Bug#198125: ITP: gtk-industrial-engine -- Flat-looking GTK engine from Ximian

2003-06-20 Thread Josselin Mouette 
Le ven 20/06/2003 à 05:42, Marc Wilson a écrit :
> Please do, for those of us still using GTK1 applications that want a
> consistent look.
> 
> Not all GTK applications are Gnome ones. :)

I did, see http://people.debian.org/~joss/packages/

Thanks for your interest,
-- 
 .''`.   Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée

Bug#198125: ITP: gtk-industrial-engine -- Flat-looking GTK engine from Ximian

2003-06-20 Thread Marc Wilson 
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 12:15:48AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I'm not sure I will package the GTK1 stuff, as we have very little Gnome
> software still using it in sid.

Please do, for those of us still using GTK1 applications that want a
consistent look.

Not all GTK applications are Gnome ones. :)

-- 
 Marc Wilson | Non-Reciprocal Laws of Expectations: Negative
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | expectations yield negative results.  Positive
 | expectations yield negative results.

Bug#198260: ITP: streamtuner -- A GUI audio stream directory browser

2003-06-20 Thread Ari Pollak 
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-20
Severity: wishlist

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

* Package name: streamtuner
  Version : 0.9.1
  Upstream Author : Jean-Yves Lefort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.nongnu.org/streamtuner
* License : GPL
  Description : A GUI audio stream directory browser

 Streamtuner is a stream directory browser. It offers an
 intuitive and unified interface to various streaming
 directories through the use of a plugin system.
 
 Current plugins included in this package are:
 - SHOUTcast

 More information and plugins can be found at:
 

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux darth 2.4.21 #1 Fri Jun 13 20:06:05 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+87QbwO+u47cOQDsRAtF9AJ9hhpKwb+pXDOIhQHdAwVztXedpZwCgg939
DnQA/buvr5U+6pzsttFTIoA=
=PZTZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#195370: marked as done (ITA: pilot-link)

2003-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jun 2003 19:32:34 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#195370: fixed in pilot-link 0.11.7-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 May 2003 07:24:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 30 02:24:25 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.dslextreme.com (co1.dslextreme.com) [66.51.205.17] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19LeFV-JP-00; Fri, 30 May 2003 02:24:25 -0500
Received: from drteeth (adsl-66.218.46.206.dslextreme.com [66.218.46.206])
by co1.dslextreme.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4U7JvLO001132;
Fri, 30 May 2003 00:19:59 -0700
Received: from bdarnell by drteeth with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19LeHO-0006wK-00; Fri, 30 May 2003 00:26:22 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Darnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: pilot-link
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 00:26:22 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Ben Darnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-30
Severity: normal

The core tools work just fine, although the language bindings have been
kinda tricky to build.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux drteeth 2.4.20-bf2.4 #1 Wed Dec 25 13:17:08 UTC 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 195370-close) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2003 23:39:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 20 18:39:25 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19TVTZ-0004xM-00; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:39:25 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19TVMw-0002Aj-00; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 19:32:34 -0400
From: Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $
Subject: Bug#195370: fixed in pilot-link 0.11.7-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 19:32:34 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pilot-link, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libpda-pilot-perl_0.11.7-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pilot-link/libpda-pilot-perl_0.11.7-4_i386.deb
libpisock++0_0.11.7-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pilot-link/libpisock++0_0.11.7-4_i386.deb
libpisock-dev_0.11.7-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pilot-link/libpisock-dev_0.11.7-4_i386.deb
libpisock8_0.11.7-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pilot-link/libpisock8_0.11.7-4_i386.deb
libpisync0_0.11.7-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pilot-link/libpisync0_0.11.7-4_i386.deb
pilot-link_0.11.7-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/pilot-link/pilot-link_0.11.7-4.diff.gz
pilot-link_0.11.7-4.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pilot-link/pilot-link_0.11.7-4.dsc
pilot-link_0.11.7-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pilot-link/pilot-link_0.11.7-4_i386.deb
python-pisock_0.11.7-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pilot-link/python-pisock_0.11.7-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated pilot-link package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 00:04:20 +0200
Source: pilot-link
Binary: libpda-pilot-perl libpisock8 pilot-link libpisock++0 libpisync0 
python-pisock libpisock-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.11.7-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: L

Bug#164483: replace this with simpleTAL?

2003-06-20 Thread Bastian Kleineidam 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I have never used python-tal, but simpleTAL[1] instead. It is written
from the ground up and has almost all features of the Zope TAL.
[1] http://www.owlfish.com/software/simpleTAL/

So I suggest
a) package python-simpletal
b) drop python-tal, people can either use the complete Zope packge
   or simpleTAL.

Any opinions?

Ciao,
- -- 
  .~.Bastian Kleineidam  .  calvin (at) debian.org
  /V\
 /( )\  GnuPG Schlüssel http://kampfwurst.net/gpgkey.txt
 ^^-^^

F: Was hat vier Beine und einen Arm?
A: Ein glücklicher Pitbull-Terrier

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+82jreBwlBDLsbz4RAvjBAJ9JLNjwIqHfHbkZaB1hCE9IbCMR0gCgqjsi
pitAOPga5Z9BnBahRVtPw8w=
=KMP1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#197523: ITA: worker -- Highly configurable two-paned file manager for X

2003-06-20 Thread Rick Younie 
Tobias Toedter wrote:
> Hi Rick,
> 
> I would be interested in adopting the worker package from you. I already got 
> the latest upstream release and had a short look at it.
> 
> If you don't object, I will retitle your bug to ITA and do the packaging.
> 
> I'm not an official DD yet, but I already have a sponsor for my other debian 
> package - so if you don't have the time for sponsering me, it's certainly not 
> a problem to get my sponsor checking and uploading worker for me as well.

Hi Tobias.

Please do adopt it.  You should touch base with
Ralf and join the announce mailing list if you're
not on it.  Good to hear you have a sponsor.

Rick
--

Bug#197523: ITA: worker -- Highly configurable two-paned file manager for X

2003-06-20 Thread Tobias Toedter 
Hi Rick,

I would be interested in adopting the worker package from you. I already got 
the latest upstream release and had a short look at it.

If you don't object, I will retitle your bug to ITA and do the packaging.

I'm not an official DD yet, but I already have a sponsor for my other debian 
package - so if you don't have the time for sponsering me, it's certainly not 
a problem to get my sponsor checking and uploading worker for me as well.

Cheers,

-- 

Tobias

The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably
the day they start making vacuum cleaners.

Bug#191203: marked as done (ITA: sbuild -- Tool for building Debian binary packages from Debian sources)

2003-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:02:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#191203: fixed in sbuild 0.26
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2003 04:03:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 28 23:03:09 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net (pd5mo3so.prod.shaw.ca) 
[24.71.223.10] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19AMKi-0002cB-00; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:03:08 -0500
Received: from pd5mr4so.prod.shaw.ca
 (pd5mr4so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.168]) by l-daemon
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon,
 28 Apr 2003 22:00:42 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pn2ml7so.prod.shaw.ca
 (pn2ml7so-qfe0.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.121.151]) by l-daemon
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon,
 28 Apr 2003 22:00:42 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from def (h24-78-157-246.vc.shawcable.net [24.78.157.246])
 by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon,
 28 Apr 2003 22:00:42 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from rick by def with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19AMIK-dt-00; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:00:40 -0700
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:00:39 -0700
From: Rick Younie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: sbuild -- Tool for building Debian binary packages from Debian
sources
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-28
Severity: normal

I request an adopter for the sbuild package.
The package description is:
 sbuild is part of a suite of programs -- consisting of
 wanna-build, buildd and sbuild -- written by Roman Hodek and
 used by most architectures to build binary packages from source
 packages.  buildd schedules work from information it gets from
 wanna-build; sbuild does the grunt-work.
 .
 sbuild can do its work in chroots so both stable and unstable
 environments can be used on the same machine.  Useful for, say,
 building the latest unstable packages against stable library
 versions.  And by keeping only essential and build-essential
 in the chroots, you can find the correct build dependencies for
 a package.

I don't have time maintain sbuild properly; it deserves better.

The adopter should be a developer to check out the sbuilds on
the various buildd machines for improvements (they all vary a
bit) and should have decent bandwidth to fix the chroot building.
There are a debootstrap scripts for that at
  http://buildd.debian.org/buildd.chroot (for woody)
  http://buildd.debian.org/buildd.chroot.sarge (for sarge and sid)

It's probably time to make sbuild strictly a user tool and forget
about compatibility with buildd as it's too much of a headache.
Only a couple of us were using it with buildd anyhow.

Rick

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux def 2.4.20 #1 SMP Tue Jan 28 22:05:38 PST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US


---
Received: (at 191203-close) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2003 14:08:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 20 09:08:13 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19TMYm-0005FC-00; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:08:12 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19TMSz-0004sQ-00; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:02:13 -0400
From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $
Subject: Bug#191203: fixed in sbuild 0.26
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:02:13 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sbuild, which is due to be install

Processed: Fixed in NMU of sbuild 0.25

2003-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 191203 + fixed
Bug#191203: ITA: sbuild -- Tool for building Debian binary packages from Debian 
sources
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#198190: ITP: upx-ucl-beta -- an efficient live-compressor for executables (beta version)

2003-06-20 Thread Robert Luberda 
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-20
Severity: wishlist


Hi,

I intend to package an unstable (beta) version of upx.
This version supports compresing of the Linux kernel and thus 
can be used by our boot floppies team.


* Package name: upx-ucl-beta
  Version : 1.91
  Upstream Author : 
Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Laszlo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://upx.sourceforge.net (CVS repository)
* License : GPL
  Description : an efficient live-compressor for executables (beta version)
  .
  This is a beta version of UPX, the advanced executable file compressor.
  .
  Comparing to the stable version (available in upx-ucl and upx-nrv packages),
  this version e.g.:
   - has slightly better compression algorithm
   - supports bootable Linux kernels
   - support playstation exes
  and probably has a lot of known and unknown bugs, so please use it
  only for testing!
  .
  NOTE: This package is based on the UCL library, which is licensed under GPL.


Regards,

Robert

Bug#198125: ITP: gtk-industrial-engine -- Flat-looking GTK engine from Ximian

2003-06-20 Thread Josselin Mouette 
Le ven 20/06/2003 à 10:50, Mateusz Papiernik a écrit :
> > I'm not sure I will package the GTK1 stuff, as we have very little Gnome
> > software still using it in sid.
> 
> But there are some useful programs, which I think - should look the same as
> GTK2 programs. If you can, I think packaging gtk1 version is a good idea.

Oh, well. I don't like to add another not-very-useful package to the
archive, but I'll do that.
-- 
 .''`.   Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée

Bug#198125: ITP: gtk-industrial-engine -- Flat-looking GTK engine from Ximian

2003-06-20 Thread Mateusz Papiernik 
> I'm not sure I will package the GTK1 stuff, as we have very little Gnome
> software still using it in sid.

But there are some useful programs, which I think - should look the same as
GTK2 programs. If you can, I think packaging gtk1 version is a good idea.



Mati

Bug#198125: ITP: gtk-industrial-engine -- Flat-looking GTK engine from Ximian

2003-06-20 Thread Josselin Mouette 
Le ven 20/06/2003 à 00:15, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> * Package name: gtk-industrial-engine
>   Version : 0.2.26
>   Upstream Author : Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   Christopher Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://ftp.ximian.com/pub/xd2/redhat-9-i386/source/
>   (I will probably make my own tarball available 
>somewhere as it currently includes unrelated stuff
>and is provided only in srpm format.)
> * License : GPL
>   Description : Flat-looking GTK+ engine from Ximian

Sorry, the license is LGPL, not GPL.
-- 
 .''`.   Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée

Bug#198151: O: kforth -- Small Forth Interpreter Written in C++

2003-06-20 Thread Bdale Garbee 
Package: wnpp

I'm not using this version of Forth, and I'm not particularly fond of C++.

Since I have no intention of fixing the FTBFS bug currently open against the
package, I hereby orphan it... anyone who wants to hack on it, feel free to
adopt it, otherwise I will try to remember to request that it be removed from
the archive before sarge is released.

Bdale