Bug#90515: marked as done (ITP: mod-log-spread -- apache distributed log method)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2003 21:10:02 +0900 (JST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#90515: Your ITP of mod-log-spread (#90515) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2001 05:02:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 23:02:54 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bombcat.netvillage.co.jp (think.araki.net) [210.81.118.254] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14falp-0007dL-00; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:02:53 -0600 Received: from localhost (think [127.0.0.1]) by think.araki.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66F036FDF for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:57:09 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:57:09 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP for mod-log-spread From: ARAKI Yasuhiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Mew version 1.95b114 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package:wnpp Serverity: wishlist I intend to package mod_log_spread and to find sponsor. Source: mod-log-spread Package: libapache-mod-log-spread Description: apache distributed log method. mod_log_spread was created to allow ease of management of log files for large web farms. Maintaining local log files across 10's or 100's of hosts is a huge time drag and a sizeable performance hit. Centralized logging allows for single point monitoring of all web traffic. Multicasting allows for multiple redundant log listeners/writers to be brought up dynamically with no performance impact or re-configuration. mod_log_spread was written as a patch/enhancement to Apache's mod_log_config which supplied a perfect and complete framework on which to build out the desired functionality. Package: spreadlogd Description: distributed log daemon. --- ARAKI Yasuhiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 90515-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2003 12:09:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 04 06:09:44 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from r-rr.iij4u.or.jp [210.130.0.76] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Un7Y-0007F5-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 06:09:44 -0600 Received: from afard2 (170.125.111.219.dy.excite.co.jp [219.111.125.170]) by r-rr.iij4u.or.jp (8.11.6+IIJ/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h04C9fO19619 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 21:09:42 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (afard2 [127.0.0.1]) by afard2 (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45C7E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 21:10:03 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 21:10:02 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#90515: Your ITP of mod-log-spread (#90515) From: ARAKI Yasuhiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Mew version 3.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level:
Bug#175310: RFP: gtkbiblevariants -- View variant readings of Original Bible (only Greek NT now)
Package: wnpp Version: 0.2-1; reported 2003-01-04 Severity: wishlist * Package name: gtkbiblevariants Version : 0.2-1 Upstream Author : Victor Porton [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://clean-bible.sf.net/ * License : GPL Description : View variant readings of Original Bible (only Greek NT now) -- System Information Debian Release: 2.2 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux home.porton.narod.ru 2.4.17 #2 Thu Mar 14 21:11:12 YEKT 2002 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 I'm the upstream author. Good .deb file already exists. It works but there are some bugs. Expect new version after several months. You must package this because this is an important revelation from God. Debian, remeber Bible about destiny of the nations people of which has sent away God's messengers. See the site, read Apocalypse.
Bug#175312: RFA: basilix
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-04 Severity: normal Upstream ignored me since 2 years, he never implemented my fixes His old fashioned programming-type is out of date. IF theres a new upstreamversion i have to rewrite it. The only reason for me to make a deb was his wap support, he dropped this also, so it makes no sense to keep hundrets webmailprogramm on ftp. http://www.basilix.org looks also unmaintained. since 14.1.2002, no changes there. If somebody want adopt this, newer fixed versions and packages are under p.d.o/~amu/basilix/ available. If nobody want adopt it, i suggest remove the package after a period of 3 month. Cheers amu -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux tr.debian.net 2.4.20-ben1 #1 Thu Dec 19 20:49:19 CET 2002 ppc Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set)
Bug#175315: ITP: libkrb5-perl -- Perl extensions for Kerberos 5
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-04 Severity: wishlist Package name: libkrb5-perl Version : 1.2 Upstream Author : Jeff Horwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://search.cpan.org/author/JHORWITZ/Krb5-1.2/ License : GPL/Artistic Description : Perl extensions for Kerberos 5 From the CPAN page: Authen::Krb5 is an object oriented interface to the Kerberos 5 API. Both the implementation and documentation are nowhere near complete, and may require previous experience with Kerberos 5 programming. Most of the functions here are documented in detail in the Kerberos 5 API documentation. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux starlite 2.4.19-686 #1 Mon Nov 18 23:59:03 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Bug#134645: marked as done (O: vdr -- Video Disk Recorder for DVB-S cards, base package)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2003 12:18:20 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#134645: fixed in vdr 1.0.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2002 23:15:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 18 17:15:23 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16cx0F-0005iX-00; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:15:23 -0600 Received: from mailinf.rhrk.uni-kl.de (mailinf.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.54]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.5) with ESMTP id g1INFKX14181; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:15:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from domino.informatik.uni-kl.de (domino.informatik.uni-kl.de [131.246.161.19]) by mailinf.rhrk.uni-kl.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.5) with ESMTP id g1INFJx17173; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:15:19 +0100 (MET) Received: from zombie (rotes255.wohnheim.uni-kl.de [131.246.178.65]) by domino.informatik.uni-kl.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g1INFKs28563; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:15:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from inet by zombie with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16cx0C-00062x-00; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:15:20 +0100 From: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RFA: vdr -- Video Disk Recorder for DVB-S cards, base package X-Reportbug-Version: 1.43 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.43 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:15:20 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-02-19 Severity: normal I request an adopter for the vdr package. Due to lack of time, missing hardware, etc. etc. The package description is: Video Disk Recorder (VDR) is a digital sat-receiver program using Linux and DVB-S technologies. It allows one to record MPEG2 streams, as well as output the stream to TV. It is also possible to watch DVDs (hardware accelerated) with some comfort and use a IR remote control. . This package contains files shared by different VDR versions and frontends. NOTE: You should install compatible DVB drivers before using these programs. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux zombie 2.4.18-rc1 #5 Sat Feb 16 09:36:05 CET 2002 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 134645-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2003 17:23:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 04 11:23:02 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Us0k-0006UF-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 11:23:02 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18UrwC-0006Hi-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 12:18:20 -0500 From: Andreas Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.29 $ Subject: Bug#134645: fixed in vdr 1.0.4-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 12:18:20 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of vdr, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: vdr-daemon_1.0.4-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/v/vdr/vdr-daemon_1.0.4-2_powerpc.deb vdr-kbd_1.0.4-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/v/vdr/vdr-kbd_1.0.4-2_powerpc.deb vdr-lirc_1.0.4-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/v/vdr/vdr-lirc_1.0.4-2_powerpc.deb vdr-rcu_1.0.4-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/v/vdr/vdr-rcu_1.0.4-2_powerpc.deb vdr_1.0.4-2.dsc to pool/main/v/vdr/vdr_1.0.4-2.dsc vdr_1.0.4-2.tar.gz to pool/main/v/vdr/vdr_1.0.4-2.tar.gz vdr_1.0.4-2_all.deb to pool/main/v/vdr/vdr_1.0.4-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andreas Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated vdr package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 16:27:00 +0100 Source: vdr
Bug#158158: marked as done (O: vdr -- Video Disk Recorder for DVB-S cards, base package)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2003 12:18:20 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#134645: fixed in vdr 1.0.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2002 08:50:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 03 03:50:15 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (uni-kl.de) [131.246.137.52] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 173Yla-00029A-00; Fri, 03 May 2002 03:50:15 -0500 Received: from mailgate1.uni-kl.de (mailgate1.uni-kl.de [131.246.120.5]) by uni-kl.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.5) with ESMTP id g438oCi15128; Fri, 3 May 2002 10:50:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mailinf.rhrk.uni-kl.de (mailinf.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.54]) by mailgate1.uni-kl.de (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g438oBNA027159; Fri, 3 May 2002 10:50:11 +0200 Received: from domino.informatik.uni-kl.de (domino.informatik.uni-kl.de [131.246.161.19]) by mailinf.rhrk.uni-kl.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.5) with ESMTP id g438oAh21230; Fri, 3 May 2002 10:50:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zombie (rotes255.wohnheim.uni-kl.de [131.246.178.65]) by domino.informatik.uni-kl.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g438oBd06442; Fri, 3 May 2002 10:50:11 +0200 (MEST) Received: from inet by zombie with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 173YlY-00015P-00; Fri, 03 May 2002 10:50:12 +0200 Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 10:50:12 +0200 From: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITA: most of my packages Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Hi folks, this is a non-standard way of doing this, but I will just try. Due to lack of time in the comming weeks (and generally sinking interest in maintianing stuff), I look for new maintainers for the following packages. General rules: The one who comes first gets the package. I wanna keep the right to NMU if I discover any problems in them later. List: Allegro and packages based on it. Idealy for someone with experience in library packaging: allegro-demo-data(1) allegro4(5) liquidwar(2) wing(2) stax(1) For boot-floppies (Oskuro): cfdisk-utf8(1) kernel-image-2.4.18-i386bf(2) Various Kernel-Modules: cdfs-src(1) ftpfs(2) dvb(4) Needed work: figure out details of the module-packaging-policy and make the packages compliant. Rest: emelfm(1) icewm-themes(1) kernel-image-2.2.20-udma100-ext3-i386(2) kernel-patch-ethernet-drivers(1) kernel-patch-ext3-2.2(1) kernel-patch-ppscsi-2.4(1) nvtv(1) pppoeconf(1) vdr(5) kvdr(1) videogen(1) unp(1) aumix(2) cdrtools(4) Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- Linux - aus klaren Quellen wird ein starker Strom. --- Received: (at 134645-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2003 17:23:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 04 11:23:02 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Us0k-0006UF-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 11:23:02 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18UrwC-0006Hi-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 12:18:20 -0500 From: Andreas Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.29 $ Subject: Bug#134645: fixed in vdr 1.0.4-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 12:18:20 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of vdr, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: vdr-daemon_1.0.4-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/v/vdr/vdr-daemon_1.0.4-2_powerpc.deb vdr-kbd_1.0.4-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/v/vdr/vdr-kbd_1.0.4-2_powerpc.deb vdr-lirc_1.0.4-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/v/vdr/vdr-lirc_1.0.4-2_powerpc.deb vdr-rcu_1.0.4-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/v/vdr/vdr-rcu_1.0.4-2_powerpc.deb vdr_1.0.4-2.dsc to pool/main/v/vdr/vdr_1.0.4-2.dsc vdr_1.0.4-2.tar.gz to pool/main/v/vdr/vdr_1.0.4-2.tar.gz vdr_1.0.4-2_all.deb to pool/main/v/vdr/vdr_1.0.4-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank
Bug#175266: ITP: dchroot -- Tools for creating and maintaining chroots on Debian machines.
In the future I'd like to add some scripts that make creating various chroots painless (call to debootstrap perhaps excluding certain packages, mount -o bind, symlinks for /etc/resolve.conf and friends, etc.) I keep a variety of chroots on my machines at home and I'd like to make it simple for others to do the same. I'd rather like creation scripts integrated with pbuilder, so that we have some integrated environment, if pbuilder sources and its configuration files are doing fine... regards, junichi
Processed: Fixed in NMU of dvb 0.9.4.20020803-4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 117995 + fixed Bug#117995: RFA: dvb -- Transmission of digital TV and Data over satellite transponders or cable connections There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#174494: debbuggtk
Hi, I'm in the process of uploading packages and sources for libdebbug-java and debbuggtk to http://www.tildemh.com/tmp/debbuggtk I'd love to hear any suggestions you have. I'm just emailing the itp and people who showed interest at the moment; don't want to add too much junk to the mailing lists (especially if it turns out that there's a big bug in it, but there shouldn't be). If you want me to let you know of new versions in the future, please ask and I'll try to remember. I don't want to upload official packages until the quality is much better. Note that they require the latest java-gnome libraries (20030103), currently in incoming. Provided programs: bugviewer bug number - this will download and display a bug report. buglister source|maint|submitter|binary package name - this downloads and displays a package listing. Clicking on an item will open it in bugviewer bugwatcher - this is my main application. In the top left, there is a list of 'watched' items. This can be added to using the buttons underneath it. When one is clicked, that packages listing is loaded in the right. This can be updated by clicking the refresh button (it will also be done on program start, but this is currently commented out). The filter box for the listings is a complete spoof at the moment - sorry. When you click on an item in the listing, the full report should be loaded at the bottom. There are problems with parsing a number of bug reports - I probably won't fix these as I'd prefer to spend time thinking about an xml machine readable interface to the bts. There is another refresh button for the bug report. The edit button just gives a mock up page at the moment. Issues: - only works with kaffe. Java-GNOME does work for other people with other jre's (such as sablevm, gij, blackdown java), but I've had no success. Also, natively compiled code does not seem to work either. - kaffe is slow. It's a fact that kaffe's JNI code is slow. Hopefully this will be fixed with newer gij, or possibly natively compiled code. - text entry and viewing is incredibly slow. I have no idea why. Most probably due to the Java problems - no GNOME support. This means we cannot have gconf, menus, toolbars or statusbars. Big TODO items: - Status: Highlight bugs which are new of have had comments added to them. Show a count in the watched list. Possibly highlight all bugs where the user has commented on them. - ListingReport filters. a quick and easy way to search bug reports. Also having more advanced things such as limiting by tags, severity, owner... - ListingReport: option of more columns (checkboxes for each tag for example). Simple menu for switching each on/off. (This may not be necessary if the filters are as useful as I hope) - bugviewer: possibly use html to display the items. Maybe on one page. Not really sure about this yet. - Colin Watson has added a Last-Modified: header to bugreport.cgi which works on HTTP HEAD requests. I can't manage to read this at present. when I do, bug reports should only be downloaded when needed. - more intelligent removal of items from cache (e.g. bugs which have been closed) - pseudo package support - bug edit: load current values generate an email for output. I don't like the ui at present - comments appreciated. - converting to work with the new debbug rewrite. I think this mainly involves working on a machine readable cgi for the server and a parser for this. Should probably look into it more though. I hope you manage to get this to work. Please let me know if you have any problems. As I've said already, we're using kaffe at the moment which does make it very slow - this will be fixed in the future. Other Java-GNOME developers have reported performance at almost the same as standard gtk, when using other jres. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#175266: ITP: dchroot -- Tools for creating and maintaining chroots on Debian machines.
In the future I'd like to add some scripts that make creating various chroots painless (call to debootstrap perhaps excluding certain packages, mount -o bind, symlinks for /etc/resolve.conf and friends, etc.) I keep a variety of chroots on my machines at home and I'd like to make it simple for others to do the same. I'd rather like creation scripts integrated with pbuilder, so that we have some integrated environment, if pbuilder sources and its configuration files are doing fine... I'd rather not, as those scripts can be useful outside of pbuilder too.
Bug#175316: ITP: libkrb4-perl -- Perl extensions for Kerberos 4
Hi Jay, On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 07:46:47AM -0500, Jay Bonci wrote: * Package name: libkrb4-perl Version : 1.1 Upstream Author : Jeff Horwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://search.cpan.org/author/JHORWITZ/Krb4-1.1/ * License : GPL/Artistic Description : Perl extensions for Kerberos 4 I have to ask, if this hasn't been needed previously, is there really any point in adding it to the archive now? Kerberos 4 is legacy technology that every site I know either has dropped or is in the process of dropping. Do you have a specific application where Authen::Krb5 is insufficient? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer pgpNCJ0tefTSm.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#175312: RFA: basilix
Hi Andreas, On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:54:15PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote: Upstream ignored me since 2 years, he never implemented my fixes His old fashioned programming-type is out of date. IF theres a new upstreamversion i have to rewrite it. The only reason for me to make a deb was his wap support, he dropped this also, so it makes no sense to keep hundrets webmailprogramm on ftp. http://www.basilix.org looks also unmaintained. since 14.1.2002, no changes there. If somebody want adopt this, newer fixed versions and packages are under p.d.o/~amu/basilix/ available. If nobody want adopt it, i suggest remove the package after a period of 3 month. If the package has as many problems as you say it does, why be so generous? Why not file against ftp.debian.org directly, requesting its removal from the archive? As you say, Debian doesn't need hundreds of webmail programs. Regards, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer pgptrRSF0zUQT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#175312: RFA: basilix
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-01-04 21:13]: If the package has as many problems as you say it does, why be so generous? Why not file against ftp.debian.org directly, requesting its removal from the archive? As you say, Debian doesn't need hundreds of webmail programs. FWIW, the proper way would be to reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org and tetitle it to something like Please remove basilix. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#98921: Your ITP of gnomesensors (#98921)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 98921 RFP: gnomesensors Bug#98921: ITP: gnomesensors -- simple Gnome applet, show the output from hardware health monitoring sensors Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#175312: RFA: basilix
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 10:55:35PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-01-04 21:13]: If the package has as many problems as you say it does, why be so generous? Why not file against ftp.debian.org directly, requesting its removal from the archive? As you say, Debian doesn't need hundreds of webmail programs. FWIW, the proper way would be to reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org and tetitle it to something like Please remove basilix. lots of people ask me, why there isnt any new version, Maybe upstream thought, i redesign his software, while he`s sitting in a bar. My answer was, do nothing more for him. I think, i was enough patient, if somebody feel to be Mr. Basilix and his livejob is, talking monologes, to upstream, he can try it. Also possible he filter my mail :) I know also, in his contry he has a hard time and a kind of their national nature, do once a time something and than crop the fruits for the rest of his live, maybe thats possible in his county, but i`ll not support this. As i said, maybe somebody other :) This is a public list, i didnt used the word starting with a and ends with e. Cheers amu
Bug#174340: marked as done (ITA: jpeginfo -- Prints information and tests integrity of JPEG/JFIF files.)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2003 17:47:43 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#174340: fixed in jpeginfo 1.6.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2002 10:44:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 26 04:44:40 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18RVVI-0003w6-00; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 04:44:40 -0600 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 6FD2326BAA; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 11:43:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 520E72362B; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 11:44:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 11:44:33 +0100 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=E1s?= Lichtmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: O: jpeginfo -- Prints information and tests integrity of JPEG/JFIF files. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-MIA-Summary: Orphaning: jpeginfo Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: normal The old maintainer of jpeginfo, Nicolás Lichtmaier (nick), is apparently not active anymore. This package is thus being orphaned now. If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- retitle this bug from 'O:' to 'ITA:', fix the outstanding bugs and upload a new version with your name in the Maintainer: field and a * New maintainer (Closes: #thisbug) in the changelog so this bug is closed. Some information about this package: Package: jpeginfo Binary: jpeginfo Version: 1.5a-1.1 Priority: optional Section: graphics Maintainer: Nicolás Lichtmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Build-Depends: debhelper, libjpeg62-dev Architecture: any Standards-Version: 3.0.1 Format: 1.0 Directory: pool/main/j/jpeginfo Files: d7836a178b82e7952aafac763917d96f 624 jpeginfo_1.5a-1.1.dsc 380068d145efe3b2f738a3e971cce26f 61454 jpeginfo_1.5a.orig.tar.gz 7b21e5f2d385630b20153d412f3dc5aa 20646 jpeginfo_1.5a-1.1.diff.gz Package: jpeginfo Priority: optional Section: graphics Installed-Size: 68 Maintainer: Nicolás Lichtmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: i386 Version: 1.5a-1.1 Depends: libc6 (= 2.2.3-1), libjpeg62 Filename: pool/main/j/jpeginfo/jpeginfo_1.5a-1.1_i386.deb Size: 11140 MD5sum: 7da098c2b10ca651bc7f4c195043cdcd Description: Prints information and tests integrity of JPEG/JFIF files. jpeginfo can be used to generate informative listings of jpeg files, and also to check jpeg files for errors. It can also detect broken jpeg and delete them automatically. [ Justification: he has not been seen for months. He was last seen on Debian lists in Oct 2001; he was on ICQ but isn't anymore. I hope you're well, Nick. ] -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 174340-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2003 22:53:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 04 16:53:43 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18UxAl-0002O5-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 16:53:43 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18Ux4x-0007jK-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 17:47:43 -0500 From: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.29 $ Subject: Bug#174340: fixed in jpeginfo 1.6.0-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 17:47:43 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of jpeginfo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: jpeginfo_1.6.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/j/jpeginfo/jpeginfo_1.6.0-1.diff.gz jpeginfo_1.6.0-1.dsc to pool/main/j/jpeginfo/jpeginfo_1.6.0-1.dsc jpeginfo_1.6.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/j/jpeginfo/jpeginfo_1.6.0-1_i386.deb jpeginfo_1.6.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/j/jpeginfo/jpeginfo_1.6.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If
Bug#162159: Upstream is well debianized already
The upstream offers a .deb for download and the source is quite well debianized, builds cleanly (although I don't have a pbuilder to make a real test.) It should take very few effort to get workrave into debian, albeit it might make sense to wait for the next release which includes system tray support, more translations etc. Johannes -- ~/.signature under construction
Bug#175373: ITP: whatsnewfm -- A utility to filter the daily newsletter from freshmeat.net
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2003-01-05 Severity: wishlist Package name: whatsnewfm Version : 0.6.0-2 Upstream Author : Christian Garbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://www.cgarbs.de/whatsnewfm.en.html License : GPL Description : A utility to filter the daily newsletter from freshmeat.net whatsnewfm is a utility to filter the daily newsletter from freshmeat.net The main purpose is to cut the huge newsletter to a smaller size by only showing items that you didn't see before. The items already seen will be stored in a database. After some time, the items expire and will be shown again the next time they are included in a newsletter. If you find an item that you consider particularly useful, you can add it to a hot list. Items in the hot list are checked for updates so that you don't miss anything about your favourite programs. Debian packages are available here (it's already finished): http://home.t-online.de/home/dietmar.garbs/download/whatsnewfm/0.6.0/ I'm going to look for a sponsor on -mentors. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux yggdrasil 2.4.20 #4 Sam Dez 14 23:07:47 CET 2002 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#175266: ITP: dchroot -- Tools for creating and maintaining chroots on Debian machines.
In the future I'd like to add some scripts that make creating various chroots painless (call to debootstrap perhaps excluding certain packages, mount -o bind, symlinks for /etc/resolve.conf and friends, etc.) I keep a variety of chroots on my machines at home and I'd like to make it simple for others to do the same. I'd rather like creation scripts integrated with pbuilder, so that we have some integrated environment, if pbuilder sources and its configuration files are doing fine... I'd rather not, as those scripts can be useful outside of pbuilder too. In fact, pbuilder already does the job of creating a chroot image, so it should really be trivial. If it is useful without pbuilder, it can be split up, but I don't see much value in splitting it up, because it is so small. regards, junichi.
