Bug#327440: O: texi2html -- Convert Texinfo files to HTML

[Nigel Jones]

On 12/09/05, Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> retitle 327440 ITA: html2ps -- HTML to PostScript converter
> owner 327440 !
> retitle 327441 ITA: texi2html -- Convert Texinfo files to HTML
> owner 327441 !
> thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCCed
> 
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:54:06 +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > Sadly, come next week, I will not be able to give it the care it may
> > need in future, it'd be better if QA manage this package for now and
> > someone else pick it up.
> 
> Sorry to see you go, and I hope whatever might be taking you from
> spending time for these packages will resolve soon in a good way.
Real Money, Real Work coming up, yeah, just a really busy time.
> 
> In the meantime I'd like to pick up html2ps and texi2html, but I
> noticed you already have tackled most serious issues...
Sorry to spoil the fun ;)
> 
> Cheers,
> Flo
> 
> 
Good to see someone steping in.
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFDJEg6s3U+TVFLPnwRAvz7AJ9InFj5HoFedDqwlXZpFdWx9aAwVACfeAxP
> GXwXjqZsRizTKBBUtV+lRMc=
> =witc
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> 
> 


-- 
N Jones

Bug#321808: O: ecb -- Code browser for several languages for Emacs.

[Zak B. Elep]

> Do you still intend to adopt ecb?  (This is just a ping, I'm not
> interested in adopting it myself.)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matej
>

Yes, I am! =) In fact I'm waiting for a sponsor, having posted an RFS at
-mentors and at http://sponsors.debian.net .  The packages are at
http://zakame.spunge.org/pub/debian/ecb/ .

My only gripe is that nobody's picking up the RFS.  Care to be my sponsor? =P

Cheers,
Zakame

-- 
ZAK B. ELEP
Outside of Home



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#238032: marked as done (ITA: twutils -- Utilities for twin)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#238032: fixed in twutils 0.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 2004 21:37:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 14 13:37:36 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B2dIe-00059U-00; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:37:36 -0800
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 8F47364D3A; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 21:37:36 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 05D6E10451; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 21:37:22 + (GMT)
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 21:37:22 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: twutils -- Utilities for twin
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-MIA-Summary: Orphaning: twutils
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

The current maintainer of twutils, Jean-Marc Bourdaret
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, is apparently not active anymore.  Therefore, I
orphan this package now.  If you want to be the new maintainer, please
take it -- see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for
detailed instructions how to adopt a package properly.

Some information about this package:

Package: twutils
Binary: twutils
Version: 0.2-5
Priority: optional
Section: utils
Maintainer: Jean-Marc Bourdaret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libtw-dev (>= 3.0.3-4)
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.5.2
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/t/twutils
Files: a0ffcafefee67502c516018d1277b427 642 twutils_0.2-5.dsc
 18136faa593d68344944287784744afb 94389 twutils_0.2.orig.tar.gz
 27b74319c03d1a3a02bb7352ecbbe113 2574 twutils_0.2-5.diff.gz

Package: twutils
Priority: optional
Section: utils
Installed-Size: 236
Maintainer: Jean-Marc Bourdaret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Version: 0.2-5
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4), libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 (>= 1:2.95.4-0.010810), 
libtw (>= 3.0.3-4)
Filename: pool/main/t/twutils/twutils_0.2-5_i386.deb
Size: 51406
MD5sum: 82fec30724e9d2194a86e693670175c0
Description: Utilities for twin
 Utilities that fits well with the Text WINdow manager, twin.
 it currently only contains twkalc, a calculator.

Justification: MIA since February 2002, email bounces

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 238032-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 05:18:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 22:18:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF3AM-0008Cg-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:17:10 -0700
From: Marco Presi (Zufus) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#238032: fixed in twutils 0.2-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:17:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: twutils
Source-Version: 0.2-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
twutils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

twutils_0.2-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/twutils/twutils_0.2-7.diff.gz
twutils_0.2-7.dsc
  to pool/main/t/twutils/twutils_0.2-7.dsc
twutils_0.2-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/twutils/twutils_0.2-7_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Marco Presi (Zufus) <[EM

Processed: merge

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> merge 206691 328027
Bug#206691: ITP: python-matplotlib -- A python based gtk plotting system in a 
style similar to matlab, aiming for publication quality plots.
Bug#328027: RFP: python2.4-matplotlib -- matplotlib is a Python module that 
implements graphical plotting in a manner similar to the comercial Matlab 
environment
Merged 206691 328027.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328027: RFP: python2.4-matplotlib -- matplotlib is a Python module that implements graphical plotting in a manner similar to the comercial Matlab environment

[Michael Gilbert]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist


this is a request for packaging of the Python matplotlib module.  it is
a Python implementation of plotting and data file loading mainly for
scientific purposes.  the commands and their usage are very intuitive to users
of Matlab and octave.  the website is

http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/

the license may be non-free.  perhaps it could be included in
either non-free or contrib.

http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/license.html

thanks for your consideration.

Mike Gilbert

* Package name: python2.4-matplotlib
  Version : x.y.z
  Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
  Description : matplotlib is a Python module that implements graphical 
plotting in a manner similar to the comercial Matlab environment

(Include the long description here.)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321808: O: ecb -- Code browser for several languages for Emacs.

[Matej Vela]

On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 09:57:57PM +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote:
> package ecp
> retitle 321808 ITA: ecb -- Code browser for several languages for Emacs.
> owner 321808 !
[...]
> I'll take this. :)  I just happened to fetch this package a couple of
> days ago as I was looking on trying out CEDET and ECB.

Do you still intend to adopt ecb?  (This is just a ping, I'm not
interested in adopting it myself.)

Thanks,

Matej


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327081: ITP: rpmstrap -- bootstrap a basic RPM-based system

[Steve Langasek]

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 02:19:09PM -0500, Sam Hart wrote:
> It actually was not my decision to GPLv2 it. I honestly didn't care what
> license it was released under. GPLv2 was just what the original base as
> written by Branden Robinson was copyrighted under.

> > > 1) Identical command-line options:
> > > 2) Placing of suite scripts inside of a "scripts/*" directory:
> > > 3) Making common functions available to suite scripts:

> > that you did seem to copy quite a bit from debootstrap anyway.

> No, I did not. Maintaining an identical interface and file layout is not
> copying code.

There are other things that are copyrightable besides code -- in
particular, usage/error messages (depending on their length and number)
are likely to be covered by copyright, and it's pretty implausible that
those would be the same between debootstrap and rpmstrap *without*
direct copying.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#68223: marked as done (RFP: tclhttpd -- TCL-based webserver)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:53:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at quiet) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2000 00:13:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 31 19:13:46 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mmagallo by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 13JPgn-pF-00; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 19:13:45 -0500
From: "Anselm Lingnau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Anselm Lingnau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: tclhttpd -- TCL-based webserver
X-Mailer: feedbts -- Flames to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Marcelo Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 19:13:45 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Submitted: 19980202

The person listed as the submitter of this bug has stated his intention to
package tclhttpd -- TCL-based webserver.
If you are interested in this package, and the ITP was submited a long time
ago (3 months or so), the prospective maintainer can be reached via
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  If you contact him, please remember to be
polite, Debian maintainers are volunteers, and Read Life has the nasty habit
of getting in the way.  Once you upload the package and it's installed on the
archive, please remember to close this bug (or include a Closes: bug#n
statement on your changelog).

This report was automatically fed into the BTS database.  The original
submission date to the WNPP system was 19980202.

You are getting a copy of this mail because your emai address was
listed on the WNPP as the person who submited the original request to the
system.

---
Received: (at 68223-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 22:53:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 15:53:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from natnoddy.rzone.de [81.169.145.166] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EExAt-io-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:53:19 -0700
Received: from ngolde.de (G93c7.g.pppool.de [80.185.147.199])
by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j8CMrH6H015522
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:53:17 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by ngolde.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2CAA1530008; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:53:30 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:53:30 +0200
From: Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.3 (2004 June 7, compiled Sep  1 2005 16:46:46)
X-Mailer: Mutt-ng http://www.muttng.org
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux sid
X-My-Homepage: http://www.ngolde.de
User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r472 (Debian)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NOSUBJECT 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,
this bug is very old and no reaction from you. Therefore I=20
close the bug. If you are still interested in maintaining=20
this program please reopen the bug otherwise retile it to=20
RFP to request that someone else makes a package if someone=20
is interested in this.
Regards Nico

--=20
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org=20
VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps=20
and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred

--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDJgbqHYflSXNkfP8RAkwsAJ9u3A/42lj1VN1ZZ0cy+IX6+ZF/NgCglRB4
3dYxcmhOnrNo76ybH+JlYwE=
=MomM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#275774: package removal?

[Nico Golde]

Hi,
what about deleting the package? Its orphaning is about a 
year old and there is a bunch of solitaire games in debian.
Regards Nico

-- 
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org 
VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps 
and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred


pgpDFIk2RMxCz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#324367: marked as done (ITP: amiwm -- The Amiga look-alike window manager)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:04:57 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324367: fixed in amiwm 0.20.48-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Aug 2005 20:10:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 21 13:10:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 80-219-64-218.dclient.hispeed.ch (linuks.mine.nu) 
[80.219.64.218] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E6w91-0003a2-00; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:10:15 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.40] (helo=localhost.localdomain)
by linuks.mine.nu with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1E6w8z-0002Lu-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:10:13 +0200
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:13:56 +0200
Subject: ITA: amiwm -- The Amiga look-alike window manager
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Generated by Pantomime 1.1.2)
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?G=FCrkan_Seng=FCn?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: GNUMail.app (Version 1.1.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wnpp

I want to maintain amiwm. Pity the bug was archived already.


---
Received: (at 324367-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 22:12:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 15:12:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEwQ5-0007PH-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:04:57 -0700
From: =?utf-8?b?R8O8cmthbiBTZW5nw7xu?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#324367: fixed in amiwm 0.20.48-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:04:57 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: amiwm
Source-Version: 0.20.48-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
amiwm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

amiwm_0.20.48-6.diff.gz
  to pool/non-free/a/amiwm/amiwm_0.20.48-6.diff.gz
amiwm_0.20.48-6.dsc
  to pool/non-free/a/amiwm/amiwm_0.20.48-6.dsc
amiwm_0.20.48-6_i386.deb
  to pool/non-free/a/amiwm/amiwm_0.20.48-6_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated amiwm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  6 Aug 2005 15:53:06 +0200
Source: amiwm
Binary: amiwm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.20.48-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 amiwm  - The Amiga look alike window manager
Closes: 324367
Changes: 
 amiwm (0.20.48-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Updated build depends for sid.
   * New maintainer. (closes: #324367)
   * Bumped standards version.
   * Removed default dh comments from debian/ manual pages and rules.
   * Update Makefile.in paths.
   * Add a user configuration example.
   * Fixed manual pages (escape minus).
Files: 
 cd3ae22ab909487374fe01651ebabb1a 1241 non-free/x11 optional amiwm_0.20.48-6.dsc
 718e20bdd62d54e6e84ee74c289fad0f 5712 non-free/x11 optional 
amiwm_0.20.48-6.diff.gz
 756e3c47c07b7a3a34ed7b2cc8f45b54 85228 non-free/x11 optional 
amiwm_0.20.48-6_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQIVAwUBQx9cQaOILr94RG8mAQJshhAA8x61rG79uOSe5bxczK4r2nFmEzOwdND7
VjxtPU8

Bug#326768: marked as done (ITP: libscriptalicious-perl -- Make scripts more delicious to SysAdmins)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:02:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326768: fixed in libscriptalicious-perl 1.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2005 15:45:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 05 08:45:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fry.debianforum.de (mail.debianforum.de) [213.239.213.245] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECJAN-0005cI-00; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 08:45:52 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.debianforum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A20DB1C0BE;
Mon,  5 Sep 2005 17:45:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.debianforum.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.debianforum.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 17422-03; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 17:45:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (dsl-082-082-241-048.arcor-ip.net 
[82.82.241.48])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.debianforum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13209B1C0BD;
Mon,  5 Sep 2005 17:45:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rafl by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ECJBt-0005KZ-FG; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 17:47:25 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: libscriptalicious-perl -- Make scripts more delicious to SysAdmins
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 17:47:24 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at debianforum.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* Package name: libscriptalicious-perl
  Version : 1.10
* License : Perl (GPL/Artistic)
  Description : Make scripts more delicious to SysAdmins

 This module helps you write scripts that conform to best common
 practices, quickly.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

---
Received: (at 326768-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 22:09:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 15:09:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEwNr-0006g5-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:02:39 -0700
From: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#326768: fixed in libscriptalicious-perl 1.10-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:02:39 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: libscriptalicious-perl
Source-Version: 1.10-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libscriptalicious-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libscriptalicious-perl_1.10-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libs/libscriptalicious-perl/libscriptalicious-perl_1.10-1.diff.gz
libscriptalicious-perl_1.10-1.dsc
  to pool/main/libs/libscriptalicious-perl/libscriptalicious-perl_1.10-1.dsc
libscriptalicious-perl_1.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/libs/libscriptalicious-perl/libscriptalicious-perl_1.10-1_all.deb
libscriptalicious-perl_1.10.orig.tar.gz
  to 
pool/main/libs/libscriptalicious-perl/libscriptalicious-perl_1.10.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be clo

Bug#324732: marked as done (ITP: libswish-api-common-perl -- Perl interface to the Swish index engine)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:55:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324732: fixed in libswish-api-common-perl 0.03-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2005 17:40:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 23 10:40:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fry.debianforum.de (mail.debianforum.de) [213.239.213.245] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E7cle-0001c7-00; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:40:58 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.debianforum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D7FB1C0B6;
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:41:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.debianforum.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.debianforum.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 07963-08; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:40:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (dsl-082-082-241-190.arcor-ip.net 
[82.82.241.190])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.debianforum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33D4B1C09E;
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:40:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rafl by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E7cn0-io-ET; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:42:22 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: libswish-api-common-perl -- Perl interface to the Swish index 
engine
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.16
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:42:22 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at debianforum.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* Package name: libswish-api-common-perl
  Version : 0.03
  Upstream Author : Mike Schilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~mschilli/SWISH-API-Common/
* License : Perl (GPL/Artistic)
  Description : Perl interface to the Swish index engine

SWISH::API::Common offers an easy interface to the Swish index engine.
While SWISH::API offers a complete API, SWISH::API::Common focusses on
ease of use.
.
Currently, SWISH::API::Common just allows for indexing documents in a
single directory and any of its subdirectories. Also, don't run index()
and search() in parallel yet.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

---
Received: (at 324732-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 22:11:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 15:11:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEwGh-0004cN-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:55:15 -0700
From: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#324732: fixed in libswish-api-common-perl 0.03-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:55:15 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: libswish-api-common-perl
Source-Version: 0.03-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libswish-api-common-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP 
archive:

libswish-api-common-perl_0.03-1.diff.gz
  to 
pool/main/libs/libswish-api-common-perl/libswish-api-common-perl_0.03-1.diff.gz
libswish-api-common-perl_0.03-1.dsc
  to pool/main/libs/libswish-api-common-perl/libswish-api-commo

Bug#323240: marked as done (ITP: viruskiller -- Game about viruses invading your computer)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:56:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323240: fixed in libpoe-component-jabber-perl 1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 17:04:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 10:04:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fry.debianforum.de (mail.debianforum.de) [213.239.213.245] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E4iNX-0006B7-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:04:03 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.debianforum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF30B1C0B9;
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:03:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.debianforum.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.debianforum.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 10759-09; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:03:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (p54B4B251.dip0.t-ipconnect.de 
[84.180.178.81])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.debianforum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7268DB1C0B8;
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:03:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rafl by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E4iOC-00039M-05; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:04:44 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: viruskiller -- Game about viruses invading your computer
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:04:43 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at debianforum.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* Package name: viruskiller
  Version : 1.0-1
  Upstream Author : Stephen Sweeney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.parallelrealities.co.uk/virusKiller.php
* License : GPL-2
  Description : Game about viruses invading your computer

Your computer has been invaded! Dozens of little viruses are pouring in
via security holes in Microsoft Internet Explorer, Microsoft Outlook,
Microsoft MSN Messenger and Microsoft Recycle Bin!! Using your trusty
mouse you must shoot the buggers before they can destroy your files!
Some will steal them from their home directories and take them back to
their security hole. Others will just eat them right there on the spot!
See how long you and your computer can survive the onslaught!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

---
Received: (at 323240-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 22:11:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 15:11:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEwI1-0004wr-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:56:37 -0700
From: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#323240: fixed in libpoe-component-jabber-perl 1.1-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:56:37 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: libpoe-component-jabber-perl
Source-Version: 1.1-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libpoe-component-jabber-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP 
archive:

libpoe-component-jabber-perl_1.1-1.diff.gz
  to 
pool/main/libp/libpoe-component-jabber-perl/

Bug#324730: marked as done (ITP: libperldoc-search-perl -- Index and search local Perl documentation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:53:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324730: fixed in libperldoc-search-perl 0.01-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2005 17:39:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 23 10:39:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fry.debianforum.de (mail.debianforum.de) [213.239.213.245] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E7cjn-zF-00; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:39:03 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.debianforum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A735B1C0B6;
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:38:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.debianforum.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.debianforum.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 07963-07; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:38:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (dsl-082-082-241-190.arcor-ip.net 
[82.82.241.190])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.debianforum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A10B1C09E;
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:38:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rafl by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E7ckM-hk-V0; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:39:39 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: libperldoc-search-perl -- Index and search local Perl 
documentation
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.16
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:39:38 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at debianforum.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* Package name: libperldoc-search-perl
  Version : 0.01
  Upstream Author : Mike Schilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~mschilli/Perldoc-Search/
* License : Perl (GPL/Artistic)
  Description : Index and search local Perl documentation

Perldoc::Search uses the swish-e engine to index the local Perl
documentation. It provides both the command line utility perldig and an
API to perform searches on the index. It uses SWISH::API::Common as the
indexing and search engine.
.
This package also contains the command line utility perldig, to dig up
keywords in the local Perl documentation

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

---
Received: (at 324730-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 22:11:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 15:11:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEwF3-0004I7-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:53:33 -0700
From: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#324730: fixed in libperldoc-search-perl 0.01-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:53:33 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: libperldoc-search-perl
Source-Version: 0.01-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libperldoc-search-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libperldoc-search-perl_0.01-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libp/libperldoc-search-perl/libperldoc-search-perl_0.01-1.diff.gz
libperldoc-search-perl_0.01-1.dsc
  to pool/main/libp/libperldoc-search-perl/libperldoc-search-per

Bug#326889: marked as done (ITP: sigscheme -- A Scheme Interpreter)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:37:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326889: fixed in sigscheme 0.1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2005 12:12:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 05:12:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from www.gniibe.org (zanshin.gniibe.org) [192.47.44.103] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECcJH-0008M0-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 05:12:19 -0700
Received: from [202.124.184.19] (helo=localhost)
by zanshin.gniibe.org with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1ECcJD-00039s-L7; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 21:12:17 +0900
Received: from gniibe by localhost with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ECcJJ-00021T-IC; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 21:12:21 +0900
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: sigscheme -- A Scheme Interpreter
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 21:12:19 +0900
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Kazuki Ohta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* Package name: sigscheme
  Version : 0.1.0
  Upstream Author : Kazuki Ohta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : 
http://mover.cool.ne.jp/others/sigscheme/sigscheme-0.1.0.tar.gz
* License : BSD
  Description : A Scheme Interpreter

SigScheme is a Scheme interpreter, which targets embedded program.
SigScheme is used as extention engine for uim, universal input method
system.  It conforms to R5RS, some of SRFI-s.

It's early development stage, but it is useful.
-- 

---
Received: (at 326889-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 21:38:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 14:38:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEvzC-tf-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:37:10 -0700
From: NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#326889: fixed in sigscheme 0.1.0-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:37:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: sigscheme
Source-Version: 0.1.0-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sigscheme, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

sigscheme_0.1.0-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/sigscheme/sigscheme_0.1.0-1.diff.gz
sigscheme_0.1.0-1.dsc
  to pool/main/s/sigscheme/sigscheme_0.1.0-1.dsc
sigscheme_0.1.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sigscheme/sigscheme_0.1.0-1_i386.deb
sigscheme_0.1.0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/s/sigscheme/sigscheme_0.1.0.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sigscheme package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  7 Sep 2005 10:54:02 +0900
Source: sigscheme
Binary: sigscheme
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 sigscheme  - A Scheme Interpreter
Closes: 326889
Changes: 

Bug#325996: marked as done (O: konq-speaker -- text-to-speech plugins for Konqueror and Kate)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:39:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ftp.debian.org: please remove konq-speaker from 
testing/unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2005 06:11:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 31 23:11:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vscan02.westnet.com.au [203.10.1.132] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EAiIG-00039v-00; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 23:11:24 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id C551211B086;
Thu,  1 Sep 2005 14:10:53 +0800 (WST)
Received: from vscan02.westnet.com.au ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (vscan02.westnet.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 31659-15; Thu,  1 Sep 2005 14:10:53 +0800 (WST)
Received: from localhost (dsl-202-173-183-137.vic.westnet.com.au 
[202.173.183.137])
by vscan02.westnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4F411B08D;
Thu,  1 Sep 2005 14:10:53 +0800 (WST)
Received: from bab by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1EAiHy-hn-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 16:11:06 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: text-to-speech plugins for Konqueror and Kate -- extra
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 16:11:06 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I'm hereby orphaning konq-speaker.

  This package contains text-to-speech plugins for Konqueror (the KDE
  file manager and web browser) and Kate (a KDE text editor).
  Text-to-speech is provided by the festival speech system.

  These plugins can be accessed through Konqueror's Tools menu and the
  plugin manager in Kate settings.

The package is not complicated to maintain.  Upstream has not worked on
it for many years, but it still works fine and is interesting from an
accessibility point of view.

Ben.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

---
Received: (at 325996-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 21:39:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 14:39:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.39.72] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEw1m-0001Xj-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:39:50 -0700
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl
([145.97.220.220] helo=mordor.wolffelaar.nl ident=Debian-exim)
by a-eskwadraat.nl with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1EEw1l-0004cE-Hs
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:39:49 +0200
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EEw1l-0005Gq-9G
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:39:49 +0200
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:39:49 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ftp.debian.org: please remove konq-speaker from testing/unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:32:08PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
> Please remove konq-speaker from unstable (and from testing when
> appropriate).

Removed (#327156).

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Bug#229960: ITA: aeromail -- Web-based e-mail client

[Jeroen van Wolffelaar]

retitle 229960 ITP: aeromail -- Web-based e-mail client
severity 229960 wishlist
thanks

On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:23:44PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi SteX,
> 
> (...) I intend to request removal of aeromail from unstable.  Please
> feel free to continue working on this package if it interests you, and
> reupload through a sponsor once you have a fixed package.

Removed, so converted to ITP.

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: ITA: aeromail -- Web-based e-mail client

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 229960 ITP: aeromail -- Web-based e-mail client
Bug#229960: ITA: aeromail -- Web-based e-mail client
Changed Bug title.

> severity 229960 wishlist
Bug#229960: ITP: aeromail -- Web-based e-mail client
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320213: Bug#320387: Name suggestion

[Nikita V. Youshchenko]

Hello

> Could this be renamed to pyicqt, removing hyphen?
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/320213 is MSN transport for Jabber, and it feels
> strange for one to be named pyicq-t, and other pymsnt.

Agreed.
Also, since PyMSNt and PyICQt are very similar, they should probably be 
similary packaged.
I'll look through pymsnt and see how to make pyicqt package as similar as 
possible.

eloy, please don't upload pyicq-t until this is done.

Nikita


pgpJx9EHDFeLF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#327081: ITP: rpmstrap -- bootstrap a basic RPM-based system

[Sam Hart]

On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 04:41 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Looking at rpmstrap-0.1, we see the following code for handling options:

> debootstrap uses the exact same code, except to say "usage_err
> 1 NEEDSUITETARGET" instead of "usage_error" and with two-space
> indentation. The usual way to parse arguments is with a `for a in "$@"'
> loop, or using getopt -- the above parsing algorithm has the bug that
> options can only appear at the beginning of the command line, eg.

I've slightly regretted not using getopt, honestly, however the bug you
point out is in many different shell scripts. This really seems a very
common way for people to parse command line options.

As for the name of the usage error function, yes they are similarly
named, but that was really coincidental I assure you.

> rpmstrap-0.1 uses the variable "$JUST_PRINT_RPMS" to track whether to dump
> the list of rpms to stdout or not; debootstrap uses "$JUST_PRINT_DEBS".

Ah, you're right on that one. The use of that variable was suggested to
me by someone who had used debootstrap for some VPS setups. He
maintained custom debootstrap scripts and desired the ability to do some
similar RPM-based VPS scripts. I'd have to check my mail archives to be
certain I am remembering this correctly, but I believe that was part of
a very early patch when rpmstrap was still living as a small set of
scripts.

> Compare the usage() functions:

> The code that handles the "You must specify a suite and a target." error
> messages looks pretty familiar too, but I've changed it a few times and
> I didn't find an exact match at first glance.

The usage() functions and error messages really should come as no
surprise. I was modeling the output based upon what I was getting from
debootstrap. Like I said, the intention was to reproduce debootstrap's
interface so rpmstrap would be familiar to people who have used
debootstrap before. I would guess that all of the error messages common
to the two of them would have similar wording.

> > I will have to check the legacy on this tool used internally at Progeny
> > to ensure nothing came from debootstrap,
> 
> As opposed to use a license that means it could potentially be incorporated
> into debootstrap or give credit where it seems like it's due, considering

It actually was not my decision to GPLv2 it. I honestly didn't care what
license it was released under. GPLv2 was just what the original base as
written by Branden Robinson was copyrighted under.

> > 1) Identical command-line options:
> > 2) Placing of suite scripts inside of a "scripts/*" directory:
> > 3) Making common functions available to suite scripts:
> 
> that you did seem to copy quite a bit from debootstrap anyway.

No, I did not. Maintaining an identical interface and file layout is not
copying code. Aside from the $JUST_PRINT_RPMs patch (which I will track
down to see what else it may have contained) doing similar things in
command-line option handling and usage() functions which have been done
many times before in other shell scripts does not show copying code.

> Even if you hadn't copied any code whatsoever, isn't a little
> acknowledgement appropriate? It's not as though debootstrap's license
> is particularly onerous.

I maintain that I did not copy any code. If you look at the problem
logically, building an RPM-based bootstrap is quite a bit different from
building a DEB-based bootstrap. In the RPM-world I have to keep track of
a lot of information that you wouldn't need to in the DEB-world because
with DEB you get a more rich set of tools. As an example, in an
RPM-based distribution you have to keep track of installation order and
grouping.

However, I do want to make sure that you and debootstrap get appropriate
acknowledgment. I honestly thought I had given sufficient acknowledgment
by linking from the website and mentioning it in the documentation.

Would adding something like the following to the header of the scripts
(under the authors line) be sufficient?
 * Inspired by and modeled after Anthony Towns' debootstrap (URL).

In all seriousness, I never wanted to /not/ let people know what
rpmstrap was intended to be like debootstrap but for RPM-based
distributions.

-- 
'
.O. Sam Hart, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
..OProgeny Linux Systems, Inc
OOO 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327890: ITP: libhtml-prototype-perl -- Generate HTML and Javascript for the Prototype library

[Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


* Package name: libhtml-prototype-perl
  Version : 1.33
  Upstream Author : Sebastian Riedel, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~mramberg/HTML-Prototype-1.33/
* License : Perl: GPL, Artistic
  Description : Generate HTML and Javascript for the Prototype library

 The module contains some code generators for Prototype, the famous
 JavaScript OO library and the script.aculous extensions.
 
 The Prototype library (http://prototype.conio.net/) is designed to make
 AJAX easy. Catalyst::Plugin::Prototype makes it easy to connect to the
 Prototype library.
 
 This is mostly a port of the Ruby on Rails helper tags for JavaScript
 for use in Catalyst.
 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-11-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
pl_PL)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327081: ITP: rpmstrap -- bootstrap a basic RPM-based system

[Anthony Towns]

On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 04:41:26AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Looking at rpmstrap-0.1, we see the following code for handling options:

Also copied was debootstrap's --arch and --include handling; even
duplicating the bug where you have to say "--arch i386" (with a space)
and "--include=foo,bar" (with an =). There even seems to have been a bug
introduced during the copying; debootstrap has:

]   --include*)
] additional="$(echo $1 | cut -f2 -d"="|tr , " ")"
] shift 1
] ;;
]   --exclude*)
] exclude="$(echo $1 | cut -f2 -d"="|tr , " ")"
] shift 1
] ;;

Someone involved in rpmstrap-0.1 evidently decided using lowercase
variables in some places was unacceptably inconsistent and changed
that to:

]   --include*)
]   ADDITIONAL="$(echo $1 | cut -f2 -d"="|tr , " ")"
]   shift 1
]   ;;
]   --exclude*)
]   ADDITIONAL="$(echo $1 | cut -f2 -d"="|tr , " ")"
]   shift 1
]   ;;

making --exclude work the same as --include, up until rpmstrap-0.4,
where they were changed to INCLUDES and EXCLUDES instead.

rpmstrap-0.1 set an UNPACK_TARBALL variable based on an --unpack-tarball
using the same code as debootstrap; but UNPACK_TARBALL is never actually
used; support for it is only implemented in rpmstrap-0.2.

Cheers,
aj


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#327081: ITP: rpmstrap -- bootstrap a basic RPM-based system

[Branden Robinson]

Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > Looking at the source it seems more "based on" than "inspired by",
> > > particular to "rpmstrap" itself, though the "functions" and "scripts/*"
> > > files sure seem more derivative than just coincidently similar. If
> > > so, it's in violation of debootstrap's license (by not including
> > > debootstrap's copyright text), and it seems fairly rude to relicense it
> > > from debootstrap's BSD-ish license to GPLv2+, not to mention expunging
> > > my name and copyright notice from the source, and for that matter all
> > > references to debootstrap.
> > > 
> > > Removing the copyright's a license violation, and presumably renders the
> > > program undistributable and unpackagable, afaics.
> > > 
> > > At least Bastian Blank's cdebootstrap was written from scratch to
> > > justify its different license and lack of recognition. Colour me
> > > unimpressed.

Sam Hart wrote:
> > For what it's worth, rpmstrap as it is today is actually based on a tool
> > developed in house at Progeny. This tool could only bootstrap Fedora
> > Core 2 at a specific revision. Looking at that code now and comparing it
> > to what I see inside of debootstrap, the only real similarities I see
> > are that they both have functions common to /many/ other shell scripts
> > (usage(), die(), warn(), trace()).

Anthony, I've been using shell functions with these names (and the
expected corresponding behaviors) in shell scripts I write for years
now, so you're probably going to need to accuse me of copyright
infringement in shell-lib.sh[1] in the XFree86 and X.Org packages as well.

> > I will have to check the legacy on this tool used internally at Progeny
> > to ensure nothing came from debootstrap, but to the best of my knowledge
> > it did not. In fact, looking at this internal tool now, it is only 314
> > lines of code, 153 of which are lists of FC2 packages, so it doesn't
> > seem likely to share any common ancestry with debootstrap.
> 
> I have just been given permission to post the original internal tool
> used at Progeny which rpmstrap is based upon, in case anyone would care
> to check the legacy for debootstrap code.
> 
> This original tool was also called "rpmstrap" and was written from
> scratch by Branden Robinson. It does not contain any code borrowed from
> debootstrap.

I assert this to be the case.  I'm easily capable of writing the trivial
shell script that constitutes the original "rpmstrap", and the
modifications I made to it subsequently.

For your edification, I'm attaching the SVN commit log for "rpmstrap" up
to and including my last change to it.  None of this is rocket science.

Oh, what the hell, how about I attach the diff of each commit as well,
making it all the easier to identify the exact spots where I absconded
with debootstrap code, mustache twitching!

> The first appearance of rpmstrap in the internal Progeny svn is the
> following code:
> http://hackers.progeny.com/~sam/rpmstrap/legacy/rpmstrap-original
> 
> The most current revision of rpmstrap in the same svn is:
> http://hackers.progeny.com/~sam/rpmstrap/legacy/rpmstrap
> 
> This is the actual base for what is now rpmstrap as I maintain. It is
> also why the current rpmstrap is GPLv2.
> 
> The one thing I have just realized is that the current rpmstrap script
> does not actually have Branden's name in it as an author (although his
> name does exist in some of the suite scripts). I will rectify this
> shortly and apologize for the oversight.

Well, only if there's any of my original nasty kludge *left*.  I kind of
hope it isn't.  :)  (Okay, you can keep usage()/trace()/warn()/die(),
but as for the rest... :) )

The original rpmstrap I wrote was done in haste, but it was not
plagiarized.  The accusation would be amusing if it weren't so
insulting.

[1] http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/svn/xorg-x11/trunk/debian/shell-lib.sh

(There, trace() is not present, but a similar function, observe(),
is.  Neither function is an example of anything more than highly
trivial and idiomatic shell usage.)

-- 
Branden Robinson  | GPG signed/encrypted mail welcome
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | 1024D/9C0BCBFB
Progeny Linux Systems | D5F6 D4C9 E25B 3D37 068C
  | 72E8 0F42 191A 9C0B CBFB

r16721 | branden | 2005-02-15 12:06:40 -0500 (Tue, 15 Feb 2005) | 2 lines

Install i386, not i686, version of openssl on x86_64 systems.


r15950 | branden | 2004-10-01 12:22:58 -0500 (Fri, 01 Oct 2004) | 3 lines

Fix erroneous architecture string in x86 glibc package for
x86_64.


r15943 | branden | 2004-09-29 15:35:44 -0500 (Wed, 29 Sep 2004) | 13 lines

Add command-line options -h | --help, -l | --list, and -v |
--verbose.

The new -l | --list feature simply prints the list of required
RPMs and exits.

Stop ha

Bug#327081: ITP: rpmstrap -- bootstrap a basic RPM-based system

[Anthony Towns]

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:12:31PM -0500, Sam Hart wrote:
> To be completely honest with you, I've not looked much at the
> debootstrap code before now. I have tried to mimic debootstrap's
> interface without a doubt, but have only done so by *using* debootstrap
> rather than snooping in its code. 

It's not "snooping" to look at the code of a free software project.

> For what it's worth, rpmstrap as it is today is actually based on a tool
> developed in house at Progeny. This tool could only bootstrap Fedora
> Core 2 at a specific revision. Looking at that code now and comparing it
> to what I see inside of debootstrap, the only real similarities I see
> are that they both have functions common to /many/ other shell scripts
> (usage(), die(), warn(), trace()).

Looking at rpmstrap-0.1, we see the following code for handling options:

] if [ $# != 0 ] ; then
] while true ; do
] case "$1" in
] --help)
] usage
] exit 0
] ;;
] ...
] esac
] done
] else
] usage_error "You must specify a suite and a target."
] fi

debootstrap uses the exact same code, except to say "usage_err
1 NEEDSUITETARGET" instead of "usage_error" and with two-space
indentation. The usual way to parse arguments is with a `for a in "$@"'
loop, or using getopt -- the above parsing algorithm has the bug that
options can only appear at the beginning of the command line, eg.

rpmstrap-0.1 uses the variable "$JUST_PRINT_RPMS" to track whether to dump
the list of rpms to stdout or not; debootstrap uses "$JUST_PRINT_DEBS".

Compare the usage() functions:

] usage()
] {
] echo "Usage: $PROGNAME [OPTION]...   []"
] echo "Bootstrap RPM-based systems."
] echo
] cat <  [ [

Bug#280023: marked as done (ITA: htp -- An HTML pre-processor)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280023: fixed in htp 1.15-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2004 18:31:37 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 06 10:31:37 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 233pc233.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [131.211.233.233] 
(mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CQVLd-0004fF-00; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 10:31:37 -0800
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CQVLd-0004pu-00; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 19:31:37 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: htp -- An HTML pre-processor
X-MIA-Summary: Orphaning: htp
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 19:31:37 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

The current maintainer of htp, Matthew MacLeod
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, is apparently not active anymore.
Therefore, I orphan this package now.  If you want to be the new maintainer,
please take it -- see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for
detailed instructions how to adopt a package properly.

Some information about this package:

Package: htp
Binary: htp
Version: 1.13-1
Priority: optional
Section: web
Maintainer: Matthew MacLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 2.0.0)
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.2.1
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/h/htp
Files: 1bac9d1c0566a1cdd4b3b0435ddbb451 557 htp_1.13-1.dsc
 302e63ffb0a71069ff5aa129687e11bd 126198 htp_1.13.orig.tar.gz
 d18642392d6140698f035e051e1af4db 4820 htp_1.13-1.diff.gz

Package: htp
Priority: optional
Section: web
Installed-Size: 384
Maintainer: Matthew MacLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Version: 1.13-1
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4)
Filename: pool/main/h/htp/htp_1.13-1_i386.deb
Size: 76640
MD5sum: 253daffb0003e4a4428d04ef21c75492
Description: An HTML pre-processor
 htp is an HTML pre-processor. It is designed to be a flexible authoring tool
 that can easily be integrated into the HTML design process.

Justification: No activity in two years, mail bounces

---
Received: (at 280023-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 18:21:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 11:21:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEsre-0002O1-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:17:10 -0700
From: Diego Escalante Urrelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#280023: fixed in htp 1.15-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:17:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: htp
Source-Version: 1.15-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
htp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

htp_1.15-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/h/htp/htp_1.15-1.diff.gz
htp_1.15-1.dsc
  to pool/main/h/htp/htp_1.15-1.dsc
htp_1.15-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/htp/htp_1.15-1_i386.deb
htp_1.15.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/h/htp/htp_1.15.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Diego Escalante Urrelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated htp package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date:

Bug#327081: ITP: rpmstrap -- bootstrap a basic RPM-based system

[Sam Hart]

On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 12:12 -0500, Sam Hart wrote:
> For what it's worth, rpmstrap as it is today is actually based on a tool
> developed in house at Progeny. This tool could only bootstrap Fedora
> Core 2 at a specific revision. Looking at that code now and comparing it
> to what I see inside of debootstrap, the only real similarities I see
> are that they both have functions common to /many/ other shell scripts
> (usage(), die(), warn(), trace()).
> 
> I will have to check the legacy on this tool used internally at Progeny
> to ensure nothing came from debootstrap, but to the best of my knowledge
> it did not. In fact, looking at this internal tool now, it is only 314
> lines of code, 153 of which are lists of FC2 packages, so it doesn't
> seem likely to share any common ancestry with debootstrap.

I have just been given permission to post the original internal tool
used at Progeny which rpmstrap is based upon, in case anyone would care
to check the legacy for debootstrap code.

This original tool was also called "rpmstrap" and was written from
scratch by Branden Robinson. It does not contain any code borrowed from
debootstrap.

The first appearance of rpmstrap in the internal Progeny svn is the
following code:
http://hackers.progeny.com/~sam/rpmstrap/legacy/rpmstrap-original

The most current revision of rpmstrap in the same svn is:
http://hackers.progeny.com/~sam/rpmstrap/legacy/rpmstrap

This is the actual base for what is now rpmstrap as I maintain. It is
also why the current rpmstrap is GPLv2.

The one thing I have just realized is that the current rpmstrap script
does not actually have Branden's name in it as an author (although his
name does exist in some of the suite scripts). I will rectify this
shortly and apologize for the oversight.

-- 
'
.O. Sam Hart, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
..OProgeny Linux Systems, Inc
OOO 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320253: RFP: libarchive-ar-perl -- Interface for manipulating ar archives

[Jay Bonci]

It needs a lot of work, and I've learned so much since then. I don't
think it's archive-ready at all.

Let me know if someone wants to pick it up upstream though. I have a lot
of plans for it that won't see the light of day until I'm finished with
a few larger projects.

-jay

On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 19:22 +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
> Hello Jay,
> 
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:12:46 +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> > I am really surprized there is no Archive::Ar module in Debian
> > repository. Well, RFP follows.
> 
> Just for your interest, I guess you are the best suited person to
> package this, if you think it should enter the archives...
> 
> Cheers,
> Flo


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Processed: Re: Bug#327462: marked as done (RFP: icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Meh, this usually happen when I don't read the complete logs before
> # doing any changes. Sorry.
> retitle 327462 RFP: icecc-icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc
Bug#327462: RFP: kicecream -- distributed compiler like distcc for kde
Changed Bug title.

> thanks and sorry
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327462: marked as done (RFP: icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc)

[David Moreno Garza]

# Meh, this usually happen when I don't read the complete logs before
# doing any changes. Sorry.

retitle 327462 RFP: icecc-icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc
thanks and sorry

On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 11:48 -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> reopen 327462
> retitle 327462 RFP: kicecream -- distributed compiler like distcc for kde
> thanks dude

> > It seems that the package you have requested now exists in the
> > Debian archive.

> Not really. The submitter meant actually a different package to the one
> that is already on the archive. I'm retitling it to 'kicecream' which
> probably could not be the best name but people could actually understand
> what this RFP is really for.

--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   | http://www.damog.net/
   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  | GPG: C671257D
  Imagine a large red swirl here.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#327462: marked as done (RFP: icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 327462
Bug#327462: RFP: icecc-icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc
Bug is already open, cannot reopen.

> retitle 327462 RFP: kicecream -- distributed compiler like distcc for kde
Bug#327462: RFP: icecc-icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc
Changed Bug title.

> thanks dude
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327462: marked as done (RFP: icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc)

[David Moreno Garza]

reopen 327462
retitle 327462 RFP: kicecream -- distributed compiler like distcc for kde
thanks dude

On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 03:33 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 03:17:20 2005

> It seems that the package you have requested now exists in the
> Debian archive.

Not really. The submitter meant actually a different package to the one
that is already on the archive. I'm retitling it to 'kicecream' which
probably could not be the best name but people could actually understand
what this RFP is really for.

Thanks for your time,

--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   | http://www.damog.net/
   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  | GPG: C671257D
  Yo no bebo: Es el amor el que me hace beber.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321347: ITA ping for libmpeg1, sodipodi

[David Moreno Garza]

On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 08:56 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > Do you still intend to adopt these?
> 
> Package done: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:45:00 +0200
> URL: http://archive.daniel-baumann.lan/debian/packages/libmpeg1/1.3.1-3/
> 
> I'm just waiting for my sponsor..

Isn't (s)he MIA right? You could be interested on asking for sponsorship
on -mentors, as well.

--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   | http://www.damog.net/
   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  | GPG: C671257D
  Kumbia King: King of Kumbia.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320253: RFP: libarchive-ar-perl -- Interface for manipulating ar archives

[Florian Ernst]

Hello Jay,

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:12:46 +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> I am really surprized there is no Archive::Ar module in Debian
> repository. Well, RFP follows.

Just for your interest, I guess you are the best suited person to
package this, if you think it should enter the archives...

Cheers,
Flo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#327462: acknowledged by developer (Package exist in Debian now)

[André Wöbbeking]

reopen 327462

On Monday 12 September 2005 12:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> It seems that the package you have requested now exists in the
> Debian archive.
>
> Information about the package:
>
> Package: icecream
> Binary: icecream
> Version: 0.8-3
> Priority: optional
> Section: net
> Maintainer: Christoph Siess (CHS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.0.0)
> Architecture: all
> Standards-Version: 3.6.1
> Format: 1.0
> Directory: pool/main/i/icecream

Obviously you didn't read all comments of this bug. I know that there is 
already a package called icecream. But it's a different one.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327081: ITP: rpmstrap -- bootstrap a basic RPM-based system

[Sam Hart]

On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 20:56 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:08:04PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> > * Package name: rpmstrap
> >   Version : 0.5
> > * URL : http://hackers.progeny.com/~sam/rpmstrap/
> > * License : GPL
> >   Description : bootstrap a basic RPM-based system
> > 
> >  rpmstrap is a tool for bootstrapping a basic RPM-based system. It is 
> > inspired
> >  by debootstrap, and allows you to build chroots and basic systems from RPM
> >  sources.
> 
> Looking at the source it seems more "based on" than "inspired by",
> particular to "rpmstrap" itself, though the "functions" and "scripts/*"
> files sure seem more derivative than just coincidently similar. If
> so, it's in violation of debootstrap's license (by not including
> debootstrap's copyright text), and it seems fairly rude to relicense it
> from debootstrap's BSD-ish license to GPLv2+, not to mention expunging
> my name and copyright notice from the source, and for that matter all
> references to debootstrap.
> 
> Removing the copyright's a license violation, and presumably renders the
> program undistributable and unpackagable, afaics.
> 
> At least Bastian Blank's cdebootstrap was written from scratch to justify
> its different license and lack of recognition. Colour me unimpressed.

To be completely honest with you, I've not looked much at the
debootstrap code before now. I have tried to mimic debootstrap's
interface without a doubt, but have only done so by *using* debootstrap
rather than snooping in its code. I am astounded that I have been
accused of stealing code or "expunging" any name or copyright
information.

For what it's worth, rpmstrap as it is today is actually based on a tool
developed in house at Progeny. This tool could only bootstrap Fedora
Core 2 at a specific revision. Looking at that code now and comparing it
to what I see inside of debootstrap, the only real similarities I see
are that they both have functions common to /many/ other shell scripts
(usage(), die(), warn(), trace()).

I will have to check the legacy on this tool used internally at Progeny
to ensure nothing came from debootstrap, but to the best of my knowledge
it did not. In fact, looking at this internal tool now, it is only 314
lines of code, 153 of which are lists of FC2 packages, so it doesn't
seem likely to share any common ancestry with debootstrap.

Starting with this internal tool, I aimed to build something that could
bootstrap any other RPM-based systems. Part of my goal was to mimic
debootstrap's functionality as it was a tool I had a lot of respect for.
However, I only mimicked it based upon my usage of debootstrap. Thus, in
my design of rpmstrap I did recreate the following from the design of
debootstrap:

1) Identical command-line options:
I wanted rpmstrap to take the same command line options
as debootstrap. This was more out of convenience because
I already knew the debootstrap options and I didn't want
to have to keep track of two different usages. This was
also because I wanted rpmstrap to be something that
someone could just drop into a tool that already used
debootstrap and it would work without any major
tweaking.

2) Placing of suite scripts inside of a "scripts/*" directory:
I wanted to split out the RPM-suites into their own
suite scripts. Originally, I thought of placing these in
either a directory called "suites/*" or one called
"scripts/*". I'll admit freely that I did a "dpkg-query
-L debootstrap" so I could mimic the directory structure
(remember, I wanted this to be a drop-in replacement).
However, that is not looking at the code, merely the
directory layout. I am reasonably certain that directory
layout is not copyrightable.

3) Making common functions available to suite scripts:
I wanted several functions written to be available to
the suite scripts. I originally place these into a file
called "functions", and was pleased to see that
debootstrap had taken similar logic when I did the
"dpkg-query -L debootstrap" above.

So, in conclusion, I did not copy any code from debootstrap, and to the
best of my knowledge, neither did any other contributors. The goal of
rpmstrap has always been to mimic what debootstrap does, except for
RPM-based systems.

rpmstrap and debootstrap both have similar design goals (and rpmstrap
was designed to have the same interface as debootstrap) so there will
undoubtedly be similarities.

Anthony, I value and respect your input, could you show me examples of
code that you believe was stolen? There is a very remote possibility
that code from contributo

Processed: ITA: libconfig-general-perl -- generic configuration module

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 289434 ITA: libconfig-general-perl -- generic configuration module
Bug#289434: O: libconfig-general-perl -- generic configuration module
Changed Bug title.

> owner 289434 !
Bug#289434: ITA: libconfig-general-perl -- generic configuration module
Owner recorded as Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCCed
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#289434: ITA: libconfig-general-perl -- generic configuration module

[Florian Ernst]

retitle 289434 ITA: libconfig-general-perl -- generic configuration module
owner 289434 !
thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCCed

Well, I'd really like to take over, yet as long as there are no bugs
and no new upstream release there is not much I can possibly do, as I
usually refrain from uploading just for the sake of claiming it...

I'll continually check back to see whether anything needs to be done.

Cheers,
Flo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#311150: marked as done (ITP: twinkle -- VoIP Softphone)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:01:07 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 May 2005 09:38:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 29 02:38:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (bristol.purcell.id.au) [212.139.94.171] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DcKFY-0002PO-00; Sun, 29 May 2005 02:38:28 -0700
Received: from dell.purcell.id.au ([192.168.3.15])
by debian with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DcKFS-0005o5-BX; Sun, 29 May 2005 10:38:25 +0100
Received: from mark by dell.purcell.id.au with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DcKFC-0007su-P4; Sun, 29 May 2005 10:38:06 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 10:38:06 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.3.15
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ITP: twinkle -- VoIP Softphone
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on debian)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* Package name: twinkle
  Version : 0.1
  Upstream Author : Michel de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.twinklephone.org/
* License : GPL
  Description : VoIP Softphone

 Softphone for making telephone calls using SIP over an IP network.
 .
 Twinkle supports direct IP phone to IP phone communication or a network using 
a SIP proxy to route your calls.


Twinkle contains the following 3rd party software packages:
- GSM codec from Jutta Degener and Carsten Bormann
Copyright 1992, 1993, 1994 by Jutta Degener and Carsten Bormann,
Technische Universitaet Berlin

- G.711 codec from Sun Microsystems
This source code is released by Sun Microsystems, Inc. to the public domain.
Please give your acknowledgement in product literature if this code is used
in your product implementation.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

---
Received: (at 311150-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 16:01:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 09:01:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEqk0-0001z6-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:01:08 -0700
Received: from djpig by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEqjz-0005L2-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:01:07 -0600
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:01:07 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Experimental upload now in unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

This WNPP bug was tagged "fixed-in-experimental", but the package has
since then moved to unstable.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327860: ITP: libpam-encfs -- PAM module to automatically mount encfs filesystems on login

[Ruben Porras]

El lun, 12-09-2005 a las 17:39 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen escribió:
> [Ruben Porras]
> > This PAM module integrates encfs [0] and PAM, so home directories
> > are automatically mounted on login. EncFS provides an encrypted
> > filesystem in user-space, this PAM module easily allow each user to
> > have an encrypted home, and mount it using its login password as
> > encfs password automatically.
> 
> This sounds very cool.  What about integrating it with cryptsetup

As I understand they have no relation, cryptsetup is a tool destined to
aid the creation of dm-crypt devices. EncFS is different to dm-crypt, it
uses FUSE instead of the linux device-mapper, but maybe I'm wrong.

>  and
> debian-installer, to have an option during installation to enable
> encrypted partitions and home directories?

yes, i would like to see encfs in d-i, because it lets create different
virtual filesystem for each user under the same partition. However, it
has also some drawbacks.

Bug#292222: ibuild: upstream rewrite delays initial release for Debian

[Martin-Éric Racine]

Following recent packages available via the Morphix archive, upstream
has come to the conclusion that a rewrite is necessary to make ibuild
cooperate with dist-utils, which will then make it easier to use CDBS
and other standard GNU tools to automatically configure the package.

Therefore, the initial release of ibuild for Debian is further delayed.

-- 
Martin-Éric Racine
http://q-funk.iki.fi


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#327860: ITP: libpam-encfs -- PAM module to automatically mount encfs filesystems on login

[Petter Reinholdtsen]

[Ruben Porras]
> This PAM module integrates encfs [0] and PAM, so home directories
> are automatically mounted on login. EncFS provides an encrypted
> filesystem in user-space, this PAM module easily allow each user to
> have an encrypted home, and mount it using its login password as
> encfs password automatically.

This sounds very cool.  What about integrating it with cryptsetup and
debian-installer, to have an option during installation to enable
encrypted partitions and home directories?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: change title

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 327462 RFP: icecc-icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc
Bug#327462: RFP: icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc
Changed Bug title.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#78209: Attention Requested

[Gary Harper]

CLIENT ALERT - For your immediate review:

Sorry for the initial delay, but your file has now been reviewed and we are 
happy to present you with three options for you to consider. 

Please note that this is a time sensitive matter and that your previous credit 
situation should not be a factor. 

Please confirm your details with our secure form to ensure our records are 
accurate and we will contact you via the method of your choice shortly.

Thank You and Good Day.

http://www.quicker-apps.com/index.php?refid=windsor


--Gary Harper
Senior Financial Advisor - eLMR Inc


Did this reach you in error? please let our office know so you won't recieve 
again:
http://www.quicker-apps.com/r.php







-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327860: ITP: libpam-encfs -- PAM module to automatically mount encfs filesystems on login

[Ruben Porras]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ruben Porras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* Package name: libpam-encfs
  Version : 0.1.2
  Upstream Author : Anders Aagaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://hollowtube.mine.nu/wiki/index.php/PAM/PamEncfs
* License : GPLv2 or later
  Description : PAM module to automatically mount encfs filesystems on login

This PAM module integrates encfs [0] and PAM, so home directories are
automatically mounted on login. EncFS provides an encrypted filesystem in
user-space, this PAM module easily allow each user to have an encrypted home,
and mount it using its login password as encfs password automatically.

[0] http://arg0.net/wiki/encfs
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/utils/encfs

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320213: Name suggestion

[Seo Sanghyeon]

Could this be renamed to pyicqt, removing hyphen?

http://bugs.debian.org/320213 is MSN transport for Jabber, and it feels
strange for one to be named pyicq-t, and other pymsnt.

FreeBSD porters evaded this problem by naming them jabber-pymsn and
jabber-pyicq.

http://www.freshports.org/net/jabber-pyicq
http://www.freshports.org/net/jabber-pymsn

Seo Sanghyeon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#303794: ITA: log4cpp -- A C++ library for flexible logging

[Christoph Berg]

Re: Fathi Boudra in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 0) does it make sense to package 0.3.4b now when 0.3.5 is in
> > preparation by upstream?
> 
> the package was orphaned and the current version in debian is 0.2.8
> until 0.3.5 will be released, the current stable upstream is 0.3.4b
> Instead of waiting for the next stable upstream release, i prefer to try to 
> provide an updated package, more up-to-date than the 0.2.8 version.

Ok. I was just curious if you knew if the release would happen during
the next few weeks.

> > 1) why is the .orig.tar.gz different from the SF.net version?
> >
> > 60f1bf4eaf60a0ca45339b0b2a93abb9139a1fd8  o/log4cpp-0.3.4b.tar.gz
> > 34f5a316f621913f60766c6be9c2f237b4f1b7de  log4cpp_0.3.4b.orig.tar.gz
> 
> you're right, i have probably done a mistake in my packaging.
> the noted differences are the config.guess and config.sub

These should go into the .diff.gz (making it very large).

> > 2) debian/copyright does not mention the copyright itself (which is
> > something that looks like "(c)  name ".
> 
> this line isn't correct ? :
> Copyright Holder: Bastiaan Bakker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

If that's what's in the source, yes. (Ideally, there would be
copyright years, but that's not really important.)

> > 6) wtf is that redirection for?
> > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I../include -g -O2 -Wall
> > -Wno-unused -pedantic -c FixedContextCategory.cpp -MT
> > FixedContextCategory.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/FixedContextCategory.TPlo -o
> > FixedContextCategory.o >/dev/null 2>&1
> 
> from the upstream release. need to investigate.

If upstream does it in that way, leave it as it is. It's still
braindead ;)

> you're the first one to review my package. Thanks for your reports.
> i'll correct my mistakes and can produce log4cpp 0.3.4b-2 or related to the 
> 1st point, can upgrade to 0.3.5rc3. what do you think of it ?

Either is fine, your choice.

Christoph
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#294849: ITA: txt2html -- Text to HTML converter

[David Alexander Contreras]

 --- Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:

> Hello there,
Hello, 

> 
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:53:07 -0600, David Alexander Contreras wrote:
> > retitle 294849 ITA: txt2html -- Text to HTML converter
> > owner 294849 !
> 
> As seven months have passed without any visible action (as in: no
> followups to any bugreport, including this one; no package on
> mentors.debian.net; no RFS on debian-mentors) I wonder
> whether you are still interested in maintaining this package...
>
Yes, I'm interested in maintaining this package. I was absent but
in this week , I hope test the new upstream version for pakaging.

Thank you for your interest.
 
> If not, do you mind if I take over?
> 
> Cheers,
> Flo
> 




| David Contreras  |
| ID : E65D1B15|
| Huella:9141 ACF2 8C29 303C 1536  A147 3E48 5695 E65D 1B15| 
| www.debiancolombia.org   |
| bachue.com/colibri   | 


__
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! 
Regístrate ya - http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/ 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#277732: O: nasm-mode -- NASM mode for XEmacs

[Matej Vela]

Hi,

Prospective adopters can take a look at an alternative implementation
at .

Cheers,

Matej


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327854: ITP: imview-doc -- The manual for Imview

[Teemu Ikonen]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Teemu Ikonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


* Package name: imview-doc
  Version : 1.0.1
  Upstream Author : Hugues Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cmis.csiro.au/Hugues.Talbot/imview/
* License : GFDL
  Description : The manual for Imview

 This is the complete user manual for Imview, an image viewing and analysis
 application found in the Debian package imview.
  

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#303794: ITA: log4cpp -- A C++ library for flexible logging

[Fathi Boudra]

> Hi.

hi

> I've grabbed the package from mentors.d.n. Please clarify the
> following points:
>
> 0) does it make sense to package 0.3.4b now when 0.3.5 is in
> preparation by upstream?

the package was orphaned and the current version in debian is 0.2.8
until 0.3.5 will be released, the current stable upstream is 0.3.4b
Instead of waiting for the next stable upstream release, i prefer to try to 
provide an updated package, more up-to-date than the 0.2.8 version.

> 1) why is the .orig.tar.gz different from the SF.net version?
>
> 60f1bf4eaf60a0ca45339b0b2a93abb9139a1fd8  o/log4cpp-0.3.4b.tar.gz
> 34f5a316f621913f60766c6be9c2f237b4f1b7de  log4cpp_0.3.4b.orig.tar.gz

you're right, i have probably done a mistake in my packaging.
the noted differences are the config.guess and config.sub

> 2) debian/copyright does not mention the copyright itself (which is
> something that looks like "(c)  name ".

this line isn't correct ? :
Copyright Holder: Bastiaan Bakker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> 3) outdated Standards-Version.

yes, another mistake -> Standards-Version: 3.6.1
it'll be updated by 3.6.2

> 4) you didn't actually change the Maintainer line. (note that you
> don't have to adopt the package, you can leave it with the QA group,
> but that's suboptimal, and invalidates the changelog entry about
> adopting).

it'll be updated.

> 5) the Description shouldn't start with "A ".

noted.

> 6) wtf is that redirection for?
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I../include -g -O2 -Wall
> -Wno-unused -pedantic -c FixedContextCategory.cpp -MT
> FixedContextCategory.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/FixedContextCategory.TPlo -o
> FixedContextCategory.o >/dev/null 2>&1

from the upstream release. need to investigate.

> 7)
> E: liblog4cpp3-dev: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file
> E: liblog4cpp3: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file

it'll be corrected.

you're the first one to review my package. Thanks for your reports.
i'll correct my mistakes and can produce log4cpp 0.3.4b-2 or related to the 
1st point, can upgrade to 0.3.5rc3. what do you think of it ?

cheers,

Fathi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Add descriptions

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 327764 O: doc-debian-ko -- Debian FAQ and other documents to Korean
Bug#327764: O: doc-debian-ko
Changed Bug title.

> retitle 327775 O: rhdb-admin -- Graphical tool to administer PostgreSQL/RHDB 
> Databases
Bug#327775: O: rhdb-admin
Changed Bug title.

> retitle 327776 O: irmp3 -- A Multimedia Audio Jukebox application
Bug#327776: O: irmp3
Changed Bug title.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#327462: marked as done (RFP: icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 327462
Bug#327462: RFP: icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#107808: Removing diskless?

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 107808 RM: diskless -- RoQA; buggy, unmaintained, better alternative 
> available
Bug#107808: ITA: diskless -- Diskless clustering
Changed Bug title.

> reassign 107808 ftp.debian.org
Bug#107808: RM: diskless -- RoQA; buggy, unmaintained, better alternative 
available
Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327462: marked as done (RFP: icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:17:19 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package exist in Debian now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2005 10:05:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 10 03:05:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EE2EZ-00048x-00; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 03:05:19 -0700
Received: from p54832b68.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[84.131.43.104] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1EE2EY-0002Ko-00; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 05:05:18 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Andre Woebbeking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFP: icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:06:58 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist


* Package name: icecream
  Version : 0.6.0
  Upstream Author : Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://wiki.kde.org/icecream
* License : GPL
  Description : distributed compiler like distcc

Hi,

could you please package Icecream for Debian. I already started with it
some time ago and it works for me, but I'm neither a Debian
maintainer/developer nor do I know if my work is correct.

You can find the source code here:

svn.kde.org/home/kde/trunk/kdenonbeta/icecream

Icecream is better than distcc because:
- the compiler is distributed by Icecream (imagine a kind of Knoppix
  live CD running Icecream, only boot the machine and your compile farm
  is ready)
- Icecream uses a scheduler:
  o there is no need to configure which hosts exists
  o if a host is already busy it doesn't accept any new jobs
  o faster hosts are prefered
- and all the things I can't remember


Cheers,
André

---
Received: (at 327462-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 10:17:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 03:17:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EElNI-0004l7-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 03:17:20 -0700
Received: from tbm by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EElNH-0007EL-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:17:19 -0600
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:17:19 -0600
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Package exist in Debian now
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

It seems that the package you have requested now exists in the
Debian archive.

Information about the package:

Package: icecream
Binary: icecream
Version: 0.8-3
Priority: optional
Section: net
Maintainer: Christoph Siess (CHS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.0.0)
Architecture: all
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/i/icecream
Files: 1a1e537818b764c6595ab039c011e79a 572 icecream_0.8-3.dsc
 e492662a2b4a95d1e11a607e3493298c 15549 icecream_0.8.orig.tar.gz
 f76862a21ac6d2c69dcc2983fc2c7c38 1974 icecream_0.8-3.diff.gz

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322625: marked as done (RFP: phpunit -- Unit testing suite for PHP4)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:17:16 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package exist in Debian now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Aug 2005 21:12:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 11 14:12:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.193] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E3KLM-0007ij-00; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:12:04 -0700
Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n15so106291nfc
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;

h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;

b=q3zwb+nHis0NXuf6f9zV8V1rvzzrNN75fldyrIYmZjNlmqFTH42gfqFdE/6ZyR1ED7l+Tch+I5LYkwm+8dswROwf7QXBiRcp0YTEcRwG37hNpt/hBTdFx0/tf+MpIblbV+anhHgfKsnvRBgeY1MVCGtm3Q2VdCpbmHMMfDRo6d8=
Received: by 10.48.239.19 with SMTP id m19mr77514nfh;
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.48.239.13 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 23:11:31 +0200
From: Nathan Samson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PHPUnit2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,ONEWORD 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: php5

Severity: wishlist

"PHPUnit is a family of PEAR packages (PHPUnit, PHPUnit2) that
supports the development of object-oriented PHP applications using the
concepts and methods of Agile Programming, Extreme Programming,
Test-Driven Development and Design-by-Contract Development by
providing an elegant and robust framework for the creation, execution
and analysis of Unit Tests."

I like to see this as package, it is usefull for developing and
testing a PHP application

Greetings

---
Received: (at 322625-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 10:17:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 03:17:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EElNF-0004kL-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 03:17:17 -0700
Received: from tbm by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EElNF-0007Dm-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:17:17 -0600
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:17:16 -0600
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Package exist in Debian now
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

It seems that the package you have requested now exists in the
Debian archive.

Information about the package:

Package: phpunit
Binary: phpunit
Version: 1.1.1-2
Priority: optional
Section: web
Maintainer: Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.1.16)
Architecture: all
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/p/phpunit
Files: c57cd55df4d4892f99c21a35195ed3b8 569 phpunit_1.1.1-2.dsc
 b7c732b20cd379faad9a0121417562e0 15412 phpunit_1.1.1.orig.tar.gz
 333f11c89111732981735a857bd58cd8 3757 phpunit_1.1.1-2.diff.gz

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#323453: marked as done (RFA: bsmtpd -- Batched SMTP mailer for sendmail and postfix)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:18:49 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixing WNPP problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2005 20:57:55 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 16 13:57:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from luv.spinnaker.de [194.8.203.54] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E58VP-0002Tj-00; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:57:55 -0700
Received: from besan.sail.spinnaker.de (besan.sail.spinnaker.de [192.168.42.7])
by luv.spinnaker.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2127489A1A;
Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:57:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by besan.sail.spinnaker.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CC9DD2A12D; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:57:52 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:57:52 +0200
From: Roland Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: bsmtpd -- Batched SMTP mailer for sendmail and postfix
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I stopped using UUCP and as a consequence also bsmtpd years ago, so I
don't use bsmtpd any more myself.

I think that someone, who actively uses the package should maintain
it, otherwise I suggest to remove the package from Debian.

Tscho

Roland

-- 
 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.spinnaker.de/ *

---
Received: (at 323453-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 10:18:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 03:18:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EElOj-0005fj-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 03:18:49 -0700
Received: from tbm by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EElOj-0007PG-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:18:49 -0600
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:18:49 -0600
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixing WNPP problems
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

This package has been removed.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#312875: marked as done (RFA: python-pcgi -- Persistent CGI for Python)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:18:25 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixing WNPP problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jun 2005 14:30:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 10 07:30:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from picard.mediasupervision.de [80.152.3.111] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DgkWq-0002cs-00; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:30:36 -0700
Received: from localhost (picard [127.0.0.1])
by picard.mediasupervision.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9CD611734B; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:30:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from picard.mediasupervision.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (picard [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 11909-06; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:30:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from clapton.mediasupervision.de (clapton.mediasupervision.de 
[10.0.0.76])
by picard.mediasupervision.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id A90D517348; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:30:22 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: python-pcgi -- Persistent CGI for Python
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:30:26 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at mediasupervision.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I request an adopter for the python-pcgi package.

The package description is:
 Persistent CGI is an architecture designed by Digital Creations
 (http://www.digicool.com) to publish Python web objects as long-running
 processes. You'll love this e.g. if you plan to publish long-running
 Bobo applications on the web.

PCGI is a legacy package. Digital Creations is now known as Zope
Corporation. Traditionally, PCGI was used to accelerate operation of
Zope with Apache, but there are still other reasonable uses of PCGI.

---
Received: (at 312875-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 10:18:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 03:18:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EElOM-0005Ok-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 03:18:26 -0700
Received: from tbm by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EElOL-0007MI-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:18:25 -0600
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:18:25 -0600
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixing WNPP problems
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

This package has been removed.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296330: marked as done (ITP: tmsnc -- Textbased MSN Client)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:17:09 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package exists in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2005 19:08:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 11:08:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from neuro-tech.net [80.68.88.74] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D3Iup-0008OM-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:08:19 -0800
Received: from luke by neuro-tech.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D3Iun-0005Dy-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:08:17 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Luke Reeves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFP: tmsnc -- Textbased MSN Client
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:08:17 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist


* Package name: tmsnc
  Version : 0.2.0b
  Upstream Author : Sanoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://tmsnc.sourceforge.net/
* License : IR Public Domain License
  Description : Textbased MSN Client

TMSNC is a MSN client written in C using a Curses interface.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-bytemark-uml-20040706-1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

---
Received: (at 296330-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 10:17:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 03:17:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EElN8-0004k7-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 03:17:10 -0700
Received: from tbm by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EElN7-0007Cg-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:17:09 -0600
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:17:09 -0600
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Package exists in the archive
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

This package is in Debian now:

Package: tmsnc
Binary: tmsnc
Version: 0.2.4-1
Priority: optional
Section: net
Maintainer: Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libssl-dev, libncurses5-dev
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.6.2
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/t/tmsnc
Files: af6c79c07551c515142c25bf3cb02455 584 tmsnc_0.2.4-1.dsc
 8e9d82ff81189c4dc364989818f02d8b 205502 tmsnc_0.2.4.orig.tar.gz
 af9a45364e7675b1fa4009481b33a3cc 15005 tmsnc_0.2.4-1.diff.gz

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: in debian

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 270844 ITA: netjuke -- Web-Based Audio Streaming Jukebox
Bug#270844: ITP: netjuke -- Web-Based Audio Streaming Jukebox
Changed Bug title.

> severity 270844 normal
Bug#270844: ITA: netjuke -- Web-Based Audio Streaming Jukebox
Severity set to `normal'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#327561: O: xmms -- Versatile X audio player that looks like Winamp

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 327561 ITA: xmms -- versatile X audio player
Bug#327561: O: xmms -- Versatile X audio player that looks like Winamp
Changed Bug title.

> owner 327561 !
Bug#327561: ITA: xmms -- versatile X audio player
Owner recorded as David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 20:11 -0400, Christopher Martin wrote:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> > I'm orphaning XMMS, since I don't use XMMS sufficiently often to be a really
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> > attentive maintainer, and Josip Rodin is completely inactive.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> >
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> > XMMS isn't too active upstream these days, yet with its large collection of
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

Too many unknown commands, stopping here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309280: ITP: Krecipes - Cooking book for KDE

[Florian Ernst]

Hello Jean-Remy, hello Matteo,

it looks like both of you intent to maintain krecipes, but one of you
apparently didn't provide any packages yet while the other forgot to
fill in an ITP.

Perhaps you might want to coordinate your efforts?

For reference, please see
,
 and
.

Cheers,
Flo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#294849: ITA: txt2html -- Text to HTML converter

[Florian Ernst]

Hello there,

On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:53:07 -0600, David Alexander Contreras wrote:
> retitle 294849 ITA: txt2html -- Text to HTML converter
> owner 294849 !

As seven months have passed without any visible action (as in: no
followups to any bugreport, including this one; no package on
mentors.debian.net; no RFS on debian-mentors) I wonder
whether you are still interested in maintaining this package...

If not, do you mind if I take over?

Cheers,
Flo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#321466: O: liblingua-ispell-perl

[Matej Vela]

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:10:56AM +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Matej Vela wrote:
> 
> > Frederic, your package pronto is the only reverse dependency of
> > liblingua-ispell-perl.  Perhaps you'd like to adopt it?
> 
> Actually I thought about orphaning (and possibly removing) pronto.
> This would be a perfect trigger.

It has only 8 votes on popcon, so I'd say go ahead.  Details on
orphaning at .

Thanks,

Matej


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321347: ITA ping for libmpeg1, sodipodi

[Matej Vela]

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 08:56:40AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Matej Vela wrote:
> > Do you still intend to adopt these?
> 
> Package done: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:45:00 +0200
> URL: http://archive.daniel-baumann.lan/debian/packages/libmpeg1/1.3.1-3/
> 
> I'm just waiting for my sponsor..

This...

> libmpeg1 (1.3.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
> 
>   * New maintainer (Closes: #321347).
>   * debian/ redone (Closes: #322833, #66504, #176349).

... is much too terse, and fails to acknowledge NMU-fixed bugs.

Thanks,

Matej


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322102: ITA ping for libmpeg1, sodipodi

[Matej Vela]

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 08:55:32AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Matej Vela wrote:
> > Do you still intend to adopt these?
> 
> Package done: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 23:18:00 +0200
> URL: http://archive.daniel-baumann.lan/debian/packages/sodipodi/0.34-1/
> 
> I'm just waiting for my sponsor..

It conflicts with djpig's upload [1], and doesn't even fix the trivial
bugs [2].

[1] 
[2] 

Thanks,

Matej


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321466: O: liblingua-ispell-perl

[Frederic Peters]

Matej Vela wrote:

> Frederic, your package pronto is the only reverse dependency of
> liblingua-ispell-perl.  Perhaps you'd like to adopt it?

Actually I thought about orphaning (and possibly removing) pronto.
This would be a perfect trigger.


Regards,
Frederic


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322102: ITA ping for libmpeg1, sodipodi

[Daniel Baumann]

Matej Vela wrote:
> Do you still intend to adopt these?

Package done: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 23:18:00 +0200
URL: http://archive.daniel-baumann.lan/debian/packages/sodipodi/0.34-1/

I'm just waiting for my sponsor..

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321347: ITA ping for libmpeg1, sodipodi

[Daniel Baumann]

Matej Vela wrote:
> Do you still intend to adopt these?

Package done: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:45:00 +0200
URL: http://archive.daniel-baumann.lan/debian/packages/libmpeg1/1.3.1-3/

I'm just waiting for my sponsor..

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]