Bug#204177: ITP: sec-rpc -- rpc-proxy that allows tunneling of nis and nfs over ssh
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-05 Severity: wishlist * Package name: sec-rpc Version : 1.5.2 Upstream Author : John Bowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.math.ualberta.ca/imaging/snfs/ * License : GPL Description : rpc-proxy that allows tunneling of nis and nfs over ssh ecure versions of the Network File System (SNFS) and Network Information System (SNIS) have now been implemented via SSH2 tunneling of UDP datagrams, as described in the SSH FAQ. This tunneling software is available for download under the GPL License: sec_rpc-1.52.tar.gz. This is a major enhancement of the original sec_rpc package developed by Holger Trapp. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux voyager 2.4.20-xfs #1 SMP Mit Jan 29 18:47:59 CET 2003 i586 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#163252: gswitchit available
Hi, I made gswitchit debs. Add this line to your sources.list: deb http://uid0.tuxfamily.org/debs/unstable ./ Cheers, Zygimantas. pgpu3vufy6xTL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#196200: Shouldn't we remove request-tracker from the archive ?
Quoting Pierre Machard [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-08-05 13:21:41 BST): Hello, I am sending you this e-mail because Jamie Wilkinson was interested by adopting request-tracker. It seems that Andrew Stribblehill and Stephen Quinney are already maintaining a package nammed request-tracker3. Could you confim that the package nammed request-tracker3 include the lastest release of request-tracker? If Yes, what do you think about asking for a remove of request-tracker? Yes, rt3 (request-tracker 3) is the latest version. However, its database schema is incompatible with that of rt2 so it can't just take over the package named request-tracker. I don't think rt2 should be removed just yet, because I expect more people use rt2 than rt3 still. I'm not totally decided, so please feel free to argue this with me ;) -- Andrew Stribblehill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems programmer, IT Service, University of Durham, England
Bug#196200: Shouldn't we remove request-tracker from the archive ?
Hello, I am sending you this e-mail because Jamie Wilkinson was interested by adopting request-tracker. It seems that Andrew Stribblehill and Stephen Quinney are already maintaining a package nammed request-tracker3. Could you confim that the package nammed request-tracker3 include the lastest release of request-tracker? If Yes, what do you think about asking for a remove of request-tracker? Thanks, -- Pierre Machard [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://debian.org GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 pgpZSpnQsxgmW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#196200: Shouldn't we remove request-tracker from the archive ?
This one time, at band camp, Pierre Machard wrote: Hello, I am sending you this e-mail because Jamie Wilkinson was interested by adopting request-tracker. It seems that Andrew Stribblehill and Stephen Quinney are already maintaining a package nammed request-tracker3. Could you confim that the package nammed request-tracker3 include the lastest release of request-tracker? If Yes, what do you think about asking for a remove of request-tracker? Matt Hope and myself are currently working on cleaning up the existing RT2 package, and are investigating ways to migrate between versions using the upstream migration scripts. There is a lot of functionality in RT2 that is not yet implemented in RT3, which many people rely on. It is not fair to a lot of RT2 users to forcefully upgrade them just yet. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~jaq
Bug#196200: Shouldn't we remove request-tracker from the archive ?
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:59:05PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: This one time, at band camp, Pierre Machard wrote: Hello, I am sending you this e-mail because Jamie Wilkinson was interested by adopting request-tracker. It seems that Andrew Stribblehill and Stephen Quinney are already maintaining a package nammed request-tracker3. Could you confim that the package nammed request-tracker3 include the lastest release of request-tracker? If Yes, what do you think about asking for a remove of request-tracker? Matt Hope and myself are currently working on cleaning up the existing RT2 package, and are investigating ways to migrate between versions using the upstream migration scripts. Oh? I have also been doing a bit of work, looking into how to package the upstream migration scripts. As there is the problem that RT2 and RT3 conflict on a number of files, I wondered about creating an rt2-to-rt3 package that contained the scripts and all the libraries it needs (both rt2 and rt3) but in a completely separate directory, such as /usr/share/rt2-to-rt3/. This means that someone could migrate with either of rt2 or rt3 installed on the machine There is a lot of functionality in RT2 that is not yet implemented in RT3, which many people rely on. It is not fair to a lot of RT2 users to forcefully upgrade them just yet. I agree with this completely, many people will want to keep running RT2 for sometime to come. I've heard of people still using RT1... Stephen Quinney
Bug#196200: Shouldn't we remove request-tracker from the archive ?
This one time, at band camp, Stephen Quinney wrote: On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:59:05PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: This one time, at band camp, Pierre Machard wrote: Hello, I am sending you this e-mail because Jamie Wilkinson was interested by adopting request-tracker. It seems that Andrew Stribblehill and Stephen Quinney are already maintaining a package nammed request-tracker3. Could you confim that the package nammed request-tracker3 include the lastest release of request-tracker? If Yes, what do you think about asking for a remove of request-tracker? Matt Hope and myself are currently working on cleaning up the existing RT2 package, and are investigating ways to migrate between versions using the upstream migration scripts. Oh? I have also been doing a bit of work, looking into how to package the upstream migration scripts. As there is the problem that RT2 and RT3 conflict on a number of files, I wondered about creating an rt2-to-rt3 package that contained the scripts and all the libraries it needs (both rt2 and rt3) but in a completely separate directory, such as /usr/share/rt2-to-rt3/. This means that someone could migrate with either of rt2 or rt3 installed on the machine I am currently investigating using the scripts as part of the postinstall; see a recent thread on debian-devel (or was it -mentors) between Matthew Palmer and Joey Hess regarding upgrades of database schemas in package upgrades, for some ideas on how it might work. I have nothing concrete yet. Anyway, I am currently looking at absorbing the old rt1 package that is also still around; providing a clean upgrade from rt1 to rt2 is a first step in unifying the packaging of this colourful and interesting software. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~jaq
Bug#173990: Are you still willing to package gnotime?
Hi Joe, Are you still willing to package gnotime? I've made a package for my own use and could help you if you currently don't have the time to package it. Regards, Goedson
Bug#201367: request for information sent to upstream
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have asked upstream if the SHIFT-AND patent protects agrep. Someone on d-mentors mentioned it. The upstream authors are not aware of any patent. I have also asked to drop the non-free license. The license will stay non-free. Kind regards Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE/L8TOAt+ECxtXDnwRAsvlAJwI8AJfY4X9vJuVAR+bHztW45XGVgCeMNvp ifYJzqx0L3+/dDns8HJNElw= =edTG -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#203894:
I use AIM and I use emacs, but I've never used TNT. I've no time to adopt TNT this month, however, if no one else steps forward, I'll adopt TNT in a few days
Bug#204263: ITP: gngeo -- NeoGeo emulator
Package: wnpp Version: reported 2003-08-05 Severity: wishlist * Package name: gngeo Version : 0.5.9a Upstream Author : M. Pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://m.peponas.free.fr/gngeo/ * License : GPL Description : NeoGeo emulator gngeo is an emulator for NeoGeo games, it runs with SDL library. Gamepad can be use to play the games. You MUST have a neo-geo bios rom stored on your system (in /usr/share/gngeo) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux evira 2.6.0-test1 #2 Mon Jul 14 18:56:06 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204263: ITP: gngeo -- NeoGeo emulator
Julien Delange wrote: Package: wnpp Version: reported 2003-08-05 Severity: wishlist * Package name: gngeo Version : 0.5.9a Upstream Author : M. Pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://m.peponas.free.fr/gngeo/ * License : GPL Description : NeoGeo emulator gngeo is an emulator for NeoGeo games, it runs with SDL library. Gamepad can be use to play the games. You MUST have a neo-geo bios rom stored on your system (in /usr/share/gngeo) if it's a file not managed by package management system shouldn't it be somewhere in /usr/local or /opt? (I mean the default location, I guess emulator allows to specify different location) erik
Processed: ITP - RFP
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 156614 RFP: cinelerra -- Audio and video production environment Bug#156614: ITP: heroine -- Complete audio and video production environm= Changed Bug title. thanks. Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#197365: sussen 0.5
We have released sussen 0.5 today. We've included the necessary Debian scripts to build a .deb archive with the source tarball. They are also available in our CVS repository. To build sussen now, you require: libgnomeui-dev libglade2-dev libgnet-dev libxslt1-dev libgda2-dev libgnomedb2-dev We also included a new build system with this release so hopefully any issues that were in 0.4 have been resolved. As always we are willing to work with any Debian developers to make sure these scripts work and get .debs available for your users. Let us know if we can be of assistance. -- Loren Bandiera, CISSP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Star Chamber Inc.
Bug#203894:
Hello, On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 02:49:03PM -0500, Vince Mulhollon wrote: I use AIM and I use emacs, but I've never used TNT. I've no time to adopt TNT this month, however, if no one else steps forward, I'll adopt TNT in a few days I made a qa upload of tnt last sunday. I fixed the very anoying problem which made tnt uninstalable. While preparing this upload, I took a look to upstream. It seems that the developement has been stalled for 2 years now. I don't really believe that it's usefull to take care of this package. Cheers, -- Pierre Machard [EMAIL PROTECTED] TuxFamily.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] techmag.info +33(0)668 178 365http://migus.tuxfamily.org/gpg.txt GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 pgpAciwprnrb3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#142762: Ping?
Hi again,
I wrote you back in April asking if you were still interested in
packaging IIP for Debian, and you said you were working on it. Its been
several more months, and I'd just like to check in again. I had made
my own working (and lintian clean) packages back then and I've now
uploaded them to mentors.debian.net. You can get the with apt with
deb{,src} http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main or on the web
at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/iip/.
I would like to do more work on these packages (to update them to the
latest policy, for example) but I don't want to step on your toes.
Would you be interested in co-maintaining IIP? I'm not yet a Debian
Developer, so I will need a sponsor in any case.
--
Steven Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Love is not enough, but it sure helps.
Get my GnuPG public key at: http://www.blckknght.org/publickey.asc
Fingerprint: 272A 3EC8 52CE F22B F745 775E 5292 F743 EBD5 936B
pgpF2Nw9Ze9bk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#204296: RFP: GRubik -- A 3D Rubik cube game
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-06 Severity: wishlist * Package name: GRubik Version : 1.16 Upstream Author : John Darrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/rubik/grubik.html * License : GPL-2 Description : A 3D Rubik cube game This is an OpenGL / GTK+ package which I have written. I've had positive feedback from the people who've looked at it so far. It's fully internationalised, has a number (5?) localisations. I'm not a DD, and am not currently able to commit to being one. However if a DD wants to become a maintainer of this package I will co-operate with him/her (eg upstream patches where needed). I have created an unofficial deb for this software, and you can get it from my website http://darrington.wattle.id.au/deb if you want to use that as a starting point. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux freyja.cellform.com 2.2.17 #1 Sun Jun 25 09:24:41 EST 2000 i?86 Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU
