Bug#231378: ITP: openggsn -- OpenSource Gateway GPRS Support Node (GGSN)
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: openggsn Version : 0.81 Upstream Author : Jens Jakobsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.openggsn.org/ * License : GPL Description : OpenSource Gateway GPRS Support Node (GGSN) OpenGGSN is a Gateway GPRS Support Node (GGSN). It is used by mobile operators as the interface between the Internet and the rest of the mobile network infrastructure. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux loon 2.4.24 #1 2004年 1月 19日 月曜日 18:52:08 JST i686 Locale: LANG=ja_JP.eucJP, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.eucJP
Bug#231335: O: pingus -- Free Lemmings(tm) clone
Hi Joerg,
Started the packaging. I incorporated spelling patches (#222152,
#226169), and reincorporated the one from bug #218970. This one has been
closed in the last upload, but does not appear in the sources or the
binary.
I also modified the package to use dpatch, as to avoid modifying files
directly. I backported all modifications to dpatch, except a few ones. I
would like to know if you can explain these to me.
Here are the files that are modified by the debian package:
pingus-0.6.0/aclocal.m4
pingus-0.6.0/config.guess
pingus-0.6.0/config.h.in
pingus-0.6.0/config.sub
pingus-0.6.0/configure
pingus-0.6.0/Makefile.in
Some of these modifications does not seem to affect the debian
compilation, so I would like to know if you can tell me more about
these. All I can see in your changelog that could be related to this
is:
Kick the config.{sub|guess} crap out of the rules file. Ask
Upstream to update his files and if they arent do that manually
for the package.
Cheers,
Raphael
Bug#231335: O: pingus -- Free Lemmings(tm) clone
Bonjour Vincent, Do you have an idea for bug #145424 ? I looked at it, and searched on the pingus mailing-lists. I only found a reference to clanlib possibly compiled with no good big endian support. A patch for clanlib is available on the pingus site. This is not confirmed however, so I'll look further on this. The best should be to try with a alternative clanlib package compiled with the patch, but I do not have a powerpc at hand. If you're willing to help, you're welcome. Cheers, Raphael
Bug#231335: O: pingus -- Free Lemmings(tm) clone
OoO En ce milieu de nuit étoilée du vendredi 06 février 2004, vers 04:15, Raphael Goulais [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait: I orphan this package now. Whoever wants it please take it. I'm willing to. Do you have an idea for bug #145424 ? -- panic(bad_user_access_length executed (not cool, dude)); 2.0.38 /usr/src/linux/kernel/panic.c pgpykyFVj59xJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#231335: O: pingus -- Free Lemmings(tm) clone
OoO En ce doux début de matinée du vendredi 06 février 2004, vers 08:21, Raphael Goulais [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait: The best should be to try with a alternative clanlib package compiled with the patch, but I do not have a powerpc at hand. If you're willing to help, you're welcome. I will fetch and try this patch. -- SILLY STRING IS NOT A NASAL SPRAY SILLY STRING IS NOT A NASAL SPRAY SILLY STRING IS NOT A NASAL SPRAY -+- Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode 5F12 pgpPybvXME35U.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#172189: OSG
On Sat, May 17, 2003, Ron wrote: Yes, my connectivity is a little sporadic at the moment, but I'm using this lib now so I'm certainly happy to get it packaged and uploaded. So, what is the status of this ITP? We use openscenegraph at work and having it in Debian would be handy. If any help is needed, please tell me; I can upload packages or help fixing issues or whatever can be done to speed things up. Regards, -- Sam.
Bug#231168: ITP: ocaml-headache -- tools to manage licence header of source files
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:01:45AM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: ocaml-headache Version : 1.02 Upstream Author : Vincent Simonet * URL : http://pauillac.inria.fr/~simonet/soft/ * License : GPL Description : tools to manage licence header of source files Why you should name this package ocaml-headache? AFAICT from the web page headache (upstream name) is supposed to work not only on ocaml source files but at least also on C source files. The fact that the package is implemented in ocaml should not be reflected in the package name IMO. Cheers. -- ^Stefano Zacchiroli - Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy$ ^ [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} http://www.bononia.it/zack $ ^Frequentando il mio maestro mi ero reso conto [.] che la logica poteva$ ^servire a molto a condizione di entrarci dentro e poi di uscirne -Adso$ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#208218: Nagios-plugins
Guido == Guido Trotter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guido On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 09:31:52AM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson Guido wrote: Hi, Is there any progress status on the nagios-plugins package(s)? I'd really (!!) like to have all netsaint stuff removed ASAP. Guido I know I'm late... I hope to make an upload on Guido sunday... (the 31st of january) Any progress? -- nitrate North Korea jihad Mossad 767 Delta Force assassination ammonium FBI killed smuggle Kennedy South Africa BATF class struggle [See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]
Bug#228673: sablevm-test-suite_0.1_i386.changes REJECTED
On Fri, 2004-02-06 at 03:27, Adam Majer wrote: I think that the biggest problem might be the description of the sablevm-test-suite Description : various java tools used to test SableVM JVM To assure SableVM is operating properly on wide range of platforms it is best if it can be tested easily, quickly, often and throughly. This package contains set of tools, partially specific to SableVM, which should help finding and diagnosing possible problems before they hit the users. Why do we need this in Debian? It seems from the description that sablevm-test-suite is something that is specific to SableVM and is used by the SableVM developers to prevent regression bugs, etc.. This is, indeed, the nub of the problem and the point of my enquiry. Could you explain why should this be in the archive? Who would use this package? This is what I wanted to know. I guess my REJECT message wasn't clear enough. I get the impression Grzegorz really doesn't want it integrated into the sablevm package and if the package really is of use to people other than JVM developers then okay. But if it *really* is just a jvm tester with no use to end-users, then it doesn't make sense to put it into Debian. D. -- Daniel Silverstone http://www.digital-scurf.org/ Hostmaster, Webmaster, and Chief Code Wibbler: Digital-Scurf Unlimited GPG Public key available from keyring.debian.org KeyId: 20687895
Bug#231335: O: pingus -- Free Lemmings(tm) clone
Raphael Goulais [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I orphan this package now. Whoever wants it please take it. I'm willing to. May I ask you why you orphan the package ? It needs some work and i dont have enough time and fun to do this. I already have a slave^H^H^H^H^H sponsor at hand, just in front of me at work, thanks. But if you want to be the sponsor for the first upload, just tell me, and I'll ask you that :) If you have one use him. -- bye Joerg (23:02) liw I should take a photograph of my stapler, the maker of which is RAPESCO
Bug#231335: O: pingus -- Free Lemmings(tm) clone
Raphael Goulais [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here are the files that are modified by the debian package:
pingus-0.6.0/aclocal.m4
pingus-0.6.0/config.guess
pingus-0.6.0/config.h.in
pingus-0.6.0/config.sub
pingus-0.6.0/configure
pingus-0.6.0/Makefile.in
Well, i asked Upstream to use AM_MAINTAINER_MODE in his auto* stuff,
but he thinks its good to rebuilt all those files again and again...
Kick the config.{sub|guess} crap out of the rules file. Ask
Upstream to update his files and if they arent do that manually
for the package.
Thats not related tho this.
Look at autotools-dev. I dont agree with this thing, so i removed the
rules for it.
They arent needed in 90% of the packages imo.
--
bye Joerg
miro Alfie: warum heist du jetzt eigentlich Rhonda?
maxx das ist heuer so mode...
Rhonda 17:07 Rhonda Nein, ich erklärs nicht schon wieder nicht
Rhonda 17:08 Rhonda 10mal nicht erklären muss genügen.
maxx Rhonda ist die Frühjahrskollektion von Alfie :)
Bug#181429: grubconf ITP
Hi! I'm one of the grub co-maintainers in debian. The pkg-grub project at alioth is set for maintainance of grub and grub-related packages (grub2, etc). Andreas, if you want to sponsor Luis' package, please do it within pkg-grub. Set Maintainer to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and everyone who applies in Uploaders. If you're otherwise too busy to sponsor grubconf, I can do it too (and probably Jason either). Luis, you made a debian-native package by mistake. This way we can't distinguish or keep track of the changes you made to upstream sources. Could you please fix that? -- Robert Millan [..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work. -- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion)
Processed: grubconf RFP
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: submitter 181429 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#181429: ITP: grubconf -- Gnome2 based GRUB configuration editor Changed Bug submitter from Grant Bowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#231417: ITP: libclass-prototyped-perl -- Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libclass-prototyped-perl Version : 0.98 Upstream Author : Toby Ovod-Everett [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~teverett/Class-Prototyped-0.98/ * License : GPL 1 (or greater) or Perl Artistic Description : Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl This package provides for efficient and simple prototype-based programming in Perl. You can provide different subroutines for each object, and also have objects inherit their behavior and state from another object. . The structure of an object is inspected and modified through *mirrors*, which are created by calling reflect on an object or class that inherits from Class::Prototyped. . The author says: 'When I reach for Class::Prototyped, it's generally because I really need it. When the cleanest way of solving a problem is for the code that uses a module to subclass from it, that is generally a sign that Class::Prototyped would be of use. If you find yourself avoiding the problem by passing anonymous subroutines as parameters to the new method, that's another good sign that you should be using prototype based programming. If you find yourself storing anonymous subroutines in databases, configuration files, or text files, and then writing infrastructure to handle calling those anonymous subroutines, that's yet another sign. When you expect the people using your module to want to change the behavior, override subroutines, and so forth, that's a sign'. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux wompom 2.6.0-1-686 #2 Sun Jan 11 16:59:17 EST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Bug#204453: marked as done (O: libastro-fits-header-perl - Perl tools for reading, modifying and writing FITS headers.)
Your message dated Fri, 06 Feb 2004 08:17:07 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#204453: fixed in libastro-fits-header-perl 2.8.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2003 12:52:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 07 07:52:15 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from womble.dur.ac.uk [129.234.2.142] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19kkFa-00088T-00; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 07:52:14 -0500 Received: from wompom (wompom.dur.ac.uk [129.234.2.63]) by womble.dur.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8E3FF30; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 13:52:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from sjq by wompom with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19kkFZ-0003uM-00; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 13:52:13 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stephen Quinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: O: libastro-fits-header-perl - Perl tools for reading, modifying and writing FITS headers. X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20 Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 13:52:13 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Stephen Quinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-07 Severity: normal As I no longer do astronomy, I do not have the time or interest to maintain this package, I am looking to focus on my remaining packages. It is in a reasonable state, I believe the upstream is still active. Stephen Quinney -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux wompom 2.4.20-3-686 #1 Sat Jun 7 22:34:55 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 204453-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2004 13:24:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 06 05:24:49 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Ap5yT-eH-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 05:24:49 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Ap5r1-0007jM-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 08:17:07 -0500 From: Michael Zehrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $ Subject: Bug#204453: fixed in libastro-fits-header-perl 2.8.1-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 08:17:07 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Source: libastro-fits-header-perl Source-Version: 2.8.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libastro-fits-header-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libastro-fits-header-perl_2.8.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/liba/libastro-fits-header-perl/libastro-fits-header-perl_2.8.1-1.diff.gz libastro-fits-header-perl_2.8.1-1.dsc to pool/main/liba/libastro-fits-header-perl/libastro-fits-header-perl_2.8.1-1.dsc libastro-fits-header-perl_2.8.1-1_all.deb to pool/main/liba/libastro-fits-header-perl/libastro-fits-header-perl_2.8.1-1_all.deb libastro-fits-header-perl_2.8.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/liba/libastro-fits-header-perl/libastro-fits-header-perl_2.8.1.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Zehrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libastro-fits-header-perl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 08:31:59 +0100 Source:
Bug#204458: marked as done (O: libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl - Perl extension for using the cfitsio library.)
Your message dated Fri, 06 Feb 2004 08:17:04 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#204458: fixed in libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl 1.01-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2003 13:02:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 07 08:02:03 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from womble.dur.ac.uk [129.234.2.142] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19kkP4-00010S-00; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 08:02:03 -0500 Received: from wompom (wompom.dur.ac.uk [129.234.2.63]) by womble.dur.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DA7FF30; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:02:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from sjq by wompom with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19kkP3-0003wX-00; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 14:02:01 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stephen Quinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: O: libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl - Perl extension for using the cfitsio library. X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20 Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 14:02:01 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Stephen Quinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-07 Severity: normal As I no longer do astronomy, I do not have the time or interest to maintain this package, I am looking to focus on my remaining packages. It is in a reasonable state, the upstream is still very much active. Stephen Quinney -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux wompom 2.4.20-3-686 #1 Sat Jun 7 22:34:55 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 204458-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2004 13:23:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 06 05:23:05 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Ap5wn-XG-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 05:23:05 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Ap5qy-0007iv-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 08:17:04 -0500 From: Michael Zehrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $ Subject: Bug#204458: fixed in libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl 1.01-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 08:17:04 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Source: libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl Source-Version: 1.01-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl_1.01-4.diff.gz to pool/main/liba/libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl/libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl_1.01-4.diff.gz libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl_1.01-4.dsc to pool/main/liba/libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl/libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl_1.01-4.dsc libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl_1.01-4_i386.deb to pool/main/liba/libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl/libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl_1.01-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Zehrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 08:07:00 +0100 Source: libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl Binary: libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.01-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer:
Bug#231417: ITP: libclass-prototyped-perl -- Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl
Stephen Quinney writes: Description : Fast prototype-based OO programming in Perl This package provides for efficient and simple prototype-based programming in Perl. You can provide different subroutines for each object, and also have objects inherit their behavior and state from another object. . The structure of an object is inspected and modified through *mirrors*, which are created by calling reflect on an object or class that inherits from Class::Prototyped. . The author says: 'When I reach for Class::Prototyped, it's generally because I really need it. When the cleanest way of solving a problem is for the code that uses a module to subclass from it, that is generally a sign that Class::Prototyped would be of use. If you find yourself avoiding the problem by passing anonymous subroutines as parameters to the new method, that's another good sign that you should be using prototype based programming. If you find yourself storing anonymous subroutines in databases, configuration files, or text files, and then writing infrastructure to handle calling those anonymous subroutines, that's yet another sign. When you expect the people using your module to want to change the behavior, override subroutines, and so forth, that's a sign'. I read this long description as similar to saying This animal looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck. If I am unfamiliar with ducks, it does not tell me why I would be interested in buying a duck. As background context, in my years of programming Perl, I have never found its prototyping capabilities wanting; I do not presently know why I would want this package. More specifically: The first paragraph describes coder-extensible OO, which is provided by standard Perl. The second is jargon-heavy but seems to describe reflection services similar to what is in Perl already. For both of these, how or why is it different than standard Perl? The third paragraph describes when the author uses his package, but it does not indicate why the package is particularly useful in those situations. It mentions two distinct activities (extending classes at code-authoring time and serialization of subroutines) without clearly stating why they are related to each other or to this package. Although it tells me more about why I might want this package than the first two paragraphs, I still don't know why I would install it. Michael
Bug#181429: grubconf ITP
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:32:25PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: Luis, you made a debian-native package by mistake. This way we can't distinguish or keep track of the changes you made to upstream sources. Could you please fix that? Sure thing, it had actually been a while since I packaged that first grubconf package. I'm re-doing it. I'll let you know once I'm done. Thanks! Luis
Bug#231430: ITP: yafray - yet another free raytracer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist I intend to package Yafray, a modern raytracer with a fairly advanced feature set, including radiosity and HDR backgrounds. License : LGPL URL or Web page : http://www.yafray.org -- -- Nick Rusnov -- http://nick.industrialmeats.com -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#211159: (no subject)
retitle 211159 ITP: dspam -- System wide spam filter thanks. I've already built a dspam package for my own use with exim, and at least for that limited purpose, it's working fine. For a real debian package, it still lacks some polishing (to meet policy requirements) and some tricky mechanism to support more than a single hard coded MDA. Unfortunately, upstream decided to hard-code nearly all config options at configure time, so it may or may not be possible to produce a versatile package for MDAs other than exim, or even with runtime configurable options...
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 211159 ITP: dspam -- System wide spam filter Bug#211159: RFP: dspam -- System wide spam filter Changed Bug title. thanks. Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#231458: O : imapfilter - filter mail in your IMAP account
Package: WNPP Version: 0.9.2-1 I am orphaning this package because I don't have time to work on it right now.
Bug#231457: O : limewire - a Java based gnutella servent
Package: WNPP Version: 3.4.5-2 I am orphaning this package because I don't have time to work on it right now.
Bug#231462: O: imapfilter - filter mail in your IMAP account
Package: WNPP Version: 0.9.2-1 I am orphaning this package because I don't have time to work on it right now.
Bug#202230: marked as done (O: xflip -- programs to mirror-image or melt your display.)
Your message dated Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:47:08 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#202230: fixed in xflip 1.01-19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2003 04:03:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 20 23:03:28 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19eRtV-0001IQ-00; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 23:03:25 -0500 Received: from bach (12-211-52-252.client.attbi.com[12.211.52.252](untrusted sender)) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id 20030721040324016002miobe; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 04:03:24 + Received: from tony by bach with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19eRnL-UM-00; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 20:57:03 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 From: tony mancill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: O: xflip -- programs to mirror-image or melt your display. X-Mailer: reportbug 2.19 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 20:57:03 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: tony mancill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-20 Severity: normal I intend to orphan the xflip package. There is no upstream (at least none that I'm aware of), so one day the nine year old source is probably going break. Hence, a knowledge of X programming may be of benefit, along with Imake. Other than that, the package is extremely simple. The package description is: Flip your (or your xhost + using friend's) screen on either the vertical or horizontal axis or melt away the graphics on your display. Both commands have a -planes option to independently act on individual bit planes. This version now comes with a new -oblic option which flips horizontally and vertically simultaneously. --- Received: (at 202230-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2004 18:53:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 06 10:53:23 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ApB6R-FF-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 10:53:23 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ApB0O-00071I-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:47:08 -0500 From: Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $ Subject: Bug#202230: fixed in xflip 1.01-19 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:47:08 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Source: xflip Source-Version: 1.01-19 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xflip, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xflip_1.01-19.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xflip/xflip_1.01-19.diff.gz xflip_1.01-19.dsc to pool/main/x/xflip/xflip_1.01-19.dsc xflip_1.01-19_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xflip/xflip_1.01-19_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xflip package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 19:21:40 +0100 Source: xflip Binary: xflip Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.01-19 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joachim Breitner [EMAIL
Bug#228232: marked as done (O: libwww-curl-perl -- Perl bindings to libcurl)
Your message dated Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:47:05 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#228232: fixed in libwww-curl-perl 2.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2004 14:43:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 17 06:43:26 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adsl-31-246.38-151.net24.it (raptus) [151.38.246.31] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AhrfZ-0007vM-00; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 06:43:26 -0800 Received: from cavok by raptus with local (Exim 4.30) id 1AhrfS-X8-LS; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:43:18 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: O: libwww-curl-perl -- Perl bindings to libcurl X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37 Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:43:18 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: normal Deedra has not enough time to care about her Debian packages, I'm orpahing them with her consent. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux raptus 2.6.1-reiser4+skas3 #1 SMP Fri Jan 9 17:03:05 CET 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 228232-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2004 18:53:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 06 10:53:03 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ApB67-CV-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 10:53:03 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ApB0L-000717-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:47:05 -0500 From: Michael Zehrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $ Subject: Bug#228232: fixed in libwww-curl-perl 2.0-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:47:05 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Source: libwww-curl-perl Source-Version: 2.0-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libwww-curl-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libwww-curl-perl_2.0-5.diff.gz to pool/main/libw/libwww-curl-perl/libwww-curl-perl_2.0-5.diff.gz libwww-curl-perl_2.0-5.dsc to pool/main/libw/libwww-curl-perl/libwww-curl-perl_2.0-5.dsc libwww-curl-perl_2.0-5_i386.deb to pool/main/libw/libwww-curl-perl/libwww-curl-perl_2.0-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Zehrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libwww-curl-perl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 09:39:00 +0100 Source: libwww-curl-perl Binary: libwww-curl-perl Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.0-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Perl Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael Zehrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libwww-curl-perl - Perl bindings to libcurl Closes: 228232 Changes: libwww-curl-perl (2.0-5) unstable; urgency=low . * Adopted orphaned package for Debian Perl Group (Closes: #228232) Files: d71e28cf565602d5d22ec216e466fc13 746 perl optional libwww-curl-perl_2.0-5.dsc 3df21cc449ca002a39d126129378b986
Bug#231168: ITP: ocaml-headache -- tools to manage licence header of source files
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 10:08:39AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:01:45AM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: ocaml-headache Version : 1.02 Upstream Author : Vincent Simonet * URL : http://pauillac.inria.fr/~simonet/soft/ * License : GPL Description : tools to manage licence header of source files Why you should name this package ocaml-headache? AFAICT from the web page headache (upstream name) is supposed to work not only on ocaml source files but at least also on C source files. The fact that the package is implemented in ocaml should not be reflected in the package name IMO. Cheers. Hello, ok no problem ;-). I will name it headache... I have no real reason to call it ocaml-headache... Regard Sylvain LE GALL
Bug#172189: OSG
So, what is the status of this ITP? We use openscenegraph at work and having it in Debian would be handy. If any help is needed, please tell me; I can upload packages or help fixing issues or whatever can be done to speed things up. Excellent question, which I also ponder the answer to. I'm a little pressed for time at the moment - staring out with a Master's degree and trying to do lots of other things at the same time - I will have to wait for things to settle own a little before I know if I will have enough time to devote to something like this. (At the moment I believe I won't have a lot.) The last time I looked at OSG's build process, a couple of things were missing, in the lines of sonames, etc, which needed to be sorted out with upstream before packaging could be finished. But that's about as much as I currently know about the package's status. Are there unofficial packages available? (I haven't checked recently.) If not, providing them should not be too much of a problem. Getting proper standards-compliant packages is what takes time. Regards, Hugo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#231458: orphaning my packages: limewire and imapfilter
retitle 231458 ITA: imapfilter - filter mail in your IMAP account thanks Touch down! :-) On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 11:36:33AM -0800, mbc wrote: I sent in my orphaning bug this morning, so go ahead and follow this procedure: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-adopting thanks! feel free to ask me any questions. I'm sure it's very out of date already. Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 10:14:12AM -0800, mbc wrote: Package: imapfilter (0.9.2-1) I'm interested into adoption. -- Francesco P. Lovergine
Bug#231473: RFP: php4-turck-mmcache -- PHP4 byte-compiler, cache, encoder and accelerator
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: php4-turck-mmcache Version : 2.4.6 Upstream Author : Dmitry Stogov [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://turck-mmcache.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPLv2 Description : PHP4 byte-compiler, cache, encoder and accelerator Turck MMCache is a free open source PHP accelerator, optimizer, encoder and dynamic content cache for PHP. It increases performance of PHP scripts by caching them in compiled state, so that the overhead of compiling is almost completely eliminated. Also it uses some optimizations to speed up execution of PHP scripts. Turck MMCache typically reduces server load and increases the speed of your PHP code by 1-10 times. Turck MMCache stores compiled PHP scripts in shared memory and execute code directly from it. It creates locks only for short time while search compiled PHP script in the cache, so one script can be executed simultaneously by several engines. Unlike php4-acs, this one seems to work ;-) It is running (non-packaged) here without problems. It is a must for squirrelmail-using sites with non-trivial loads... -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh
Processed: Re: orphaning my packages: limewire and imapfilter
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 231458 ITA: imapfilter - filter mail in your IMAP account Bug#231458: O : imapfilter - filter mail in your IMAP account Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: [tbm@cyrius.com: Re: orphaning my packages: limewire and imapfilter]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 231458 231462 Bug#231458: ITA: imapfilter - filter mail in your IMAP account Bug#231462: O: imapfilter - filter mail in your IMAP account Merged 231458 231462. retitle 231462 ITA: imapfilter - filter mail in your IMAP account Bug#231462: O: imapfilter - filter mail in your IMAP account Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Adopting the ident2 package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 195556 ITA: ident2 -- An advanced ident daemon Bug#195556: RFA: ident2 -- An advanced ident daemon Changed Bug title. owner 195556 ! Bug#195556: ITA: ident2 -- An advanced ident daemon Owner recorded as Chuan-kai Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED]. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#231462: marked as done (ITA: imapfilter - filter mail in your IMAP account)
Your message dated Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:47:03 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#231458: fixed in imapfilter 0.9.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2004 18:52:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 06 10:52:07 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from relay.pair.com [209.68.1.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ApB5D-Ao-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 10:52:07 -0800 Received: (qmail 49342 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2004 18:52:06 - Received: from adsl-67-124-221-61.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net (HELO debian.org) (67.124.221.61) by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 6 Feb 2004 18:52:06 - X-pair-Authenticated: 67.124.221.61 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 10:52:18 -0800 From: mbc [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: O: imapfilter - filter mail in your IMAP account Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Package: WNPP Version: 0.9.2-1 I am orphaning this package because I don't have time to work on it right now. --- Received: (at 231458-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2004 21:53:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 06 13:53:02 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ApDuI-0003s3-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:53:02 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ApDoV-0006cI-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:47:03 -0500 From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $ Subject: Bug#231458: fixed in imapfilter 0.9.5-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:47:03 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Source: imapfilter Source-Version: 0.9.5-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of imapfilter, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: imapfilter_0.9.5-1.diff.gz to pool/main/i/imapfilter/imapfilter_0.9.5-1.diff.gz imapfilter_0.9.5-1.dsc to pool/main/i/imapfilter/imapfilter_0.9.5-1.dsc imapfilter_0.9.5-1_i386.deb to pool/main/i/imapfilter/imapfilter_0.9.5-1_i386.deb imapfilter_0.9.5.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/i/imapfilter/imapfilter_0.9.5.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated imapfilter package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 22:25:13 +0100 Source: imapfilter Binary: imapfilter Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: imapfilter - filter mail in your IMAP account Closes: 231458 Changes: imapfilter (0.9.5-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release * New maintainer (closes: #231458) * Policy updated to 3.6.1 * README.Debian has been removed, being superfluous. * Copyright file revised. Files: 049bd211001f43cf994c17844074a859 608 mail optional imapfilter_0.9.5-1.dsc
Bug#231494: ITP: mlpcap -- binding of libpcap for OCaml
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: mlpcap Version : 0.7 Upstream Author : Jonathan Heusser [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.drugphish.ch/~jonny/mlpcap.html * License : GPL Description : binding of libpcap for OCaml MLpcap implements OCaml stubs to libpcap. It allows to call almost all function of libpcap from OCaml. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.1 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#231458: marked as done (ITA: imapfilter - filter mail in your IMAP account)
Your message dated Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:47:03 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#231458: fixed in imapfilter 0.9.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2004 18:26:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 06 10:26:27 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from relay.pair.com [209.68.1.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ApAgN-0004pl-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 10:26:27 -0800 Received: (qmail 28502 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2004 18:26:22 - Received: from adsl-67-124-221-61.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net (HELO riseup.net) (67.124.221.61) by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 6 Feb 2004 18:26:22 - X-pair-Authenticated: 67.124.221.61 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 10:26:33 -0800 From: lotus [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: O : imapfilter - filter mail in your IMAP account Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Package: WNPP Version: 0.9.2-1 I am orphaning this package because I don't have time to work on it right now. --- Received: (at 231458-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2004 21:53:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 06 13:53:02 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ApDuI-0003s3-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:53:02 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ApDoV-0006cI-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:47:03 -0500 From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $ Subject: Bug#231458: fixed in imapfilter 0.9.5-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:47:03 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Source: imapfilter Source-Version: 0.9.5-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of imapfilter, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: imapfilter_0.9.5-1.diff.gz to pool/main/i/imapfilter/imapfilter_0.9.5-1.diff.gz imapfilter_0.9.5-1.dsc to pool/main/i/imapfilter/imapfilter_0.9.5-1.dsc imapfilter_0.9.5-1_i386.deb to pool/main/i/imapfilter/imapfilter_0.9.5-1_i386.deb imapfilter_0.9.5.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/i/imapfilter/imapfilter_0.9.5.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated imapfilter package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 22:25:13 +0100 Source: imapfilter Binary: imapfilter Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: imapfilter - filter mail in your IMAP account Closes: 231458 Changes: imapfilter (0.9.5-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release * New maintainer (closes: #231458) * Policy updated to 3.6.1 * README.Debian has been removed, being superfluous. * Copyright file revised. Files: 049bd211001f43cf994c17844074a859 608 mail optional imapfilter_0.9.5-1.dsc
Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.
Dear friend, My name is Mr. Nozipo Pfupajena Chief Credit Officer (CCO), Standard Chartered Bank. On December 6, 1999, a Foreign consultant/contractor, Mr. Peter Smith, made a numbered time (Fixed) Deposit for twelve calendar months, valued at 30,000,000.00, in my branch. Upon maturity, I sent a routine notification to his forwarding address but got no reply. After a month, I sent a reminder and finally we discovered from his contract employers, that Mr. Smith died from an automobile accident. On further investigation, I found out that he died without making a Will, and all attempts to trace his next of kin was fruitless. I therefore made further investigation and discovered that Mr. Smith did not declare any next of kin or relations in all his official documents, including his Deposit paperwork here. From past experiences, I know that no one will ever come forward to claim the deceased funds. According to my country Laws, at the expiration of 5 (five) years, the funds will be Unclaimed and revert to the ownership of the State if nobody applies to claim the fund. In order to avert this development, I in conjunction with a colleague (the Chief Operating Officer in the bank) now seek your permission to allow an attorney do a backdated WILL in your name, so that the funds would be released to you as the new owner (on behalf of me and my colleague). We are writing you because, as public servants, we cannot operate a foreign account or have an account that is more than Five Hundred thousand in my country's currency. Consequently, I will present you as the owner of the funds so you can be able to claim them with the help of an attorney. This is simple. I will like you to provide immediately your: FULL NAMES/FULL CONTACT ADDRESS/PHONE/FAX NUMBERS, so that an Attorney will prepare the necessary papers which will put you in place as the new owner. It will then be released to you, for us to split. The Attorney will do all the paperwork and this will guarantee everything. Upon your response, I shall then provide you with more details and further explanation that will help you understand. Note also that we shall require your assistance to invest our share in your country. (Buying of properties like houses, hotels etc). Reach me via my email. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks and regards. Mr. Nozipo Pfupajena.
Bug#181429: grubconf ITP
Hey gang, I've fixed the package. Here's the new one: http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grubconf/grubconf-0.5-debian/ Let me know how this one is. Regards, Luis On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:32:25PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: Hi! I'm one of the grub co-maintainers in debian. The pkg-grub project at alioth is set for maintainance of grub and grub-related packages (grub2, etc). Andreas, if you want to sponsor Luis' package, please do it within pkg-grub. Set Maintainer to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and everyone who applies in Uploaders. If you're otherwise too busy to sponsor grubconf, I can do it too (and probably Jason either). Luis, you made a debian-native package by mistake. This way we can't distinguish or keep track of the changes you made to upstream sources. Could you please fix that? -- Robert Millan [..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work. -- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion)
Bug#172189: OSG
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 09:58:17PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote: So, what is the status of this ITP? We use openscenegraph at work and having it in Debian would be handy. If any help is needed, please tell me; I can upload packages or help fixing issues or whatever can be done to speed things up. The last time I looked at OSG's build process, a couple of things were missing, in the lines of sonames, etc, which needed to be sorted out with upstream before packaging could be finished. But that's about as much as I currently know about the package's status. This is the most major issue that will need to be sorted out afair too. Unfortunately upstream didn't seem too responsive to the idea of fixing it when I queried them about what we should do about it. For myself, the more I looked into the code itself, the more I saw similar issues elsewhere too, so I've been mainly exploring other options in preference to dealing with OSG's shortcomings at this stage. Are there unofficial packages available? (I haven't checked recently.) If not, providing them should not be too much of a problem. Getting proper standards-compliant packages is what takes time. There was a fellow on one of the OSG lists who was 'brute forcing' his local builds into binary .debs and he had a site somewhere he was uploading them to. But it certainly didn't take me very long to build some crude source packages out of it, however it is probably going to take someone collaborating with upstream before they can ever reach a state that I would consider minimally acceptable for even 'unofficial' distribution to other people. If someone wants to pick up that baton, they'd have my blessing to do so. cheers, Ron
