Bug#286012: O: guppi -- GNOME graph and plot component
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 12:17:45AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote: > Hola Martin Michlmayr! > > guppi is orphaned. It was originally orphaned in #188498 but this bug > > got closed erroneously. If you want to be the new maintainer, please > > take it -- see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for > > detailed instructions how to adopt a package properly. > I closed the bug because I realized the package has been dropped both from > testing and unstable... What's the point of having a package up for > adoption, if it's not going to be there anymore? $ madison guppi guppi | 0.40.3-1 |stable | source guppi | 0.40.3-10 | testing | source guppi | 0.40.3-10 | unstable | source $ Please note that guppi is the source package name only. > Take into account it's a GNOME 1 package, that really makes no sense in an > environment, as sarge, that's completely migrated to GNOME 2. Sarge is not completely migrated to GNOME 2. Sarge still includes gnucash, which is a GNOME 1 app. I would miss it if it went away. :) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#214203: Package for wmpower?
Hello, will you upload package for wmpower to debian? I have ready package, so I can do it. Thanks, Antonin
Bug#286012: O: guppi -- GNOME graph and plot component
* Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-17 00:17]: > Take into account it's a GNOME 1 package, that really makes no sense > in an environment, as sarge, that's completely migrated to GNOME 2. Thomas, it seems gnucash is the only packae which build-depend on guppi. Do you know if there's any chance of getting rid of this build-dependency before sarge? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/
Bug#286012: O: guppi -- GNOME graph and plot component
* Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-17 00:17]: > I closed the bug because I realized the package has been dropped both from > testing and unstable... What's the point of having a package up for > adoption, if it's not going to be there anymore? Well, the point is that the package is still there: 11902:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] madison guppi guppi | 0.40.3-1 |stable | source guppi | 0.40.3-10 | testing | source guppi | 0.40.3-10 | unstable | source 11903:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] > Take into account it's a GNOME 1 package, that really makes no sense in an > environment, as sarge, that's completely migrated to GNOME 2. It seems gnucash build-depends on it. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/
Bug#286027: ITP: ms-sys -- tool for writing Microsoft compatible boot records
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 09:21:03PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > > This is a Linux program for writing Microsoft compatible boot records. The > > program does the same as Microsoft "fdisk /mbr" to a hard disk or "sys d:" > > to a floppy or FAT partition except that it does not copy any system files, > > only the boot record is written. > > Where is the included boot block code from? According to the author's page it's taken from: http://www.geocities.com/thestarman3/asm/mbr/MBR_in_detail.htm > I'd also like to point out that the boot block source code is not > included, certainly making this package non-DFSG-free, and probably > making it undistributable by us under the GPL. Boot blocks are included as a series of properly ordered bytes, so yes... seems that it's not DFSG free. Don't know however if it makes it totally undistributable. Author chose GPL and it's his decision. You can always change those boot blocks by changing bytes listings. Anyway... if it's impossible to put it in non-free then I'm going to close that bugreport. regards fEnIo -- _ Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo _|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska (0 0) phone:+48602383548 | Slackware - the weakest link ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#286027: ITP: ms-sys -- tool for writing Microsoft compatible boot records
i maintained ms-sys until the 1.1.3, i knew about 2.0 but didn't do the update. did you see some part of mbr code is free and some not? you probably want to talk to upstream, as i don't intend to maintain ms-sys anymore (i don't want non-free stuff generally). i was pointed to the package "mbr" in #debian-nonfree and i know about free mbr code in www.freedos.org (in the kernel source package) good luck cheers, guerkan -- Gürkan Sengünmail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ETH Hönggerberg HPR E 86.1 phone: +41 1 633 6604 Departement Physik, ETH Zürich web: http://www.phys.ethz.ch
Bug#286027: marked as done (ITP: ms-sys -- tool for writing Microsoft compatible boot records)
Your message dated Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:34:28 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#286027: ITP: ms-sys -- tool for writing Microsoft compatible boot records has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2004 00:24:17 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 16 16:24:17 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from on.debian.linux.org.pl (localhost.localdomain) [80.48.213.222] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cf5uq-0007wp-00; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:24:17 -0800 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 123DC3BB72; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 01:24:07 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: ms-sys -- tool for writing Microsoft compatible boot records X-Mailer: reportbug 3.4 Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 01:24:06 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: ms-sys Version : 2.0.0. Upstream Author : Henrik Carlqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://ms-sys.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : tool for writing Microsoft compatible boot records Grabbed from homepage: This is a Linux program for writing Microsoft compatible boot records. The program does the same as Microsoft "fdisk /mbr" to a hard disk or "sys d:" to a floppy or FAT partition except that it does not copy any system files, only the boot record is written. --- Received: (at 286027-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2004 13:35:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 17 05:35:01 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rtr.skawsoft.com.pl (localhost.localdomain) [213.25.37.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CfIG5-0002QF-00; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 05:35:01 -0800 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 602233BB72; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:34:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:34:28 +0100 From: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#286027: ITP: ms-sys -- tool for writing Microsoft compatible boot records Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mail-Followup-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 01:56:43PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > | * Package name: ms-sys > | Version : 2.0.0. > | Upstream Author : Henrik Carlqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | * URL : http://ms-sys.sourceforge.net/ > | * License : GPL > | Description : tool for writing Microsoft compatible boot records >=20 > http://packages.debian.org/ms-sys Geee I had to be blind yesterday ;) Ok I'm closing this bugreport, and sorry for confusion. regards fEnIo --=20 _ Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEn= Io _|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska (0 0) phone:+48602383548 | Slackware - the weakest link ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001 --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-D
sam-solutions.net echoing list mail
I just received this mail via the debian-wnpp list and sam-solutions.net, which is erroneously routing mail based on the contents of To/Cc fields. This needs to be fixed. Cheers, - Forwarded message from Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 08:28:03 + Received: from shadowlands.magd.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.43.30]) by tirian.magd.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CfDT1-000380-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 08:28:03 + Received: from the.earth.li ([193.201.200.66]) by shadowlands.magd.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 1CfDT1-Zp-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 08:28:03 + Received: from mail.sam-solutions.net ([217.21.35.41]) by the.earth.li with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CfDT0-0007ER-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 08:28:02 + Received: from c71.sam-solutions.net ([217.21.35.67]) by mail.sam-solutions.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CfDSv-0004Cv-Ik for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:27:57 +0200 Received: from mail pickup service by c71.sam-solutions.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:27:56 +0200 Received: from mail.sam-solutions.net ([217.21.35.41]) by c71.sam-solutions.net over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 23:52:44 +0200 Received: from murphy.debian.org ([146.82.138.6]) by mail.sam-solutions.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cf3Y8-0007PN-V7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 23:52:41 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP id 418AE2EAAD; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:52:39 -0600 (CST) Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Original-To: debian-wnpp@lists.debian.org Received: from master.debian.org (master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]) by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1992E9C5 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:52:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from spohr.debian.org [128.193.0.4] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cf3Y6-0005X2-00; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:52:38 -0600 Received: from debbugs by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cf3U2-0003nX-00; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 13:48:26 -0800 X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Bug#259587: marked as done (ITA: libquantum-entanglement-perl -- Quantum Mechanic entanglement of variables in perl) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [snip extra headers and content]
Bug#180369: pain tolerancy test next sunday
pain is killing your sister V_1,C*O^D*1-N 750 m-gg 30 PIlLS 169.oO 6o P1LLS 245.95 90 PiLlS 319.Oo learn more : http://checkithere.com Same Day Sh1pp1ng To En0ugh : http://checkithere.com/please/ let me know Cassie Spears Alderman HyTest Ltd., Turku, 20520, Finland, Finland Phone: 129-731-2741 Mobile: 114-211-5449 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is beng sent to confirm your account. Please do not reply directly to this message This file is a 20 second definite shareware NOTES: The contents of this connection is for your exclusive use and should not be alamo accompany alibi instead obstruent Time: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 17:11:12 +0200
Bug#286105: ITP: pngwriter -- Library for plotting PNG image pixel by pixel
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: pngwriter Version : 0.5.0 Upstream Author : Paul Blackburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://pngwriter.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Description : Library for plotting PNG image pixel by pixel PNGwriter is a very easy to use open source graphics library that uses PNG as its output format. The interface has been designed to be as simple and intuitive as possible. It supports plotting and reading in the RGB (red, green, blue), HSV (hue, saturation, value/brightness) and CMYK (cyan, magenta, yellow, black) colour spaces, basic shapes, scaling, bilinear interpolation, full TrueType antialiased and rotated text support, bezier curves, opening existing PNG images and more. Documentation in English and Spanish. Runs under Linux, Unix, Mac OS X and Windows. Requires libpng and optionally FreeType2 for the text support. Homepage: http://pngwriter.sourceforge.net/ -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=ca_ES, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Bug#286105: ITP: pngwriter -- Library for plotting PNG image pixel by pixel
Good idea. > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > > * Package name: pngwriter > Version : 0.5.0 > Upstream Author : Paul Blackburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://pngwriter.sourceforge.net > * License : GPL > Description : Library for plotting PNG image pixel by pixel > > PNGwriter is a very easy to use open source graphics library that uses > PNG as its output format. The interface has been designed to be as simple > and intuitive as possible. It supports plotting and reading in the RGB > (red, green, blue), HSV (hue, saturation, value/brightness) and CMYK > (cyan, magenta, yellow, black) colour spaces, basic shapes, scaling, > bilinear interpolation, full TrueType antialiased and rotated text support, > bezier curves, opening existing PNG images and more. Documentation in > English and Spanish. Runs under Linux, Unix, Mac OS X and Windows. Requires > libpng and optionally FreeType2 for the text support. Good luck. pgprlyEdg23nW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: adopting
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 279780 ITA: libchart-perl Bug#279780: O: libchart-perl -- Chart Library for Perl Changed Bug title. > owner 279780 ! Bug#279780: ITA: libchart-perl Owner recorded as Ivan Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > retitle 279784 ITA: libfile-counterfile-perl Bug#279784: O: libfile-counterfile-perl -- Persistent counter class for Perl Changed Bug title. > owner 279784 ! Bug#279784: ITA: libfile-counterfile-perl Owner recorded as Ivan Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#99943: [wnpp cleanup round] Please confirm interest in ITP of Debian package
Hi, wnpp needs a little cleanup. Thus, your ITP will be retitled to an RFP in 30 days, unless the original submitter, current owner, or somebody else within that 30 day time frame confirms interest in the ITP by actively working on packaging. Confirmation of interest is sent as follow-up to @bugs.debian.org and preferably CC me. That way it's easier for me to track which ITPs should be retitled (alternatively, do the retitling yourself (and CC me). Thanks in advance. Justification: ITP was submitted more than 1000 days ago, and there has been no real activity/progress for a long, long time. If you think I'm being unreasonable or if you believe that I, in any other way, have wrongfully addressed your particular ITP with this mail, let me know. Best regards, -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk
Re: Bug#99943: [wnpp cleanup round] Please confirm interest in ITP of Debian package
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:48:12PM +0100, Frederik Dannemare wrote: > wnpp needs a little cleanup. Thus, your ITP will be retitled to an RFP > in 30 days, unless the original submitter, current owner, or somebody > else within that 30 day time frame confirms interest in the ITP by > actively working on packaging. > Confirmation of interest is sent as follow-up to @bugs.debian.org > and preferably CC me. That way it's easier for me to track which ITPs > should be retitled (alternatively, do the retitling yourself (and CC > me). Thanks in advance. > Justification: ITP was submitted more than 1000 days ago, and there has > been no real activity/progress for a long, long time. > If you think I'm being unreasonable or if you believe that I, in any > other way, have wrongfully addressed your particular ITP with this > mail, let me know. Shouldn't this message have gone to the -submitter addresses? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#286141: ITP: kbandwidth -- Network interface monitor in KDE tray
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: kbandwidth Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Niko Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=18939 * License : GPL Description : Network interface monitor in KDE tray Network monitoring Kicker-applet for KDE 3.x. This tool can show speed of any network interfaces. For example traffic of your ADSL, LAN, Modem or others. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2)
Bug#286167: ITP: cluster3 -- [Biology] Reimplementation of the Eisen-clustering sofware
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: cluster3 Version : 1.27 Upstream Author : M. J. L. de Hoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, S. Imoto, J. Nolan, and S. Miyano * URL : http://bonsai.ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mdehoon/software/cluster/ * License : non-free Description : [Biology] Reimplementation of the Eisen-clustering software The clustering software by Michael Eisen is well known and accepted in the Bioinfromatics community. This package represents a reimplementation and extension of the Windows program. . This software implements clustering routines that can be used to analyze gene expression data. Routines for hierarchical (pairwise simple, complete, average, and centroid linkage) clustering, k-means and k-medians clustering, and 2D self-organizing maps are included. The routines are available in the form of a C clustering library, an extension module to Python, a module to Perl, as well as an enhanced version of Cluster, which was originally developed by Michael Eisen of Berkeley Lab. The C clustering library and the associated extension module for Python was released under the Python license. The Perl module was released under the Artistic License. Cluster 3.0 is covered by the original Cluster/TreeView license. . This package contains the command line and motif gui versions of Cluster 3.0. . Homepage: http://bonsai.ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mdehoon/software/cluster/ An inital effort to provide a package is available from http://bioinformatics.pzr.uni-rostock.de/~moeller/debian/cluster3 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Re: Bug#99943: [wnpp cleanup round] Please confirm interest in ITP of Debian package
On Friday 17 December 2004 23:13, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:48:12PM +0100, Frederik Dannemare wrote: > > wnpp needs a little cleanup. Thus, your ITP will be retitled to an > > RFP in 30 days, unless the original submitter, current owner, or > > somebody else within that 30 day time frame confirms interest in > > the ITP by actively working on packaging. > > > > Confirmation of interest is sent as follow-up to > > @bugs.debian.org and preferably CC me. That way it's easier > > for me to track which ITPs should be retitled (alternatively, do > > the retitling yourself (and CC me). Thanks in advance. > > > > Justification: ITP was submitted more than 1000 days ago, and there > > has been no real activity/progress for a long, long time. > > > > If you think I'm being unreasonable or if you believe that I, in > > any other way, have wrongfully addressed your particular ITP with > > this mail, let me know. > > Shouldn't this message have gone to the -submitter addresses? Oh, boy. I seem to have screwed up a little bit here. Sorry about that but I was under the impression that the bts would automatically include the address of the submitter (who initially is also the owner, right?) on follow-up messages. I could have sworn that I in the past had automatically received copies of mails on follow-ups to reports submitted by me, but maybe I have been explicitly addressed as a receiver of such mails, I guess. Upon closer reading of debian.org/Bugs/Developer it seems that the submitter is notified automatically only with mails sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I would therefore always need to explicitly address the bug submitter via either his/her own mail address or via [EMAIL PROTECTED] when merely doing regular follow-ups, right? Anyhow, I will make sure that [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets a copy of my mail during the weekend. I better get some sleep now. Best regards, -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk
Re: Bug#99943: [wnpp cleanup round] Please confirm interest in ITP of Debian package
On Friday 17 December 2004 23:13, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:48:12PM +0100, Frederik Dannemare wrote: > > wnpp needs a little cleanup. Thus, your ITP will be retitled to an > > RFP in 30 days, unless the original submitter, current owner, or > > somebody else within that 30 day time frame confirms interest in > > the ITP by actively working on packaging. > > > > Confirmation of interest is sent as follow-up to > > @bugs.debian.org and preferably CC me. That way it's easier > > for me to track which ITPs should be retitled (alternatively, do > > the retitling yourself (and CC me). Thanks in advance. > > > > Justification: ITP was submitted more than 1000 days ago, and there > > has been no real activity/progress for a long, long time. > > > > If you think I'm being unreasonable or if you believe that I, in > > any other way, have wrongfully addressed your particular ITP with > > this mail, let me know. > > Shouldn't this message have gone to the -submitter addresses? Btw, I forgot to ask: Besides notifying the submitter of any such future mails (ITP "overdue" warning), should I then send a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of sending it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best regards, -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk
Re: Bug#99943: [wnpp cleanup round] Please confirm interest in ITP of Debian package
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 03:36:31AM +0100, Frederik Dannemare wrote: > On Friday 17 December 2004 23:13, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Shouldn't this message have gone to the -submitter addresses? > Oh, boy. I seem to have screwed up a little bit here. Sorry about that > but I was under the impression that the bts would automatically include > the address of the submitter (who initially is also the owner, right?) > on follow-up messages. > I could have sworn that I in the past had automatically received copies > of mails on follow-ups to reports submitted by me, but maybe I have > been explicitly addressed as a receiver of such mails, I guess. > Upon closer reading of debian.org/Bugs/Developer it seems that the > submitter is notified automatically only with mails sent to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I would therefore always need to explicitly > address the bug submitter via either his/her own mail address or via > [EMAIL PROTECTED] when merely doing regular follow-ups, right? Right. > Btw, I forgot to ask: Besides notifying the submitter of any such future > mails (ITP "overdue" warning), should I then send a copy to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of sending it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Since emails sent to -submitter are logged in the BTS, I don't think you would need to cc either -quiet or [EMAIL PROTECTED] in this case. > Anyhow, I will make sure that [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets a copy of my mail > during the weekend. I better get some sleep now. Sleep well. :) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#245103: Debian and kmuddy
Hello Tomas Hope you have uploaded my arch linux pkgbuild. I am packaging kmuddy for debian now. i read that you were already packaging it but the message was from april so i guess your not active on this. can i carry one packaging it or are you giong to be doing it -- Best Regards, Warren Brian Noronha. Norrix (http://www.norrix.com)
