Bug#637351: ITP: urfkill -- urfkill is a daemon for the management of the radio killswitches.
2011/8/11 Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org: Quoting Keng-Yu Lin (ken...@lexical.tw): Thanks for the suggestion. I modified the description as below.I hope that it is better explained and understandable. Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Keng-Yu Lin ken...@lexical.tw * Package name : urfkill Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : Gary Lin g...@suse.com * URL : http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/urfkill * License : GPL, LGPL Programming Lang: C Description : wireless killswitch management daemon for laptops urfkill daemon provides the management of the rfkill-related hotkeys and the killswitches in a more configurable way for the common RF devices, e.g. WiFi, Bluetooth, WWan, etc. urfkill handles the various key codes (KEY_WLAN, KEY_BLUETOOTH, KEY_RFKILL, etc) and toggles the killswitches based on a pre-defined policy. Maybe just avoid starting sentences with urfkill as it is always wierd to have sentences beginning with a lowercase letter. A common trick is using The foo program|daemon. Also avoid e.g. which is a latinism that's too often used in English..:). I propose parenthesis...another option would be using such as. Replace etc. with an ellipsis (...) as it avoids the tricky use of a dot before and after a closing parenthesis. That would give: The urfkill daemon allow managins the rfkill-related hotkeys and the killswitches in a more configurable way for the common RF devices (WiFi, Bluetooth, WWan...). It handles the various key codes (KEY_WLAN, KEY_BLUETOOTH, KEY_RFKILL, etc) and toggles the killswitches based on a pre-defined policy. Thanks for the refinement. I hope the description looks better now. :-) Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Keng-Yu Lin ken...@lexical.tw * Package name: urfkill Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : Gary Lin g...@suse.com * URL : http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/urfkill * License : GPL, LGPL Programming Lang: C Description : wireless killswitch management daemon for laptops The urfkill daemon allow managing the rfkill-related hotkeys and the killswitches in a more configurable way for the common RF devices (WiFi, Bluetooth, WWan...). It handles the various key codes (KEY_WLAN, KEY_BLUETOOTH, KEY_RFKILL...) and toggles the killswitches based on a pre-defined policy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAMe48Jj8ZykwTumD9VVVxvVTSjLdíw4qvwkkzw4jgyjax...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#637351: ITP: urfkill -- urfkill is a daemon for the management of the radio killswitches.
2011/8/13 Andrea Bolognani e...@kiyuko.org: I believe you could achieve the same effect using a combination of triggerhappy and the aforementioned rfkill, and I don’t like the idea of having a special daemon running to handle a subset of the special keys when there’s a more general solution to the problem already in the archive. That said, urfkill might have advantages I don’t see. rfkill has nothing to do with the hotkey management. It is just a tool to enable/disable a wireless device as specify in the argument. urfkill is a way to manage and toggle these devices based on the conf file. The immediate problem is that when KEY_WLAN is commonly generated by the key press, should bluetooth and 3G be turned off too where there are in fact keycodes dedicated for each: KEY_BLUETOOTH, KEY_WWAN. Also as a planned function (but not yet implemented in the code now) of urfkill, people desire to turn off wifi on the first pressing, bluetooth on the second and so on... This is only possible if there is a dedicated daemon for handling this. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/came48jj2snmia4rlnayvu-mwn5mbtts83wcbtojztourz05...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#553707: RFH: lzma -- future of Debian squashfs-lzma
reassign 553707 lzma-source 4.43-14 retitle 553707 please remove squashfs-lzma module (does not work with current kernel) severity 553707 important quit Hi again, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Good news: squashfs maintainer Phillip Lougher is pushing for LZMA support in squashfs 4.0 in the mainline kernel [...] 1. How to support current users until an updated kernel enters sid? squashfs xz landed in 2.6.38. Userspace arrived in Debian in squashfs-tools 1:4.1-1. [...] 2. Once squashfs 4 + lzma is available, is there a need to continue to support squashfs 3 + lzma? No, unsquashfs takes care of that. [...] 3. More generally, what do people use squashfs-lzma for, and what guarantees do they need in order to do it? LiveCDs. Now that squashfs 4 is in mainline, the format is probably going to remain supported for a while. Old formats were subject to change from time to time but unsquashfs can be used to read the older ones (all the way back to 1.x). [...] I am hoping some squashfs-lzma user can explain how and perhaps take on the task of assuring it is well supported for squeeze. So this is taken care of. It looks like what's left is to remove the lzma-source package and perhaps lzma-dev (it has one declared reverse-build-dependency --- chromium --- which I don't think actually uses the headers). That way the rest of the package can be less scary to modify. How about something like the following to start? Thanks, Jonathan --- debian/changelog |7 +++ debian/control | 18 -- debian/rules | 20 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 4eb32b95..a5351a73 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +lzma (4.43-14.1) local; urgency=low + + * Drop lzma-source package. It doesn't work with current kernels +and SquashFS XZ is part of the standard kernel now. + + -- Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com Tue, 16 Aug 2011 03:53:31 -0500 + lzma (4.43-14) unstable; urgency=low * Bump Standards-Version to 3.8.0. diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 05c617c1..8f348b77 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -44,24 +44,6 @@ Description: Compression method of 7z format in 7-Zip program - development file This package contains the headers and libraries of lzma. It is experimental and will be replaced by the library as soon as it is available. - -Package: lzma-source -Architecture: all -Depends: module-assistant, debhelper ( 4.0.0), bzip2, make, lzma-dev -Description: Source for the lzma kernel module - LZMA is a compression algorithm, based on the famous Lempel Ziv - compression method. - . - The main characteristics of the algorithm are very good compression, - fast decompression, use of lot of RAM for compression and low usage of - RAM for decompression. - . - LZMA provides high compression ratio and very fast decompression, so it - is very suitable for embedded applications. For example, it can be used - for ROM (firmware) compression. - . - This package provides the source code for the lzma kernel modules. - Kernel source and headers are required to compile these modules. Package: lzma-alone Architecture: any diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index c432919c..5d81ea55 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ SRC_DIR_C = C/7zip/Compress/LZMA_C SRC_DIR_ALONE = C/7zip/Compress/LZMA_Alone -MOD = $(SRC_DIR_C)/kmod/module.c $(SRC_DIR_C)/uncomp.c DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE=$(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE=$(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) @@ -64,25 +63,6 @@ binary-indep: build install dh_link -i dh_compress -i dh_fixperms -i - - # Create the temporary directory for lzma-source - mkdir -m755 -p debian/modules/lzma/debian - - # Copy the source and header files - install -m644 $(MOD) $(SRC_DIR_C)/LzmaDecode.c $(SRC_DIR_C)/kmod/Makefile \ - debian/modules/lzma - - # Copy the debian specific files - install -m644 debian/changelog debian/compat debian/copyright \ - debian/control.modules.in debian/modules/lzma/debian - - # This rules file is specific to m-a - install -m755 debian/rules.modules \ - debian/modules/lzma/debian/rules - - # Finally create the tarball which contains the module directory - cd debian tar jcf lzma-source/usr/src/lzma.tar.bz2 modules - dh_installdeb -i dh_gencontrol -i dh_md5sums -i -- 1.7.6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110816092225.ga3...@elie.gateway.2wire.net
Processed: Re: RFH: lzma -- future of Debian squashfs-lzma
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 553707 lzma-source 4.43-14 Bug #553707 [wnpp] RFH: lzma -- future of Debian squashfs-lzma Bug reassigned from package 'wnpp' to 'lzma-source'. Bug #553707 [lzma-source] RFH: lzma -- future of Debian squashfs-lzma Bug Marked as found in versions lzma/4.43-14. retitle 553707 please remove squashfs-lzma module (does not work with current kernel) Bug #553707 [lzma-source] RFH: lzma -- future of Debian squashfs-lzma Changed Bug title to 'please remove squashfs-lzma module (does not work with current kernel)' from 'RFH: lzma -- future of Debian squashfs-lzma' severity 553707 important Bug #553707 [lzma-source] please remove squashfs-lzma module (does not work with current kernel) Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 553707: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553707 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131348656612786.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#637988: O: zfs-fuse -- ZFS on FUSE
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Due to unsufficient time, I intend to orphan the zfs-fuse package. The package description is: ZFS is an advanced filesystem from Sun Microsystems, originally developed for solaris. It provides a number of advanced features, such as live integrity checks, atomic updates, atomic snapshots and clones, compression, and much more. . This package provides an implementation of Sun's ZFS filesystem in userspace, using FUSE. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110816111703.3017.4946.report...@centurion.befour.org
Bug#538067: request for pkg review (ITP #538067)
Hi, it is been a while since our last review of the OpenCPN packaging, and the stable release we were working towards has now shipped. Our .deb packaging efforts await further instructions. source tarball: http://pkg-grass.alioth.debian.org/tarballs/opencpn_2.5.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz debian/ packaging files: svn co svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-grass/packages/opencpn/trunk/debian earlier review+comments can be found in the ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/538067 You'll notice our source tarball is labeled dfsg. This is because there were some included DLLs to help build the MS Windows version of the program which we didn't need/want for the Linux build, the source code itself is untouched. With respect to that, the one unanswered question Anton myself had was if the version in debian/changelog needed to exactly match the filename of the source package? i.e. do we need to include dfsg in the version number? I would prefer not to as our build is bit-for-bit identical to the upstream source distribution, and amending the version number gives the impression that upstream is somehow not DFSG. There was some talk that pbuilder had issues with the .orig.tar.gz version number having to match the final binary package number. Is there a work around? Does there have to be? (I mean do the debian buildbots care if the source.orig.tar.gz version exactly matches?) I am using debuild and don't experience the problem myself.. thanks, Hamish -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1313494294.19695.yahoomailclas...@web110016.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
Bug#636043: ITP: nautilus-wipe -- Secure deletion extension for Nautilus
Le samedi 30 juillet 2011 à 15:25 +0200, intrigeri+deb...@boum.org a écrit : Package: wnpp Owner: intrigeri+deb...@boum.org Severity: wishlist * Package name: nautilus-wipe Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Colomban Wendling b...@herbesfolles.org * URL or Web page : http://wipetools.tuxfamily.org/nautilus-wipe.html * License : GPL-3+ Description : Secure deletion extension for Nautilus Nautilus Wipe is a Nautilus extension that adds Securely erase and Securely fill empty space items to the right-click menu. . The progress and results of the operations are shown in a progress dialog. Apparently the package has not been ported to GTK+ 3.0. Unless this is done, the package will be removed from the archive when nautilus 3 is uploaded, so it doesn’t look very useful as is. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1313498725.3506.216.camel@pi0307572
Bug#538067: request for pkg review (ITP #538067)
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Hamish hamis...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, it is been a while since our last review of the OpenCPN packaging, and the stable release we were working towards has now shipped. Our .deb packaging efforts await further instructions. source tarball: http://pkg-grass.alioth.debian.org/tarballs/opencpn_2.5.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz debian/ packaging files: svn co svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-grass/packages/opencpn/trunk/debian earlier review+comments can be found in the ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/538067 You'll notice our source tarball is labeled dfsg. This is because there were some included DLLs to help build the MS Windows version of the program which we didn't need/want for the Linux build, the source code itself is untouched. Is the source included for those DLLS? If so, I'm not convinced you need to DFSG repack, but someone else can chime in. I don't think just because upstream uses krufty practices that it should be repacked. Now, if it had a nonfree issue, and while you're in there you cleaned it up, I'm sure that'd be fine. Again, perhaps a DD can chime in. Was the source included for the DLLs? With respect to that, the one unanswered question Anton myself had was if the version in debian/changelog needed to exactly match the filename of the source package? i.e. do we need to include dfsg in the version number? Yeah, you do. Lintian should complain if it's wrong. Take a look at the source to Fluxbox, we have a dfsg repack in place. Here's a snippit for you: fluxbox (1.3.1~dfsg1-2) unstable; urgency=low I would prefer not to as our build is bit-for-bit identical to the upstream source distribution, and amending the version number gives the impression that upstream is somehow not DFSG. There Are they DFSG? Why repack if it's already DFSG? was some talk that pbuilder had issues with the .orig.tar.gz version number having to match the final binary package number. Is there a work around? Does there have to be? (I mean do the debian buildbots care if the source.orig.tar.gz version exactly matches?) I am using debuild and don't experience the problem myself.. thanks, Hamish -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1313494294.19695.yahoomailclas...@web110016.mail.gq1.yahoo.com -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cao6p2qqdntqk2rmhd08anwnp-goke9dn+yc7xbagcfrgkgz...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#583619: RFP: otf-googlefonts -- Free Web Fonts by Google
There have already been various discussions on this but I'm now adding it to this particular bug. These libre/open fonts must be packaged separately and not in a huge lump of different upstreams, usecases and licenses. No one is likely to use them all at the same time. This is in line with the general policies of the pkg-fonts team. Some of these fonts are already packaged by members of the pkg-fonts team: http://pkg-fonts.alioth.debian.org This RFP should probably be closed. -- Nicolas Spalinger, SIL NRSI volunteer - http://scripts.sil.org Debian fonts task force - http://pkg-fonts.alioth.debian.org Open font community - http://planet.open-fonts.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e4a7e34.5060...@sil.org
Bug#638013: ITP: libclippoly -- polygon clipping routines
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Barak A. Pearlmutter b...@debian.org * Package name: libclippoly Version : 0.11 (upstream designation: PL11) Upstream Author : Klamer Schutte kla...@mi.el.utwente.nl * URL : http://clippoly.sourceforge.net * License : LGPL-2+ Programming Lang: C++ Description : polygon clipping routines Robust routines for clipping polygons against each other: finding unions and intersections and differences of polygonal regions. (The proximal reason for packaging this is that the ivtools system can make use of it. However it is of independent interest, hence would not make sense to put in the same source package as ivtools, even if that were technically easy.) prelim packaging in: http://github.com/barak/clippoly -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1QtKfu-0008SA-Uu@port-kdr.hamilton.local
Bug#563951: MCollective Debian packages
Hello, the MCollective packages are now ready. I have used the packages from Ubuntu as source. The mcollective source package produces the following debs: - mcollective = MCollective Daemon - mcollective-client = MCollective Client stuff - mcollective-common = MCollective Libs used by Client/Daemon - mcollective-doc= MCollecitve Docs The packages use debconf to setup server.cfg and client.cfg. This debconf can be used for preseeding. Example pressed file is included into mcollective-common. All files are available at: git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-puppet/mcollective.git The MCollective package is lintian clean, except for some warnings about no manpages for binaries. Could any DD please check my packages? Thanks, Jonas signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#582884:
Hey Sam, If there hasn't been any progress on this I would be extremely interested in taking over this. I have many things on my hands right now and therefor feel free to take over this package. Enjoy, Adnan On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Sam Dunne sam.dunne...@gmail.com wrote: Hey there, If there hasn't been any progress on this I would be extremely interested in taking over this. Let me know :) -- Sam Dunne BSc Computer Science, UCD Dublin. -- Adnan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALbGxZnGUOcEvwPGKteeh+cDJteTqei=vef+77n-_gyjxqr...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#638043: O: libpicocontainer-java
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I am orphaning the package in behalf of the Java team because: - it hasn't been maintained for a long time - it has no reverse dependencies - it has a low popcon value Feel free to re-introduce it to the team if want to actively maintain it. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110816194220.ga26...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#638044: O: libparanamer-java
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I am orphaning the package in behalf of the Java team because: - it hasn't been maintained for a long time - it has only orphaned reverse dependencies - it has a low popcon value Feel free to re-introduce it to the team if want to actively maintain it. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110816194719.ga4...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#638042: O: libnachocalendar-java
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I am orphaning the package in behalf of the Java team because: - it hasn't been maintained for a long time - it has no reverse dependencies - it has a low popcon value Feel free to re-introduce it to the team if want to actively maintain it. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110816193610.ga15...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#638041: O: libnxml
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, neither Varun nor me have time to maintain this package properly. That is why I am orphaning it now. Cc-ing the last NMU uploader. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110816192746.ga25...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#638039: O: libmrss
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, neither Varun nor me have time to maintain this package properly. That is why I am orphaning it now. Cc-ing the former NMU uploader. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110816192043.ga8...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#624540: marked as done (RFA: syncevolution -- Evolution data synchronization program using SyncML (CLI))
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:49:07 + with message-id e1qtpdl-0002g3...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#624540: fixed in syncevolution 1.1.99.5a-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #624540, regarding RFA: syncevolution -- Evolution data synchronization program using SyncML (CLI) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 624540: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624540 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request an adopter for the syncevolution package. Anybody who takes this on will most likely want to take over libsynthesis as well, since that syncevolution is its only rdepends in Debian. The package description is: SyncEvolution synchronizes Evolution's contact, calendar and task items via SyncML. The items are exchanged in the vCard 2.1 or 3.0 format and iCalender 2.0 format via the Synthesis C++ client API library, which should make SyncEvolution compatible with the majority of SyncML servers. Full, one-way and incremental synchronization of items are supported. Background: I don't use the package anymore, and perhaps more importantly I don't use gnome or evolution, so I'm a bit out of touch with the whole ecosystem. This makes me a less motivated and attentive maintainer than is ideal. All of the packaging is in collab-maint git on alioth. Upstream is using git as well, so staying with that is probably sensible. There are a couple RC bugs in unstable, these are fixed in a new upstream in experimental; upstream didn't consider that version suitable for unstable/testing. The main upstream developer, Patrick Ohly, is very supportive of the Debian packaging efforts. He is subscribed to the BTS, and sometimes answers reports before I do. I'm willing to sponsor/mentor somebody taking over the packages, at least for a while.. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: syncevolution Source-Version: 1.1.99.5a-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of syncevolution, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libsyncevo-dbus0_1.1.99.5a-2_amd64.deb to main/s/syncevolution/libsyncevo-dbus0_1.1.99.5a-2_amd64.deb libsyncevolution0_1.1.99.5a-2_amd64.deb to main/s/syncevolution/libsyncevolution0_1.1.99.5a-2_amd64.deb sync-ui_1.1.99.5a-2_amd64.deb to main/s/syncevolution/sync-ui_1.1.99.5a-2_amd64.deb syncevolution-common_1.1.99.5a-2_all.deb to main/s/syncevolution/syncevolution-common_1.1.99.5a-2_all.deb syncevolution-dbg_1.1.99.5a-2_amd64.deb to main/s/syncevolution/syncevolution-dbg_1.1.99.5a-2_amd64.deb syncevolution-dbus_1.1.99.5a-2_amd64.deb to main/s/syncevolution/syncevolution-dbus_1.1.99.5a-2_amd64.deb syncevolution-http_1.1.99.5a-2_all.deb to main/s/syncevolution/syncevolution-http_1.1.99.5a-2_all.deb syncevolution-libs_1.1.99.5a-2_amd64.deb to main/s/syncevolution/syncevolution-libs_1.1.99.5a-2_amd64.deb syncevolution_1.1.99.5a-2.debian.tar.gz to main/s/syncevolution/syncevolution_1.1.99.5a-2.debian.tar.gz syncevolution_1.1.99.5a-2.dsc to main/s/syncevolution/syncevolution_1.1.99.5a-2.dsc syncevolution_1.1.99.5a-2_amd64.deb to main/s/syncevolution/syncevolution_1.1.99.5a-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 624...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Tino Keitel tino+deb...@tikei.de (supplier of updated syncevolution package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:18:46 +0200 Source: syncevolution Binary: syncevolution sync-ui syncevolution-common syncevolution-libs syncevolution-dbus syncevolution-http syncevolution-dbg libsyncevolution0 libsyncevo-dbus0 Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 1.1.99.5a-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Tino Keitel tino+deb...@tikei.de Changed-By: Tino Keitel tino+deb...@tikei.de Description: libsyncevo-dbus0 - Sync personal information data using SyncML and CalDAV/CardDAV (s libsyncevolution0 - Sync personal information data using SyncML and CalDAV/CardDAV (s sync-ui- Sync personal information data using SyncML and CalDAV/CardDAV (G syncevolution - Sync personal information
Bug#630200: Wrong Author(s)
The authors of BrailleUtils are Bert Frees and Joel Håkansson. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110816200828.GA18173@krustenbook
Bug#638054: O: libpixie-java
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I am orphaning the package in behalf of the Java team because: - it hasn't been maintained for a long time - it has only orphaned reverse dependencies - it has a low popcon value Feel free to re-introduce it to the team if want to actively maintain it. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110816204759.ga22...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#638051: O: libxml-java
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I am orphaning the package in behalf of the Java team because: - it hasn't been maintained for a long time - it has only orphaned reverse dependencies - it has a low popcon value Feel free to re-introduce it to the team if want to actively maintain it. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110816203639.ga32...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#638056: O: librepository
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I am orphaning the package in behalf of the Java team because: - it hasn't been maintained for a long time - it has only orphaned reverse dependencies - it has a low popcon value Feel free to re-introduce it to the team if want to actively maintain it. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110816205750.ga2...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#638052: O: libloader
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I am orphaning the package in behalf of the Java team because: - it hasn't been maintained for a long time - it has only orphaned reverse dependencies - it has a low popcon value Feel free to re-introduce it to the team if want to actively maintain it. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110816204354.ga11...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#638055: RFP: libfcgi-client-perl -- client library for fastcgi protocol
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libfcgi-client-perl Version : 0.06 Upstream Author : Tokuhiro Matsuno tokuhirom @*(#RJKLFHFSDLJF gmail.com * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/FCGI-Client/ * License : Artistic or GPL Programming Lang: Perl Description : client library for fastcgi protocol FCGI::Client - connection to FastCGI server -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110816205614.11455.65530.report...@swetlana.brachium-system.net
Bug#638064: O: libstevesoft-regex-java
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I am orphaning the package in behalf of the Java team because: - it hasn't been maintained for a long time - it has no reverse dependencies - it has a low popcon value Feel free to re-introduce it to the team if want to actively maintain it. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110816211415.ga4...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#633774: marked as done (RFP: osgi-core -- Core OSGi)
Your message dated Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:09:47 +0200 with message-id 20110816220947.GA22810@earth.universe and subject line Re: Bug#633774: RFP: osgi-core -- Core OSGi has caused the Debian Bug report #633774, regarding RFP: osgi-core -- Core OSGi to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 633774: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633774 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: osgi-core Version : 4.2.1 Upstream Author : OSGi Alliance * URL : http://www.osgi.org * License : Apache 2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : Core OSGi The Open Services Gateway initiative framework is a module system and service platform for the Java programming language that implements a complete and dynamic component model, something that as of does not exist in standalone Java/VM environments. This package contains the OSGi Core Interfaces and Classes for use in compiling bundles. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi, I'm closing this bug, since h2database also works with the osgi version from eclipse. Thanks for the suggesting this Niels. -- Sebastian ---End Message---
Bug#594027: ITP: lucene3
I am interested in maintaining this package, as well as packaging apache solr 3 (now built from the same upstream source package.) I have done some initial work on this but I do not yet have a working candidate package. I am not a DM yet, so I would need the cooperation of a sponsor.
Processed (with 2 errors): ITP: lucene3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 594027 ITP: lucene3 -- Lucene is a full-text search engine for Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. the Java(TM) programming language. Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. owner 594027 ! Bug #594027 [wnpp] RFP: lucene3 -- Lucene is a full-text search engine for the Java(TM) programming language. Owner recorded as Mat Scales m...@wibbly.org.uk. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 594027: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594027 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13135352387693.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed (with 1 errors): Re: ITP: lucene3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 594027 ITP: lucene3 -- Lucene is a full-text search engine Bug #594027 [wnpp] Full-text search engine library for Java(TM) Changed Bug title to 'ITP: lucene3 -- Lucene is a full-text search engine' from 'Full-text search engine library for Java(TM)' library for Java(TM) Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 594027: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594027 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131353699116855.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: ITP: lucene3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 594027 ITP: lucene3 -- Full-text search engine library Bug #594027 [wnpp] ITP: lucene3 -- Lucene is a full-text search engine Changed Bug title to 'ITP: lucene3 -- Full-text search engine library' from 'ITP: lucene3 -- Lucene is a full-text search engine' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 594027: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594027 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131353713917743.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: ITP: lucene3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 594027 Full-text search engine library for Java(TM) Bug #594027 [wnpp] RFP: lucene3 -- Lucene is a full-text search engine for the Java(TM) programming language. Changed Bug title to 'Full-text search engine library for Java(TM)' from 'RFP: lucene3 -- Lucene is a full-text search engine for the Java(TM) programming language.' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 594027: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594027 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131353694916624.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#637820: I can adopt this package
This time, CCing Peter. On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:10:41PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: Dear Jean-Philippe, On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 01:26:09AM +0200, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: I will try to adopt this package, as well as festival (so I'll try closing bug 601596 too). Of course I'll have to see the TODO, see if there's update to do, where finding new upstream source. Finally, as I've to use sponsoring process, it could take some time. But I will try handling these 2 bugs. This is wonderful. Thank you for the initiative; I greatly appreciate it! Another good samaritan, namely Peter Drysdale, whom I have CCed, has responded with an offer of help. It would be nice if you could collaborate on your changes, so that things can become easier for all and share your ideas. I'll also try to chip in whatever way I can. Thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah -- Kumar Appaiah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2011081702.ga24...@bluemoon.alumni.iitm.ac.in
Bug#637820: I can adopt this package
Dear Jean-Philippe, On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 01:26:09AM +0200, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: I will try to adopt this package, as well as festival (so I'll try closing bug 601596 too). Of course I'll have to see the TODO, see if there's update to do, where finding new upstream source. Finally, as I've to use sponsoring process, it could take some time. But I will try handling these 2 bugs. This is wonderful. Thank you for the initiative; I greatly appreciate it! Another good samaritan, namely Peter Drysdale, whom I have CCed, has responded with an offer of help. It would be nice if you could collaborate on your changes, so that things can become easier for all and share your ideas. I'll also try to chip in whatever way I can. Thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110817021041.ga23...@bluemoon.alumni.iitm.ac.in
Bug#637820: I can adopt this package
Hi. On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 05:42:35AM +0200, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:10:41PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: Another good samaritan, namely Peter Drysdale, whom I have CCed, has responded with an offer of help. It would be nice if you could collaborate on your changes, so that things can become easier for all and share your ideas. Oh yes! great! Indeed my skills in programming are very low. So if I can work on packaging and someone to work on the code itself (patches, discuss with upstream), it'd be excellent. We could work together in a complementary way. I did 1st tests with lintian, I've to say I don't understand some messages, especially those which have been appeared since I changed from 3.9.1 to 3.9.2 as TODO says. That for both packages. Fantastic! I'll also try to chip in whatever way I can. In changelog, I added myself to Maintainer and uploaders, but I let your name. Does Peter want to be added to these fields? If yes, I could send the result of lintian and we could work together on it. I guess Peter would, but I wouldn't mind having my name removed. I stay available for every idea, Would you guys want to collaborate on this, say on an SVN/GIT/hg/… repository or such? I can set one up for you on Debian infrastructure if you would find it useful. Alternately, collaboration over e-mail is also good enough, whatever you prefer. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110817034520.ga29...@bluemoon.alumni.iitm.ac.in
Bug#637820: I can adopt this package
Hi, Le mardi 16 août 2011 à 21:11 -0500, Kumar Appaiah a écrit : This time, CCing Peter. On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:10:41PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: Another good samaritan, namely Peter Drysdale, whom I have CCed, has responded with an offer of help. It would be nice if you could collaborate on your changes, so that things can become easier for all and share your ideas. Oh yes! great! Indeed my skills in programming are very low. So if I can work on packaging and someone to work on the code itself (patches, discuss with upstream), it'd be excellent. We could work together in a complementary way. I did 1st tests with lintian, I've to say I don't understand some messages, especially those which have been appeared since I changed from 3.9.1 to 3.9.2 as TODO says. That for both packages. I'll also try to chip in whatever way I can. In changelog, I added myself to Maintainer and uploaders, but I let your name. Does Peter want to be added to these fields? If yes, I could send the result of lintian and we could work together on it. I stay available for every idea, Regards, Thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah - Jean-Philippe MENGUAL accelibreinfo, votre partenaire en informatique adaptée aux déficients visuels Tél.: 06.76.34.93.37 Mail: mengualjean...@free.fr Site Web: http://www.accelibreinfo.eu signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Bug#637820: I can adopt this package
Le mardi 16 août 2011 à 22:45 -0500, Kumar Appaiah a écrit : Hi. On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 05:42:35AM +0200, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: Would you guys want to collaborate on this, say on an SVN/GIT/hg/… repository or such? I can set one up for you on Debian infrastructure if you would find it useful. Alternately, collaboration over e-mail is also good enough, whatever you prefer. My situation is that I'm nothing in Debian. I only have an alioth account. So I don't know how is easy collaborating on svn/git. So my 1st idea is going on by mail, agreeing about a method, then go ahead. But of course if solutions exist to have svn/git easily, I agree if Peter and you think it's useful. So far I discover Debian's world and rules (from dev point of view) and I've to know it's not easy to understand processes and infrastructure now I know to package. So I stay opened for every proposal. Regards, Thanks. Kumar - Jean-Philippe MENGUAL accelibreinfo, votre partenaire en informatique adaptée aux déficients visuels Tél.: 06.76.34.93.37 Mail: mengualjean...@free.fr Site Web: http://www.accelibreinfo.eu signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
