Bug#536245: RFH: graphviz -- rich set of graph drawing tools
Heya, On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 03:21:58PM +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: > Sebastian Harl wrote: > > Thanks for your interest and offering your help! To be honest, I'm > > not sure about what needs to be done at the moment. > > Normally when adopting a package I would start by: > > - triaging any open bugs; > - adopting dpkg source format 3.0 (quilt); > - adopting dh(1) for debian/rules; > - uupdating to a new upstream (if any); and finally > - adopting DEP-5 for debian/copyright and updating it. > > I'll leave this (graphviz) at the bottom of my IN tray for now; if I > get around to working on it, I'll send patches to you rather than > applying them directly. This will give you a chance to veto anything > you don't like. Great! I'm not convinced about 3.0 (quilt) yet, so I'd prefer not to use that for graphviz. Anything else sounds good to me, though. Thanks again for your interest! Cheers, Sebastian -- Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/ Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin signature.asc Description: Digital signature
reassign 560004 to wnpp, retitle 560004 to RFP: lxdm -- LXDE display manager
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3 reassign 560004 wnpp retitle 560004 RFP: lxdm -- LXDE display manager -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: reassign 560004 to wnpp, retitle 560004 to RFP: lxdm -- LXDE display manager
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3 > reassign 560004 wnpp Bug #560004 [lxdm] Add the LXDE display manager "LXDM" into the Debian repository, please Warning: Unknown package 'lxdm' Bug reassigned from package 'lxdm' to 'wnpp'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions 0.0.2. > retitle 560004 RFP: lxdm -- LXDE display manager Bug #560004 [wnpp] Add the LXDE display manager "LXDM" into the Debian repository, please Changed Bug title to 'RFP: lxdm -- LXDE display manager' from 'Add the LXDE display manager "LXDM" into the Debian repository, please' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#553357: Idea
God'day, Giuseppe, I think I can adopt this package, I just need some instructions to make sure that I will do a good joob. Maybe is better if I co-maintain this package until I get all the process to make this package working. Is it a good Idea? I've read some documentations like new debian mantainers and debian policy. There's anything I can do to make me ready to mantein this package? Kind Regards Bruno Gurgel signature.asc Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
Bug#453825: Someone adopt it already?
Faw, The package still orphan? If you have adopt it, and need some help I will be happy in help. Or if you don't I'm intrested in adopt it. Just wanna some helps in the process, and I think I will need a Sponsor. Kind Regards signature.asc Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
Bug#459325: ITP: clang -- C language family frontend for LLVM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sorry for putting the manpages under GPL - old habit, I intended them to be released under a simple public-domain-equivalent disclaimer instead of going through the roundabout way of referencing LLVM's custom license (which is BSD-like but not *the* BSD license). I have edited the manpages from my packaging and attached them here. Will this suffice? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLHi4SAAoJEDqDNnQ69yYSfW0H+QHO5dRD6L51z1OMo0bhtSym J83PhU41ItfiJmrHgYIipJeaVluFQcQir3BczFyFkrFVdGbToarlj76aVmMPbqbq pO6t95sDYIWqlbxl0xrSP95hlrD/ktKntHzR/5H/B+CAhw9nQ83pp+atulKg6180 Vcsj/t2wmZWAutFvHzX7424HO59uPUbbXJDLs2qiNroZ77A1asS0b6p2gGSjHzD2 2m+fru7ezQtP2iEJe8h7skYz6hl417o9N90sGcCQ8mnVvmC2AJaSrx3rBAgdb0P2 BF8Zlgz2mPPM/Y7VW7QK5wt26TLyxZVe/srjXw+AcO/nUX7vV2C3hbObxXu1804= =jXHq -END PGP SIGNATURE- .TH CLANG-CC "1" "December 2009" "2.6" "User Commands" .SH NAME clang-cc \- clang compiler program .SH SYNOPSIS clang\-cc [options] .SH DESCRIPTION \fBclang-cc\fR is the compiler program used by \fBclang\fR. In most cases, you will want to use \fBclang\fR, a frontend with GCC-compatible interface, instead. .PP .SS "OPTIONS:" .PP \fB\-C\fR\- Enable comment output in \fB\-E\fR mode .PP \fB\-CC\fR \- Enable comment output in \fB\-E\fR mode, even from macro expansions .PP \fB\-D=\fR\- Predefine the specified macro .IP Choose output type: .PP \fB\-Eonly\fR \- Just run preprocessor, no output (for timings) .PP \fB\-E\fR \- Run preprocessor, emit preprocessed file .PP \fB\-dump\-raw\-tokens\fR\- Lex file in raw mode and dump raw tokens .PP \fB\-analyze\fR\- Run static analysis engine .PP \fB\-dump\-tokens\fR\- Run preprocessor, dump internal rep of tokens .PP \fB\-parse\-noop\fR \- Run parser with noop callbacks (for timings) .PP \fB\-fsyntax\-only\fR \- Run parser and perform semantic analysis .PP \fB\-parse\-print\-callbacks\fR \- Run parser and print each callback invoked .PP \fB\-emit\-html\fR \- Output input source as HTML .PP \fB\-ast\-print\fR \- Build ASTs and then pretty\-print them .PP \fB\-ast\-print\-xml\fR \- Build ASTs and then print them in XML format .PP \fB\-ast\-dump\fR \- Build ASTs and then debug dump them .PP \fB\-ast\-view\fR \- Build ASTs and view them with GraphViz .PP \fB\-print\-decl\-contexts\fR\- Print DeclContexts and their Decls .PP \fB\-emit\-pth\fR \- Generate pre\-tokenized header file .PP \fB\-emit\-pch\fR \- Generate pre\-compiled header file .PP \fB\-S\fR \- Emit native assembly code .PP \fB\-emit\-llvm\fR \- Build ASTs then convert to LLVM, emit .ll file .PP \fB\-emit\-llvm\-bc\fR \- Build ASTs then convert to LLVM, emit .bc file .PP \fB\-emit\-llvm\-only\fR \- Build ASTs and convert to LLVM, discarding output .PP \fB\-rewrite\-test\fR \- Rewriter playground .PP \fB\-rewrite\-objc\fR \- Rewrite ObjC into C (code rewriter example) .PP \fB\-rewrite\-macros\fR \- Expand macros without full preprocessing .PP \fB\-rewrite\-blocks\fR \- Rewrite Blocks to C .PP \fB\-fixit\fR \- Apply fix\-it advice to the input source .PP \fB\-F=\fR\- Add directory to framework include search path .PP \fB\-I=\fR\- Add directory to include search path .PP \fB\-MP\fR \- Create phony target for each dependency (other than main file) .PP \fB\-MT=\fR \- Specify target for dependency .PP \fB\-O=\fR \- Optimization level .PP \fB\-Os\fR \- Optimize for size .PP \fB\-P\fR\- Disable linemarker output in \fB\-E\fR mode .PP \fB\-U=\fR\- Undefine the specified macro .PP \fB\-W=\fR \- .PP \fB\-Wno\-rewrite\-macros\fR \- Silence ObjC rewriting warnings .PP \fB\-analyze\-function=\fR\- Run analysis on specific function .PP \fB\-analyzer\-constraints\fR \- Source Code Analysis \- Symbolic Constraint Engines .TP =basic \- Use basic constraint tracking .TP =range \- Use constraint tracking of concrete value ranges .PP \fB\-analyzer\-display\-progress\fR\- Emi
Bug#559774: ITP: modem-cmd -- send arbitrary AT commands to your modem
Robert Millan wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 02:14:52AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 01:43 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: >>> Package: wnpp >>> Severity: wishlist >>> Owner: Robert Millan >>> >>> * Package name: modem-cmd >>> Version : 0.0.1 >>> Upstream Author : me >>> * URL : none yet, debian-native >> Why should this be Debian-specific? > > I don't know. Should it? No, it should not. I assume other distributions support modems, too - so its clearly not Debian specific. -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79 ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#459325: ITP: clang -- C language family frontend for LLVM
On 09/12/08 16:44 +0600, Maia Kozheva said ... > Sorry for putting the manpages under GPL - old habit, I intended them to > be released under a simple public-domain-equivalent disclaimer instead > of going through the roundabout way of referencing LLVM's custom license > (which is BSD-like but not *the* BSD license). > > I have edited the manpages from my packaging and attached them here. > Will this suffice? Yes, this is good, thank you. Arthur Loiret started packaging clang independent of this ITP and the work in GIT and uploaded the package to the archive already. We will build upon what is in the archive and I will ensure that these are included in the Debian package as well as sent upstream. Cheers, Giridhar -- Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://people.debian.org/~appaji/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560004: Add the LXDE display manager "LXDM" into the Debian repository, please
Andew, did you see this package request? * fluxbox [2009-12-08 10:02]: > To: sub...@bugs.debian.org > From: fluxbox > Subject: Add the LXDE display manager "LXDM" into the Debian repository, > please > Package: LXDM > Version: 0.0.2 > Severity: wishlist > > > Is it possible, to add LXDE Display Manager "LXDM" into the Debian repository? > More informations can be found on the website of the LXDE project. > > http://wiki.lxde.org/en/LXDM > > http://blog.lxde.org/?p=531 > > Discussions and files > > http://forum.lxde.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=640 > > > Thank you > -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: retitle 560004 to ITP: LXDM
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 560004 ITP: LXDM Bug #560004 [wnpp] RFP: lxdm -- LXDE display manager Changed Bug title to 'ITP: LXDM' from 'RFP: lxdm -- LXDE display manager' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: owner 560004
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 560004 ajq...@debian.org Bug #560004 [wnpp] ITP: LXDM Owner recorded as ajq...@debian.org. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560004: Add the LXDE display manager "LXDM" into the Debian repository, please
Thanks for notice me. The LXDE hasn't had a release tarball yet. I would upload the package it when it ready. Best regards, -Andrew Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Andew, did you see this package request? > > * fluxbox [2009-12-08 10:02]: >> To: sub...@bugs.debian.org >> From: fluxbox >> Subject: Add the LXDE display manager "LXDM" into the Debian repository, >> please >> Package: LXDM >> Version: 0.0.2 >> Severity: wishlist >> >> >> Is it possible, to add LXDE Display Manager "LXDM" into the Debian >> repository? >> More informations can be found on the website of the LXDE project. >> >> http://wiki.lxde.org/en/LXDM >> >> http://blog.lxde.org/?p=531 >> >> Discussions and files >> >> http://forum.lxde.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=640 >> >> >> Thank you >> > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#474034: ITP: gpxe -- PXE network bootloader for x86 PCs
Thanks for taking this over, i've been overwhelmed with RL stuff for some time. :/ We should consider adding a small package shipping just the ROMs needed for qemu/kvm (which are currently pxe-ne2k_pci.bin, pxe-rtl8139.bin, pxe-e1000.bin and pxe-pcnet.bin - 32kB each). Best regards, Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#503529: marked as done (ITA: udhcp -- very small DHCP client)
Hi Geert! On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:21:04 +0100, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Your message dated Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:17:42 + > with message-id > and subject line Bug#503529: fixed in udhcp 0.9.8cvs20050303-3 > has caused the Debian Bug report #503529, > regarding ITA: udhcp -- very small DHCP client > to be marked as done. [...] > From: Geert Stappers > Subject: Bug#503529: fixed in udhcp 0.9.8cvs20050303-3 > To: 503529-cl...@bugs.debian.org > Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:17:42 + > > Source: udhcp > Source-Version: 0.9.8cvs20050303-3 > > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of > udhcp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: Can you please explain me the reason for this hijack without any announce? There was no hurry in adopting this package (it was broken since a while) and moreover there is a real plan going on to completely replace a stand-alone package with one which use the busybox version instead: http://bugs.debian.org/537623 Note that I do not care to maintain this package, but I care about the above plan, which also reduces duplicate code in the Debian archive. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca pgpgCPC5OU0QS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#560043: ITP: libnfo -- an NFO file parser/writer library
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Package name: libnfo Version: 1.0.0 Upstream Author: Benjamin Zores URL: http://libnfo.geexbox.org License: LGPL v2 or later Description: an NFO file parser/writer library libNFO is a small library to parse and write NFO files. NFO files are used to store metadata information on many multimedia files. The NFO format is used by both Enna and XBMC Media Center. See http://xbmc.org/wiki/?title=Import_-_Export_Library for a format definition. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560047: ITP: libvalhalla -- a tiny media scanner library
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Package name: libvalhalla Version: 1.0.0 Upstream Author: Mathieu Schroeter, Benjamin Zores URL: http://libvalhalla.geexbox.org License: LGPL v2.1 or later Description: a tiny media scanner library libvalhalla is a scanner and parser library for audio/video files based on SQLite and FFmpeg/libavformat. Media files are retrieved in paths defined by the user and metadata are saved in a database. It provides a very simple API and it can use several parsers concurrently to speed up on a multi-core/cpu system. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560048: ITP: libplayer -- a multimedia A/V abstraction layer API
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Package name: libplayer Version: 1.0.0 Upstream Author: Benjamin Zores, Mathieu Schroeter URL: http://libplayer.geexbox.org License: LGPL v2.1 or later Description: a multimedia A/V abstraction layer API libplayer is a multimedia A/V abstraction layer API. . libplayer provides a generic A/V API that relies on various multimedia player for Linux systems. It currently supports MPlayer and xine. Its main goal is to provide an unique API that player frontends can use to control any kind of multimedia player underneath. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#474034: ITP: gpxe -- PXE network bootloader for x86 PCs
Jan Luebbe wrote: We should consider adding a small package shipping just the ROMs needed for qemu/kvm (which are currently pxe-ne2k_pci.bin, pxe-rtl8139.bin, pxe-e1000.bin and pxe-pcnet.bin - 32kB each). i'll have a look at some other worthwile build targets that i'll enable in the main binary package (gpxe), and split the others out for qemu/kvm into gpxe-qemu. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#551763: License for FOCAL Interpreter
Daniel Moerner wrote: On 12/07/2009 08:31 AM, Dave Pitts wrote: Daniel Moerner wrote: Hi David, I see that you've done the work to write an interpreter for the FOCAL language. Recently, a request for this package was filed in Debian GNU/Linux.[1] I'd be interested in packaging your interpreter for distribution in Debian (and by extension, Ubuntu) because it seems like a useful piece of history. Never thought anybody would be that interested in Focal Well, "that interested" is a loose term! But at least one person was interested, and I think it's helpful to keep work like this around for people to use. It has 82 downloads on Softpedia, at the very least. I also get downloads of the tarball from my site (Not through Softpedia). If we're going to productize this program. I'm going to add files to the tarball like ChangeLog, README, etc. Do you have any other recommendations? Also, I'll start the version numbering at 1.0.0 for this distribution work. However, before doing that, I would need clarification on the license. I don't see one in the source. Under what conditions is the distribution of your interpreter permitted? Some good choices for free licenses may be the GPL or the 3-clause BSD license, depending on your taste. Normally, Public Domain is not as good of a choice.[2] Well, I did the initial coding, in Pascal, of Focal wy before anybody thought of GPL or BSD licenses. I converted it to C in the early 1980s on Dec VAX running VMS. So, what would be the easiest way to set it up? I signed GPL stuff for GCC and GAWK work that I've done in the past. Since it's your work, there should be no trouble. For the gcc work it was a bit different because you would have had to sign over your copyright to the FSF. In this case, you don't have to forfeit your copyright. All you would have to do is choose a license that you like and add it to the source tarball. This would state the license under which you authorize redistribution of Focal as copyright holder of the code of the interpreter. OK, after looking at the GCC source, we have a COPYING file, that contains the license, and comment blocks in the source like: * FOCAL is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under * the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free * Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later * version. * * FOCAL is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY * WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License * for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with FOCAL; see the file COPYING. If not, write to the Free * Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA * 02111-1307, USA. Anything else? Also, is there a versioning system you use for packaging? Or is this the final version of FOCAL? I occasionally fix things and haven't given much thought to versioning the code. I guess I could start it at version 1.0.0 for these release purposes. What do you think? And how many are interested in a package? It's impossible to say in advance how many people would be interested. But it's my view at least that making pieces of history like this accessible to the public is always worthwhile. Regards, Daniel -- Dave Pitts PULLMAN: Travel and sleep in safety and comfort. dpi...@cozx.comMy other RV IS a Pullman (Colorado Pine). http://www.cozx.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560061: RFP: cope -- colour wrapper for text level programs (e.g. ps, stat, xrandr)
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: cope Version : none yet (rc1 as of 2009-12-07) Upstream Author : Benjamin Sago * URL : http://stuff.cytzol.org/cope/ * License : like Perl Programming Lang: Perl Description : colour wrapper for text level programs (e.g. ps, stat, xrandr) cope is a wrapper around programs that output to a terminal, to give them colour for utility and aesthetics while still keeping them the same at the text level. Adding colours on top of text makes it easy to see when something's amiss. For utility, you can stop hunting through your terminal's scroll buffer to locate an error when it's clearly highlighted in red, or locating a network address hidden in dense output when they're marked in yellow and blue (local and foreign, respectively). As for aesthetics, even the simplest utility can be brightened up by adding a dash of colour on top. cope's scripts are written in Perl, so they're as flexible (and fast) as Perl allows. (text taken from project website) the project is maintained in the git repository git://github.com/cytzol/cope.git (Vcs-browser: http://github.com/cytzol/cope) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: ITA: gmanedit -- GTK+ man pages editor
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 553984 ITA: gmanedit -- GTK+ man pages editor Bug #553984 [wnpp] O: gmanedit -- GTK+ man pages editor Changed Bug title to 'ITA: gmanedit -- GTK+ man pages editor' from 'O: gmanedit -- GTK+ man pages editor' > owner 553984 ! Bug #553984 [wnpp] ITA: gmanedit -- GTK+ man pages editor Owner recorded as Jorge Dardón . > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#553984: ITA: gmanedit -- GTK+ man pages editor
retitle 553984 ITA: gmanedit -- GTK+ man pages editor owner 553984 ! thanks Hello, I will adopt this packages. -- Jorge Dardón Galicia -- www.elblogdeljorge.com www.xelalug.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Tue Dec 8 19:03:25 UTC 2009 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: execnet > tags 559152 + pending Bug #559152 [wnpp] ITP: python-execnet -- perform zero-install bootstrapping into other interpreters Added tag(s) pending. > # Source package in NEW: envstore > tags 558684 + pending Bug #558684 [wnpp] ITP: envstore -- save and restore environment variables Added tag(s) pending. > # Source package in NEW: cecil-flowanalysis > tags 556837 + pending Bug #556837 [src:cecil-flowanalysis] cecil-flowanalysis: FTBFS: mono stuff Added tag(s) pending. > # Source package in NEW: cecil-flowanalysis > tags 493513 + pending Bug #493513 [cecil-flowanalysis] libmono-cecil-flowanalysis0.1-cil needs better short and long descriptions Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560088: ITP: python-portio -- low level port I/O for Linux
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dmitrijs Ledkovs * Package name: python-portio Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Fabrizio Pollastri * URL : http://portio.inrim.it/ * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: Python, C Description : low level port I/O for Linux Wrapper for the port I/O macros like outb, inb and other provided by the C library on Linux x86 platforms. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560102: ITP: libattica -- a Qt library that implements the Open Collaboration Services API
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thibaut Gridel * Package name: libattica Version : 0.1.1 Upstream Author : Eckhart Wörner , Frederik Gladhorn , Cornelius Schumacher * URL : ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/attica * License : LGPL2 Programming Lang: C++ Description : a Qt library that implements the Open Collaboration Services API Attica is a Qt library that implements the Open Collaboration Services API version 1.4. The REST API is defined here: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/open-collaboration-services It grants easy access to the services such as querying information about persons and contents. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560088: ITP: python-portio -- low level port I/O for Linux
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 08:23:15PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > * Package name: python-portio > Version : 0.4 > Upstream Author : Fabrizio Pollastri > * URL : http://portio.inrim.it/ > * License : GPL-3+ > Programming Lang: Python, C > Description : low level port I/O for Linux > > Wrapper for the port I/O macros like outb, inb and other provided by the C > library on Linux x86 platforms. Honestly, this doesn't sound like something that should be encouraged. inb and outb are the source of much incompatibility between architectures, and any package depending on this one will be (likely permanently) stuck to i386. Is there something that you want to package that depends on this? -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 713 440 7475 | http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#551763: License for FOCAL Interpreter
On 12/08/2009 07:48 AM, Dave Pitts wrote: > If we're going to productize this program. I'm going to add files to the > tarball like ChangeLog, README, etc. Do you have any other > recommendations? Also, I'll start the version numbering at 1.0.0 for > this distribution work. Well, I'd like to stress that I'm not trying to coerce you into doing other work you weren't willing to do! This doesn't have to be very complex at all, if you have a Changelog that would be nice. Before packaging it for Debian I'll also make a brief man page for it, which I will forward to you. >> However, before doing that, I would need clarification on the license. I don't see one in the source. Under what conditions is the distribution of your interpreter permitted? Some good choices for free licenses may be the GPL or the 3-clause BSD license, depending on your taste. Normally, Public Domain is not as good of a choice.[2] >>> Well, I did the initial coding, in Pascal, of Focal wy before >>> anybody thought of GPL or BSD licenses. I converted it to C in the early >>> 1980s on Dec VAX running VMS. So, what would be the easiest way to set >>> it up? I signed GPL stuff for GCC and GAWK work that I've done in the >>> past. >>> >> >> Since it's your work, there should be no trouble. For the gcc work it >> was a bit different because you would have had to sign over your >> copyright to the FSF. In this case, you don't have to forfeit your >> copyright. All you would have to do is choose a license that you like >> and add it to the source tarball. This would state the license under >> which you authorize redistribution of Focal as copyright holder of the >> code of the interpreter. >> >> > OK, after looking at the GCC source, we have a COPYING file, that > contains the license, and comment blocks in the source like: > > * FOCAL is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under > * the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free > * Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later > * version. > * > * FOCAL is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY > * WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or > * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License > * for more details. > * > * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > * along with FOCAL; see the file COPYING. If not, write to the Free > * Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA > * 02111-1307, USA. > > Anything else? That's the proper way to handle the license if it's under the GPL. Also don't forget to add in a header to explain that you hold the copyright since you started working on it. I appreciate your cooperation on this; it's nice that other people will be able to more easily benefit from your work. Regards, Daniel signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#560088: ITP: python-portio -- low level port I/O for Linux
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 22:37 +, brian m. carlson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 08:23:15PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > > * Package name: python-portio > > Version : 0.4 > > Upstream Author : Fabrizio Pollastri > > * URL : http://portio.inrim.it/ > > * License : GPL-3+ > > Programming Lang: Python, C > > Description : low level port I/O for Linux > > > > Wrapper for the port I/O macros like outb, inb and other provided by the C > > library on Linux x86 platforms. > > Honestly, this doesn't sound like something that should be encouraged. > inb and outb are the source of much incompatibility between > architectures, and any package depending on this one will be (likely > permanently) stuck to i386. They're not really the source of much incompatibility, because people rarely try to use them! I have written a module like this myself for testing some new hardware. On top of the low-level I/O, I defined classes for PCI devices and register sets, and then wrote test cases using them. It was a lot easier to write those test cases in Python than it would have been in C. > Is there something that you want to package that depends on this? I do hope not; this should never be used in production. But it may yet be useful in hardware development. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Logic doesn't apply to the real world. - Marvin Minsky signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: retitle 546981 to ITA: soundtouch -- development files for sound stretching library, owner 546981 p...@debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 546981 ITA: soundtouch -- development files for sound stretching > library, owner 546981 p...@debian.org Bug #546981 [wnpp] O: soundtouch -- development files for sound stretching library Changed Bug title to 'ITA: soundtouch -- development files for sound stretching library, owner 546981 p...@debian.org' from 'O: soundtouch -- development files for sound stretching library' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560102: ITP: libattica -- a Qt library that implements the Open Collaboration Services API
FYI, we recently packaged this for Kubuntu. Please have a look and make use of what you find useful. I'll be glad to point out where to find the package, if needed. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#559761: ITP: release -- provides information about the current releases
Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 10:01 +0100 schrieb Mike Hommey:
> I fail to see how that can be useful as a package, except if the package
> only calls an online service, in which case having that as a package
> makes not much sense.
> For example, ubuntu-release -d would say lucid on karmic, but what
> about when lucid is released ? karmic is still going to say lucid, while
> lucid will be saying the next one.
Until lucid is released, ubuntu-release -d would say lucid, but after
the release it will say m... (yes, a SRU with a one line change to the
data csv file is needed for the new information). The development
release is determined based on the date. We can add the next codename,
when it's announced.
> Wouldn't it be simpler for ubuntu to use something like "ubuntu-next" or
> "ubuntu-dev" as a target distribution ?
'ubuntu-release -d' should always give you _current_ development release
or it will fail with telling you, that the data are outdated (example:
ubuntu-release -d --date=2011-01-01).
> Debian doesn't have these
> problems, since it only uses "unstable". (likewise for stable, where we
> have s-p-u and stable-security)
Yes, this tool is less useful on Debian, but it still provides you a
mapping from {old,stable,testing,sid} to the current codename. That's
for example useful for my pbuilder config.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Bug#560088: ITP: python-portio -- low level port I/O for Linux
2009/12/8 Ben Hutchings : > I do hope not; this should never be used in production. But it may yet > be useful in hardware development. > > Ben. > I'm working on a parallel LCD interface with my custom PCB and I wanted interactive way to use parallel port. Found this decided to package it for myself and anyone else. Should my packaging be changed to i386 & amd64 only? -- With best regards Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima), Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#559761: ITP: release -- provides information about the current releases
Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 09:03 +0100 schrieb Frank Lin PIAT:
> On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 00:14 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> >
> > * Package name: release
>
> The tool isn't about releasing, but about to querying the release. Also,
> it's about distribution release (not package...). May be a name like
> {get|query}-distr[o]?-release... or something completely different like
> "supported-distro" would be more explicit.
Yes, the name is a bit to generic. Any other suggestions for the name?
On the mailing list I found 'release-info'. On my list are now:
* release-info
* distro-release-info
* distro-releases
Any preferred name or suggestions?
Should i rename the scripts, too?
> > Description : provides information about the current releases
> >
> > This package contains information about all releases of Debian and Ubuntu.
> > The
> > release script will give you the codename for e.g. the latest stable
> > release of
> > your distribution.
>
> There was some discussions about a similar tool & issues:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/05/msg01138.html
> and to query Debian point release.
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/12/msg00742.html
The topic of these discussions were slightly different. The release
packages does not know anything about the running release. It only needs
a date (and up-to-date data) for calculating the result.
> > To get information about a specific distribution there are
> > the debian-release and the ubuntu-release scripts.
>
> I suppose you mean that there will be different back-end script.
> (I suppose that you don't mean that each program will have to implement
> a select/case algorithm?)
Yes, there are different back-end scripts. Due to different release
models the both scripts use different algorithms. The distro data are
stored in cvs files (like a table) and then I throw a little bit of
Python on it. Subtracting the command line parsing only 60 lines of code
are required.
> > It's based on the idea posted on the ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> > [1]. Comments, suggestions and feature requests are highly welcome.
> >
> > For Debian I need some informations: Until when were following
> > releases supported: buzz, rex, bo, hamm, slink, and potato?
>
> See http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases but I didn't/couldn't find the
> information for bo/rex/buzz. Anyone ?
I found that page, too. The wikipedia page of Debian did not contain
more information.
> AFAIK, Debian have never supported more than two stable distributions
> (stable + old-stable), therefore, you can assume that a distribution end
> of life is "lower than" distribution N+2 release.
I used this algorithm to calculate the support dates until we find
something more precise.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Bug#560088: ITP: python-portio -- low level port I/O for Linux
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 23:42 +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > 2009/12/8 Ben Hutchings : > > I do hope not; this should never be used in production. But it may yet > > be useful in hardware development. > > > > Ben. > > > > I'm working on a parallel LCD interface with my custom PCB and I > wanted interactive way to use parallel port. Found this decided to > package it for myself and anyone else. > > Should my packaging be changed to i386 & amd64 only? All architectures that support PCI provide some means to access PCI I/O space. It appears that glibc supports the in*() and out*() functions on alpha, amd64, arm, ia64 and i386. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Logic doesn't apply to the real world. - Marvin Minsky signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 541644 ITA: keysafe -- safe, simple storage system for passwords Bug #541644 [wnpp] O: keysafe -- safe, simple storage system for passwords Changed Bug title to 'ITA: keysafe -- safe, simple storage system for passwords' from 'O: keysafe -- safe, simple storage system for passwords' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#559761: ITP: release -- provides information about the current releases
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 09:03 +0100 schrieb Frank Lin PIAT: >> On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 00:14 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: >> > For Debian I need some informations: Until when were following >> > releases supported: buzz, rex, bo, hamm, slink, and potato? >> >> See http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases but I didn't/couldn't find the >> information for bo/rex/buzz. Anyone ? > > I found that page, too. The wikipedia page of Debian did not contain > more information. Try the debian-history package or its maintainer. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Our lists are good to promote your kind of business
Our Medical Doctor list has contact data for all American States and in many different specialties such as anesthesiology, cardiology,dermatology and emergency medicine. This week only the list can be purchased at half price. For details and samples please reply to this address elv...@expertprodat.be. Should you wish to not be contacted again please contact Esteban at rem...@expertprodat.be -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: retitle 559563 to RFP: nestopia -- advanced emulator for the Nintendo Entertainment System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 559563 RFP: nestopia -- advanced emulator for the Nintendo > Entertainment System Bug #559563 [wnpp] Nestopia - An advanced emulator for the Nintendo (TM) Entertainment System Changed Bug title to 'RFP: nestopia -- advanced emulator for the Nintendo Entertainment System' from 'Nestopia - An advanced emulator for the Nintendo (TM) Entertainment System' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: retitle 559906 to RFP: muPDF -- lightweight PDF viewer and toolkik
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 559906 RFP: muPDF -- lightweight PDF viewer and toolkik Bug #559906 [wnpp] RFP: muPDF Changed Bug title to 'RFP: muPDF -- lightweight PDF viewer and toolkik' from 'RFP: muPDF' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560122: RFP: libindicate -- panel indicator applet
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libindicate Version : 0.2.3 Upstream Author : Ted Gould * URL : https://launchpad.net/libindicate * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C Description : panel indicator applet A small library for applications to raise "flags" on DBus for other components of the desktop to pick up and visualize. Currently used by the messaging indicator. Ubuntu packages: http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/lucid/libindicate -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#552705: ITP: mp4v2 -- a library that provides functions to read, eate, and modify mp4 files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 gtkpod, in fact, only uses mp4v2's metadata functionality. Unfortunately, taglib is a C++ library and gtkpod is written in C, so porting it to taglib is not an option. Reinhard suggested porting it to libavformat - I couldn't find documentation specifically about its metadata functionality, though, and I'm not sure upstream will agree about adding a dependency on ffmpeg, given how conservative they are. It can be patched for Debian/Ubuntu, at least. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEbBAEBAgAGBQJLH0VlAAoJEDqDNnQ69yYSbDMH+KhRXnKpVtcySIZr3pwCXOS4 5WB0mrdtFMZPr5juYK0Mf0hi0UlG7Et9zLLyHVEiOpf49vlt0/LQ+WyBqepFiOYd Ad9FXYEASv1dQ34CwDIKxEoChQP0aVbUx2G1xOfT6QC5MIB13nD8/zhZcmLrfM+W jSvfy5b+3VdNq6ewttxG3umyLB+mgzY+ni6buHrimGWcUTu51ZuK3rRunCcXp8bq opjanTE5qusuD14w6zxg/YxDeA0KoSlOF89ydiJorxSq1iNWIO+0hvVviJddyOTM 2O7S9wjlCcXsZEYXLIlbXq7q82BSGWSJMjTDLoX5q1RIuMZP+09bn+pfHRDxbg== =+yUR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Wed Dec 9 07:03:52 UTC 2009 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: camelot > tags 51 + pending Bug #51 [wnpp] ITP: python-camelot -- a python GUI framework on top of Elixir / Sqlalchemy inspired by the Django admin interface Added tag(s) pending. > # Source package in NEW: libb-hooks-op-annotation-perl > tags 559984 + pending Bug #559984 [wnpp] ITP: libb-hooks-op-annotation-perl -- module to allow annotation and delegation of hooked OPs Added tag(s) pending. > # Source package in NEW: mffm-fftw > tags 474525 + pending Bug #474525 [wnpp] O: mffm-fftw -- A C++ wrapper for the fftw.org C library (version 3) Added tag(s) pending. > # Source package in NEW: scidavis > tags 495105 + pending Bug #495105 [wnpp] ITP: scidavis -- application for scientific data Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
