Bug#291792: ITP: gonzui -- a source code search engine
Hi gniibe-san, I think you might have gonzui package by yourself. But, if you have not packaged gonzui yet, please use gonzui from follows. p.s. I think you have better relation with upstream(satoru) than me. So you appropriate to be gonzui main maintainer. If you need, I welcome to be co-maintainer. deb-src http://araki.net/deb/sid/ ./ deb http://araki.net/deb/sid/ ./ http://www.araki.net/deb/sid/ http://www.araki.net/deb/sid/gonzui_0.2-3.diff.gz -- ARAKI Yasuhiro A Debian Official Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpqPT6FkDman.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#291796: ITP: planetpenguin-racer -- another 3D racing game featuring Tux, the Linux penguin
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: planetpenguin-racer Version : 0.2.3 Upstream Author : planetpenguin.de Crew / Volker Stroebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://projects.planetpenguin.de/racer/ * License : GPL Description : another 3D racing game featuring Tux, the Linux penguin PlanetPenguin Racer is a simple OpenGL racing game featuring Tux, the Linux mascot. The goal of the game is to slide down a snow- and ice-covered mountain as quickly as possible, avoiding the trees and rocks that will slow you down. . It is based on the GPL version of TuxRacer. Oliver, as the current maintainer of tuxracer. Would you like to comment an my intentions? Any hints or usefull suggestions? Yours sincerely, Alexander -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#288379: I offer to look after the package for you untill you become a developer, Ian!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06-01-2005 19:16, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>Hash: SHA1 >> >>On 06-01-2005 16:45, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> >> >>>It looks fundamentally broken. Just sponsor it the normal way. >> >>Did you volunteer? Else please let me do it how I want to (as long as I >>do not break policies or in other ways bring our society in danger). > > > You did not read, did you. It *does* break policies and it *does* bring > danger. I wrote an example (the NM<->packages case). Yes, I read, but did not at that time find any policy breach. I have now found a place that I obstruct: The "Checklist for Application Managers". I still do not believe to break Debian Policy (please state a specific one), but it can be argued that I do not help either. I will not sign packages of non-developers, because (as stated earlier) I do not believe this works. Please, instead of persuading me to use my signature for something I do not believe in, go ahead and do so yourself! > And Maintainer: always should be the actual maintainer... You did not read, did you? I offer to be the actual maintainer until Ian can take over using our core procedures (not the NM add-on that I do not believe in). Ian: You are still welcome to have me help: Make a package and put it public somewhere (including sources). Then we can discuss possible improvements and I maintain the package (with your changes clearly declared as coming from you, off course) until you can take it over yourself. I assume you want to adopt this package because you believe it is for the good of Debian users, not only to proove your packaging skills. If you believe that demonstrating your packaging skills this non-NM way hurts your case then off course you should not accept my offer. Have a nice day, everyone - Jonas P.S. If package count was my goal, I'd go package a bunch of perl modules instead of helping upcoming maintainers. - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB83mGn7DbMsAkQLgRAuu2AJ0UBGMZgjTsRGZnsv+/cJ2zGOaQzwCcCkz6 4Zm7gL+u0GH/P3jAFth3vNk= =387/ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#291803: RFP: bbsmount -- Black box/fluxbox desktop tool to manage mount points
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: bbsmount Version : x.y.z Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://bbtools.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : Black box/fluxbox desktop tool to manage mount points (Include the long description here.) See sourceforge. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291801: RFP: bbrun -- Black Box/fluxbox desktop tool to run commands
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: bbrun Version : 1.1 Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sf.net/projects/bbtools * License : GPL Description : Black Box/fluxbox desktop tool to run commands (Include the long description here.) See sourceforge for more details. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291802: RFP: bbslashdot -- Black box/fluxbox desktop tool for slashdot site
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: bbslashdot Version : x.y.z Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sf.net/projects/bbtools * License : GPL Description : Black box/fluxbox desktop tool for slashdot site (Include the long description here.) See Sourceforge site -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#234854: marked as done (ITP: tinyscheme -- very, very lightweight embeddable Scheme interpreter)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:48:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bugs now fixed in 1.1.2-1 in unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2004 03:34:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 25 19:34:58 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from hyperfast.ca (hypervite.net) [216.99.97.96] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AwCIc-0008Fs-00; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:34:58 -0800 Received: from unicorn.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us (actioncancelled.com [216.99.97.2] (may be forged)) (authenticated (0 bits)) by hypervite.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1Q3WIr16506; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:32:19 -0500 Received: by unicorn.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 70BC74AF7B; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:34:36 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: tinyscheme -- very, very lightweight embeddable Scheme interpreter X-Mailer: reportbug 2.48 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:34:36 -0500 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: tinyscheme Version : 1.33 Upstream Author : Dimitrios Souflis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://tinyscheme.sourceforge.net/ * License : BSD Description : very, very lightweight embeddable Scheme interpreter TinyScheme is a very, very lightweight embeddable Scheme interpreter. Compiled versions of the interpreter are typically less than 100 kB in size, yet provide a significant subset of R5RS Scheme. . TinyScheme is embeddable; there's a dynamic library for including the interpreter in other programs. It's also extensible; it includes a mechanism for dynamically linking in other libraries. There's also a command-line interpreter. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.3-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 --- Received: (at 234854-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2005 12:48:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 23 04:48:03 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Csh9v-0005nD-00; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 04:48:03 -0800 Received: from quadrant.corpus.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.235.202]:32919) by ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130]:25) with esmtp id 1Csh9s-0005NO-16 (Exim 4.44) (return-path <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>); Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:48:00 + Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:48:13 + From: Robert McQueen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bugs now fixed in 1.1.2-1 in unstable References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 I've uploaded 1.1.2-1 to unstable, which contains the gevolution plugin, a gaim-dev package for compiling plugins, and gaim-data for architecture independent data.
Processed: Re: Bug#234854: marked as done (ITP: tinyscheme -- very, very lightweight embeddable Scheme interpreter)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 234854 Bug#234854: ITP: tinyscheme -- very, very lightweight embeddable Scheme interpreter Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291818: RFP: bbacpi -- Black box/fluxbox desktop tool to manage ennergy saving features
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: bbacpi Version : x.y.z Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://bbtools.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : Black box/fluxbox desktop tool to manage ennergy saving features (Include the long description here.) See sourceforge -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#276057: mediawiki package
Coin, I made a 1.3.9 mediawiki package recently because i wanted a stable mediawiki package, only a dirty one was available on the net, and #217571 IPT was long without result. I am not interrested in taking over the maintainership and you look like motivated, so i'm happy someone take care of it. My package is working and quite clean, integrating math support, so you may look at it to improve yours. It is available here : http://debian.duckcorp.org/ Have a lot of FUN ! -- Marc DequÃnes (Duck) pgpQABPbCaTw3.pgp Description: PGP signature
You are eligible for $400000
Dear Applicant, Your application was processed and approved. You are eligible for $ 500,000 with a 2.1 % rate. Please verify your information here: http://masfre.info/azvml We look forward to hearing from you. Margit Karl.Heinz, Account Manager Vaude Marketing not interested -> http://epidermic.masfre.info/index.php
Bug#288379: I offer to look after the package for you untill you become a developer, Ian!
Hi, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >>>It looks fundamentally broken. Just sponsor it the normal way. > >> > >>Did you volunteer? Else please let me do it how I want to (as long as I > >>do not break policies or in other ways bring our society in danger). You do. You break the - unwritten iirc - sponsoring policy. And you will make Ian have a hard time going through NM. In NM we check if a prospective maintainer already has packages. If Maintainer: is you, he has no package. And no, I won't accept a package which is not Maintainer: the NM to be maintained by the NM and I think many other NMs won't do it either. Because Maintainer: says it is maintained by you. That he "sends patches" (note the "'s) is not enough for the having-a-package-in-the-archive criterium. I don't know how the FD handles them but he won't get approved so with some AMs I guess... > I will not sign packages of non-developers, because (as stated earlier) > I do not believe this works. Please, instead of persuading me to use my Why not? Check their changes (interdiff, zless etc.) and then rebuild fully and sign it. Then your sponsoree sends you new .dsc and .diff.gz (and probably .orig if there is a new upstream) and do the same. > signature for something I do not believe in, go ahead and do so yourself! I won't either. But you *check* the package before signing it. You look at it. You build it youself. Just that the Sponsoree is Maintainer: > Ian: > > You are still welcome to have me help: Make a package and put it public > somewhere (including sources). Then we can discuss possible improvements > and I maintain the package (with your changes clearly declared as coming > >from you, off course) until you can take it over yourself. > > I assume you want to adopt this package because you believe it is for > the good of Debian users, not only to proove your packaging skills. > > If you believe that demonstrating your packaging skills this non-NM way > hurts your case then off course you should not accept my offer. As I said, I at last won't count that as a package maintained by him. And now that we have this discussion I ponder trying to get him as NM... > If package count was my goal, I'd go package a bunch of perl modules > instead of helping upcoming maintainers. You'll help him better doing it the usual way instead of taking over the package and make him send patches (which is in fact the case then)... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#288379: I offer to look after the package for you untill you become a developer, Ian!
Jonas> You are still welcome to have me help: Make a package and put it Jonas> public somewhere (including sources). Then we can discuss Jonas> possible improvements and I maintain the package (with your Jonas> changes clearly declared as coming from you, off course) until Jonas> you can take it over yourself. Jonas> I assume you want to adopt this package because you believe it is Jonas> for the good of Debian users, not only to proove your packaging Jonas> skills. Not either, really; it is for my own benefit, since I use it (indirectly), and I prefer having everything apt-able. Rene> You'll help him better doing it the usual way instead of taking Rene> over the package and make him send patches (which is in fact the Rene> case then)... I have already uploaded a diff and dsc: http://primate.net/~itz/vcg_1.30debian-2.diff.gz http://primate.net/~itz/vcg_1.30debian-2.dsc However, Jens Secher (who had offered to sponsor me the usual way) pointed out that the .orig tarball differs from the one listed in the copyright file. This is not my doing; I just took the .orig file apt-get source gave me. We (Jens, me, and previous maintainer) had some inconclusive discussion about this, and right now I don't know how to proceed. My indecision has only been reinforced by the thread below (which, too, petered out in an ambiguous way): http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00297.html -- I wonder which is the best virus for unix and if I can write a better one in Microsoft BASIC ? Hans-Marc Olsen in comp.unix.programmer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#288379: I offer to look after the package for you untill you become a developer, Ian!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23-01-2005 18:07, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Jonas> I assume you want to adopt this package because you believe it is > Jonas> for the good of Debian users, not only to proove your packaging > Jonas> skills. > > Not either, really; it is for my own benefit, since I use it (indirectly), > and I prefer having everything apt-able. You can make your personal packages apt-get'able without the need for them being official. No need to become a Debian Maintainer for that, or have your packages sponsored. > Rene> You'll help him better doing it the usual way instead of taking > Rene> over the package and make him send patches (which is in fact the > Rene> case then)... > > I have already uploaded a diff and dsc: Rene also wrote (aimed at me like above, not Ian): > You break the - unwritten iirc - sponsoring policy. Good luck following this unwritten policy, everyone. regards, - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB899an7DbMsAkQLgRAqecAKCGnH4VhbZQnG/CDq4AYtqG51Ky4QCfdfTr NjQjsWl0KrQ7csIonTKFT5c= =fpxm -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#288379: I offer to look after the package for you untill you become a developer, Ian!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23-01-2005 16:45, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >It looks fundamentally broken. Just sponsor it the normal way. Did you volunteer? Else please let me do it how I want to (as long as I do not break policies or in other ways bring our society in danger). > > > You do. You break the - unwritten iirc - sponsoring policy. > > And you will make Ian have a hard time going through NM. In NM we check > if a prospective maintainer already has packages. If Maintainer: is you, > he has no package. And no, I won't accept a package which is not > Maintainer: the NM to be maintained by the NM and I think many other NMs > won't do it either. Because Maintainer: says it is maintained by you. > That he "sends patches" (note the "'s) is not enough for the > having-a-package-in-the-archive criterium. I don't know how the FD > handles them but he won't get approved so with some AMs I guess... If "helping out the project the best as he can while waiting for the process to move on" hurts his case, then off course he shouldn't. And if that is the case I think I see a reason why your mysterious policy is not written down... :-P >>I will not sign packages of non-developers, because (as stated earlier) >>I do not believe this works. Please, instead of persuading me to use my > > > Why not? Check their changes (interdiff, zless etc.) and then rebuild > fully and sign it. My worry is not so much what I sign but the visibility of my signature. The reason is _not_ fame, but things like ability for the community to keep track of non-developer maintainers and their sponsors: Can you tell me which packages are currently maintained by non-developers, and sponsored by which developers? I don't know how. Our tools and policies are designed to handle developers in a keyring. Sponsoring of packages is a hack and I believe that hack has flaws on the meta level. What I see as bugs others find convenient - so I won't make a fuzz about it (like you may have noticed I do with the (ab)use of -private). I simply choose to not use those routines. >>signature for something I do not believe in, go ahead and do so yourself! > > > I won't either. I offered to help Ian my way. You offer nothing, but tell me to do things you won't do yourself. That makes no sense to me. Greetings, - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB8+kPn7DbMsAkQLgRAuSHAJ9zzdCchIImsQDo4c+AjL0uO89J/ACfVpbB 3kHwWmZDQ8ArNmd4HjTBJNw= =m9sM -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Processed: Bug#291745: ITA: mozilla-locale-lt -- Mozilla Lithuanian Language/Region Package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package mozilla-locale-lt Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mozilla-locale-lt > retitle 291745 ITA: mozilla-locale-lt -- Mozilla Lithuanian Language/Region > Package Bug#291745: RFA: mozilla-locale-lt -- Mozilla Lithuanian Language/Region Package Changed Bug title. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291745: ITA: mozilla-locale-lt -- Mozilla Lithuanian Language/Region Package
package mozilla-locale-lt retitle 291745 ITA: mozilla-locale-lt -- Mozilla Lithuanian Language/Region Package stop Hi all, I would like to adopt this important (for Lithuanian users) package. Few months ago I packaged mozilla-locale-lt and asked KÄstas BiliÅnas to check this package for fit with Debian standards and maintain for a while ;) Yesterday I talked to KÄstas BiliÅnas (we live in the same city). He told me, that he mainly uses FireFox, not Mozilla, while my favorite is Mozilla, so I think I would be a better maintainer ;) -- Good luck, Mantas KriauÄiÅnasJabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG ID: 43535BD5 Public organization "Open Source for Lithuania" - www.akl.lt
Processed: owner 291745 mantas@akl.lt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > owner 291745 ! Bug#291745: ITA: mozilla-locale-lt -- Mozilla Lithuanian Language/Region Package Owner recorded as "AKL. Mantas Kriauciunas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#227787: package has been taken over
It seems that Matthew Vernon has taken over this package. Matthew, please close this bug. Also, please check WNPP before taking over orphaned packages next time. -- Dafydd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#261585: marked as done (ITA: modemu -- Telnet services for communication programs)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:32:10 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#261585: fixed in modemu 0.0.1-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jul 2004 20:08:39 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 26 13:08:39 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gatekeeper.excelhustler.com (heinrich.complete.org) [68.99.114.105] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BpBm3-0008Im-00; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:08:39 -0700 Received: by heinrich.complete.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 45D2EAA4; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:08:03 -0500 (CDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: O: modemu X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:08:03 -0500 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: normal I am orphaning this package. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US --- Received: (at 261585-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2005 21:36:10 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 23 13:36:09 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CspOy-0005LV-00; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:36:08 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CspL8-0001ts-00; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:32:10 -0500 From: =?utf-8?q?V=C3=ADctor_P=C3=A9rez_Pereira?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#261585: fixed in modemu 0.0.1-9 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:32:10 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: modemu Source-Version: 0.0.1-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of modemu, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: modemu_0.0.1-9.diff.gz to pool/main/m/modemu/modemu_0.0.1-9.diff.gz modemu_0.0.1-9.dsc to pool/main/m/modemu/modemu_0.0.1-9.dsc modemu_0.0.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/m/modemu/modemu_0.0.1-9_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Víctor Pérez Pereira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated modemu package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:40:17 -0400 Source: modemu Binary: modemu Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.0.1-9 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Víctor Pérez Pereira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Víctor Pérez Pereira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: modemu - Telnet services for communication programs Closes: 261585 Changes: modemu (0.0.1-9) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer (closes: #261585). Files: f45f853e6c4f54bb126aae6993b6b171 560 net optional modemu_0.0.1-9.dsc e70dbe8da3223ffaff0775dc432edbca 5347 net optional modemu_0.0.1-9.diff.gz 31d5ca9903d91171cc8e15eb7b9f3a07 23092 net optional modemu_0.0.1-9_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB9BSANFDtUT/MKpARAs58AKDpbRHa1pF3hzZuPaFgIJVm1T8lyACeLnR2 RDEmbb/cpMzS4T5eZiW0A5c= =B6IV -END PGP
Processed: Package already made
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > owner 259062 ! Bug#259062: ITP: rrootage -- abstract arcade shooter Owner recorded as Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#259062: Package already made
owner 259062 ! thanks We've already finished the package. We asked Robertle if he preferred to package it himself or it was all right if we packaged it and he agreed we could go for it. The package is almost finished by now. __ Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!: ¡250 MB GRATIS! Nuevos servicios, más seguridad http://correo.yahoo.es -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#288379: VCG, license, and source location
Ian Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However [...] the .orig tarball differs from the one listed in > the copyright file. [...] We (Jens, me, and previous maintainer) > had some inconclusive discussion about this, and right now I don't > know how to proceed. How about putting the DFSG/GPL-compatible source on Savanna (or similar), so that there is a (new) canonical place to get VCG. Of course, politely ask the original authors about their opinion first. But I am by no means going to be obstructive over this. I just noticed the mismatch while inspecting the package. > My indecision has only been reinforced by > the thread below (which, too, petered out in an ambiguous way): > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00297.html That thread talks about possible problems with the Common Public License (CPL). The conclusion seems to be that the CPL is OK. Anyways, VCG is under GPL, so I fail to see the connection...? -- Jens Peter Secher _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher get2net dk_ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291916: ITP: innerspace.app -- Screensaver for GNUstep
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: innerspace.app Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alex Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.nongnu.org/gap/ * License : GNU GPL Description : Screensaver for GNUstep InnerSpace is a screensaver for GNUstep. This comes with a set of modules. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux ibook 2.4.23-ben1 #7 Sat Dec 27 11:20:38 CET 2003 ppc Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=POSIX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291918: ITP: timemon.app -- CPU time usage monitor
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: timemon.app Version : 4.0 Upstream Author : Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alexander Malmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Original Author) * URL : http://www.nongnu.org/gap/ (CVS!), http://www.doubleu.com/TimeMon.html * License : YES [1] Description : CPU time usage monitor TimeMon gives a graphical representation of where the CPU cycles are going. It's coarse, but better than nothing. The best "feature" is that it runs in an icon on your dock, so that you never lose it. [1] Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided that this copyright notice appear in all copies. Scott Hess makes no representations about the suitability of this software for any purpose. It is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux ibook 2.4.23-ben1 #7 Sat Dec 27 11:20:38 CET 2003 ppc Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=POSIX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#227787: marked as done (ITA: xtrlock -- Minimal X display lock program)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:38:31 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line package has been taken over has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:25:57 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:25:57 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AguOb-0007AQ-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:25:57 -0600 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 75CCD26BA2; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:25:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 06585FF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:22:47 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:22:47 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: O: xtrlock -- Minimal X display lock program Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-MIA-Summary: Orphaning: xtrlock User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: normal The current maintainer of xtrlock, Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed instructions how to adopt a package properly. Some information about this package: Package: xtrlock Binary: xtrlock Version: 2.0-7 Priority: optional Section: x11 Maintainer: Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: xutils, xlibs-dev Architecture: any Standards-Version: 3.5.6 Format: 1.0 Directory: pool/main/x/xtrlock Files: 82debb25b3d3f2617b3a4f97c25a7720 1186 xtrlock_2.0-7.dsc f026c9a4ce9a018469f5d0177e86c04c 7223 xtrlock_2.0-7.tar.gz Package: xtrlock Priority: optional Section: x11 Installed-Size: 88 Maintainer: Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: i386 Version: 2.0-7 Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.5-13), xlibs (>> 4.1.0) Filename: pool/main/x/xtrlock/xtrlock_2.0-7_i386.deb Size: 8968 MD5sum: 6846a7876686e7b0fd146763c9cda66e Description: Minimal X display lock program xtrlock is a very minimal X display lock program, which uses nothing except the Xlib library. It doesn't obscure the screen, it is completely idle while the display is locked and you don't type at it, and it doesn't do funny things to the X access control lists. Justification: Countless NMUs, packages really old -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 227787-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2005 23:38:35 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 23 15:38:34 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.135] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CsrJS-000521-00; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:38:34 -0800 Received: from rapun.sel.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.232.108]:4480) by ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.135]:25) with esmtp id 1CsrJP-0007zm-I2 (Exim 4.44) (return-path <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>); Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:38:31 + Received: from matthew by rapun.sel.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CsrJP-oZ-00; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:38:31 + MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:38:31 + From: Matthew Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Dafydd Harries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: package has been taken over In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 7.18 under Emacs 21.2.1 Sender: Matthew Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no versio
Bug#288379: VCG, license, and source location
Jens> How about putting the DFSG/GPL-compatible source on Savanna (or Jens> similar), so that there is a (new) canonical place to get VCG. Of Jens> course, politely ask the original authors about their opinion Jens> first. Okay. Ian> My indecision has only been reinforced by the thread below (which, Ian> too, petered out in an ambiguous way): >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00297.html Jens> That thread talks about possible problems with the Common Public Jens> License (CPL). The conclusion seems to be that the CPL is OK. Jens> Anyways, VCG is under GPL, so I fail to see the connection...? The thread is about a particular package newly under CPL - graphviz. graphviz can do many of the same things vcg can, and seems to be more widely used. And, after seeing the vcg source, graphviz is probably easier to maintain -- I wonder which is the best virus for unix and if I can write a better one in Microsoft BASIC ? Hans-Marc Olsen in comp.unix.programmer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
