Bug#366647: ITP: rp-l2tp -- a user-space implementation of L2TP (RFC 2661) for Linux

2006-05-09 Thread alex bodnaru
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


* Package name: rp-l2tp
  Version : 0.4
  Upstream Author : Copyright 2002 Roaring Penguin Software Inc
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/rp-l2tp/
* License : GPL
  Programming Lang: C
  Description : a user-space implementation of L2TP (RFC 2661) for Linux

 rp-l2tp  provides  a  user-space  L2TP daemon.  L2TP is the Layer Two
 Tunneling  Protocol described in RFC 2661.  It allows you to tunnel 
 PPP  sessions over a network or transport protocol (in this case, UDP.)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-skas3-v8.2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#366618: ITP: cdck -- A simple program to verify CD/DVD quality

2006-05-09 Thread Nacho Barrientos Arias
Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 23:50:06 +0200
Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> * Package name: cdck
>   Version : 0.5.2
>   Upstream Author : Alexey Semenoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.example.org/
> * License : GPL
>   Description : A simple program to verify CD/DVD quality
> 
>  Actually cdck is a simple program to verify CD/DVD quality. The known
>  fact is that even if all files on the disc are readable, some sectors
>  having bad timing can easily turn into unreadable ones in the future.
>  .
>  To get an idea about disc cdck reads it sector by sector, keeping all
>  reading timings  and then  tells you its  verdict. Optionally  it can
>  write timing  table into text  file usable by gnuplot(1)  program, so
>  you can draw some graphs out of it.
>  .
>   http://swaj.net/unix/#cdck

What about #366554 ?

-- 
Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://criptonita.com/~nacho



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#366625: ITA(hijack): bacula

2006-05-09 Thread John Goerzen
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I intend to hijack the Bacula package.  I posted the reasons to
debian-devel.  That post is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/05/msg00260.html and
is reproduced here.

The maintainer in question also has unaddressed RC bugs for other
packages (such as progsreiserfs)

Copying the MIA people per suggestion from #debian-devel.

==

Hello,

I intend to take over the Bacula package.  I would first like to say
thanks to Jose Luis Tallon for initially packaging it for Debian and
maintaining it for these years.

A brief history of why I intend to do this:

 * Bacula has had RC bugs open for more than a year.  It was removed
   from testing several months ago because of this.

 * Bacula's current maintainer is not a Debian Developer and has been
   in NM since 2003.

 * Bacula as it currently exists in sid is unbuildable and
   uninstallable.  Bacula will not be present in etch unless significant
   problems are fixed.

 * The last upload for Bacula was almost a year ago.

 * The maintainer has repeatedly, over the last year, said he's working
   on this but hasn't made much real progress, and has made no upload to
   Debian.

 * Several additional critical-level or grave-level unreported bugs
   exist in the bacula Debian source tree (such as stopping database servers
   without permission and deleting files un-owned by a particular package)

 * There are various policy compliance issues with the current packages.

 * The current maintainer does respond to pings, but has a long record
   of problems getting bugs (even RC bugs) fixed in a timely fashion.

I have already prepared an NMU that fixes 22 bugs, including all four RC
bugs.  I have tagged those bugs as pending.  This release is currently
sitting in NEW.  I also prepared subsequent NMUs that fix critical, but
unreported, bugs in the Debian Bacula packages.

Fixing the rest of the problems with Bacula requires a level of work
that is not really appropriate for an NMU.  I have discussed the
situation with Jose's AM, Stephen Frost, who encouraged me to hijack the
package.  I have also discussed the situation on #debian-devel, and
consensus there seemed to be that a hijack was warranted.

Finally, I should add that we intend to use Bacula at my workplace and
have made the fixes already made to Bacula as part of my job.  We will
be using it in a production environment, and I do not want to do that
until I can trust the Bacula packages to work right.  We will be backing
up 2-5TB of data across Debian, AIX, and Windows servers to a 48-tape
LTO3 library.  In short, I will be maintaining working Bacula packages
anyway, and I might as well upload them to Debian.

I also e-mailed Jose about the situation, offering to adopt Bacula, on
April 27, but have not yet received a reply to that message.

-- John


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#366617: ITP: php-net-ldap -- interface for searching and manipulating LDAP-entries

2006-05-09 Thread Jose Carlos Medeiros

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Carlos Medeiros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* Package name : php-net-ldap
* Version : 0.6.6
* Upstream Author: Tarjei Huse
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/Net_LDAP/
* License : LGPL
* Description :
Net Ldap is a clone of Perls Net::LDAP object interface to
ldapservers. It does not contain all of Net::LDAPs features,
but has:
- A simple OO-interface to connections, searches and entries.
- Support for tls and ldap v3.
- Simple modification, deletion and creation of ldapentries.
- Support for schema handling.
Net_LDAP layers itself on top of PHP's existing ldap extensions.


Bug#366618: ITP: cdck -- A simple program to verify CD/DVD quality

2006-05-09 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* Package name: cdck
  Version : 0.5.2
  Upstream Author : Alexey Semenoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : GPL
  Description : A simple program to verify CD/DVD quality

 Actually cdck is a simple program to verify CD/DVD quality. The known
 fact is that even if all files on the disc are readable, some sectors
 having bad timing can easily turn into unreadable ones in the future.
 .
 To get an idea about disc cdck reads it sector by sector, keeping all
 reading timings  and then  tells you its  verdict. Optionally  it can
 write timing  table into text  file usable by gnuplot(1)  program, so
 you can draw some graphs out of it.
 .
  http://swaj.net/unix/#cdck

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#208459: probably you

2006-05-09 Thread Shawn
Do not ignore me please,
I found your email somewhere and now decided to write you.
I bam coming to your place in few weaeks abnd thought we 
can meeta each other. Let me know if you do not mind.
I am a nice pretty girl. Don't reply to this email. 
Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#194155: my dream come true

2006-05-09 Thread Rodney
Hire,
i am here sitting in the internet caffe. Found your email and
decided to write. I might be coming to your placae in 14 days, 
so I decided to email you. May be we can! meet? I am 25 y.o.
girl. I ha!ve! aa picture! if you want. No n!eed to reply here !as 
this is not my email. Write me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#366554: ITP: cdck -- verifies the quality of written CDs/DVDs

2006-05-09 Thread gregor herrmann
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


* Package name: cdck
  Version : 0.5.2
  Upstream Author : Alexey Semenoff>
* URL : http://swaj.net/unix/index.html#cdck
* License : GPL (2 or later)
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description : verifies the quality of written CDs/DVDs

 cdck (CD/DVD check tools) is a simple console program to verify CD/DVD
 quality. The known fact is that even if all files on the disc are readable,
 some sectors having bad timing can easily turn into unreadable ones in the
 future.
 .
 To get an idea about a disc cdck reads it sector by sector, keeping
 all reading timings and then tells you its verdict. Optionally it
 can write the timing table into text file usable by gnuplot(1)
 program, so you can draw some graphs out of it.


Additional comment:
qpxtool does something similar, but it depends on the used drive and
it needs X. cdck works on all discs/drives and is a console
application.


gregor


- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 
'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.200605061601
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEYME3OzKYnQDzz+QRAisWAKDZyNEHSLSR4M1EpdKIaCATXQMvWwCePZHX
wtKB9mzU3laMwkdl0gLcgbo=
=5L0d
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: fixing wnpp bug

2006-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> #missing short description
> retitle 366524 RFA: xbattbar -- Display battery status in X11
Bug#366524: RFA: xbattbar
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#366551: O: request-tracker3.4 -- Extensible trouble-ticket tracking system

2006-05-09 Thread Stephen Quinney
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I've been mostly ignoring request-tracker3.4 for a while as I am
hardly using it now and I no longer have the necessary time to spend
on the package maintenance so I have orphaned the request-tracker3.4
package.

If you are interested in taking up the maintainership of this package
I would recommend that you first discuss it on debian-perl, there's a
good chance others will be interested in some form of team.

Stephen Quinney


The package description is:
 Request Tracker (RT) is an enterprise-grade ticketing system which
 enables a group of people to intelligently and efficiently manage
 tasks, issues, and requests submitted by a community of users. It
 features a web, email and command-line interfaces (see the package
 rt3.4-clients).
 .
 This is the 3.4 series of RT, it can be installed alongside the 3.0
 and 3.2 series without any problems. This release is a big
 improvement over previous versions and features many new features,
 substantial performance improvements and a significant cleanup and
 restructuring of the codebase.
 .
 Written in object-oriented Perl, RT is a high-level, portable,
 platform independent system that eases collaboration within
 organizations and makes it easy for them to take care of their
 customers.
 .
 RT manages key tasks such as the identification, prioritization,
 assignment, resolution and notification required by
 enterprise-critical applications including project management, help
 desk, NOC ticketing, CRM and software development.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#317382: Status update

2006-05-09 Thread Alan Woodland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

FYI: thunderbird and mailnews packages now both build. I'm currently
looking into an issue with preferences not appearing mailnews still.
Once that is completed packages should be largely done, possibly
requiring some more testing though.

Alan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEYLyn1FNW1LDdr0IRAmFTAKCMpyUYmx58PsJd8NXMuLrJHYnaRgCfZ7Dt
x8vdC/ifJuCZSm8oe50K4RM=
=SOny
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#366547: ITP: xmlrpc++ -- XML-RPC library for C++

2006-05-09 Thread Ondřej SurÃœ
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Ondřej Surý" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* Package name: xmlrpc++
  Version : 20040713
  Upstream Author : Chris Morley
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/xmlrpcpp/
* License : LGPL
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description : XML-RPC library for C++

 XmlRpc++ is a C++ implementation of the XML-RPC protocol. It is
 based upon Shilad Sen's excellent py-xmlrpc. The XmlRpc protocol
 was designed to make remote procedure calls easy: it encodes data
 in a simple XML format and uses HTTP for communication. XmlRpc++
 is designed to make it easy to incorporate XML-RPC client and server
 support into C++ applications.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-22-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)



Bug#366483: ITP: oci-mpc -- The Makefile, Project and Workspace Creator

2006-05-09 Thread thomas . g . girard
Selon alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> examining mpc-ace, i found it's dependent on libace and libtao, which
> is, in my opinion, too much for a few perl scripts ;-).

Ouch, you're right. It depends on libace-dev, and recommends libtao-dev.

> is this really needed for this special versions of mpc?

Let me check... Well, I've added this dependency because of the makefile
fragments in rules.* files. I'll have a closer look soon and let you
know. In the meantime, you can install libace-dev and see if you can
get further.

Thanks,

Thomas



Bug#366483: ITP: oci-mpc -- The Makefile, Project and Workspace Creator

2006-05-09 Thread alex bodnaru

hi thomas,

no problem, i'd like to help. oc-mpc is 3.3.95 right now, as upstream
were proud to announce.

if you could find out what tweaks are needed for ace+tao, they may even
not hurt a pure oci-mpc distribution.

in the meantime, i'd also check the project i'm working on with both the
versions.

alex


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Selon alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
>>hi thomas,
>>
>>i have needed mpc to package another program.
>>
>>i'd rather use your prepared package, of course.
>>
>>pitty the aleged upstream authors (oci), didn't know anything about your
>>effort.
> 
> 
> Well, as you may know, OCI's version is upstream. The DOC group uses a
> snapshot version for ACE+TAO[0] development, and this is the version
> packaged as mpc-ace. You may find out that the mpc-ace version is
> outdated.
> 
> If that happen please let me know, and together we'll move toward the OCI
> version, therefore deprecating mpc-ace. I know that ACE+TAO can be
> compiled with OCI's MPC with some tweaks.
> 
> 
>>please close my itp bugs in your changelog, and tell me how could i
>>totally cancel oci-mpc in favour of your package.
> 
> 
> I don't need to mention this ITP in ACE+TAO packages changelog.
> 
> As soon as you have find out that mpc-ace MPC version fits your needs,
> i.e. you can build your package with it, then you can close the ITP
> by yourself stating that oci-mpc is not needed because of mpc-ace.
> If mpc-ace does not fit, we'll use this ITP to move to OCI's version.
> 
> Do you agree ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#366483: ITP: oci-mpc -- The Makefile, Project and Workspace Creator

2006-05-09 Thread alex bodnaru

hi thomas,

examining mpc-ace, i found it's dependent on libace and libtao, which
is, in my opinion, too much for a few perl scripts ;-).

is this really needed for this special versions of mpc?

alex

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Selon alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
>>hi thomas,
>>
>>i have needed mpc to package another program.
>>
>>i'd rather use your prepared package, of course.
>>
>>pitty the aleged upstream authors (oci), didn't know anything about your
>>effort.
> 
> 
> Well, as you may know, OCI's version is upstream. The DOC group uses a
> snapshot version for ACE+TAO[0] development, and this is the version
> packaged as mpc-ace. You may find out that the mpc-ace version is
> outdated.
> 
> If that happen please let me know, and together we'll move toward the OCI
> version, therefore deprecating mpc-ace. I know that ACE+TAO can be
> compiled with OCI's MPC with some tweaks.
> 
> 
>>please close my itp bugs in your changelog, and tell me how could i
>>totally cancel oci-mpc in favour of your package.
> 
> 
> I don't need to mention this ITP in ACE+TAO packages changelog.
> 
> As soon as you have find out that mpc-ace MPC version fits your needs,
> i.e. you can build your package with it, then you can close the ITP
> by yourself stating that oci-mpc is not needed because of mpc-ace.
> If mpc-ace does not fit, we'll use this ITP to move to OCI's version.
> 
> Do you agree ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#366525: RFA: hlfl -- translator for firewalling rules

2006-05-09 Thread Thomas Seyrat
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal


I request an adopter for the hlfl package.

I don't use this anymore, the upstream is reponsive but has apparently
no plan to update hlfl anymore.



The package description is:
 HLFL (High Level Firewall Language) translates your firewalling
 rules into usable rules for ipfw, IPFilter, ipfwadm, IPChains,
 Netfilter and Cisco.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#366483: ITP: oci-mpc -- The Makefile, Project and Workspace Creator

2006-05-09 Thread alex bodnaru

hi,

thanks very much for pointing me to the package. i acrually need to use it.

i have told the maintainer to close my itp bugs, but please tell me what
else should i do to eliminate oci-mpc, in favour of mcp-ace.

regards,

alex

Ramiro Morales wrote:
> Alex,
> 
> On 5/8/06, alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>> * Package name: oci-mpc
>>   Version : 3.3.95
>>   Upstream Author : Designed by Justin Michel ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>> and Chad Elliott.
>> Implemented by Chad Elliott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>> * URL : http://www.example.org/
>> * License : Close to BSD:
>>  Since MPC is open source and free of licensing fees, you are free to
>> use,
>>  modify, and distribute the source code, as long as you include this
>>  copyright statement.
>>  In particular, you can use MPC to build proprietary software and are
>> under
>>  no obligation to redistribute any of your source code that is built
>> using
>>  MPC. Note, however, that you may not do anything to the MPC code,
>> such as
>>  copyrighting it yourself or claiming authorship of the MPC code, that
>> will
>>  prevent MPC from being distributed freely using an open source
>> development
>>  model.
>>
>>   Programming Lang: Perl
>>   Description : The Makefile, Project and Workspace Creator
>>
>>  A single tool (MPC) can be used to generate tool specific input (i.e.
>>  Makefile, dsp, vcproj, etc).  The generator takes platform and building
>>  tool generic files (mpc files) as input which describe basic information
>>  needed to generate a "project" file for various build tools.  These
>> tools
>>  include Make, NMake, Visual C++ 6, Visual C++ 7, etc.
> 
> 
> MPC is already being packaged and distributed with Debian
> 
> http://packages.debian.org/mpc-ace
> 
> as a part of the ACE packages (ace source package)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- 
> Ramiro Morales
> 
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#366524: RFA: xbattbar

2006-05-09 Thread Thomas Seyrat
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal


  I don't use xbattbar anymore. It has no open bug.

  Thomas Seyrat



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.9
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#366483: ITP: oci-mpc -- The Makefile, Project and Workspace Creator

2006-05-09 Thread thomas . g . girard
Selon alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hi thomas,
>
> i have needed mpc to package another program.
>
> i'd rather use your prepared package, of course.
>
> pitty the aleged upstream authors (oci), didn't know anything about your
> effort.

Well, as you may know, OCI's version is upstream. The DOC group uses a
snapshot version for ACE+TAO[0] development, and this is the version
packaged as mpc-ace. You may find out that the mpc-ace version is
outdated.

If that happen please let me know, and together we'll move toward the OCI
version, therefore deprecating mpc-ace. I know that ACE+TAO can be
compiled with OCI's MPC with some tweaks.

> please close my itp bugs in your changelog, and tell me how could i
> totally cancel oci-mpc in favour of your package.

I don't need to mention this ITP in ACE+TAO packages changelog.

As soon as you have find out that mpc-ace MPC version fits your needs,
i.e. you can build your package with it, then you can close the ITP
by yourself stating that oci-mpc is not needed because of mpc-ace.
If mpc-ace does not fit, we'll use this ITP to move to OCI's version.

Do you agree ?

Thanks,

Thomas



Bug#366483: ITP: oci-mpc -- The Makefile, Project and Workspace Creator

2006-05-09 Thread alex bodnaru

hi thomas,

i have needed mpc to package another program.

i'd rather use your prepared package, of course.

pitty the aleged upstream authors (oci), didn't know anything about your
effort.

please close my itp bugs in your changelog, and tell me how could i
totally cancel oci-mpc in favour of your package.

thanks again for your good work,

alex

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Selon alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
> 
>>Package: wnpp
>>Severity: wishlist
>>Owner: alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>* Package name: oci-mpc
>>  Version : 3.3.95
> 
> 
> Hello Alex,
> 
> a slightly modified version of MPC is available with ACE+TAO.
> The package is named mpc-ace. Doesn't this version suit your needs ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#366483: ITP: oci-mpc -- The Makefile, Project and Workspace Creator

2006-05-09 Thread thomas . g . girard
Selon alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: oci-mpc
>   Version : 3.3.95

Hello Alex,

a slightly modified version of MPC is available with ACE+TAO.
The package is named mpc-ace. Doesn't this version suit your needs ?

Thanks,

Thomas