Bug#509164: libdatetime-format-sqlite-perl URL and license?

2008-12-19 Thread MJ Ray
This module does not appear on URL : http://datetime.perl.org/
according to the search box on that site.

Also, is the licence GPL+Artistic or as Perl?  That's what I was
trying to check.

Thanks for any replies,
-- 
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#509182: RFP: haskell-fastcgi -- Haskell interface to FastCGI

2008-12-19 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: haskell-fastcgi
  Version : 3001.0.2.2
  Upstream Author : Bjorn Bringert bj...@bringert.net
* URL : 
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/fastcgi
* License : 3-clause BSD
  Programming Lang: Haskell
  Description : Haskell interface to FastCGI

This package provides the Haskell module Network.FastCGI, a Haskell
interface to FastCGI.  FastCGI provides an interface between web servers
and CGI programs that runs the CGI program as a long-running server
which services many requests.  Network.FastCGI provides an interface
almost identical to Network.CGI, making it easy to port existing Haskell
CGI programs to FastCGI.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#441637: [php-maint] php-mdb2X-PGP-KeyID: 0xF22A794E

2008-12-19 Thread Didier Raboud
# Just to let the upload close it…
reopen 441642
stop

Le jeudi 4 décembre 2008 21:13:14 Vincent Bernat, vous avez écrit :

 I have uploaded both packages. Thanks for your contribution.

Many thanks to Vincent for the upload and to Mark for the packaging !

I was waiting for this package for a relatively long time now !

Best thankful regards, 

OdyX

-- 
Didier Raboud, proud Debian user.
CH-1802 Corseaux
did...@raboud.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#509164: libdatetime-format-sqlite-perl URL and license?

2008-12-19 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, MJ Ray wrote:


This module does not appear on URL : http://datetime.perl.org/
according to the search box on that site.


Oops.  This is the url I put in debian/control:

http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-SQLite/



Also, is the licence GPL+Artistic or as Perl?  That's what I was
trying to check.




From the POD:


AUTHOR
   Claus FA~Xrber cfaer...@cpan.org

   based on DateTime::Format::MySQL by David Rolyks.


   Copyright AX 2008 Claus FA~Xrber.

   Copyright AX 2003 David Rolsky.

   This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
   under the same terms as Perl itself.


Thanks for any replies,



--
Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#493645: Fwd: Thanks for nostromo-1.8.7.tar.gz

2008-12-19 Thread Kai Hendry
Oh I noticed that the nostromo packaging fails to build on amd64. The
problem is something I forwarded upstream last month. However upstream
says Debian is doing it wrong! ;)
http://git.debian.org/?p=users/kai-guest/nostromo

So should there be a Debian patch for -Wall?


-- Forwarded message --
From: Marcus Glocker mar...@nazgul.ch
Date: Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: Thanks for nostromo-1.8.7.tar.gz
To: Kai Hendry hen...@iki.fi


On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 08:08:26PM +, Kai Hendry wrote:

 ssh mar...@hetty.webconverger.com
 pass: nazgul

 Thanks!

OK, I have found out that it seems off_t is defined as `long int'
instead `long long int'.  IMO this is wrong, but I am no Linux/Debian
specialist.  I haven't seen that problem with other Linux distris yet.

You can make a simple workaround by removing the compiler option
`-Wall' in nostromo/src/nhttpd/GNUmakefile from CCFLAGS, then it
should compile.

Regards,
Marcus



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#508840: taking over

2008-12-19 Thread Felipe Sateler
package wnpp
owner 508840 !
retitle 508840 ITA: cmt -- Computer Music Toolkit (cmt) a collection of LADSPA 
plugins
thanks

I will be taking over this package.

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Processed: taking over

2008-12-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 package wnpp
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wnpp

 owner 508840 !
Bug 508840 [wnpp] O: cmt -- Computer Music Toolkit (cmt) a collection of LADSPA 
plugins
Owner recorded as Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com.
 retitle 508840 ITA: cmt -- Computer Music Toolkit (cmt) a collection of 
 LADSPA plugins
Bug#508840: O: cmt -- Computer Music Toolkit (cmt) a collection of LADSPA 
plugins
Changed Bug title to `ITA: cmt -- Computer Music Toolkit (cmt) a collection of 
LADSPA plugins' from `O: cmt -- Computer Music Toolkit (cmt) a collection of 
LADSPA plugins'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#504080: ITP: courier-pythonfilter -- filter collection for the Courier MTA

2008-12-19 Thread Frederik Dannemare
On Thursday 18 December 2008 10:05, Paweł Tęcza wrote:
 I've just found Python module for PostgreSQL support of Pythofilter.
 It's python-pgsql [1]. Unfortunately it hasn't been debianized yet.
 Debian has python-pgsql package for long time, but it's different
 package! Its real name is pypgsql [2], grrr...

Ah, that kind of thing is always bloody annoying.

 I would like to make Debian package with python-pgsql. I don't know
 what the best name for it is, so probably I'll contact with Debian
 Python Team.

Yeah, or maybe try asking on the Debian mentors mailing list. The people 
there are usually full of good ideas.

B/R,
Frederik Dannemare



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#247337: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: lives_0.9.8.10-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED]]

2008-12-19 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 01:14:49AM +0100, salsa...@xs4all.nl wrote:
  quote
  Additionally your debian/copyright file is incomplete and misses
  (C)holders/license data. You have to include all such differences.
  Like all of libOSC/*, some of the icons.
 
 
 There was some code in colourspace.c which was by another author, it was
 basically minimal code (setting some conversion values in tables). All of
 this has now been rewritten from scratch. As far as I know the copyright
 file is up to date. If anybody finds something missing, let me know and I
 can add it in.

Great! Sounds like that would be solved now.

  And next, it includes a mixture of GPL/LGPL v2/v2.1 and v3.
  Now you need to check if all v2/v2.1 ones are or any later. If not it
  is undistributable.
  /quote
 
 
 All of the LiVES code is licensed under the GPL v3 or LGPL v3. In fact, I
 made the change on the day that the GPL v3 was released, and am proud of
 that fact.

Hey, you beat me (win32-loader) by just one day! ;-)

 During the transition there may have been one or two files
 which were mistakenly left as GPL v2 or higher. I believe all such files
 have now been updated. If you find any files marked GPL2 or higher, please
 let me know and I will update them.

GPL v2 or higher files can be combined with GPL v3 code, so this is not a
problem as far as Debian is concerned.  It's only a problem if they're v2
only without or later.  Would that be the case for any of your files?

  RFX.spec is a documentation file which documents a standard. I am happy
  to
  change the license for this to whatever you recommend (what does debian
  recommend for standards ?).
 
  GPL or LGPL would be fine.
 
 OK, I still need to make this one change, I will check it into CVS now.

Sorry, I was not particularly bright that day.  GPL or LGPL is indeed fine for
Debian, in that it makes the document free (modifiable, etc), but I didn't
understand what you meant about a license for standards.

When people write a standard, it's logical they don't want modified versions
to be also considered the same standard unless they previously sanction them.

But sometimes standard drafters (like the RFC) take this too far and forbid
moficication completely, making the document non-free.

If you wanted to allow modification only in case they give the standard another
name, you could draft a license specifically for this.  That's what the Apache
folks did, but it's really a bad idea.  It breaks GPL compatibility and it
abuses copyright to do something that really belongs to trademarks.  For
version 2 of their license, it seems they realized this, and simply said:

quote
This License does not grant permission to use the [...] trademarks
/quote

GPLv3 has a provision for something similar:

quote
  Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, for material you
add to a covered work, you may (if authorized by the copyright holders of
that material) supplement the terms of this License with terms:

[...]
c) Prohibiting misrepresentation of the origin of that material, or
requiring that modified versions of such material be marked in
reasonable ways as different from the original version; or

[...]

e) Declining to grant rights under trademark law for use of some
trade names, trademarks, or service marks; or
/quote

which you might find useful.  Hope that helps!

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

2008-12-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # Fri Dec 19 19:03:11 UTC 2008
 # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
 # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
 #
 # Source package in NEW: php-mdb2-driver-mysql
 tags 441642 + pending
Bug number 441642 not found. (Is it archived?)

 # Source package in NEW: pcscada
 tags 508846 + pending
Bug#508846: ITP: pcscada -- Ada bindings to PC/SC middleware
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#247337: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: lives_0.9.8.10-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED]]

2008-12-19 Thread salsaman
On Fri, December 19, 2008 19:28, Robert Millan wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 01:14:49AM +0100, salsa...@xs4all.nl wrote:
  quote
  Additionally your debian/copyright file is incomplete and misses
  (C)holders/license data. You have to include all such differences.
  Like all of libOSC/*, some of the icons.
 

 There was some code in colourspace.c which was by another author, it was
 basically minimal code (setting some conversion values in tables). All
 of
 this has now been rewritten from scratch. As far as I know the copyright
 file is up to date. If anybody finds something missing, let me know and
 I
 can add it in.

 Great! Sounds like that would be solved now.

I hope so. Somebody mentioned the icons also last time - I can't believe
anybody would complain, they are 16 x 16 pixel (8 in total) bitmaps used
for play/rewind/stop/pause etc buttons. But I have added the thanks in to
the debian/copyright file now.





  And next, it includes a mixture of GPL/LGPL v2/v2.1 and v3.
  Now you need to check if all v2/v2.1 ones are or any later. If not
 it
  is undistributable.
  /quote
 

 All of the LiVES code is licensed under the GPL v3 or LGPL v3. In fact,
 I
 made the change on the day that the GPL v3 was released, and am proud of
 that fact.

 Hey, you beat me (win32-loader) by just one day! ;-)


I was following the shinanegans with MS and Novell at the time, and was
keen to take a stand against their supposed patent dealings.



 During the transition there may have been one or two files
 which were mistakenly left as GPL v2 or higher. I believe all such files
 have now been updated. If you find any files marked GPL2 or higher,
 please
 let me know and I will update them.

 GPL v2 or higher files can be combined with GPL v3 code, so this is not a
 problem as far as Debian is concerned.  It's only a problem if they're v2
 only without or later.  Would that be the case for any of your files?



Like I said, all files are GPL/LGPL 3 or higher.

The libOSC code which I distribute with LiVES is not written by me, and is
under a BSD license. This is also mentioned in debian/copyright.




  RFX.spec is a documentation file which documents a standard. I am
 happy
  to
  change the license for this to whatever you recommend (what does
 debian
  recommend for standards ?).
 
  GPL or LGPL would be fine.

 OK, I still need to make this one change, I will check it into CVS now.

 Sorry, I was not particularly bright that day.  GPL or LGPL is indeed fine
 for
 Debian, in that it makes the document free (modifiable, etc), but I didn't
 understand what you meant about a license for standards.

 When people write a standard, it's logical they don't want modified
 versions
 to be also considered the same standard unless they previously sanction
 them.

 But sometimes standard drafters (like the RFC) take this too far and
 forbid
 moficication completely, making the document non-free.

 If you wanted to allow modification only in case they give the standard
 another
 name, you could draft a license specifically for this.  That's what the
 Apache
 folks did, but it's really a bad idea.  It breaks GPL compatibility and it
 abuses copyright to do something that really belongs to trademarks.  For
 version 2 of their license, it seems they realized this, and simply said:

 quote
 This License does not grant permission to use the [...] trademarks
 /quote

 GPLv3 has a provision for something similar:

 quote
   Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, for material you
 add to a covered work, you may (if authorized by the copyright holders of
 that material) supplement the terms of this License with terms:

 [...]
 c) Prohibiting misrepresentation of the origin of that material, or
 requiring that modified versions of such material be marked in
 reasonable ways as different from the original version; or

 [...]

 e) Declining to grant rights under trademark law for use of some
 trade names, trademarks, or service marks; or
 /quote

 which you might find useful.  Hope that helps!

 --
 Robert Millan

   The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when
 (and
   how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
   still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all.




I am not too bothered about this really. I have now changed the license of
the document to GNU FDL, and the standard itself is now GPL.

(Incidentally, that brings me on to another point, off topic, but I have
always wondered why the FSF don't introduce the GPSL (GNU Public Standards
License). I intend to ask RMS about it the next time I see him.)




Anyway, back to the main point, I hope we can get moving on this soon and
get LiVES into the official debian repositories.

As was mentioned initially, indeed LiVES offers great ogg/theora support
both for encoding and decoding (instant decode is now a feature). In
future I plan to offer enhanced support for other free codecs, for 

Bug#509213: ITP: qtcreator -- IDE specifically designed for Qt

2008-12-19 Thread Adam Majer
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adam Majer ad...@zombino.com

* Package name: qtcreator
  Version : 0.9.1-beta
  Upstream Author : Nokia
* URL : http://trolltech.com/developer/qt-creator
* License : GPL
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description : IDE specifically designed for Qt

Qt Creator is a lightweight development environment (IDE) designed to
make development with the Qt application framework faster and easier.
  * Tailored specifically to the needs of Qt developers creating
cross-platform applications
  * Focuses on features that boost developer productivity without
getting in their way
  * Helps new Qt developers get up and running faster
  * Open and extendable; integrates familiar tools and file formats



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#493645: Fwd: Thanks for nostromo-1.8.7.tar.gz

2008-12-19 Thread Matthias-Christian Ott
Kai Hendry wrote:
 Oh I noticed that the nostromo packaging fails to build on amd64. The
 problem is something I forwarded upstream last month. However upstream
 says Debian is doing it wrong! ;)
 http://git.debian.org/?p=users/kai-guest/nostromo

Did they explain how to do it correctly?
 
 So should there be a Debian patch for -Wall?

Makes no sense to me.
 
 
 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Marcus Glocker mar...@nazgul.ch
 Date: Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:39 AM
 Subject: Re: Thanks for nostromo-1.8.7.tar.gz
 To: Kai Hendry hen...@iki.fi
 
 
 On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 08:08:26PM +, Kai Hendry wrote:
 
  ssh mar...@hetty.webconverger.com
  pass: nazgul
 
  Thanks!
 
 OK, I have found out that it seems off_t is defined as `long int'
 instead `long long int'.  IMO this is wrong, but I am no Linux/Debian
 specialist.  I haven't seen that problem with other Linux distris yet.

I don't know to which line he's refering, but it shouldn't matter if
the source code uses off_t, if it's a long or long long. Can someone
explain this to me or point me to the relevant file and line?
 
 You can make a simple workaround by removing the compiler option
 `-Wall' in nostromo/src/nhttpd/GNUmakefile from CCFLAGS, then it
 should compile.

Sounds wrong to me since -Wall just displays warning messages. I think
the error will persist, but is not reported and therefore the source
code compiles.
 
 Regards,
 Marcus
 
 
 
 -- 
 To unsubscribe, send mail to 493645-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#503625: marked as done (ITP: debirf -- Build a kernel and initrd to run Debian from RAM)

2008-12-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:44:46 -0500
with message-id 20081219194446.ga4...@finestructure.net
and subject line package has been uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #503625,
regarding ITP: debirf -- Build a kernel and initrd to run Debian from RAM
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
503625: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503625
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@phys.columbia.edu

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

* Package name: debirf
  Version : 0.18
  Upstream Author : Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@phys.columbia.edu
* URL : http://cmrg.fifthhorseman.net/wiki/debirf
* License : GPLv3
  Programming Lang: Bash
  Description : Build a kernel and initrd to run Debian from RAM

debirf (DEBian on Initial Ram Filesystem) is a set of tools designed
to create and prepare a kernel and initial ram filesystem that can
run a full-blown Debian environment entirely from RAM.
.
The kernel and initramfs pair created by debirf can be used for a
myriad of purposes, from quick-and-easy system repair to diskless
thin clients.  The kernel and initrd can be placed in your system
boot partition, burnt to read-only media, or supplied by a netboot
server.
.
The debirf tools use a module architecture which allows you to
customize debirf for any possible purpose by specifying what
components are included in the generated image.

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
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=VcJk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
This package has now been uploaded:

http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/debirf.html

Thanks.

jamie.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---


Bug#505806: marked as done (ITP: monkeysphere -- use the OpenPGP web of trust to verify ssh connections)

2008-12-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:04:16 -0500
with message-id 20081219200416.ga5...@finestructure.net
and subject line package has been uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #505806,
regarding ITP: monkeysphere -- use the OpenPGP web of trust to verify ssh 
connections
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
505806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505806
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

* Package name: monkeysphere
  Version : 0.20
  Upstream Author : Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net
* URL : http://web.monkeysphere.info
* License : GPLv3
  Programming Lang: Bash, C
  Description : use the OpenPGP web of trust to verify ssh connections

 SSH key-based authentication is tried-and-true, but it lacks a true
 Public Key Infrastructure for key certification, revocation and
 expiration.  Monkeysphere is a framework that uses the OpenPGP web of
 trust for these PKI functions.  It can be used in both directions:
 for users to get validated host keys, and for hosts to authenticate
 users.

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
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=6myd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
This package has now been uploaded:

http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/monkeysphere.html

Thanks.

jamie.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---


Bug#247337: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: lives_0.9.8.10-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED]]

2008-12-19 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 08:00:20PM +0100, salsa...@xs4all.nl wrote:
 
 I hope so. Somebody mentioned the icons also last time - I can't believe
 anybody would complain, they are 16 x 16 pixel (8 in total) bitmaps used
 for play/rewind/stop/pause etc buttons. But I have added the thanks in to
 the debian/copyright file now.

This sounds like copyright-significant, but I don't think it's a problem;
if the author doesn't want to license them, we have plenty of generic icons
for play/etc already (I bet both GNOME and KDE have a few of them).

 As was mentioned initially, indeed LiVES offers great ogg/theora support
 both for encoding and decoding (instant decode is now a feature).

Great.  Btw, is mencoder needed for input?  Note that although mplayer is in
Debian, mencoder isn't yet.

 In
 future I plan to offer enhanced support for other free codecs, for example
 the dirac codec which has been developed by the BBC. LiVES already
 includes experimental encoding support for this format.

How does Dirac compare to Theora?  I heard both are patent-free.

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#509225: ITP: tevent -- talloc-based event loop library

2008-12-19 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org

--- Please fill out the fields below. ---

   Package name: tevent
Version: 1.0.0
Upstream Author: Samba Team
URL: http://www.samba.org/
License: LGPLv3
Description: talloc-based event  loop library

tevent is a simple library that can handle the main event loop for an
application. It supports three kinds of events: timed events, file
descriptors becoming readable or writable and signals.

Talloc is used for memory management, both internally and for private
data provided by users of the library.

This library is used by newer versions of libldb, which is already in
Debian.
-- 
Jelmer Vernooij jel...@samba.org - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
Jabber: jel...@jabber.fsfe.org


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Bug#509225: ITP: tevent -- talloc-based event loop library

2008-12-19 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:53:47PM +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:

Package name: tevent
 Description: talloc-based event  loop library
 
 tevent is a simple library that can handle the main event loop for an
 application. It supports three kinds of events: timed events, file
 descriptors becoming readable or writable and signals.
 
 Talloc is used for memory management, both internally and for private
 data provided by users of the library.

It seems very similar to libevent and libev, both already in Debian. Is there
anything special about tevent using talloc? Is upstream aware of these other
projects? If possible, try to get them to work with each other to merge their
features and reduce the number of event loop libraries.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
  Guus Sliepen g...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#509227: ITP: lua-bitop -- fast lua bit manipulation library

2008-12-19 Thread Enrico Tassi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org

--- Please fill out the fields below. ---

   Package name: lua-bitop
Version: 1.0.0
Upstream Author: Mike Pall
URL: http://bitop.luajit.org
License: MIT/X
Description: fast lua bit manipulation library

This library will also be luajit2 friendly, allowing compilation
of bitwise operation to native bit operations for better performances
-- 
Enrico Tassi



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#509225: ITP: tevent -- talloc-based event loop library

2008-12-19 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Hoi Guus,

Am Freitag, den 19.12.2008, 23:14 +0100 schrieb Guus Sliepen:
 On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:53:47PM +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
 
 Package name: tevent
  Description: talloc-based event  loop library
  
  tevent is a simple library that can handle the main event loop for an
  application. It supports three kinds of events: timed events, file
  descriptors becoming readable or writable and signals.
  
  Talloc is used for memory management, both internally and for private
  data provided by users of the library.
 
 It seems very similar to libevent and libev, both already in Debian. Is there
 anything special about tevent using talloc? Is upstream aware of these other
 projects? If possible, try to get them to work with each other to merge their
 features and reduce the number of event loop libraries.
We're certainly aware of these other two projects - the name tevent was
picked to avoid naming conflicts or confusion with them.

The talloc integration is one of the main advantages for us, since LDB
(and Samba 4, which also uses this library heavily but includes a copy
of it at the moment) use talloc pretty heavily. 

Also, as far as I can tell neither libevent nor libev provide AIO
support at the moment.

An alternative would be to implement tevent as a wrapper around libev or
libevents that added talloc support to the API but that's hardly worth
the trouble as that would add another dependency and the library is
pretty small itself as is.

Cheers,

Jelmer

-- 
Jelmer Vernooij jel...@samba.org - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
Jabber: jel...@jabber.fsfe.org


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Bug#479659: Help with manpages

2008-12-19 Thread Julian Aloofi
Hello,
I would like to help writing the missing manpages. I don't know git yet, so I 
will read the Git User's Manual tomorrow. This is one of my first active 
contributions to the Debian Project, except from some package description I 
translated, so please tell me if I make any terrible mistakes ;)

Julian Aloofi



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#509225: ITP: tevent -- talloc-based event loop library

2008-12-19 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 23:49 +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:

 An alternative would be to implement tevent as a wrapper around libev or
 libevents that added talloc support to the API but that's hardly worth
 the trouble as that would add another dependency and the library is
 pretty small itself as is.

It would however prevent further fragmentation in this space ;)

libevent + libtevent-which-wraps-libevent is better than
libtevent-which-duplicates-much-of-libevent. :)

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#509225: ITP: tevent -- talloc-based event loop library

2008-12-19 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Am Samstag, den 20.12.2008, 11:10 +1100 schrieb Robert Collins:
 On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 23:49 +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
 
  An alternative would be to implement tevent as a wrapper around libev or
  libevents that added talloc support to the API but that's hardly worth
  the trouble as that would add another dependency and the library is
  pretty small itself as is.
 
 It would however prevent further fragmentation in this space ;)
 
 libevent + libtevent-which-wraps-libevent is better than
 libtevent-which-duplicates-much-of-libevent. :)
In theory, I agree. However, in this case libevents is about a factor 10
larger in terms of source code than libtevent, and that's even without
the wrapper that would add talloc support and the support for AIO.

But more importantly (with my upstream hat on): we have to support a lot
of folks that are not running fancy systems like Debian (apt FTW), and
who have to still install everything manually. This means another
dependency for them to install. 

Cheers,

Jelmer
-- 
Jelmer Vernooij jel...@samba.org - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
Jabber: jel...@jabber.fsfe.org


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Processed: WNPP bugs maintenance

2008-12-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 package wnpp
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wnpp

 owner 509227 Enrico Tassi gareuselesi...@debian.org
Bug 509227 [wnpp] ITP: lua-bitop -- fast lua bit manipulation library
Owner recorded as Enrico Tassi gareuselesi...@debian.org.
 owner 509225 Jelmer Vernooij jel...@samba.org
Bug 509225 [wnpp] ITP: tevent -- talloc-based event loop library
Owner recorded as Jelmer Vernooij jel...@samba.org.
 tags 505653 - pending
Bug#505653: ITP: gtask -- GObject toolkit for asynchronous programming
Tags were: pending
Tags removed: pending

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#509242: ITP: lensfun -- LensCorrection editor plugin

2008-12-19 Thread Mark Purcell
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell m...@debian.org

* Package name: lensfun
  Version : 0.2.3
  Upstream Author : Andrew Zabolotny z...@homelink.ru
* URL : http://lensfun.berlios.de
* License : GPL, MIT/X
  Programming Lang: C++  C
  Description : LensCorrection editor plugin

Database of photographic lenses and their characteristics.

The lensfun library not only provides a way to read the database
and search for specific things in it, but also provides a set of
algorithms for correcting images based on detailed knowledge of
lens properties. Right now lensfun is designed to correct
distortion, transversal (also known as lateral) chromatic aberrations,
vignetting and colour contribution of the lens (e.g. when sometimes
people says one lens gives yellowish images and another, say, bluish).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)


debian/copyright:
=
This package was debianized by Mark Purcell m...@debian.org on
Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:33:25 +1000.

It was downloaded from http://lensfun.berlios.de

Upstream Authors:

CODE:
Andrew Zabolotny z...@homelink.ru

LENS DATA:
Tom Niemann: original open-source ptlens database.

Copyright:

[Copyright: 2005-2007 Andrew Zabolotny]

License:

The libraries which are part of this package are licensed under the terms
of the GNU Lesser General Public License, version 3. Libraries are located
under the subdirectory libs/ of the source package. A copy of the license
is available in the file lgpl-3.0.txt which can be found in the source
archive. You can read it here: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-3.0.html

Applications which are part of this package are licensed under the terms
of the GNU General Public License, version 3. Applications are located
under the apps/ subdirectory of the source package. A copy of the license
can be found in the file gpl-3.0.txt which can be found in the source
achive. You can read it here: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html

Also the build system (the contents of the build/ subdirectory plus the
ac.py file) is licensed under GPL v3.

Test programs and tools are put into public domain, unless explicitly
specified otherwise in the header of the source files. Test programs
are located under the tests/ subdirectory, and tools are located in tools/.

The lens database is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share
Alike 3.0 license. The database is located under the data/ subdirectory
of the source package. You can read it here:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/


The Debian packaging is (C) 2008, Mark Purcell m...@debian.org and
is licensed under the GPL, see `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.

# Please also look if there are files or directories which have a
# different copyright/license attached and list them here.

tools/makedep/pr.cpp: MIT/X11 (BSD like) 
  [Copyright: 1993, 1994 X Consortium]

tools/makedep/cppsetup.cpp: MIT/X11 (BSD like) 
  [Copyright: 1993, 1994 X Consortium]

tools/makedep/include.cpp: MIT/X11 (BSD like) 
  [Copyright: 1993, 1994 X Consortium]

tools/makedep/parse.cpp: MIT/X11 (BSD like) 
  [Copyright: 1993, 1994 X Consortium]

tools/makedep/ifparser.cpp: UNKNOWN
  [Copyright: 1992 Network Computing Devices, Inc]

tools/makedep/main.cpp: MIT/X11 (BSD like) 
  [Copyright: 1993, 1994 X Consortium]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org