Processed: Re: ITA/co-adopt cplay
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 279367 ITA: cplay -- A front-end for various audio players Bug#279367: RFA: cplay -- A front-end for various audio players Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#279367: ITA/co-adopt cplay
retitle 279367 ITA: cplay -- A front-end for various audio players thanks [Martin Michlmayr] > I'd be happy if you'd maintain cplay (and I can sponsor you). The > onl question I really have is how good your Python is (afaik you > aren't a big Python fan). Thanks for the offer - I'm retitling the bug now. It can always be changed back, after all. (: I don't see any high-priority bugs in the package, so I don't know whether it would be useful to do an upload solely for the sake of changing the maintainer address, or if it would be better to wait until there's a real reason to upload. I suppose with a small package, which is also Architecture: all, a useless upload doesn't do much harm. You are correct, I'm not a big python fan. I do know some python, and in my limited experience so far, it seems to be quite easy to pick up. I'm confident that I know enough to not make stupid mistakes, and when faced with maintainer decisions that require more proficiency, I'm confident I can learn it. Peter signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#280209: ITP: codeville -- More anarchic revision control system
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 09:13:23PM -0600, Michael Janssen wrote: > * Package name: codeville > Version : 0.1.9 > Upstream Author : Ross Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://www.codeville.org > * License : Open Software License 2.0 I presume that this is going in non-free, as the OSL 2.0 appears to have DFSG problems. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00118.html - Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#277913: marked as done (RFP: ksetispy -- Status monitor / Cache handler / Tray tool for setiathome)
Your message dated Mon, 08 Nov 2004 09:06:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing RFP ksetispy has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2004 10:48:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 23 03:48:05 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rfhs0023.fh-regensburg.de [194.95.104.23] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CLJRM-0008Hy-00; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 03:48:05 -0700 Received: (qmail 15788 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2004 10:47:57 - Received: from unknown (HELO rfhs0023.fh-regensburg.de) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2004 10:47:57 - Received: from [192.168.1.1] (rx2417.cip.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.248.220]) by rfhs0023.fh-regensburg.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9NAlqZB015753; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:47:56 +0200 (MEST) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Tobias Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RFP: ksetispy -- Status monitor / Cache handler / Tray tool for setiathome X-Mailer: reportbug 3.0 Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:47:58 +0200 X-PMX-Version: 4.7.0.111621, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.1.0, Antispam-Data: 2004.10.22.2 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=III, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0' Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: ksetispy Version : 0.6.3 Upstream Author : Roberto Virga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://ksetispy.sf.net * License : OSI Approved :: GNU General Public License (GPL) Description : Status monitor / Cache handler / Tray tool for setiathome KSetiSpy is a KDE utility that monitors the progress of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] client, and displays all kinds of information about the work unit(s) being processed. It uses the same interface as SETI Spy, a popular Windows utility. I already packed 0.6.1 for private use, but I'm not a debian maintainer. If any questions arise or help is needed, please contact me. ( tobi _at_ coldtobi.de ) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 277913-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2004 08:07:32 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 08 00:07:32 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from fmmailgate05.web.de [217.72.192.243] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CR4Yl-0002fG-00; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 00:07:31 -0800 Received: by fmmailgate05.web.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/webde Linux 0.7) with SMTP id iA886W7K021688 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:06:59 +0100 Received: from 132.199.213.2 by freemailng1402.web.de with HTTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 09:06:57 +0200 Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 09:06:57 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Tobias Frost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing RFP ksetispy Precedence: fm-user X-WEBDE-Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: http://freemail.web.de/ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="STEFAN418f2923714a" Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This is a MIME encoded message. --STEFAN418f2923714a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! I just received a mail from the upstream author (see attachment, sorry it's German) This mail states, that setiathome will continue with another client, not compatible to the current clients. There's a statement from the seti site: "Once [EMAIL PROTECTED]/BOINC is running smoothly and versions are available
Bug#278923: Team
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 01:15:00AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Hi > > Just for the record: > We are now a group of maintainers for nagios, preparing a new upload. > Needs a few days until its finished, as its a complete restructure of > the nagios packages, so please be patient. Eh, is it a good idea to do a complete restructure so close to release? Of course, I do not know in how far you're 'restructuring', but any major change runs the risk of introducing new bugs, and it'd be unfortunate if one of those bugs is too late discovered to be fixed for sarge. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
Bug#280208: marked as done (O: qmailadmin)
Your message dated Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:33:18 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#280208: O: qmailadmin has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2004 02:39:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 07 18:39:59 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from moya.zyxel.no [212.125.177.50] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CQzRn-0008UH-00; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 18:39:59 -0800 Received: from [217.199.59.230] (helo=[10.0.0.3] ident=lompefjes) by moya.zyxel.no with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CQzAO-0001bw-00; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 03:22:00 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Christer Mjellem Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: O: qmailadmin Bcc: Christer Mjellem Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 03:39:54 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: normal It would seem this package needs to be orphaned. There has been no apparent work done on it since it's initial release over a year ago, even though there have been many upstream releases since then. New upstream versions would also close all currently reported bugs, and yet the package hasn't been upgraded, ref. #235778 & #242806 Can you check up on the maintainer to see if he's still interested? Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 280208-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2004 09:33:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 08 01:33:33 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.34.218] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CR5u1-0007EI-00; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 01:33:33 -0800 Received: from jeroen by A-Eskwadraat.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CR5tm-0001lm-00; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 10:33:18 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:33:18 +0100 To: Christer Mjellem Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Sam Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#280208: O: qmailadmin Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 03:39:54AM +0100, Christer Mjellem Strand wrote: > It would seem this package needs to be orphaned. There has been no > apparent work done on it since it's initial release over a year ago, > even though there have been many upstream releases since then. New > upstream versions would also close all currently reported bugs, and > yet the package hasn't been upgraded, ref. #235778 & #242806 > > Can you check up on the maintainer to see if he's still interested? Of course, but such a request is not done by just orphaning his package, but by asking on debian-qa, for example. Only orphan a package _after_ you've concluded the maintainer shows no reaction. It's also polite to at least cc the maintainer when you orphan his package, so he knows you've done so, in stead of only when someone goes to much efforts to take it over, and then discovers it's an hijack after all. In the past, the maintainer wrote: | I have a 1.2.1 package, but it doesn't compile. Nor does the one at | http://www.rnd-software.com/debian/ for that matter. If someone interested in qmail wants to NMU the package towards the newest version, he is hereby invited to do so. Sam, pleas
Processed: Re: Postgis package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 146051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#146051: ITP: postgis -- Library that adds support for geographic objects to PostgreSQL Changed Bug submitter from Giuseppe Sacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Re: Postgis package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 146051 Giuseppe Sacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#146051: ITP: postgis -- Library that adds support for geographic objects to PostgreSQL Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Giuseppe Sacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > owner 146051 Roberto Boati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#146051: ITP: postgis -- Library that adds support for geographic objects to PostgreSQL Owner recorded as Roberto Boati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#278923: Team
Am 8.11.2004 schrieb "Jeroen van Wolffelaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 01:15:00AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: >> Hi >> Just for the record: >> We are now a group of maintainers for nagios, preparing a new upload. >> Needs a few days until its finished, as its a complete restructure of >> the nagios packages, so please be patient. >Eh, is it a good idea to do a complete restructure so close to release? >Of course, I do not know in how far you're 'restructuring', but any >major change runs the risk of introducing new bugs, and it'd be >unfortunate if one of those bugs is too late discovered to be fixed for >sarge. I know that we try to release, but IMO it is better to do this know than to release with the old packaging, as that had a lot of things I dont want to release with. Yes, there is the risk for new bugs, i know that, I simply hope that we get it in a shape that fits for sarge. The current thing has to many (mostly unreported) things in it.
Bug#280209: ITP: codeville -- More anarchic revision control system
> * Package name: codeville > Version : 0.1.9 > Upstream Author : Ross Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://www.codeville.org > * License : Open Software License 2.0 > Description : More anarchic revision control system > > Codeville is a new version control system. > > All other version control systems require that you keep careful track > of the relationships between branches so as not have to repeatedly > merge the same conflicts. Codeville is much more anarchic. It allows > you to update from or commit to any repository at any time with no > unnecessary re-merges. > > Codeville works by creating an identifier for each change which is > done, and remembering the list of all changes which have been applied > to each file and the last change which modified each line in each > file. When there's a conflict, it checks to see if one of the two > sides has already been applied to the other one, and if so makes the > other side win automatically. When there's an actual not automatically > mergeable version conflict, Codeville behaves in almost exactly the > same way as CVS. From the description, it sounds a lot like Subversion. How does Codeville improve upon Subversion? This is not a challenge; it is just a question. Please copy your reply to me. Good luck with Codeville. It sounds like a good package. pgpHNmjBuR2YD.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#195948: cgi config problems for the packaging work that I did
As it stands, the dspam cgis look in their current directory (/var/www/dspam/) for the "admins", and "default.prefs" files, whereas I have packaged these under /etc/dspam/. The proper thing to do, is to fix up admin.cgi and dspam.cgi so that they look in the config directory for these config files (and probably send to upstream, but I'm not sure if jonz feels the same way about this sort of thing - if you make it a configure time option, and set the default to the cgi directory, my hunch is he'll be happy with that).. I have already made some compile-time changes to these files, so the change is trivial. Meanwhile, this will work around the problem.. # ln -s /etc/dspam/default.prefs /var/www/dspam/ # ln -s /etc/dspam/admins /var/www/dspam/ Tim.
Bug#279367: ITA/co-adopt cplay
* Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-08 00:15]: > package, so I don't know whether it would be useful to do an upload > solely for the sake of changing the maintainer address, or if it would > be better to wait until there's a real reason to upload. I suppose > with a small package, which is also Architecture: all, a useless upload I wouldn't bother for now; just subscribe to the PTS and start looking at the existing bugs. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/
Processed: Re: Bug#280209: ITP: codeville -- More anarchic revision control system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 280209 ITP: codeville -- More anarchic revision control system > [non-free] Bug#280209: ITP: codeville -- More anarchic revision control system Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#280209: ITP: codeville -- More anarchic revision control system
retitle 280209 ITP: codeville -- More anarchic revision control system [non-free] thanks On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:00:20PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 09:13:23PM -0600, Michael Janssen wrote: > > * Package name: codeville > > Version : 0.1.9 > > Upstream Author : Ross Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * URL : http://www.codeville.org > > * License : Open Software License 2.0 > > I presume that this is going in non-free, as the OSL 2.0 appears to have > DFSG problems. > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00118.html > > - Matt Apparently so. Man, you'd expect with a name like "Open Software License" it would pass DFSG. Thanks for the heads-up. -- Michael Janssen --- Jamuraa --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#280313: ITP: openguides -- A web application for managing a collaboratively-written city guide
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: openguides Version : 0.43 Upstream Author : The OpenGuides Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://openguides.org/ * License : Dual GPL/Artistic Description : A web application for managing a collaboratively-written city guide The OpenGuides software provides the framework for a collaboratively-written city guide. It is similar to a wiki but provides somewhat more structured data storage allowing you to annotate wiki pages with information such as category, location, and much more. It provides searching facilities including "find me everything within a certain distance of this place". Every page includes a link to a machine-readable (RDF) version of the page. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (10, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.ISO-8859-15
Bug#280319: ITP: libdbix-fulltextsearch-perl -- Indexing documents with MySQL as storage
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libdbix-fulltextsearch-perl Version : 0.73 Upstream Author : T.J. Mather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-FullTextSearch/ * License : Dual GPL/Artistic Description : Indexing documents with MySQL as storage DBIx::FullTextSearch is a flexible solution for indexing contents of documents. It uses the MySQL database to store the information about words and documents and provides Perl interface for indexing new documents, making changes and searching for matches. For DBIx::FullTextSearch, a document is nearly anything -- Perl scalar, file, Web document, database field. . The basic style of interface is shown above. What you need is a MySQL database and a DBI with DBD::mysql. Then you create a DBIx::FullTextSearch index -- a set of tables that maintain all necessary information. Once created it can be accessed many times, either for updating the index (adding documents) or searching. . DBIx::FullTextSearch uses one basic table to store parameters of the index. Second table is used to store the actual information about documents and words, and depending on the type of the index (specified during index creation) there may be more tables to store additional information (like conversion from external string names (eg. URL's) to internal numeric form). For a user, these internal thingies and internal behaviour of the index are not important. The important part is the API, the methods to index document and ask questions about words in documents. However, certain understanding of how it all works may be useful when you are deciding if this module is for you and what type of index will best suit your needs. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (10, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.ISO-8859-15
Bug#280318: ITP: libcgi-wiki-perl -- A toolkit for building Wikis
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libcgi-wiki-perl Version : 0.61 Upstream Author : Kake Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/CGI-Wiki/ * License : Dual GPL/Artistic Description : A toolkit for building Wikis Helps you develop Wikis quickly by taking care of the boring bits for you. You will still need to write some code - this isn't an instant Wiki. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (10, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.ISO-8859-15
Bug#280324: ITP: freemind -- A Java Program for creating and viewing Mindmaps
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: freemind Version : 0.7.1 Upstream Author : Christian Foltin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://freemind.sf.net/ * License : GPL Description : A Java Program for creating and viewing Mindmaps Hi, the package does already exist actually (see http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/FreeMind_on_Linux for details), I'm the maintainer of the package for the FreeMind project and I'd like to have it in the official Debian repository (contrib Section). I'm not yet a Debian developer, going through the documentation and the process of becoming one. Cheers, Eric -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8
Processed: Re: Let's remove ksmp3play
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 273704 ftp.debian.org Bug#273704: O: ksmp3play -- Curses-based MP3 player Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'. > retitle 273704 Please remove ksmp3play Bug#273704: O: ksmp3play -- Curses-based MP3 player Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#273704: Let's remove ksmp3play
reassign 273704 ftp.debian.org retitle 273704 Please remove ksmp3play thanks * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-08 12:54]: > I think we can do without ksmp3play. It seems to have a truckload of > functional bugs open against it, and we have similiar packages like > mp3blaster. I agree (I also filed several bugs on it years ago). RoQA; orphaned, upstream was Debian developer, no development for years -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/
Bug#228074: ITA: plr -- Procedural Language interface between PostgreSQL and R
Note to potential adopters: PostgreSQL 8.0 will provide a small build infrastructure for plugin modules, and I believe the plr author is already working on equipping his package for that. This should help all those packages that currently need a full PostgreSQL source tree for building. So you might want to wait for PostgreSQL 8.0 and the new plr before you proceed.
Bug#280327: ITP: wwwstat -- httpd logfile analysis package
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: wwwstat Version : 2.0 Upstream Author : Roy Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/websoft/wwwstat/ * License : Artistic Description : httpd logfile analysis package wwwstat processes a sequence of httpd Common Logfile Format access_log files and prior summary outputs, and then outputs a summary of the access statistics in a nice HTML format. . splitlog processes a sequence of httpd Common Logfile Format access_log files (or CLF with a one-field prefix) and splits the entries into separate files according to the requested URL and/or vhost prefix. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Bug#186163: RFP: xyzzy -- Xyzzy is the historical command that prints "Twice as much happens!"
The given URL http://xyzzy.sourceforge.net/ does not exist. Do you know where the software is available?
Bug#241235: November Biotech Equipment Sale Items
Lab Centraal B.V. www.labcentraal.com November Sale Items (Click links for more information and pricing) Qiagen Biorobot 8000 Liquid Handling System Biomek FX Laboratory Automation Workstation B. Bruan SIGMA 4K 15 Refrigerated Benchtop Centrifuge MWG Biotech MicroArrayer Affymetrix GMS 417 Millipore Milli-Q Biocel Ultrapure Water Purification System Shimadzu 10A (HPLC) Liquid Chromatography System Pharm-Assist F Range Isolator With Steris VHP 1000E Biodecontamination System Sanyo MLS-3020U Upright 300x670mm Autoclave Lab Centraal B.V. was established to service the Earth's growing Biotechnology communities. If you have received this in error or wish to be removed from this list kindly send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lab Centraal B.V. Postbus 312 2000 AH Haarlem, The Netherlands Phone: +31 23 531 4979 Fax: +31 23 532 5357 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#279519: marked as done (ITA: linux32 -- Wrapper to set the execution domain)
Your message dated Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:47:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#279519: fixed in linux32 1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2004 14:41:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 03 06:41:14 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 233pc233.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [131.211.233.233] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CPMK2-0006jr-00; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 06:41:14 -0800 Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CPMHp-ia-00; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 15:38:57 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Debbugs-CC: Chris G. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: O: linux32 -- Wrapper to set the execution domain X-MIA-Summary: Orphaning: linux32 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 15:38:57 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: normal The current maintainer of linux32, Chris G. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed instructions how to adopt a package properly. Some information about this package: Package: linux32 Binary: linux32 Version: 1-1 Priority: extra Section: utils Maintainer: Chris G. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: debmake Architecture: i386 amd64 ia64 s390 s390x sparc sparc64 ppc Standards-Version: 3.5.10.0 Format: 1.0 Directory: pool/main/l/linux32 Files: 71cd8adbb7c858ff49d3fdd9f872291e 681 linux32_1-1.dsc 42d1ba563d7c7e88b80dcabd07840eb0 1585 linux32_1.orig.tar.gz 95b46a35e053a61a2e7efe1d2cdfe7a3 2185 linux32_1-1.diff.gz Package: linux32 Priority: extra Section: utils Installed-Size: 68 Maintainer: Chris G. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: i386 Version: 1-1 Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1) Filename: pool/main/l/linux32/linux32_1-1_i386.deb Size: 4548 MD5sum: d7962a83fc90ec7f35b9f4ac4cab47ab Description: Wrapper to set the execution domain the linux32 tools allows 64bit systems with support for 32 bit applications to set the execution domain to the 32 bit native type. . For instance, on an ia64 machine, commands run with this wrapper will think the machine type is i386, as returned by uname -m. . On systems without support for the PER_LINUX_32 execution domain, this program has no effect. . Justification: No activity since 2003, doesn't respond to ping --- Received: (at 279519-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2004 22:53:26 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 08 14:53:26 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CRIO6-0002WO-00; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 14:53:26 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CRIHw-0005SP-00; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:47:04 -0500 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#279519: fixed in linux32 1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:47:04 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: linux32 Source-Version: 1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of linux32, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: linux32_1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/l/linux32/linux32_1-2.diff.gz linux32_1-2.dsc to pool/main/l/linux32/linux32_1-2.dsc linux32_1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/l/linux32/linux32_1-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have
Bug#189967: Good news regarding the economy
Homeowners - do you have less-than-perfect credit* We'll quickly match you up with the B.EST provider based on YOUR NEEDS. Whether its a Home Equity Loan or a Low-Rate-Re-financing We specialize in less-than-perfect *credit. We'll help you get the YES! you deserve. Goto: http://www.your-mort-gage.com?eek Turn notifications off: http://lme.your-mort-gage.com/rem.php Sincerely, Miriam Kirby
