluded that while the
codebase is of common roots, changing rapidly to make the gap wider between
the two versions, and it is not expected that the two version will ever get
closer to one another.
Links' goal is stability without too much features, while ELinks favour
bugs fixed and features implemented, like ipv6, cookies, bookmarks,
embedded programming language and more. I was politely asked by several
Debian developers to consider splitting these packages, and put they in
their respective packages where they belong.
Doing that raised another question which I am not able to answer due the
fuzzy discussions all around: can I discard 'links-ssl' (and possible
'elinks-ssl') and simply include SSL-enabled versions in main? There are
several SSL-enabled packages in main but the policy (as far as my eyes
serve me right) still seem to deny this. Anyone feeling authoritative
regarding this?
URL (for both): http://links.browser.org/
License: GPL
ps: only after woody released, I think.
pps: If you think this is all too simple, I'll share with you the fact that
links 2.xx will contain graphics and javascript support. But as far as I
see, it is going to be in the 'links' tree, without forking. Let us pray.
:-)
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
---
Received: (at 149336-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 15:14:56 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 09:14:56 2002
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.141]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18SIfw-0002oY-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:14:56 -0600
Received: from localhost (ramstraat29.xs4all.nl [80.126.10.231])
by smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id gBSFEshV071434
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bas by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18SIfu-0001QZ-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:54 +0100
From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Your ITP of elinks (#149336)
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:14:54
Bug#98921: Your ITP of gnomesensors (#98921)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of gnomesensors. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#98703: Your ITP of ea (#98703)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of ea. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#98607: Your ITP of quick-dicts (#98607)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of quick-dicts. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#98597: Your ITP of fortunes-movies (#98597)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of fortunes-movies. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#98362: Your ITP of s10sh (#98362)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of s10sh. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#97963: Your ITP of maks (#97963)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of maks. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#95687: Your ITP of opmake (#95687)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of opmake. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#95469: Your ITP of cgen (#95469)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of cgen. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#95442: Your ITP of python-webware (#95442)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of python-webware. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#94223: Your ITP of libchasen-ruby (#94223)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of libchasen-ruby. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#93074: Your ITP of libtext-chasen-perl (#93074)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of libtext-chasen-perl. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#90892: Your ITP of xfuzzy (#90892)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of xfuzzy. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#91999: Your ITP of jce1.1-cryptix (#91999)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of jce1.1-cryptix. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#90663: Your ITP of simplefirewall (#90663)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of simplefirewall. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#90503: Your ITP of vmail (#90503)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of vmail. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#89554: Your ITP of rnmap (#89554)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of rnmap. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#87810: Your ITP of openrpg (#87810)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of openrpg. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#87666: Your ITP of bigwig (#87666)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of bigwig. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#86779: Your ITP of srp (#86779)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of srp. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#88603: Your ITP of wavnorm (#88603)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of wavnorm. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#85392: Your ITP of docbook-xmlschema (#85392)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of docbook-xmlschema. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#85581: Your ITP of hasas (#85581)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of hasas. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#85382: Your ITP of phorum (#85382)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of phorum. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#82903: Your ITP of conf-isdn-account (#82903)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of conf-isdn-account. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#82091: Your ITP of ithought (#82091)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of ithought. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#81234: Your ITP of bakery (#81234)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of bakery. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#80278: Your ITP of wmfinder (#80278)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of wmfinder. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#80261: Your ITP of gender (#80261)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of gender. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#80248: Your ITP of cpc4x (#80248)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of cpc4x. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#78762: Your ITP of xmms-blursk (#78762)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of xmms-blursk. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#79966: Your ITP of batak (#79966)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of batak. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#78208: Your ITP of narval (#78208)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of narval. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#83342: Your ITP of libnet-aolim-perl (#83342)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of libnet-aolim-perl. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#77945: Your ITP of orbacus (#77945)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of orbacus. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#77982: Your ITP of libapache-mod-virgule (#77982)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of libapache-mod-virgule. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#77705: Your ITP of asc (#77705)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of asc. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#77075: Your ITP of kvoctrain (#77075)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of kvoctrain. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#76816: Your ITP of qtwvdialer (#76816)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of qtwvdialer. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#75672: Your ITP of ofbis (#75672)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of ofbis. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#75078: Your ITP of imagej (#75078)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of imagej. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#73036: Your ITP of siggen (#73036)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of siggen. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#72105: Your ITP of xfonts-silipa (#72105)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of xfonts-silipa. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#69763: Your ITP of fbmuck (#69763)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of fbmuck. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#72776: Your ITP of libmhash-ruby (#72776)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of libmhash-ruby. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#69446: Your ITP of biomail (#69446)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of biomail. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#68709: Your ITP of roundup (#68709)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of roundup. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#68269: Your ITP of kopi (#68269)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of kopi. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#69952: Your ITP of dict-de-it (#69952)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of dict-de-it. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#68256: Your ITP of tinymush (#68256)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of tinymush. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#68226: Your ITP of gtk-module-gspeech (#68226)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of gtk-module-gspeech. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#68223: Your ITP of tclhttpd (#68223)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of tclhttpd. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#68117: Your ITP of projex (#68117)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of projex. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#68170: Your ITP of changesys (#68170)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of changesys. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#126200: Your ITP of ethstatus (#126200)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of ethstatus. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#88382: marked as done (ITA: icmake -- Intelligent C-like MAKEr, or the ICce MAKE utility)
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 06:47:28 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#88382: fixed in icmake 6.22-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2001 22:13:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 03 16:13:20 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailhub.stusta.mhn.de) [:::141.84.69.5] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14ZKH9-0007xp-00; Sat, 03 Mar 2001 16:13:20 -0600 Received: (qmail 24496 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2001 22:13:18 - Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 3 Mar 2001 22:13:18 - Received: from bunk by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14ZKFv-0003MW-00; Sat, 03 Mar 2001 23:12:03 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RFA: icmake -- Intelligent C-like MAKEr, or the ICce MAKE utility X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14 Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 23:12:03 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2001-03-03 Severity: normal I'll maintain this package until someone else wants to maintain it. Please contact me before taking it. --- Received: (at 88382-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 11:53:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 05:53:08 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SFWd-XK-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 05:53:07 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18SFRA-mm-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 06:47:28 -0500 From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.29 $ Subject: Bug#88382: fixed in icmake 6.22-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 06:47:28 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of icmake, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: icmake_6.22-4.diff.gz to pool/main/i/icmake/icmake_6.22-4.diff.gz icmake_6.22-4.dsc to pool/main/i/icmake/icmake_6.22-4.dsc icmake_6.22-4_i386.deb to pool/main/i/icmake/icmake_6.22-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated icmake package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 12:28:43 +0100 Source: icmake Binary: icmake Architecture: source i386 Version: 6.22-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: icmake - Intelligent C-like MAKEr, or the ICce MAKE utility Closes: 88382 Changes: icmake (6.22-4) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer (closes: #88382) * Updated policy. Files: 619e0b4d2cbb6359d518f59ba0cc3b77 563 devel optional icmake_6.22-4.dsc 4b574e7d315bb87c9259c83fcf3a2e72 3499 devel optional icmake_6.22-4.diff.gz db233cd72d14858438d6073673f6ff52 129958 devel optional icmake_6.22-4_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+DYyMpFNRmenyx0cRAnTbAJ0e9hbpzCm9dQR3lPBwnsqJzzIW8wCePSdw 0bOQEk2F9yXyVfiJ2jFO7RM= =fQyQ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#124343: Your ITP of openmash (#124343)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of openmash. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#126037: Your ITP of scipy (#126037)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of scipy. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#171936: marked as done (ITP: fontilus --)
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:13 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Your ITP of fontilus (#171936) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 2002 03:53:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 05 21:53:01 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx-outgoing.verbum.org (monk.verbum.org) [216.226.142.159] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18K9Xx-0004Bf-00; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 21:53:01 -0600 Received: from space-ghost.verbum.private (dhcp024-208-189-249.columbus.rr.com [24.208.189.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN space-ghost.verbum.org, Issuer verbum.org CA (verified OK)) by monk.verbum.org (Postfix (Debian/GNU)) with ESMTP id A2E7074002D4; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 22:53:00 -0500 (EST) Received: by space-ghost.verbum.private (Postfix (Debian/GNU), from userid 1000) id D19B4BFA92; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 22:38:18 -0500 (EST) Subject: ITP: fontilus -- From: Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: The Debian Project Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 Date: 05 Dec 2002 22:38:18 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=NOSPAM_INC,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-05 Severity: wishlist * Package name: fontilus Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : James Henstridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/fontilus/ * License : GPL Description : graphical font management tool for GNOME Fontilus is a tool for managing your installed fonts; it is implemented as set of extensions for the Nautilus file manager. This allows you to easily view installed fonts (including previews), and to drag-and-drop new fonts, and have them immediately installed on your system. Fontilus is split into a number of components: . - libfont-method: a gnome-vfs method implementing the fonts:/// URI scheme. - gnome-thumbnail-font: a program to render a small preview of a font. Uses a custom stream implementation, so can render fonts from arbitrary gnome-vfs URIs (provided the file can be openned in random access mode). For example, it can render files in fonts:/// - gnome-font-viewer: a simple program to display info about a font and render some of the glyphs. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux space-ghost 2.4.19+xfs+ipsec #1 Tue Aug 27 19:31:56 EDT 2002 ppc Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE= --- Received: (at 171936-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 15:15:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 09:15:14 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.138] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SIgE-0002to-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:15:14 -0600 Received: from localhost (ramstraat29.xs4all.nl [80.126.10.231]) by smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id gBSFFD6v086072 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from bas by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18SIgD-0001Rr-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:13 +0100 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Your ITP of fontilus (#171936) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:13 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of fontilus. The package fontilus seems already to be in the archive. Therefore, I'm closing this bug. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#126498: Your ITP of spambouncer (#126498)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of spambouncer. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#124205: Your ITP of libcrypt-gpg-perl (#124205)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of libcrypt-gpg-perl. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#94371: Renaming ITP of netramet (#94371)
retitle 94371 RFP: NeTraMet -- accounting meter severity 94371 wishlist submitter 94371 debian-qa@lists.debian.org thanks Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of netramet. I am retitling this bug to an RFP, because you didn't reply to a ping in the BTS. Therefore, I assume that you are no longer interested in packaging this program. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#123416: Your ITP of treecc (#123416)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of treecc. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#111167: Renaming ITP of loop-aes (#111167)
retitle 67 RFP: loop-aes -- AES cipher loadable Linux kernel module severity 67 wishlist submitter 67 debian-qa@lists.debian.org thanks Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of loop-aes. I am retitling this bug to an RFP, because you didn't reply to a ping in the BTS. Therefore, I assume that you are no longer interested in packaging this program. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#171875: marked as done (ITP: libclass-trigger-perl -- A mix-in class to add / call hooks that get called at points you specify)
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:12 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Your ITP of libclass-trigger-perl (#171875) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2002 18:11:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 05 12:11:25 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from oxmail3.ox.ac.uk (oxmail.ox.ac.uk) [129.67.1.3] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18K0T5-0005N1-00; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 12:11:23 -0600 Received: from smtp0.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.246]) by oxmail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18K0T3-0007BT-03; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 18:11:21 + Received: from mizar.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.15.107]) by smtp0.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18K0T3-0001eo-00; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 18:11:21 + Received: from stephen by mizar.oucs.ox.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18K0T3-0005zW-00; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 18:11:21 + From: Stephen Quinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: libclass-trigger-perl -- A mix-in class to add / call hooks that get called at points you specify X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 18:11:21 + X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Stephen Quinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-05 Severity: wishlist * Package name: libclass-trigger-perl Version : 0.06 Upstream Author : Tatsuhiko Miyagawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/MI/MIYAGAWA/Class-Trigger-0.06.tar.gz * License : Perl license Description : A mix-in class to add / call hooks. Class::Trigger is mix-in class to add / call inheritable triggers (or hooks) that get called at some points you specify. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux mizar 2.4.20 #1 Fri Nov 29 09:22:48 GMT 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE= --- Received: (at 171875-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 15:15:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 09:15:13 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.138] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SIgD-0002tc-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:15:13 -0600 Received: from localhost (ramstraat29.xs4all.nl [80.126.10.231]) by smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id gBSFFC6v086068 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from bas by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18SIgC-0001Rm-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:12 +0100 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Your ITP of libclass-trigger-perl (#171875) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:12 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of libclass-trigger-perl. The package libclass-trigger-perl seems already to be in the archive. Therefore, I'm closing this bug. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#112118: Renaming ITP of python-visual (#112118)
retitle 112118 RFP: python-visual -- A Python library for 3d visualization severity 112118 wishlist submitter 112118 debian-qa@lists.debian.org thanks Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of python-visual. I am retitling this bug to an RFP, because you didn't reply to a ping in the BTS. Therefore, I assume that you are no longer interested in packaging this program. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#165963: marked as done (RFP: gtk-engines-lighthouseblue -- LightHouseBlue theme for GTK+ 1.2)
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:08 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Your ITP of gtk-engines-lighthouseblue (#165963) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2002 22:55:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 22 17:55:36 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.42] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 1847w0-00020Y-00; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:55:36 -0500 Received: from graydon.wasters ([213.107.21.170]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 23:55:34 +0100 Received: from alisdair by graydon.wasters with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1847vx-0003Yn-00; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 23:55:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Alisdair McDiarmid [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RFP: gtk-engines-lighthouseblue -- LightHouseBlue theme for GTK+ 1.2 X-Mailer: reportbug 2.8 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 23:55:33 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-10-22 Severity: wishlist * Package name: gtk-engines-lighthouseblue Version : 0.4.2 Upstream Author : Jan Rosczak [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://lighthouseblue.sf.net/ * License : GPL Description : LightHouseBlue theme for GTK+ 1.2 LighthouseBlue is a theme engine for GTK+. It was inspired by the article Thoughts UI Clean-Ups on a Random Red Hat/Gnome2 Screenshot on OSNews.com, and is based on RedHat's BlueCurve theme. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux graydon 2.4.20-pre7-preempt #1 Wed Sep 18 02:20:43 BST 2002 i= 686 Locale: LANG=3Den_GB, LC_CTYPE=3Den_GB --- Received: (at 165963-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 15:15:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 09:15:10 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.138] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SIg9-0002sa-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:15:09 -0600 Received: from localhost (ramstraat29.xs4all.nl [80.126.10.231]) by smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id gBSFF86v086042 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from bas by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18SIg8-0001RX-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:08 +0100 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Your ITP of gtk-engines-lighthouseblue (#165963) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:08 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of gtk-engines-lighthouseblue. The package gtk-engines-lighthouseblue seems already to be in the archive. Therefore, I'm closing this bug. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#123920: Your ITP of anteater (#123920)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of anteater. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#112478: Renaming ITP of thoteditor (#112478)
retitle 112478 RFP: thoteditor -- customizable editor for structured documents severity 112478 wishlist submitter 112478 debian-qa@lists.debian.org thanks Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of thoteditor. I am retitling this bug to an RFP, because you didn't reply to a ping in the BTS. Therefore, I assume that you are no longer interested in packaging this program. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#96103: Renaming ITP of protux (#96103)
retitle 96103 RFP: protux -- ProTools-like Digital Audio Workstation severity 96103 wishlist submitter 96103 debian-qa@lists.debian.org thanks Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of protux. I am retitling this bug to an RFP, because you didn't reply to a ping in the BTS. Therefore, I assume that you are no longer interested in packaging this program. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#115368: Renaming ITP of xmlrpclib (#115368)
retitle 115368 RFP: xmlrpclib -- Python implementation of the XML-RPC protocol severity 115368 wishlist submitter 115368 debian-qa@lists.debian.org thanks Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of xmlrpclib. I am retitling this bug to an RFP, because you didn't reply to a ping in the BTS. Therefore, I assume that you are no longer interested in packaging this program. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#123250: Your ITP of mozilla-locale-es-es (#123250)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of mozilla-locale-es-es. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#122614: Your ITP of publicfile-installer (#122614)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of publicfile-installer. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#122453: Your ITP of jboss (#122453)
Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of jboss. Do you still intend to package this program? If not, could you please close this bug or rename it to an RFP? If you don't reply to this message, it will be assumed that you are no longer interested, and someone of the QA team will close or rename this ITP. Note that I am not interested in taking over this ITP or uploading this package; I am just cleaning the WNPP. Therefore, please do not reply to me personally. An message in the BTS (sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will suffice. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
Bug#160451: marked as done (RFP: libdc1394-9 -- high level programming interface for IEEE1394 digital camera)
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:05 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Your ITP of libdc1394-9 (#160451) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2002 02:06:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 10 21:06:56 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx1.net.titech.ac.jp [131.112.125.25] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17owu8-0002nX-00; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:06:56 -0500 Received: (qmail 81114 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2002 02:11:06 - Received: from unknown (HELO vc1.net.titech.ac.jp) (131.112.125.35) by 0 with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 02:11:06 - Received: (qmail 11147 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2002 02:08:12 - Received: from unknown (HELO nuts.it.ss.titech.ac.jp) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 02:08:12 - Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:06:52 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RFP: libdc1394-9 -- high level programming interface for IEEE1394 digital camera From: Ryutaroh Matsumoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Mew version 1.95b112 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libdc1394-9 Version : 0.9.0-2 Upstream Author : Dan Dennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/libdc1394 * License : LGPL Description : high level programming interface for IEEE1394 digital camera This is a shared library for using IEEE1394 digital camera. This is a new version of libdc1394 whose API is different from the existing libdc1394-8 Debian package. I think libdc1394 0.9.0-2 can coexist with the old libdc1394-8, because its major version of shared library is changed from libdc1394-8. Ryutaroh Matsumoto, Ph.D., Research Associate Department of Communications and Integrated Systems Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 160451-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 15:15:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 09:15:06 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.138] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18SIg6-0002rk-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:15:06 -0600 Received: from localhost (ramstraat29.xs4all.nl [80.126.10.231]) by smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id gBSFF56v086027 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from bas by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18SIg4-0001RI-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:04 +0100 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Your ITP of libdc1394-9 (#160451) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:15:05 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Hi! This is a semi-automated message concerning your ITP of libdc1394-9. The package libdc1394-9 seems already to be in the archive. Therefore, I'm closing this bug. Kind regards, Bas Zoetekouw.
