Sevgililer Gününe Özel Reklam Teklifi
Sayın Yetkili; Firmalarımız için hazırladığımız Sevgililer Gününe Özel proje detayları aşağıdaki gibidir. 12-13-14 Şubat tarihlerinde her kanalda günde 7 defa şeklinde yayınlanacaktır. 1.SKYTURK 21 ADET 5SN.LİK KUŞAK REKLAM(105sn.) 2.KANAL24 21 ADET 5SN.LİK KUŞAK REKLAM(105sn.) 3.SAMANYOLU HABER 21 ADET 5SN.LİK KUŞAK REKLAM(105sn.) 4.TGRT HABER 21 ADET 5SN.LİK KUŞAK REKLAM(105sn.) 5.ULKE TV 21 ADET 5SN.LİK KUŞAK REKLAM(105sn.) 6.BUGUN TV 21 ADET 5SN.LİK KUŞAK REKLAM(105sn.) 7.KANALTURK 21 ADET 3SN.LİK KUŞAK REKLAM(63sn.) Toplam Spot: 147 adet kuşak reklam. Toplam Süre: 735sn. SADECE ve SADECE 2.500 TL+KDV Firmanızın reklam çalışmaları içinde kullanılabilir. Değerlendirmelerinizi bekler, İyi çalışmalar dilerim. Saygılarımla... ALTERNATİF MEDYA Büşra ALTAŞ Reklam Satış Müdürü T:0216 459 0 444 F:0216 459 0 555 bu...@alternatifmedya.tv busra.alternatifme...@gmail.com Not: Mail almak istemiyorsanız bu maili 'listenizden çıkmak istiyorum' diye cevaplamanız yeterlidir. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/b2263733cfcbd856f2050c8c2333e...@alternatifmedya.tv
Processed: Re: Bug#606117: retitle the bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 606117 ITP: php5-pecl-http -- PHP PECL module for extended HTTP support Bug #606117 [wnpp] ITP: php5-pecl-http -- Extended HTTP support for php5 Changed Bug title to 'ITP: php5-pecl-http -- PHP PECL module for extended HTTP support' from 'ITP: php5-pecl-http -- Extended HTTP support for php5' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 606117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606117 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12956896069338.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#603277: marked as done (ITP: python-ordereddict -- drop-in substitute for Py2.7's new collections.OrderedDict)
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2011 11:23:59 +0100 with message-id 1295691839.3056.3.ca...@sfera.home and subject line closing ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #603277, regarding ITP: python-ordereddict -- drop-in substitute for Py2.7's new collections.OrderedDict to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 603277: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603277 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Package name: python-ordereddict Version: 1.1 Upstream Author: Raymond Hettinger URL: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ordereddict/ License: MIT Description: drop-in substitute for Py2.7's new collections.OrderedDict python-ordereddict is a drop-in substitute for Py2.7's new collections.OrderedDict that works in Python 2.4-2.6. The recipe has big-oh performance that matches regular dictionaries (amortized O(1) insertion/deletion/lookup and O(n) iteration/repr/copy/equality_testing). ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- After a discussion with Sandro Tosi, I've decided to withdraw this ITP: Wheezy is going to have Python 2.7, so this package would be useful only for a few months before the transition. Davide ---End Message---
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 543880 O:pyneighborhood -- PyGTK2 SAMBA browser Bug #543880 [wnpp] ITP: pyneighborhood -- PyGTK2 SAMBA browser Changed Bug title to 'O:pyneighborhood -- PyGTK2 SAMBA browser' from 'ITP: pyneighborhood -- PyGTK2 SAMBA browser' noowner 543880 Bug #543880 [wnpp] O:pyneighborhood -- PyGTK2 SAMBA browser Removed annotation that Bug was owned by jimmy.l...@gmail.com. # I do not have sufficient time to work on this package. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 543880: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543880 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12957044071712.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#579509: ctpl version 0.3.2 available at m.d.n
Hi everybody ! I've uploaded a new version which takes Chow Loong Jin's remarks into account. Thanks to him! Le Thu, 20 Jan 2011 03:22:39 +0800, Chow Loong Jin hyper...@ubuntu.com a écrit : Hi Johnathan, I can't sponsor your package (I've already uploaded 0.3.2 to Ubuntu though), but I'd like to drop a few notes from what I've noticed while bringing ctpl up to date in Ubuntu. This may sound as duplicate work, but as I'm quite new to packaging so this way I learn a lot more. I don't know however whether this will make conflicts at Ubuntu sync time… in case this package get uploaded to main Debian. 1. libctpl2.symbols should not be copied from libctpl1.symbols. This is because libctpl1.symbols was for libctpl.so.1, but libctpl2.symbols is for libctpl.so.2. If you have a symbol that's versioned 0.2, for example, then what could happen is that you get a package that depends on libctpl2 (= 0.2), but libctpl2 did not exist prior to 0.3, when the SONAME bump took place. Understood and done. 2. Evgeni mentioned this to me sometime back, but I'm not sure if the message reached you -- static libraries shouldn't be packaged at all, so please drop /usr/lib/lib*.a from libctpl-dev.install Done. Effectivly I didn't know about that before. 3. ctpl is only built if gio-2.0 = 2.24 is found, and gio-2.0 is part of libglib2.0-dev, so you'll need to bump the version for that in the build-dep to 2.24 rather than leaving it at 2.16. Done too. Was a oops. 4. Why are you build-dep'ing on libglib2.0-doc? I'm not sure whether this is really needed. This is needed so that gtk-doc can create links to glib's pages in the html documentation . As libctpl heavily uses glib types and facilities I thought that this will greatly improve the doc's usability. 5. Drop the libctpl2 depends from ctpl in debian/control. dh_shlibdeps will pick it up on its own, with a more accurate dependency. Okay, done. 6. I'm not sure why libctpl-doc recommends libglib2.0-doc. Is that really necessary? This is related to 4). If we link to glib's doc, it's recommended (but not absolutely necessary) that libglib2.0-doc be installed. Apart from that, I think the package looks fine :-) Thanks! I'm waiting for Squeeze's release and end of deep freeze to seek for a sponsor. -- Jonathan Michalon Étudiant en informatique -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110122163959.1c738...@runningpinguin.chalmion.homelinux.net
Bug#578469: Turpial package
2011/1/14 Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:13:36AM -0430, Miguel Landaeta wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Miriam Ruiz mir...@debian.org wrote: I'll take a look at it. I'll try to make it ASAP, but I'm not sure to have spare time until the weekend. Not problem. Just let us know when you have time. I set up a git repo to maintain this package at http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/turpial.git. With that the review and modifications should be more easy to do. Hi Miriam! Since upstream released a new version recently I was wondering if you had any chance to take a look at this? I uploaded preliminary source[1] and binary[2] packages and you also can review the git[3] repository. Sorry for the delay. I finally had time to look at it, but I've noticed that debian/copyright is missing some copyright lines. At least turpial/api/protocols/twitter/oauth.py shows some Copyright (c) 2007 Leah Culver under the MIT license and turpial/api/services/uploadpic/pyTweetPhoto.py a Copyright (c) 2010/2009, Marcel Caraciolo with a BSD license. debian/copyright should reflect both of them, as well as the copyright of the packaging itself (Copyright (C) 2010, Efrain Valles Pulgar and Miguel Landaeta, I guess). ¿Could yo correct that, please? otherwise ftpmasters will reject it. Greetings, Miry PS: I'm really really sorry for the delay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimkmqo0qwyke2e7wh3qjaav2h-vorsh2+fgj...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#579509: ctpl version 0.3.2 available at m.d.n
On Saturday 22,January,2011 11:39 PM, Jonathan Michalon wrote: [...] I can't sponsor your package (I've already uploaded 0.3.2 to Ubuntu though), but I'd like to drop a few notes from what I've noticed while bringing ctpl up to date in Ubuntu. This may sound as duplicate work, but as I'm quite new to packaging so this way I learn a lot more. I don't know however whether this will make conflicts at Ubuntu sync time… in case this package get uploaded to main Debian. It shouldn't conflict. The Ubuntu packages have a version of a.b.c-XubuntuY, where a.b.c-X is the Debian version it is based on. The ctpl package I have uploaded has a version 0.3.2-0ubuntu1, which can be superseded by the Debian version at any point in the future. If there is a need to preserve a delta against your package, then we'll just merge it into the new version, yielding something like 0.3.2-1ubuntu1. [...] 4. Why are you build-dep'ing on libglib2.0-doc? I'm not sure whether this is really needed. This is needed so that gtk-doc can create links to glib's pages in the html documentation . As libctpl heavily uses glib types and facilities I thought that this will greatly improve the doc's usability. Oh, I see, so the links aren't hardcoded in the generated docs? I thought they were. 5. Drop the libctpl2 depends from ctpl in debian/control. dh_shlibdeps will pick it up on its own, with a more accurate dependency. Okay, done. 6. I'm not sure why libctpl-doc recommends libglib2.0-doc. Is that really necessary? This is related to 4). If we link to glib's doc, it's recommended (but not absolutely necessary) that libglib2.0-doc be installed. Okay, understood. Apart from that, I think the package looks fine :-) Thanks! I'm waiting for Squeeze's release and end of deep freeze to seek for a sponsor. There's always Evgeni to poke. He's always on #geany on FreeNode. :-) -- Kind regards, Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#578469: Turpial package
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Miriam Ruiz mir...@debian.org wrote: Sorry for the delay. I finally had time to look at it, but I've noticed that debian/copyright is missing some copyright lines. At least turpial/api/protocols/twitter/oauth.py shows some Copyright (c) 2007 Leah Culver under the MIT license and turpial/api/services/uploadpic/pyTweetPhoto.py a Copyright (c) 2010/2009, Marcel Caraciolo with a BSD license. debian/copyright should reflect both of them, as well as the copyright of the packaging itself (Copyright (C) 2010, Efrain Valles Pulgar and Miguel Landaeta, I guess). ¿Could yo correct that, please? otherwise ftpmasters will reject it. Hi Miriam! Don't worry about the delay. AIUI currently there is almost no processing of the NEW queue so I don't have a hurry with this. I already committed some changes clarifying the copyright file and I added Efraín and myself as copyright holders for the packaging work. Please take look at http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/turpial.git;a=commitdiff;h=4ea13104e55c5f634efb6e80de9728376df33f90 Thanks for the review. Please, let us know if something else needs to be done. Cheers, -- Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc secure email with PGP 0x7D8967E9 available at http://keyserver.pgp.com/ Faith means not wanting to know what is true. -- Nietzsche -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikgxdhwdw_9d3bqwsz5kquqlkozue3bfwmgw...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#304570: Fw: Embedded code in prospective package (Code::Blocks)
Ciao David, On 01/20/2011 08:01 PM, David Paleino wrote: Would it be ok to upload it to NEW with the above? All the embedded code is part of various plugins, and they need to be compiled at the same time. I'll wait for a reply before uploading to NEW. No objections against uploading it, those code copies don't strike me as a security-relevant overhead Cheers, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Sat Jan 22 19:03:18 UTC 2011 # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html # # Source package in NEW: librest tags 555381 + pending Bug #555381 [src:librest] FTBFS with binutils-gold Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: wxsqlite3 tags 610686 + pending Bug #610686 [wnpp] ITP: wxsqlite3 -- SQLite3 C++ wrapper for use in programs based on the wxWidgets Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: vala-0.12 tags 606139 + pending Bug #606139 [vala] Please update vala to 0.11.2 in experimental Added tag(s) pending. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 606139: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606139 555381: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555381 610686: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610686 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129572301316544.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#610820: ITP: libio-socket-ip-perl -- module for using IPv4 and IPv6 sockets in a protocol-independent way
Package: wnpp Owner: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libio-socket-ip-perl Version : 0.06 Upstream Author : Paul Evans leon...@leonerd.org.uk * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-Socket-IP/ * License : Artistic or GPL-1+ Programming Lang: Perl Description : module for using IPv4 and IPv6 sockets in a protocol-independent way IO::Socket::IP provides a protocol-independent way to use IPv4 and IPv6 sockets. It allows new connections to be made by specifying the hostname and service name or port number. It allows for connections to be accepted by sockets listening on local ports, by service name or port number. It uses Socket::GetAddrInfo's getaddrinfo function to convert hostname/service name pairs into sets of possible addresses to connect to. This allows it to work for IPv6 where the system supports it, while still falling back to IPv4-only on systems which don't. It provides an API which, for most typical cases, should be a drop-in replacement for IO::Socket::INET; most constructor arguments and methods are provided in a compatible way. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110122212117.ga27...@belanna.comodo.priv.at
Processed: limit package to wnpp, tagging 610820
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: #libio-socket-ip-perl (0.06-1) unstable; urgency=low # # * Initial release (closes: #610820). # limit package wnpp Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'wnpp' Limit currently set to 'package':'wnpp' tags 610820 + pending Bug #610820 [wnpp] ITP: libio-socket-ip-perl -- module for using IPv4 and IPv6 sockets in a protocol-independent way Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 610820: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610820 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129573212529374.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#592159: Poezio for Debian
Hey, Ok, feel free to go ahead! You are now the owner of the ITP. I'm sorry I couldn't manage to find time to do this. I would have loved to... Thank you and have a good time! :) -- Nicolas Maître -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=3ha2dn8gi=so5a5kdsbm53cm93m8f5avbs...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#511715: ...time passes
On 1/10/2011 8:27 PM, Michael Schultheiss wrote: Bharat Mediratta wrote: It's been 3 months since the last activity on this bug. Can we please get this packaged? Michael, I am more than happy to beat the bushes to find a new maintainer but right now this seems to be going nowhere which is very frustrating. I apologize for the continued delays - I'll get the packaging finished ASAP. Michael, it's now been another 12 days which brings this to over two years that we've been waiting on you to make some progress on making a Debian package for Gallery 3. I'm gearing up to release Gallery 3.0.1 this weekend which means that Debian users have not had a package for the 3.0 release at all. I've asked nicely, sent polite pings, given plenty of notice and heard lots of promises but seen no results. This is very frustrating. In a week or so if I don't see any progress, I'm going to officially ask the broadest possible audience for somebody to take over packaging Gallery 3 for Debian. regards, -Bharat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d3b6113.9030...@menalto.com
Processed: Re: Bug#610793: bino: Request for Adoption of Bino : stereoscopic video player with multidisplay support
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 610793 wnpp Bug #610793 [bino] bino: Request for Adoption of Bino : stereoscopic video player with multidisplay support Warning: Unknown package 'bino' Bug reassigned from package 'bino' to 'wnpp'. retitle 610793 RFP: bino -- stereoscopic video player with multidisplay support Bug #610793 [wnpp] bino: Request for Adoption of Bino : stereoscopic video player with multidisplay support Changed Bug title to 'RFP: bino -- stereoscopic video player with multidisplay support' from 'bino: Request for Adoption of Bino : stereoscopic video player with multidisplay support' -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 610793: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610793 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129574915227395.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#590776:
Hi Joe, Hi, I'm interested in maintaining python-django-djblets. I'm an enthusiastic student and developer in the Django community. I'd love to be able to contribute as a maintainer. It's great you would like to contribute. However, python-django-djblets is tightly coupled with reviewboard - it's not really possible to upgrade one without the other. Thus, it does not make sense to take over maintainership of djblets without also taking reviewboard. As it happens, I am also orphaning Reviewboard if you are interested in that, but I'm not sure it's particularly suited to a beginner due to the large amount of Debianisation required. Hope this is helpful to you. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110123031536.2507d...@happycat.chris-lamb.co.uk
Processed: retitle 304570 to ITP: codeblocks -- Code::Blocks integrated development environment (IDE) ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 304570 ITP: codeblocks -- Code::Blocks integrated development environment (IDE) Bug #304570 [wnpp] ITP: codeblocks -- Code::Blocks is a free C/C++ IDE built Changed Bug title to 'ITP: codeblocks -- Code::Blocks integrated development environment (IDE)' from 'ITP: codeblocks -- Code::Blocks is a free C/C++ IDE built' tags 304570 + pending Bug #304570 [wnpp] ITP: codeblocks -- Code::Blocks integrated development environment (IDE) Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 304570: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=304570 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129576607725665.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#511715: ...time passes
Bharat Mediratta wrote: In a week or so if I don't see any progress, I'm going to officially ask the broadest possible audience for somebody to take over packaging Gallery 3 for Debian. The Debian packages for 3.0.1 were uploaded a few minutes ago. Since this is a new package, they will not be available in Debian Unstable until after the FTP Masters process the upload. I can host packages on people.debian.org in the meantime. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
