Bug#248048: wmi ITP
Christoph Wegscheider writes... Hi, as wmi is dead and it's successor wmii was released yesterday I'm going to close this bug. Would it be useful to have both in Debian? Is wmii stable enough yet? Is there any reason people would prefer wmi over wmii? Sorry I didn't get to this yet. The ITP for wmii is #311567 and debian packages can be found at deb(-src) http://wegi.net/debian unstable/ I'm still seeking a sponsor for it. I'll take a look when I get a chance. If someone beats me to it that's fine too. -- Matt Taggart [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#311597: RFP: anyterm -- ssh java applet
Package: wnpp, mindterm Severity: wishlist * Package name: anyterm * URL : http://anyterm.org/ * License : GPL Description : ssh java applet This is a mindterm replacement, and assuming it is as good as it looks, the right thing to do would seem to be to make it replace the (unmaintainable) mindterm package in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#248048: wmi ITP
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:49:00PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote: as wmi is dead and it's successor wmii was released yesterday I'm going to close this bug. Would it be useful to have both in Debian? Is wmii stable enough yet? Is there any reason people would prefer wmi over wmii? Sorry I didn't get to this yet. wmi is not maintained any longer and quite buggy (mostly smaller annoying ones). wmii do have it's share of bugs too. There should be roughly 2 major releases/year, and additionally minor bugfix releases of the current major version as they are needed. That means that after the release yesterday many bugs will be discovered due to the broader audience, which will result in a bugfix release soon. IMHO It is already mature enough for unstable. wmii is different then wmi and requires some learning in the beginning. All in all one can emulate the wmi behaviour close enough that I think all/most people will switch sooner or later. I don't think the remaining ones justify to add an unmaintained, upstream death, buggy package into debian. There is an unofficial debian repo for them: deb http://wegi.net/debian unstable/ I'll take a look when I get a chance. If someone beats me to it that's fine too. Thanks :) Christoph pgprw7ojKARVT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#278810: Status update
Hi Folks! Just for the record, PostgreSQL 8.0 packages with the new architecture and structure are in experimental and will be uploade to unstable soon. The new package libpq-dev now contains the client-side library development files and is enough to build all client applications. I don't know the structure of Slony-1, but if it does not just operate on the client side, but installs a server library, then you need postgresql-server-dev-8.0 (or -7.4, it's probably best to build one slony deb for each version). So far I did not actually use the server dev package for anything, so if it misses something or needs improvements, please bug me about it. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RE: Your Final Noice # 3S9254
Hi, Did you recieve my email from last week? I'm happy to tell you that you can get a home loan at a rock-bottom rate right now. Your tracking number is # X7 777 587 You need to confirm your details within the next 24 hours. Please respond to this email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be sure to include the following: - Full name - Phone # - Best time to reach you - Type and amount of loan We will get back with you right away to discuss the details. Best Regards, Madeleine Manuel Account Officer International Equity Corp. To never hear from us again nolimitsbiz.info/unsubscribe_beetle.html
Bug#299759: what do you need??
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I am interested in this package since I just bought a DLink DWL-122 in order to get wifi on my new ibook and I had packaged pwc [0] a kernel driver for Philips webcams, so... What do you need? Can I help you? Thanks [0] http://packages.debian.org/pwc-source - -- Victor Seva [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key ID: 0x48DF1546 http://www.torreviejawireless.org jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCnwW6MhTKu0jfFUYRAgsgAJ0VR9suZjvzO7IEf/jwvQRbY/8fFgCfS4l4 G2JT0l9KxgBAAXhS7pkJFpY= =miI+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#311597: RFP: anyterm -- ssh java applet
Joey Hess wrote: Description : ssh java applet Correction, it does not use ssh (and it's javascript). Makes it less attractive, though it can be secured using https. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#311665: RFP: lsdvd -- read the content info of a DVD
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2005-06-02 Severity: wishlist * Package name: lsdvd Version : 0.15 Upstream Author : Chris Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/acidrip/ * License : GPL Description : read the content info of a DVD An application for reading the contents of a DVD and printing the contents to your terminal. Some project information is available from URL: http://untrepid.com/acidrip/lsdvd.html This package is a dependency of the freevo package. There is an ubuntu package available from URL:http://ftp.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/multiverse/l/lsdvd/. This WNPP is _not_ about the the DVD player project available from URL: www.csh.rit.edu/projects/lsdvd/ . -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#311666: ITP: boo -- OO, statically typed programming language for the CLI
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: boo Version : 0.5.5.1651 Upstream Author : Rodrigo B. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://boo.codehaus.org/ * License : free, see below Description : OO, statically typed programming language for the CLI Boo is a new object oriented statically typed programming language for the Common Language Infrastructure with a python inspired syntax and a special focus on language and compiler extensibility. License: Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification,are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * Neither the name of Rodrigo B. de Oliveira nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS AS IS AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OFTHIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
approximately a hundred
ALERT: This is your Second Notification, there now are two potential deals for your review. Please note that past credit history is a non-issue as long as you respond in a timely fashion. Verify your information with our secure form to ensure our records are accurate. http://www.on-funding.com/index.php?refid=windsor We look forward to helping you secure your future. --Jane Crandall Financial Analyst - LRA Inc. Did this reach you in error? please let us know so you won't recieve again: http://www.on-funding.com/r.php -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: special note here
ALERT: This is your Second Notification, there now are two potential deals for your review. Please note that past credit history is a non-issue as long as you respond in a timely fashion. Verify your information with our secure form to ensure our records are accurate. http://www.on-funding.com/index.php?refid=windsor We look forward to helping you secure your future. --Matt Ingram Financial Analyst - LRA Inc. Did this reach you in error? please let us know so you won't recieve again: http://www.on-funding.com/r.php -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306119: marked as done (ITP: gwaterfall -- View all characters of font in all sizes)
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2005 17:32:33 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306119: fixed in gwaterfall 0.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2005 12:02:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 24 05:02:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from lio.fmi.uni-sofia.bg (smtp.fmi.uni-sofia.bg) [62.44.101.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DPfoU-0003XX-00; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 05:02:14 -0700 Received: from roller ([62.44.101.57]) by smtp.fmi.uni-sofia.bg; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:55:48 +0300 Received: by roller (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1DFD31DB0; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:02:08 +0300 (EEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ognyan Kulev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: gwaterfall -- View all characters of font in all sizes X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:02:08 +0300 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ognyan Kulev [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: gwaterfall Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Noah Levitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://keithp.com/cvs/gwaterfall/ * License : MIT-like Description : View all characters of font in all sizes With gwaterfall, you can browse characters of font in different rendering configurations. There is line for each font size from 5px to 36px -- thus the name waterfall. The following parameters can be changed and view is updated immediately on screen: font size range and increment, hinting, autohinting, anti-aliasing, subpixel smoothing, and aspect. Upstream has named binary as waterfall, but CVS module is gwaterfall because there is older waterfall module. I named package as gwaterfall to avoid confusion with original program written by Keith Packard. I have written manual page for Debian. Both package description and manual page need review by native speaker. License is: * Copyright (c) 2003 Noah Levitt * * This program is free software; the author gives unlimited permission * to copy and/or distribute it, with or without modifications, as long as * this notice is preserved. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law; without even * the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR * PURPOSE. Package can be found in http://debian.fmi.uni-sofia.bg/~ogi/tmp/ -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers experimental APT policy: (600, 'experimental'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=bg_BG, LC_CTYPE=bg_BG (charmap=CP1251) --- Received: (at 306119-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2005 21:38:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 02 14:38:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DdxOE-0007Na-00; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:38:10 -0700 Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DdxIn-00041u-00; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 17:32:33 -0400 From: Ognyan Kulev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#306119: fixed in gwaterfall 0.1-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 17:32:33 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: gwaterfall Source-Version: 0.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gwaterfall, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gwaterfall_0.1-3.diff.gz to
Bug#311666: marked as done (ITP: boo -- OO, statically typed programming language for the CLI)
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:19:27 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#311666: fixed in boo 0.5.5.1651-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2005 15:08:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 02 08:08:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 213-140-22-78.fastres.net (lana.initd.org) [213.140.22.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DdrIz-gu-00; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 08:08:21 -0700 Received: by lana.initd.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A249737ADE; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 17:07:53 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: boo -- OO, statically typed programming language for the CLI X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12 Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 17:07:53 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_CBL,UPPERCASE_25_50,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: boo Version : 0.5.5.1651 Upstream Author : Rodrigo B. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://boo.codehaus.org/ * License : free, see below Description : OO, statically typed programming language for the CLI Boo is a new object oriented statically typed programming language for the Common Language Infrastructure with a python inspired syntax and a special focus on language and compiler extensibility. License: Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification,are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * Neither the name of Rodrigo B. de Oliveira nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS AS IS AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OFTHIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 311666-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2005 22:26:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 02 15:26:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Ddy8c-00038s-00; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:26:06 -0700 Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Ddy2B-5d-00; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:19:27 -0400 From: Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#311666: fixed in boo 0.5.5.1651-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:19:27 -0400
Bug#310044: marked as done (ITP: proguard -- java class file shrinker, optimizer, and obfuscator)
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:18:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#310044: fixed in proguard 3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 May 2005 09:19:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 21 02:19:54 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-138-198.sfo4.dsl.speakeasy.net (shadowfax.superduper.net) [66.93.138.198] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DZQ99-00037S-00; Sat, 21 May 2005 02:19:51 -0700 Received: from [82.153.82.57] (helo=localhost) by shadowfax.superduper.net with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1DZQR0-0005mX-Mh; Sat, 21 May 2005 02:38:20 -0700 Received: from sam by localhost with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DZQ91-0002Ho-IG; Sat, 21 May 2005 10:19:43 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: proguard -- java class file shrinker, optimizer, and obfuscator X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11 Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 10:19:42 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: proguard Version : 3.2 Upstream Author : Eric Lafortune [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://proguard.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : java class file shrinker, optimizer, and obfuscator ProGuard is a free Java class file shrinker, optimizer, and obfuscator. It can detect and remove unused classes, fields, methods, and attributes. It can then optimize bytecode and remove unused instructions. Finally, it can rename the remaining classes, fields, and methods using short meaningless names. The resulting jars are smaller and harder to reverse-engineer. This package builds just with jikes-classpath and runs with kaffe which are both in main. My provisional packages are available here: http://people.debian.org/~samo/experimental/ There is an archived ITP for proguard from over a year ago and I have checked with the original filer that he is no longer interested in this package. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 310044-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2005 22:21:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 02 15:21:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Ddy4A-00023z-00; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:21:30 -0700 Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Ddy14-0008TP-00; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:18:18 -0400 From: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#310044: fixed in proguard 3.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:18:18 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: proguard Source-Version: 3.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of proguard, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: proguard_3.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/proguard/proguard_3.2-1.diff.gz proguard_3.2-1.dsc to pool/main/p/proguard/proguard_3.2-1.dsc proguard_3.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/proguard/proguard_3.2-1_i386.deb proguard_3.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/p/proguard/proguard_3.2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for
Bug#285757: marked as done (ITP: rt2400-source -- source code for RaLink RT2400 kernel module)
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:15:02 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#285757: fixed in rt2400 1.2.2+cvs20050530-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2004 12:51:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 15 04:51:00 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from h131n4c2o1027.bredband.skanova.com (ogre.magicalforest.se) [217.208.27.131] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CeYcO-0007d6-00; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 04:51:00 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.5] (helo=[192.168.0.5] ident=nafallo) by ogre.magicalforest.se with asmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CeYbb-0004CO-VB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:50:12 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:50:25 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2hyaXN0aWFuIEJqw6RsZXZpaw==?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041012) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: rt2400-source -- source code for RaLink RT2400 kernel module Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist RaLink have developed a 802.11b chipset that exists in many brands of wifi cards on the market. They started with this driver as distibuted source without right to modify. Then Minitar have worked with RaLink to make the Linux driver for this chipset available as open source under the GPL license. The source is located here: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/rt2400/rt2400-1.2.1.tar.gz?download Sincererly -- Christian .-.Bjälevik Eskilstuna/v\[SWEDEN] ICQ UIN // \\ 60036598 Linux User /( )\ [344682] GPG Key ID ^^-^^ 23FE8EB7 Jabber Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 285757-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2005 22:21:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 02 15:21:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Ddy4Y-00028D-00; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:21:54 -0700 Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Ddxxu-0008Ip-00; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:15:02 -0400 From: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#285757: fixed in rt2400 1.2.2+cvs20050530-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:15:02 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: rt2400 Source-Version: 1.2.2+cvs20050530-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rt2400, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: rt2400-base_1.2.2+cvs20050530-1_all.deb to pool/main/r/rt2400/rt2400-base_1.2.2+cvs20050530-1_all.deb rt2400-source_1.2.2+cvs20050530-1_all.deb to pool/main/r/rt2400/rt2400-source_1.2.2+cvs20050530-1_all.deb rt2400_1.2.2+cvs20050530-1.dsc to pool/main/r/rt2400/rt2400_1.2.2+cvs20050530-1.dsc rt2400_1.2.2+cvs20050530-1.tar.gz to pool/main/r/rt2400/rt2400_1.2.2+cvs20050530-1.tar.gz rt2400_1.2.2+cvs20050530-1_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rt2400/rt2400_1.2.2+cvs20050530-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated rt2400 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
Penis Enlargement announcement
Now, it's finally possible for you to enlarge your penis http://www.renonu.com/ss/ Never do anything yourself that others can do for you. It is your work in life that is the ultimate seduction. Virtue is insufficient temptation. Everything you can imagine is real. Sex education classes in our public schools are promoting incest. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
