Bug#560244: RFS: mysql-cluster
I have replied toSteven privately. I look forward to this package being in Debian but I don't think it will be very quick. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4feaa3c2.8040...@periapt.co.uk
Processed: mysqltuner: block ITA 679205 by RFS 679201
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 679205 by 679201 Bug #679205 [wnpp] ITA: mysqltuner -- high-performance MySQL tuning script 679205 was not blocked by any bugs. 679205 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 679205: 679201 stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 679205: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679205 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134077799311623.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#573822: RFA: gwibber -- microblogging client for GNOME
I was looking through RFA and came across this package, I used to blog with it often in Ubuntu and would like to know if anyone is interested in working on this project with me? I am brand new to the development side of things and would like to maintain this package with the guidance of the Debian community. How would I get involved on this project and if necessary take it over. Can someone respond privately and let me know how to? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1340779430.540.20.ca...@debian.stackoverflow.org
Bug#622216: marked as done (ITP: nomnom -- download videos from Youtube and other similar video websites)
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2012 07:47:57 + with message-id e1sjmyj-0004vd...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#622216: fixed in nomnom 0.3.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #622216, regarding ITP: nomnom -- download videos from Youtube and other similar video websites to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 622216: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622216 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Owner: Alejandro Garrido Mota garridom...@gmail.com Severity: wishlist * Package name: nomnom * Version : 0.1.2 * Upstream Author : Toni Gundogdu lega...@gmail.com * URL : http://nomnom.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-3 * Programming Lang: C Description: download videos from Youtube and other similar video websites application for downloading videos from Youtube and other similar video websites that require Adobe Flash to view the video content. Video streaming or downloading can be started simply by dropping an URL onto the application window. Regards -- http://www.mogaal.com Ing Eléctrica - Universidad Simón Bolívar GNU/Linux Debian SID Usuario Linux registrado #386758 GPG Key Fingerprint = F6A7 EF7E 4688 70C6 6B37 A8EF F6B0 9645 B24B F200 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: nomnom Source-Version: 0.3.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nomnom, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: nomnom_0.3.1-1.debian.tar.gz to main/n/nomnom/nomnom_0.3.1-1.debian.tar.gz nomnom_0.3.1-1.dsc to main/n/nomnom/nomnom_0.3.1-1.dsc nomnom_0.3.1-1_amd64.deb to main/n/nomnom/nomnom_0.3.1-1_amd64.deb nomnom_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz to main/n/nomnom/nomnom_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 622...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alejandro Garrido Mota garridom...@gmail.com (supplier of updated nomnom package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 10:18:30 -0430 Source: nomnom Binary: nomnom Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.3.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Alejandro Garrido Mota garridom...@gmail.com Changed-By: Alejandro Garrido Mota garridom...@gmail.com Description: nomnom - download videos from Youtube and other similar video websites Closes: 622216 Changes: nomnom (0.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release (Closes: #622216) Checksums-Sha1: 34b33156b5742e21914d2b09a90609c08318f689 1832 nomnom_0.3.1-1.dsc 73a1289b528dbad720559c2ce0d2f4159c1e8d60 226706 nomnom_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz a7f09d68b5bf2a0477b4e6ca4dd676600eddf2be 1597 nomnom_0.3.1-1.debian.tar.gz 5b97e0cfa8d1708adc616c20a3f255f0256f7652 183114 nomnom_0.3.1-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 669ec5809294a1526d52c961708ad0d7a88c51a2d62708a41d7fdff0e1c43ab9 1832 nomnom_0.3.1-1.dsc 12669f3d6375bb13b127a8533e949ec5672ce7ccb4c817a9f933be0618eb02e8 226706 nomnom_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz fb26396ec5dbb9b59dc4cb3f533b04d99369a7c78a9a859ec2c0ca526f07827d 1597 nomnom_0.3.1-1.debian.tar.gz 901e65c843c127c529c126fb16b8755209e042187cd07d8f0886e090365c 183114 nomnom_0.3.1-1_amd64.deb Files: 7b53518c8bd2ac39372913042432b54c 1832 video extra nomnom_0.3.1-1.dsc 68ce70a51ad57ebc4ec872b52c2d4d41 226706 video extra nomnom_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz 575e89185e23d3ddbec433eb0297c659 1597 video extra nomnom_0.3.1-1.debian.tar.gz bb2b2445c93c4f461ea2d68ba38e4e90 183114 video extra nomnom_0.3.1-1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP5d4LAAoJELs6aAGGSaoGqXkP/jnOhj/BebHVR0m9VLttEWB0 f9pVStfejFT1ejLKfe2/fIRqW3nGoeiM0QalBPOKIQd+bTSIR1PaSiJ8vJlBkEVr wEbhA6aoRAat5CDhC9jOZIMJSmr8xkPhcfsCkWh3Nn0k81RiflD3CX+xPT52nm9e aMBbuqRJdE41bya01GSbqHLSb5QUbbgcnn57XVz3WReXTDY+2FtXPAhYE7WN68aJ 96PF9KSpgCMOfjstVx5qedPhwtrwyeQ2SgRTld/WxHBUR5XMTTJ6JPCopTep3gAN EZC0dRSjSH25MYpjiJjBbPZNn65aMb3c/97l2ViFVDvvkzxw3KVQXn2arfkXnhNw 7UuEk3J331DQ3/ZMtgiRwCK2deTluE2us3SqX2Cbhrf2qGqd8mbVGseW5nO3ugiw /2ov4oFMjpcE+5owzADZsMwaRdjERECdG8BUeVKJr7tUzTXV9BL0laZ152zxmkeG iUWR5if8QjNghxwTeGsfyBc1Zlms99ffKe7ues/tbzySucz5B0pUyvvFPVmSmSiX
Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Wednesday 27 June 08:03:32 UTC 2012 # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html # # Source package in NEW: libplack-middleware-expires-perl tags 679156 + pending Bug #679156 [wnpp] RFP: libplack-middleware-expires-perl -- Middleware to control the setting of expiry headers in server responses Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: acpi-support-minimal tags 679078 + pending Bug #679078 [wnpp] ITP: acpi-support-minimal -- minimal acpi scripts Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: librtas tags 386676 + pending Bug #386676 [wnpp] RFP: librtas -- Libraries for PowerPC64 Run-Time Abstraction Services (RTAS) Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: sblim-wbemcli tags 675232 + pending Bug #675232 [wnpp] ITP: sblim-wbemcli -- WBEM Command Line Interface Added tag(s) pending. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 386676: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=386676 675232: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675232 679078: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679078 679156: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679156 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13407842268362.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#679212: ITP: python-whois -- Python module/library for retrieving WHOIS information of domains
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Francois Marier franc...@debian.org * Package name: python-whois Version : 0.6.3 Upstream Author : DDarko dda...@ddarko.org * URL : https://code.google.com/p/python-whois/ * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python Description : Python module/library for retrieving WHOIS information of domains This Python wrapper for the whois command has a simple interface to access parsed WHOIS data for a given domain. . It is able to extract data for many of the popular TLDs (com, org, net, biz, info, pl, jp, uk, nz, ...) and queries WHOIS servers directly instead of going through an intermediate web service. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627083130.24669.27456.report...@isafjordur.dyndns.org
Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions
Hi Daniel, I was searching for the package libcrypt-openssl-aes-perl. With some wildcards I stumbled upon this wnpp bug. Was my package (Crypt::OpenSSL::AES) included in your wnpp, or should I create a new wnpp bug for this? Thanks for your input. Regards, Kai Storbeck signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#678815: ITP: wmfs -- Window Manager From Scratch
2012/6/27 Axel Beckert a...@debian.org: Hi Mickaël, Hi If you still need a sponsor: I'm curious on that window manager. The feature description by Serge sounded promising and the screenshots on the website look neat, too. Yes, i'm still looking for a sponsor :-) I will add more informations to the ITP bug soon. I'm currently using awesome and ratpoison -- and packaging a non-tiling window manager myself which I prefer when a tiling doesn't do the job (think Gimp). Yeah, Gimp (= 2.6) is a problem with almost every tiling window manager I had the same problem, that's why i switched to Gimp 2.7. While awesome and ratpoison are fine for my daily work they still have their usability itches (a few of them were already mentioned by Serge -- awesome's configuration in Lua is one of them). I also tried i3 and scrotwm for a while, and looked at subtle and herbstluftwm (despite their concepts are too far away from what I look for). I never tryed Ratpoison, but i used Awesome for a while, and i ended up with a 800 lines long rc.lua. I'm not a big fan of Lua :-p I tryed i3 too, but i don't like the tree structure, so finally i tryed WMFS and i use it since a little more than a year. That's why i had the idea to package it. I tried to look at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wmfs/wmfs_2~beta201206-3.dsc and http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wmfs/wmfs_2~beta201206-3.dsc but those upload seems incomplete: dpkg-source: error: File ./wmfs_2~beta201206.orig.tar.xz has size 53492 instead of expected 296604 dpkg-source: error: File ./wmfs_2~beta201206.orig.tar.xz has size 53492 instead of expected 53512 In fact, the `debian' folder i created for the package is now in the WMFS git repository, so when i want to build it, i create a .orig.tar.xz file with the following command: tar --xz -cvf ../wmfs2~beta201206.orig.tar.xz --exclude=debian ... and then i build the package with `debuild' and i upload it with `dput'. So i think i forgotten to run `make clean' before archiving and there is probably some binaries inside, which whould explain the error message :-/ If you want to try WMFS, you can still use the source: git clone git://github.com/xorg62/wmfs.git cd wmfs debian/rules binary-all The newest one which seemed complete was http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wmfs/wmfs_2\~beta201206.dsc Since alone from what I see on the mentors site the newer packages are quite improved over that one, I'd prefer to have a look at the current state instead of this out-dated version. As i said in the previous message, i'm currently at work and i go back home only Friday evening, so i can't fix the problem with the orig file till then... Apart from that, i am wondering if it's better to call the package `wmfs' with the version number `2~betadate', as i did, or if i should rather call it `wmfs2' with version number `date', as WMFS was been completely rewritten since the version 1 ... Have a nice day. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CADx5VdrdOGu4vkKSh=vzegbq0r0sny_qawqj0jrn7yeyzvj...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#679223: ITP: tonicdns -- RESTful API for PowerDNS
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kouhei Maeda mkou...@palmtb.net * Package name: tonicdns Version : 1.1.0 Upstream Author : Cyso Managed Hosting developm...@cyso.nl * URL : https://github.com/Cysource/TonicDNS * License : GPL Programming Lang: PHP Description : RESTful API for PowerDNS It uses the MIT licensed Tonic RESTful library as its base. Feature is below: * Token based communication. * Option to store tokens in the PowerDNS database, or in a separate SQLite database. * Should work with any PowerDNS backend database, tested with MySQL. * Supports adding of zones, records and zone and record templates. * Atomic commits, all modifications are validated on input and executed in a single transaction. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627094519.12281.21839.report...@vmdeb.cyberagent.co.jp
Bug#679078: ITP: acpi-support-minimal -- minimal acpi scripts
* Michael Meskes mes...@debian.org [120626 14:48]: [ Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org [120626 12:05]:] I'll be reopening 665987, but if that gets closed again I'd be very happy to switch to acpi-support-minimal from my now locally built acpi-support packages w/ the consolekit dependency removed. [...] I'm absolutely willing to listen to ideas of solving this, which imo would be a much better solution than creating an additional package that will only partly work. [...] I'd prefer to get this fixed in acpi-support-base, but I think you have made your point very clear that the only purpose of that package is to not do anything if some power manager is running and that to detect this perfectly you are totally willing to force anyone to install consolekit (and thus dbus) who justs wants his system shutting down cleanly when the power button is pressed. That this is not issue for you at all and that you do not see any problem in introducing this change 2012-06-21 i.e. shortly before the freeze. If that gets closed again sounds like I was closing the bug without a reason, which I didn't. That sentence was much more neutral than anything I think I could have written. After you were closing two bug reports by just dismissing the issue, a if that gets closed again is a totally objective way to describe expectations. Bernhard R. Link -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627093253.ga3...@client.brlink.eu
Bug#675310: This Package grive would be very useful.
Hello, This Package grive would be very usefully. Thank You. Regards, -- Pierre Crescenzo mailto:pie...@crescenzo.nom.fr http://www.crescenzo.nom.fr/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87iped12v3@tpol.unice.fr
Bug#679235: RFA: animals -- Traditional AI animal guessing engine using a binary tree DB
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request an adopter for the animals package. After the personal vendetta by Ron Lee against me I'm no longer interested in wasting my time for the Debian project. The package itself is in good shape and easy to maintain. I still will do the upstream and will happly help a new maintainer to take this, including answering questions and be cooperative with futur problems. Hope all those little animals find a nice new home! The package description is: You think of an animal, and this package tries to guess it... when it's wrong, you teach it about your animal. . To be more flexible and help educational aspect this game does not contain an initial database. This also allows it to be used for non animals like guessing of tools or locations. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627103317.31804.35203.report...@ph7.ph.sft.vpn
Bug#679236: O: ckport -- portability analysis and security checking tool
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hereby I orphan the package ckport. The package as made hardy useful by Ron Lee's personal vendetta against me. While not directly related most packages provided data for this package (ckport database) will be removed or orphaned. As it is not fully useless I only orphan it not asking for RM. The package itself is in good shape. Upstream development is not affected by this. I hope the package will find a new home. I will gladly help a new maintainer as needed. The package description is: ckport is a tool to check already compiled binaries and libraries for porting and security problems. . It uses objdump to read the binaries and analyses calls and jumps to functions. . This package is architecture independent and can be used on non-host architecture binaries if an objdump tool for the target architecture is installed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627104934.31992.97663.report...@ph7.ph.sft.vpn
Bug#675310: This Package grive would be very useful.
Thanks for your support :-) El 27/06/12 12:11, Pierre Crescenzo escribió: Hello, This Package grive would be very usefully. Thank You. Regards, -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#678815: ITP: wmfs -- Window Manager From Scratch
Hi, Mickaël Raybaud-Roig wrote: I'm currently using awesome and ratpoison -- and packaging a non-tiling window manager myself which I prefer when a tiling doesn't do the job (think Gimp). Yeah, Gimp (= 2.6) is a problem with almost every tiling window manager I had the same problem, that's why i switched to Gimp 2.7. Haven't tried Gimp in a while and Squeeze has 2.6. I never tryed Ratpoison, It's basically the same keybindings as with GNU Screen on the console, just for X and with Ctrl-T instead of Ctrl-A by default (and no detach feature :-) -- so if you know Screen, you can immediately use it and be productive. Which IMHO is quite an impressive feature in the tiling window manager world. but i used Awesome for a while, and i ended up with a 800 lines long rc.lua. 1800 lines here... :-/ I tried to look at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wmfs/wmfs_2~beta201206-3.dsc and http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wmfs/wmfs_2~beta201206-3.dsc but those upload seems incomplete: dpkg-source: error: File ./wmfs_2~beta201206.orig.tar.xz has size 53492 instead of expected 296604 dpkg-source: error: File ./wmfs_2~beta201206.orig.tar.xz has size 53492 instead of expected 53512 JFTR: I get the same issue on some other box. In fact, the `debian' folder i created for the package is now in the WMFS git repository, so when i want to build it, i create a .orig.tar.xz file with the following command: tar --xz -cvf ../wmfs2~beta201206.orig.tar.xz --exclude=debian Should do it. IIRC with source format 3.0, for non-native packages, dpkg-source ignores any debian directory which is in the .orig tarball. ... and then i build the package with `debuild' and i upload it with `dput'. So i think i forgotten to run `make clean' before archiving and there is probably some binaries inside, which whould explain the error message :-/ That would explain different expected size above. Is it possible that you tried to fix this by manually uploading a corrected wmfs_2~beta201206.orig.tar.xz after having used dput? That would at least explain the problems above. (I though would have expected that mentors catches such cases in some way.) If you want to try WMFS, you can still use the source: git clone git://github.com/xorg62/wmfs.git cd wmfs debian/rules binary-all Will do. But probably won't dig too much into it before the freeze. As i said in the previous message, i'm currently at work and i go back home only Friday evening, so i can't fix the problem with the orig file till then... No stress. I'm quite busy currently, too. Apart from that, i am wondering if it's better to call the package `wmfs' with the version number `2~betadate', as i did, or if i should rather call it `wmfs2' with version number `date', as WMFS was been completely rewritten since the version 1 ... As long as you don't want to have both versions installed in parallel via package, I'd prefer just wmfs as package name and the 2 into the version. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert a...@debian.org, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `-| 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627111726.gk3...@sym.noone.org
Bug#679237: ITP: ecflow -- Work flow controller for running programs based on time or dependencies
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alastair McKinstry mckins...@debian.org * Package name: ecflow Version : 2.0.30 Upstream Author servic...@ecmwf.int * URL : http://software.ecmwf.int/wiki/display/ECFLOW/Home * License : Apache Programming Lang: python, C++ Description : Work flow controller for running programs based on time or dependencies ecFlow is a work flow package that enables users to run a large number of programs ( with dependencies on each other and on time) in a controlled environment. It provides reasonable tolerance for hardware and software failures, combined with good restart capabilities. ecFlow submits tasks(jobs) and receives acknowledgements from tasks when they change status and when they send events, using child commands embedded in the scripts. ecflow stores the relationship between tasks, and is able to submit tasks dependent on triggers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627111609.21401.26379.report...@ailm.sceal.ie
Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions
On 06/27/2012 05:26 AM, Kai wrote: I was searching for the package libcrypt-openssl-aes-perl. With some wildcards I stumbled upon this wnpp bug. Was my package (Crypt::OpenSSL::AES) included in your wnpp, or should I create a new wnpp bug for this? I don't believe #534338 covered Crypt::OpenSSL::AES. However, i do wonder whether Crypt::OpenSSL::AES has received permission from the OpenSSL upstrem for the use of the term OpenSSL in its name, as referred to at: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=534338#20 I suppose the same question needs to be asked about: libcrypt-openssl-bignum-perl libcrypt-openssl-dsa-perl libcrypt-openssl-random-perl libcrypt-openssl-rsa-perl libcrypt-openssl-x509-perl (cc'ing the debian perl team to se if there's any knowledge there) --dkg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#610623: ITP: nlopt -- nonlinear optimization library
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 22:28 +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote: On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 08:56:25PM +0200, Christophe Trophime wrote: If you like to comantain the package, no problem Howto? :) If you manage to get a better package, you could upload your changes on debian science svn and add your name to maintainers. A better? It depends. Attached above package on mentors.d.m is working fully. Yours has known RC bugs (octave and guile packages). which ones? I don't understand fully decisions you made (e.g. python packaging stuff, autoreconf mess). So, I can't simple upload my changes (actually, it's an independent packaging effort) to svn. Feel free to adopt my stuff, anyway. I had like to co-maintain the package, in case you merge my debian/* stuff fully or explain me your's current content first (why do you need autoreconf, why to support multiple python version, etc). Please, consider migration to git too: http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2008/05/msg00199.html I have added your patches to svn. I would rather stick to svn... it's easier for me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1340798832.14777.9.ca...@calcul8.lcmi.local
Bug#679078: ITP: acpi-support-minimal -- minimal acpi scripts
On Jun 27, Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org wrote: I'd prefer to get this fixed in acpi-support-base, but I think you have made your point very clear that the only purpose of that package is to not do anything if some power manager is running and that to detect this perfectly you are totally willing to force anyone to install consolekit (and thus dbus) who justs wants his system shutting down cleanly when the power button is pressed. That this is not issue for you at all and that you do not see any problem in introducing this change 2012-06-21 i.e. shortly before the freeze. Agreed. The consolekit dependencies are unacceptable for headless servers where you just want the ACPI power button event to work. If fixing acpi-support-base is hard then acpi-support-minimal or acpi-support-server would be just as good. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#597490: marked as done (ITP: rhnlib -- Collection of python modules used by the Red Hat Network)
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:18:41 + with message-id e1sjrcj-0007yp...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#597490: fixed in rhnlib 2.5.52-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #597490, regarding ITP: rhnlib -- Collection of python modules used by the Red Hat Network to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 597490: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597490 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Miroslav Suchý miros...@suchy.cz * Package name: rhnlib Version : 2.5.26 Upstream Author : Spacewalk development team spacewalk-de...@redhat.com * URL : https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/ * License : GPLv2 Programming Lang: Python Description : Collection of python modules used by Spacewalk software Collection of base python modules used by the Red Hat Network (http://rhn.redhat.com) and Spacewalk software. This is common library used by both clients and server. Note that I am also one of the upstream authors. Best regards, Miroslav Suchy ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: rhnlib Source-Version: 2.5.52-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rhnlib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: python-rhn_2.5.52-1_all.deb to main/r/rhnlib/python-rhn_2.5.52-1_all.deb rhnlib_2.5.52-1.debian.tar.gz to main/r/rhnlib/rhnlib_2.5.52-1.debian.tar.gz rhnlib_2.5.52-1.dsc to main/r/rhnlib/rhnlib_2.5.52-1.dsc rhnlib_2.5.52.orig.tar.gz to main/r/rhnlib/rhnlib_2.5.52.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 597...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bernd Zeimetz b...@debian.org (supplier of updated rhnlib package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:25:38 +0200 Source: rhnlib Binary: python-rhn Architecture: source all Version: 2.5.52-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Miroslav Suchý miros...@suchy.cz Changed-By: Bernd Zeimetz b...@debian.org Description: python-rhn - Python libraries for the RHN project Closes: 597490 Changes: rhnlib (2.5.52-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release (Closes: #597490) Checksums-Sha1: e18139a1a221332ff788deede0bfa0fef5782653 1770 rhnlib_2.5.52-1.dsc 33e83ffe2701c1f6530aab6a15ca762b36eaa27d 52918 rhnlib_2.5.52.orig.tar.gz b7ed39cd901a41e59c0a4ec05d1b94e6db26d10d 1895 rhnlib_2.5.52-1.debian.tar.gz 5cff70d6e70720e23e294a0eb64a920aafc5ca3c 28964 python-rhn_2.5.52-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 3bb887edcc8eee5917185cc1a2b1223eb40623f3dfba88f768442992f33533da 1770 rhnlib_2.5.52-1.dsc 2e21a607efd315af4ac7872fdca18316b6d6ed3c1a0f130bca32d0af194a41ba 52918 rhnlib_2.5.52.orig.tar.gz f1c83908e2d2e9c8b5d8b4e2a6981c1d4a270a48ccd898cb036a9dfe8f89ec95 1895 rhnlib_2.5.52-1.debian.tar.gz a2d7aaf9351d17c2cb15e34bc11edf24a9792a9901f2b48fd8786b45feeaff13 28964 python-rhn_2.5.52-1_all.deb Files: febf10bbad8e8fd4821dc9f824d1b9f1 1770 python extra rhnlib_2.5.52-1.dsc 2e3cb2c9628f171e1ffd3dc8acc0f3eb 52918 python extra rhnlib_2.5.52.orig.tar.gz 333156ef04ada991c48436892ba50821 1895 python extra rhnlib_2.5.52-1.debian.tar.gz f037c3907000cd084686844cc596dff9 28964 python extra python-rhn_2.5.52-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP21jBAAoJEOs2Fxpv+UNfHSkP/RLQ0c08sQaI/rddR1+n903B LNP1TbyY2qX5idHWQz2/STmg6ydU+pQjf8MzCCTyWE89PSOg7vRk0Z3ueICAurj4 kWXqAY9ZJ/OrOX/Tcfu21Y/nAjbhJbJwhUkcDWMuymRKLZb1P8kIvyVAD7y8Biee x5aQy3gPRCwPI0llJICbctOIuIYX9gJ5iyfMA4vUxqNsEV8JEo8cxU7ZmZpuIFZM NrH12RfW0UqzUYEZqirJh52Hia1uM4vZmhHfeBnPRzIVxMW5z2xLbIn7IXegjnok RPTX275p48ajk+acugkBlOKjUxKWkq2PNB2Ro/TrAROnm0YkbSRelV0AtpX/uGvl WtF9xDOsqsfTPq0gClbLNQxWGa5/XtC+IVtAObwj79ZBiTNSKxtktjUFI9TDt92K w3VXdZYuV22VQH4yzpGtbxnamj/dIU27+1mAU8A2bFPJd3Qj8RnKSFhuhWHw/xgY Vsp8u9Rk4r4pZmU05DJrB+9FGPu34Zp9xphsymXOnhU7rXuDqo+qRabpt7b7Qq/J G8vHa321rMM7tQXZsQYHbdYvt5LZo7ChBfNvhYrg0x2nyMB5q5D/UOh1YoZBBiag G6242cm+NuiAOLdcuA+ZnngmaJEC4yOrY9dDiIds3YUOo+QgNXI6GJ1cp8k71SKI OcwenEDy76h354vycX61 =4s2o -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#679249: RFH: libburn -- library to provide CD/DVD writing functions
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request assistance with maintaining the libburn package. I currently lack the sufficient time, and burning devices to provide adequate testing of its optical burning capabilities, although the software is in quite mature state. In this case the burning applicaiton is cdrskin. Upstream is responsive. There is an alioth project could be reached at: pkg-libburnia-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Co-maintainers welcome. The package description is: libburn is a library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs. Supported media are: CD-R, CD-RW, DVD-RAM, DVD+RW, DVD+R, DVD+R/DL, DVD-RW, DVD-R, DVD-R/DL, BD-R, BD-RE. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627124802.17218.26501.reportbug@sid
Bug#549323: marked as done (ITP: python-ethtool -- Python bindings for the ethtool kernel interface)
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:47:29 + with message-id e1sjreb-0003ae...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#549323: fixed in python-ethtool 0.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #549323, regarding ITP: python-ethtool -- Python bindings for the ethtool kernel interface to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 549323: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549323 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: python-ethtool Version : 0.3.1 Upstream Author : Dag Wieers d...@wieers.com * URL : http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/acme/python-ethtool.git * License : GPL Programming Lang: Python Description : Python bindings for the ethtool kernel interface Allows querying and changing of ethernet card settings Needed by tuna application ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: python-ethtool Source-Version: 0.7-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of python-ethtool, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: python-ethtool_0.7-1.debian.tar.gz to main/p/python-ethtool/python-ethtool_0.7-1.debian.tar.gz python-ethtool_0.7-1.dsc to main/p/python-ethtool/python-ethtool_0.7-1.dsc python-ethtool_0.7-1_amd64.deb to main/p/python-ethtool/python-ethtool_0.7-1_amd64.deb python-ethtool_0.7.orig.tar.gz to main/p/python-ethtool/python-ethtool_0.7.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 549...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bernd Zeimetz b...@debian.org (supplier of updated python-ethtool package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:48:15 +0200 Source: python-ethtool Binary: python-ethtool Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.7-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Miroslav Suchý miros...@suchy.cz Changed-By: Bernd Zeimetz b...@debian.org Description: python-ethtool - Python bindings for the ethtool kernel interface Closes: 549323 Changes: python-ethtool (0.7-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Packaging for Debian main (Closes: #549323). Checksums-Sha1: 9f56d7e45f6378f3505fc69cf72eccbd27ae5d05 2106 python-ethtool_0.7-1.dsc 1ed6dcd1f9f98eb01cc1257a8eb4dd7210573b26 28184 python-ethtool_0.7.orig.tar.gz aa8eb185705aa4f55d5b07647e19d2f42885d282 2131 python-ethtool_0.7-1.debian.tar.gz 32c30fa69f8e0f13919110489c6fd2fc403fe121 36036 python-ethtool_0.7-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: f850501954a5a48df755dfeafb6068dc5faf6e40c809c52b024588d15ba6a175 2106 python-ethtool_0.7-1.dsc c7a225967ab4c42900121d79d19dbc047d90c8f4c155cf6fd9b16a11518a3687 28184 python-ethtool_0.7.orig.tar.gz fb465b4e13c88bf9ec92990e398d9ce56a1c70fddc6829bff6d7acefc1707105 2131 python-ethtool_0.7-1.debian.tar.gz 2da2372d0d52304c5509c8ef34e6471e04e198a33d3019e5dfe6ea12cda4a893 36036 python-ethtool_0.7-1_amd64.deb Files: efa0570d8e93d2d8f34615ff626d7c7c 2106 python extra python-ethtool_0.7-1.dsc 7883303a66e535411dfd88b4734c9a09 28184 python extra python-ethtool_0.7.orig.tar.gz e10ef5b81a8ccd6f6c148d042bd51881 2131 python extra python-ethtool_0.7-1.debian.tar.gz 6fff048ae5219807b4e6119df3f3a0c7 36036 python extra python-ethtool_0.7-1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP24hQAAoJEOs2Fxpv+UNf9MMQAJwltHMNEed72DB2GLOQUg2U KnN2s35yFvDvas13O4v77L/4DYis7lTiIm8S8/w69cRWckrIFee/dMiv//bNMPed bZPFLKQvCQ9Fx/3Hd7Tuw10CpZnO8JNuE06Qx+oKxiCjKlJvkcA5Q8IEHEwWo6Ah zbEqW2i3CiGvJE6XMIbCnAvBp21aJwuUZ90AMHWZxhoQQOjzZmsINJwjecTd04jt SGXbSioURXWwhFS8yqiy+G9kz4ecawRmxtwvy/B/fBEJ9YHPUOJMEgo816xoZaAB PRA1/vCox6hfjDnlgS7v+ZFju5wAEG5PXStSwDsgIxAfrEvslM72/nCAvykbQB/Z 04562L7spdfWGuYWiBNU7nrksdX0e/T699Z9PpIMc8yDMP0ZuxlrBghv1EGsDfa/ 6pxs964OGa88329QrsiruSdNBYm9oZINNxz3JdrsDH3uQQiYE60+v7eaylglyGkq 54fX+HtuTbcqO2bz7Z8RsY+FLByvJS1zw9dgvAK6usAWIuRkqgvTg/6riRPoiw1B YlnYPrnGQE3CtdQ2U/8Rg2rZMieeH7H2nmihiXkzfUYwkcnKX2ElGLPQgPjqGN07 snd5XNcHV4JguBifVyvPyaP3ldp75dwk8/DHZYJaDZ8P+rmtmn7lMLAJ13ijkHsn 43zE7NojkrATdcrXrPox =ueB8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#679251: O: php-codesniffer -- PHP, CSS and JavaScript coding standard analyzer and checker
Package: wnpp Severity: normal The current maintainer of php-codesniffer, Jack Bates ms...@freezone.co.uk, is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it. If you want to be the new maintainer, please see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed instructions how to adopt a package properly. Some information about this package: Package: php-codesniffer Binary: php-codesniffer Version: 1.3.4-0.1 Maintainer: Jack Bates ms...@freezone.co.uk Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8), pkg-php-tools, phpunit (= 3.6), php-timer Build-Depends-Indep: php-pear Architecture: all Standards-Version: 3.9.3 Format: 3.0 (quilt) Files: a1b5a8826db53ac98094aae3e330ca87 1346 php-codesniffer_1.3.4-0.1.dsc e4cbfd5188b077e55fd3251ccc305628 335461 php-codesniffer_1.3.4.orig.tar.gz d8e6c64489308c05f1ec8f533362857c 4482 php-codesniffer_1.3.4-0.1.debian.tar.gz Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-php/php-codesniffer.git Vcs-Git: http://git.debian.org/git/pkg-php/php-codesniffer.git Checksums-Sha1: 6e87436718af4e14676d4ee6e5d2e25f8cefd105 1346 php-codesniffer_1.3.4-0.1.dsc 02dd5c708e614841f32b1a6f99a71a3c3acefd16 335461 php-codesniffer_1.3.4.orig.tar.gz 9149a6d9fc5b816cf89559802ebf3d2357d592cf 4482 php-codesniffer_1.3.4-0.1.debian.tar.gz Checksums-Sha256: da752c370405e953173f4e691dde876f62890047e165389e067c0ec0a0ff16eb 1346 php-codesniffer_1.3.4-0.1.dsc 2caa56e5cdd30c551732ef337de5416326682f7a33888543b98d7a9eabe986de 335461 php-codesniffer_1.3.4.orig.tar.gz 563d84d1fcec68218612faae356cbe90cad3931a0cb31dc7443cd5b11852db5d 4482 php-codesniffer_1.3.4-0.1.debian.tar.gz Homepage: http://pear.php.net/package/PHP_CodeSniffer Package-List: php-codesniffer deb php optional Directory: pool/main/p/php-codesniffer Priority: source Section: php Package: php-codesniffer Version: 1.3.4-0.1 Installed-Size: 3295 Maintainer: Jack Bates ms...@freezone.co.uk Architecture: all Depends: php5-cli, php-pear, php-timer Description-en: PHP, CSS and JavaScript coding standard analyzer and checker PHP_CodeSniffer is a PHP5 script that tokenises PHP, JavaScript and CSS files to detect violations of a defined coding standard. It is an essential development tool that ensures your code remains clean and consistent. It can also help prevent some common semantic errors made by developers. Homepage: http://pear.php.net/package/PHP_CodeSniffer Description-md5: 60a641efd8218154a14044bd0ab6e4ee Section: php Priority: optional Filename: pool/main/p/php-codesniffer/php-codesniffer_1.3.4-0.1_all.deb Size: 456920 MD5sum: 2d7b9b1f6443d1498c2eb5fd3bfb4570 SHA1: 7c55a4af236ae979d30033bc9bb7c8a4015c4ad1 SHA256: d043ddd844b6ef421ff10a4b336a96c6c21ddc9d1d68ba7bd16bab38b16523c5 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions
On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 07:27 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: [snip] I don't believe #534338 covered Crypt::OpenSSL::AES. However, i do wonder whether Crypt::OpenSSL::AES has received permission from the OpenSSL upstrem for the use of the term OpenSSL in its name, as referred to at: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=534338#20 [snip] It depends what derived from this software means. The only protection OpenSSL has, in itself, would be as a trademark. Apple has an example here: http://www.apple.com/legal/trademark/appletmlist.html which seems to indicate that OpenSSL Project and OpenSSL Toolkit are protected but not bare OpenSSL. It also indicates that the restrictions imposed are only using the openssl name for marketing. But Apple has a written agreement with OpenSSL. -- --gh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1340802015.26197.48.ca...@cray.home.cotef.net
Bug#679254: RFH: libisofs -- library to create ISO9660 images
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request assistance with maintaining the libisofs package. I currently lack the time to maintain this package alone. The major drain of time is following various image specs, following the upstream VCS, and further discussions. One interesting aspect is that libisofs links with libjte in order to produce jigdo representation at the same time while producing the iso image itself (state stable). Further developments are ongoing to produce ISO9660/HFS(+) hybrids, see #630351 for some details, which is also of interest of debian-cd task (currently performed by genisoimage for Debian PowerPC images offered) This would take quite some effort in testing and proving it correct. Upstream is responsive. The alioth project could be reached at: pkg-libburnia-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Co-maintainers welcome. The package description is: libisofs creates ISO images which can then be burnt with cdrskin or other software. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627130139.17765.29666.reportbug@sid
Bug#679265: RFH: libisoburn -- command line ISO-9660 and Rock Ridge manipulation tool
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request assistance with maintaining the libisoburn package. I currently lack the time to maintain this package alone. This includes a high-level library along with a versatile app called xorriso for burning and image production. It has grown a tremendous amount of options, to the point of being language interpreter on its own right, also featuring other program option personalities (like these of mkisofs, cdrecord). This is the hardest part to thoroughly test. Debian-cd image production is in the hands of xorriso, except for the PowerPC images due to lack of ISO9660/HFS(+) support which is currently emerging. Upstream conversations and following upstream VCS are almost a must. Upstream is responsive. The alioth project could be reached at: pkg-libburnia-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Co-maintainers welcome. The package description is: xorriso is a command line and dialog application, which creates, loads, manipulates, and writes ISO-9660 file system images with Rock Ridge extensions. . It maps file objects from POSIX compliant file systems into Rock Ridge enhanced ISO-9660 file systems and features session-wise manipulation of such file systems. It can load the management information of existing ISO images and write the resulting session to optical medium or as file system objects. . Supported optical media types: - CD-R, CD-RW - DVD-R, DVD-R DL, DVD-RW, DVD+R, DVD+R DL, DVD+RW, DVD-RAM - BD-R, BD-RE . Some interesting features: - Emulation of the mkisofs and cdrecord programs. - Data backup and restore capabilities - compression, ACLs, and filters. - Isohybrid MBR with partition offset - features booting ISOLINUX from USB sticks, or from other devices that appear to PC-BIOS as hard disks. The images carry a conventional partition table for a USB stick; the first partition reports the size of the ISO image, but starts at a non-zero address. It is nevertheless still mountable. - Jigdo Template Export - jigdo representation of the resulting ISO-9660 image, generated on the fly. . Test suite: xorriso source code comes with a release engineering test-suite called `releng', which aims to cover most of the functionality of the xorriso and the underlying libraries of libburn, libisofs, and libisoburn. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627131407.18171.20759.reportbug@sid
Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions
On 06/27/2012 09:00 AM, Guy Hulbert wrote: It depends what derived from this software means. The only protection OpenSSL has, in itself, would be as a trademark. I don't think this is the case, but i could be wrong. Trademark would be used to keep someone from marketing and unrelated product as OpenSSL. In this case, it's simply the copyright license (not a trademark) which grants the toolkit's re-use, modification, and redistribution rights only under the constraint that: * 5. Products derived from this software may not be called OpenSSL *nor may OpenSSL appear in their names without prior written *permission of the OpenSSL Project. This seems like a silly and annoying clause to me, but it's in the license, and i think we should try to respect the authors' expressed wishes. Given that the perl modules in question clearly contain OpenSSL in their names, this appears to only be satisfied under one of the following conditions: 0) a perl module is not a product 1) these perl modules are not derived from OpenSSL 2) the OpenSSL Project has given these modules explicit permission 3) this clause is considered unenforceable and/or somehow illegitimate Alternately, we could choose to not accept the copyright license, by not redistributing or using OpenSSL for these packages (though i don't know technically how we would accomplish this). I can't summon enough cognitive dissonance to argue for conditions 0 or 1, and i have no idea how to raise a consensus on 3, so i suspect the simplest way forward would be (2): for the perl modules in question to get written permission from the OpenSSL project for their names. Maybe they've already done so -- i haven't checked! Perhaps the debian uploaders could verify with upstream? I really don't think this is a trademark issue. Regards, --dkg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#679235: i am willing to adopt those animals
i am willing to adopt those animals -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALkubT75P9yeo=ndo2w9kklmq2rjkkgkp_e4orgz6px8uap...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#674269: waiting for source versioning
I have sent an email to upstream author to get a versioning between binaries and sources. Sources are not delivered, only in SVN, and not tagged. We can watch new version via download page on binaries but we cannot match a binary with a source SVN commit or tag. -- gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4feb23ca.9040...@irisa.fr
Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions
On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 10:03 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: Given that the perl modules in question clearly contain OpenSSL in their names, this appears to only be satisfied under one of the following conditions: 0) a perl module is not a product 1) these perl modules are not derived from OpenSSL I think this is the best argument. 2) the OpenSSL Project has given these modules explicit permission 3) this clause is considered unenforceable and/or somehow illegitimate It's unenforcable if the modules in question do not incorporate any OpenSSL code and are just an interface to the library. I think this is probably the case. There seem to be between 30 and 40 modules on CPAN with OpenSSL in the name and no-one seems to be bothered. -- --gh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1340815129.26197.57.ca...@cray.home.cotef.net
Bug#650439: marked as done (O: libihelp-ruby -- Ruby console contextual help)
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:41:21 + with message-id e1sjviv-0005xd...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#679165: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #650439, regarding O: libihelp-ruby -- Ruby console contextual help to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 650439: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650439 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: normal I'm going to retire from Debian, so I'm orphaning all packages. Maybe you can just drop this package. -- Esteban ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.4.5-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libihelp-ruby has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/679165 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ---End Message---
Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions
On 06/27/2012 12:38 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote: It's unenforcable if the modules in question do not incorporate any OpenSSL code and are just an interface to the library. I think this is probably the case. Eh? How is a binding to a library not a project that is derived from that library? I don't follow your explanation that the clause is unenforcable. What makes it unenforcable? Do you think that the holder of a fully-proprietary license (imagine the most absurd non-free software imaginable) wouldn't have any grounds to complain against someone who was distributing a binding to their library without their approval? You know that you can only make a binding by at least building against header files, and linking at runtime to object files, right? There seem to be between 30 and 40 modules on CPAN with OpenSSL in the name and no-one seems to be bothered. You're seeing the modules that *remain* in CPAN. There used to be a perl module named OpenSSL. It doesn't exist in CPAN any more (in fact, the authors removed it when i asked them about these questions, as can be seen in the history of #534338. :( Listen, i don't like this situation either, and i wouldn't bother with it except that authors of some code in debian have made an explicit request by placing a constraint on their license that we have accepted by redistributing it. Shouldn't we at least try to honor that request? --dkg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions
On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 12:49 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 06/27/2012 12:38 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote: It's unenforcable if the modules in question do not incorporate any OpenSSL code and are just an interface to the library. I think this is probably the case. Eh? How is a binding to a library not a project that is derived from that library? I don't follow your explanation that the clause is unenforcable. What makes it unenforcable? Because if I write the code, I own it. So in the case of a perl module I can call it anything I want unless there is a trademark involved (and, i believe trademarking words is a perversion). Please just disregard my input if you want to play lawyer. I will stop now. -- --gh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1340815948.26197.66.ca...@cray.home.cotef.net
Bug#642934: marked as done (ITP: aircrack-ng -- wireless WEP/WPA cracking utilities)
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:02:09 + with message-id e1sjvd3-m4...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#642934: fixed in aircrack-ng 1:1.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #642934, regarding ITP: aircrack-ng -- wireless WEP/WPA cracking utilities to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 642934: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642934 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove aircrack-ng. It has unresolved license problems, is not part of stable and genereally unmaintained. Better alternatives exist. Cheers, Moritz ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: aircrack-ng Source-Version: 1:1.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of aircrack-ng, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: aircrack-ng_1.1-2.debian.tar.gz to main/a/aircrack-ng/aircrack-ng_1.1-2.debian.tar.gz aircrack-ng_1.1-2.dsc to main/a/aircrack-ng/aircrack-ng_1.1-2.dsc aircrack-ng_1.1-2_amd64.deb to main/a/aircrack-ng/aircrack-ng_1.1-2_amd64.deb aircrack-ng_1.1.orig.tar.gz to main/a/aircrack-ng/aircrack-ng_1.1.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 642...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez clo...@igalia.com (supplier of updated aircrack-ng package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:17:36 WST Source: aircrack-ng Binary: aircrack-ng Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:1.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez clo...@igalia.com Changed-By: Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez clo...@igalia.com Description: aircrack-ng - wireless WEP/WPA cracking utilities Closes: 588588 600753 610688 642698 642934 Changes: aircrack-ng (1:1.1-2) unstable; urgency=low . * New mantainer. * Re-upload to unstable (Closes: #642934) * Rework debian/* Switch debian/rules to dh. Switch debian/copyright to machine-readable. Add DEP-3 headers to debian/patches/* * Remove injection patches from package files. airdriver-ng downloads this patches from Internet, so is not needed at all to have this files on the package. * Include initial pre-downloaded file airodump-ng-oui.txt on package. * Add hardening flags. * Compile with sqlite support (Closes: #610688) (Closes: #600753) * Add 004-fix-license-issues.diff (cherry-pick from svn). Fixes copyright issues with src/sha1-sse2.* (Closes: #588588) * Add 005-fix-issues-cppcheck-r2008.patch (cherry-pick from svn). Fix issues on the code found by cppcheck. * Add 006-fix-ftbfs-and-man-path.patch (cherry-pick from svn). Fix FTBFS with gcc=4.6 and fix manpage path. * Add 007-Add-support-for-GnuTLS.patch Add support for GnuTLS and link against GnuTLS. Fix issues with GPL and OpenSSL licenses. * Add 008-fix_path_airodump-ng-oui.patch. Fix paths to file airodump-ng-oui.txt on airodump-ng and script airodump-ng-oui-update. * Add 009-airodump-ng-oui-update-manpage.patch (cherry-pick from svn). Include manpage for script airodump-ng-oui-update. * Add 010-add-freebsd-support.patch Add support for GNU/kFreeBSD (Closes: #642698) * Update Standards-Version to 3.9.2 Checksums-Sha256: c9d9633328b1dd4b9141d65632d5639b5df8cb4b5904ebaf6344175eddb2 1867 aircrack-ng_1.1-2.dsc 08eaa2a7ccc3926f54e0efa8f0928a39a06c98498efe67dba8be91a2c883177c 208912 aircrack-ng_1.1-2.debian.tar.gz 407fd8c86dfef0a75c2fefc8b179037e5762131b391f332c6dcccb46b1b6c4c5 823194 aircrack-ng_1.1-2_amd64.deb b136b549b7d2a2751c21793100075ea43b28de9af4c1969508bb95bcc92224ad 1453272 aircrack-ng_1.1.orig.tar.gz Checksums-Sha1: 63909fc131c19882d2a647ba446da517b911268d 1867 aircrack-ng_1.1-2.dsc 67c6f0201370cd750c3d89a4502426d1e76c07e0 208912 aircrack-ng_1.1-2.debian.tar.gz 254cd135e1621fc0034ffe6e795473f3f6caf511 823194 aircrack-ng_1.1-2_amd64.deb 16eed1a8cf06eb8274ae382150b56589b23adf77 1453272 aircrack-ng_1.1.orig.tar.gz Files: df871c5136a879ea1ae6f2aef238121f 1867 net optional aircrack-ng_1.1-2.dsc
Bug#679235: RFA: animals -- Traditional AI animal guessing engine using a binary tree DB
Hi, On Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2012, Philipp Schafft wrote: I request an adopter for the animals package. After the personal vendetta by Ron Lee against me what??? -v please. I'm no longer interested in wasting my time for the Debian project. eeks. not cheering, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627.13226.hol...@layer-acht.org
Processed: RFS: mysql-cluster-7.2/7.2.6+dfsg-1 [ITP]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 560244 by 679107 Bug #560244 [wnpp] ITP: mysql-cluster -- MySQL database server with cluster support Bug #585877 [wnpp] ITP: mysql-cluster -- MySQL database server with cluster support 560244 was not blocked by any bugs. 560244 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 560244: 679107 585877 was not blocked by any bugs. 585877 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 585877: 679107 stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 560244: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560244 585877: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585877 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134081861124408.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:52:28PM -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote: On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 12:49 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 06/27/2012 12:38 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote: It's unenforcable if the modules in question do not incorporate any OpenSSL code and are just an interface to the library. I think this is probably the case. Eh? How is a binding to a library not a project that is derived from that library? I don't follow your explanation that the clause is unenforcable. What makes it unenforcable? Because if I write the code, I own it. So in the case of a perl module I can call it anything I want unless there is a trademark involved (and, i believe trademarking words is a perversion). In this case *some* of the code was written by the authors of the perl code, but much of the source code comes directly from openssl. The perl module author is taking a lot of code from openssl, adding some of their own, them compiling that together into a new work. This is clearly a derrivative work. Look, for example at the source code to libcrypt-openssl-rsa-perl. In RSA.xs, these lines appear: #include openssl/bio.h #include openssl/bn.h #include openssl/err.h #include openssl/md5.h #include openssl/objects.h #include openssl/pem.h #include openssl/rand.h #include openssl/ripemd.h #include openssl/rsa.h #include openssl/sha.h #include openssl/ssl.h Those are instructions to the compiler to directly include source code from the openssl project. stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions
On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 13:42 -0400, Mike O'Connor wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:52:28PM -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote: On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 12:49 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 06/27/2012 12:38 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote: It's unenforcable if the modules in question do not incorporate any OpenSSL code and are just an interface to the library. I think this is probably the case. Eh? How is a binding to a library not a project that is derived from that library? I don't follow your explanation that the clause is unenforcable. What makes it unenforcable? The stuff on CPAN is source. So it's not linked to anything. It may have instructions to link to something but OpenSSL has no legal authority to stop that. Because if I write the code, I own it. So in the case of a perl module I can call it anything I want unless there is a trademark involved (and, i believe trademarking words is a perversion). In this case *some* of the code was written by the authors of the perl code, but much of the source code comes directly from openssl. The perl module author is taking a lot of code from openssl, adding some of their own, them compiling that together into a new work. This is clearly a derrivative work. Define derivative. Until it's compiled, it's not. Look, for example at the source code to libcrypt-openssl-rsa-perl. In RSA.xs, these lines appear: #include openssl/bio.h #include openssl/bn.h #include openssl/err.h #include openssl/md5.h #include openssl/objects.h #include openssl/pem.h #include openssl/rand.h #include openssl/ripemd.h #include openssl/rsa.h #include openssl/sha.h #include openssl/ssl.h Those are instructions to the compiler to directly include source code from the openssl project. Tha *compiler*. So it might be a problem for Debian except that Debian is NOT using the string OpenSSL. It is using the lower-case version. So there's no violation ... though IANAL. IMO, if Debian is to do anything, it should first contact the OpenSSL Project to see if there's a problem. Harassing CPAN authors seems premature to me. stew -- --gh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1340819651.26197.73.ca...@cray.home.cotef.net
Bug#650441: marked as done (ITA: dhelp -- online help system)
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:17:45 + with message-id e1sjwod-0005m7...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#650441: fixed in dhelp 0.6.21 has caused the Debian Bug report #650441, regarding ITA: dhelp -- online help system to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 650441: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650441 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: normal I'm going to retire from Debian, so I'm orphaning all packages. This package will be adopted by Georgios Zarkadas (not a Debian Developer yet). -- Esteban ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: dhelp Source-Version: 0.6.21 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dhelp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dhelp_0.6.21.dsc to main/d/dhelp/dhelp_0.6.21.dsc dhelp_0.6.21.tar.gz to main/d/dhelp/dhelp_0.6.21.tar.gz dhelp_0.6.21_all.deb to main/d/dhelp/dhelp_0.6.21_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 650...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Georgios M. Zarkadas g...@member.fsf.org (supplier of updated dhelp package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 12 June 2012 21:50:00 +0300 Source: dhelp Binary: dhelp Architecture: source all Version: 0.6.21 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Georgios M. Zarkadas g...@member.fsf.org Changed-By: Georgios M. Zarkadas g...@member.fsf.org Description: dhelp - online help system Closes: 650441 669041 669758 678055 Changes: dhelp (0.6.21) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer: Georgios M. Zarkadas g...@member.fsf.org (Closes: #650441). * Support other web servers in addition to apache2 (Closes: #669041). * Support apache2 packaging transition for version 2.4 (Closes: #669758). * Support new ruby packaging policy transition for Wheezy. * Use OptionParser instead Commandline::Application (Closes: #678055). Thanks Gunnar Wolf. * Support new layout of man2html cgi scripts for Wheezy. * Keep supporting previous policies/layouts, either during build time or during runtime, to aid backporting. * Man and info pages links are activated only if associated packages are installed on the system. * Subsections now show in the sections list only if section is selected. * New color, styles and icons themes. * Package installation now does not fail if cache data cannot be generated during install. * Fix some minor lintian warnings. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3. Checksums-Sha1: f3bdb8eeceda28d510a7796a04fae69054144079 1549 dhelp_0.6.21.dsc bd6608b685c2212d27e1f3f462da7d889a5e02d2 76763 dhelp_0.6.21.tar.gz ed0fe10fcacb8e70fd066622ca4865ebe4c4c00a 70740 dhelp_0.6.21_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 65ef7bddefd0fb0e25b3f2e814e6f38428ea86234bd4e83a4b1d02f769d3 1549 dhelp_0.6.21.dsc 239625e0ea1950e4ede2183c0a6c1ca4ec722eb2672f7573d413d5ea50128bfd 76763 dhelp_0.6.21.tar.gz 422c17c03640b0652c30e4f98201777389a3ec7967882dfa81825922c151d4fb 70740 dhelp_0.6.21_all.deb Files: c593b9ccf4f782a5ed6c3c8a372d8523 1549 doc optional dhelp_0.6.21.dsc b89e16a524947f0e71a4067cc8ccf9f5 76763 doc optional dhelp_0.6.21.tar.gz b91bd985b8f670a567fb11ecdba09179 70740 doc optional dhelp_0.6.21_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP60ruAAoJEGc6A+TB25If5iIP/3zAXLB8p5guPHG/XFoknS49 aOr5RpSk6Ry1Uug2uQTRJ9BXi236toaXRbr9/tichIAjSTbwS27PCXQQizBwNnQd YjPfiJKvIgNThgx/aRapwvpiRz7XQfJLPzvKO0z81iA95xDXOHltFeq426cJM8SR PFSDESrd15DhJS3QBvpNIcDPS/jFjOly1lGlqnbDLtidSaqQALSK43HlNH9xSI9H aUfnbR0icKh4vB0RjO4gy33nNv+2efXl8VYQez9rarB3p5t0sexnr41MZyik0oxk gBEw6TVRXtroHOKJrE7YF3aGdIRb8NdEqR9gusSmpT7OQGrJT4WzwlbE/oC4gZCh zi00fdx8IMK3sR4TsWkyVVtBqvPb75JKCAHk/w/x0ik1X8VTqRD+dNliX+EStIZO FYG02HDMPW6E/CBHHO9xus1hDTXdUYxK/eIS8wpYcnWAfnGAqCZIT8fP2UXMlnhJ q3Fh04Kvplev9QvSdwj2gZo8xir27Bxztw1IkyB9Nmzym907Jk/1Ldddyzf3booT wQInU0mRwJ9pK/VzRrcqw4C0dgb6sHh8DS3meU7xXMyh/auFVqK/ZZibiLihTF7A bqVzX3JVTI4JgIMpUAqHo1GY/1UxzmdvNMrZKlyN8ucTckl90D61ua84foSKTycI ahkkZCDsE+eGXx0BfmU5 =fVwO -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions
On 06/27/2012 01:54 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote: Define derivative. Until it's compiled, it's not. Right. Unfortunately for debian, and any other binary distributor of CPAN modules, we distribute it compiled. Tha *compiler*. So it might be a problem for Debian except that Debian is NOT using the string OpenSSL. It is using the lower-case version. So there's no violation ... though IANAL. Wow, there's a way to thread the needle that hadn't occurred to me. Was this what you were trying to point out before? I have my doubts about the legitimacy of the case of the package name as a differentiator, frankly, but i suppose that's one approach to take. Should we also change the case of the man pages and the paths to the .pm files? IMO, if Debian is to do anything, it should first contact the OpenSSL Project to see if there's a problem. Harassing CPAN authors seems premature to me. I'm not sure how the debian project can ask the OpenSSL project for written permission to use the string in these projects, since: (a) debian can't accept a debian-specific license exception (see the DFSG for details), and (b) debian isn't the CPAN upstream author. A successful request by CPAN module authors to the OpenSSL project to get approval for the use of the name would resolve the issue for *all* binary distributors of CPAN modules, afaict. I'm not sure what we would gain from a request from debian. If OpenSSL says sure, you can do that in debian, then we leave our derivatives and distributors (and other users) exposed to an ambiguous license that could be used against them, which is contrary to the DSC. It seems like the CPAN module authors are going to have to be involved (harrassed) somehow, unless openssl is considered sufficiently different from OpenSSL to invalidate stanza 5 of the OpenSSL license. --dkg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions
On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 14:25 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 06/27/2012 01:54 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote: Define derivative. Until it's compiled, it's not. Right. Unfortunately for debian, and any other binary distributor of CPAN modules, we distribute it compiled. Tha *compiler*. So it might be a problem for Debian except that Debian is NOT using the string OpenSSL. It is using the lower-case version. So there's no violation ... though IANAL. Wow, there's a way to thread the needle that hadn't occurred to me. Was this what you were trying to point out before? I have my doubts about I had not thought carefully initially the whole discussion is so ridiculous on its face that I just reacted. I told you once you could ignore me. the legitimacy of the case of the package name as a differentiator, frankly, but i suppose that's one approach to take. Should we also change the case of the man pages and the paths to the .pm files? This is clearly ridiculous. I was just referring to the debian package name. I thought that was obvious from context. IMO, if Debian is to do anything, it should first contact the OpenSSL Project to see if there's a problem. Harassing CPAN authors seems premature to me. I'm not sure how the debian project can ask the OpenSSL project for written permission to use the string in these projects, since: Perhaps you should first get written permission to use the OpenSSL string in this email thread. [snip] -- --gh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1340821943.26197.79.ca...@cray.home.cotef.net
Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 02:32:23PM -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote: Perhaps you should first get written permission to use the OpenSSL string in this email thread. Who are you? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627185241.ga1...@scru.org
Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Wednesday 27 June 20:03:20 UTC 2012 # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html # # Source package in NEW: python-whois tags 679212 + pending Bug #679212 [wnpp] ITP: python-whois -- Python module/library for retrieving WHOIS information of domains Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: munin-plugins-openstack tags 679191 + pending Bug #679191 [wnpp] ITP: munin-plugins-openstack -- Plugins for munin compatible monitoring OpenStack based systems Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: dunst tags 678445 + pending Bug #678445 [wnpp] ITP: dunst -- minimalistic notification daemon Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: fact++ tags 431175 + pending Bug #431175 [wnpp] RFP: fact++ -- description logic reasoner for the semantic web Added tag(s) pending. # Source package in NEW: python-pyds9 tags 679111 + pending Bug #679111 [wnpp] ITP: python-pyds9 -- Python interface to DS9 Added tag(s) pending. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 431175: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=431175 678445: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678445 679111: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679111 679191: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679191 679212: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679212 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13408274216150.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#587062: Re: exactimage: file format misdetection
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 23:06:26 you wrote: Current version of program in Wheeze has no this bug. Thanks. Can you please coordinate your quest in http://bugs.debian.org/587062 The new version is already packaged in the experimental branch of http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/exactimage.git -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1353220.0hqdeq3...@sven-desktop.home.narfation.org
Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions
Hi guys, Cheers for the elaborate thread that emerged from my graveyard bump. Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: It seems like the CPAN module authors are going to have to be involved (harrassed) somehow, unless openssl is considered sufficiently different from OpenSSL to invalidate stanza 5 of the OpenSSL license. --dkg I'm a bit perplexed that the module authors have anything to do with this as long as they are clearly stating their code is released under the artistic license. Should Debian concern itself (too much) with the authority of such a claim? Is it debians task to mediate between all open source forges around the world and their claims for licensing? Apologies if this is in the debian policy. Sincere Regards, Kai Storbeck signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#560244:
Crossreferencing to RFS bug #679107 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAFiqYu=of6p-dconp1ssmbbmqaqfunfyaid-6gc96bjqjs6...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#587062: exactimage: file format misdetection
Hi, Can you please coordinate your quest in http://bugs.debian.org/587062 Thanks a lot for a note. I have no intention to become the maintainer of this package. I've just prepared the QA upload. See my RFS: http://bugs.debian.org/679321 (Unfortunately I have no access to collab-maint yet, and I cannot commit to it directly. So I prepared the package in usual way.) The new version is already packaged in the experimental branch of http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/exactimage.git Hmm, I saw only master branch and 0.8.5-4 tag there via web browser. But now I've cloned git repo and found experimental branch. So I'll just close my RFS. Best regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/826061340831...@web13e.yandex.ru
Bug#587062: Re: RFS: exactimage/0.8.7-1 [QA] -- fast image manipulation programs
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 23:18:14 Schrober wrote: On Wednesday 27 June 2012 23:51:01 you wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the package exactimage. It builds those binary packages: edisplay - fast image manipulation programs (image viewer) exactimage - fast image manipulation programs exactimage-dbg - fast image manipulation library (debug symbols) libexactimage-perl - fast image manipulation library (Perl bindings) php5-exactimage - fast image manipulation library (PHP bindings) python-exactimage - fast image manipulation library (Python bindings) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/exactimage Direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/exactimage/exactimage_0.8.7-1 . dsc Changes in the package: exactimage (0.8.7-1) unstable; urgency=low * QA upload. * Update to stable release 0.8.7. And why do you update to a new upstream version in an QA upload anyway? It the task of the ITA owner and not yours -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4670416.ripjvge...@sven-desktop.home.narfation.org
Bug#587062: Re: exactimage: file format misdetection
On Thursday 28 June 2012 00:16:03 you wrote: Hi, Can you please coordinate your quest in http://bugs.debian.org/587062 Thanks a lot for a note. I have no intention to become the maintainer of this package. I've just prepared the QA upload. See my RFS: http://bugs.debian.org/679321 (Unfortunately I have no access to collab-maint yet, and I cannot commit to it directly. So I prepared the package in usual way.) Everyone can get an account by visiting the alioth register page [1] and selecting request to join on the collab-maint [2] project. [1] https://alioth.debian.org/account/register.php [2] https://alioth.debian.org/projects/collab-maint/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1577490.dfuqje3...@sven-desktop.home.narfation.org
Bug#587062: exactimage: file format misdetection
Everyone can get an account by visiting the alioth register page [1] and selecting request to join on the collab-maint [2] project. I've sent my request to join on June 18. There is no reply yet. Regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/808751340833...@web17f.yandex.ru
Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions
On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 23:13 +0200, Kai Storbeck wrote: I'm a bit perplexed that the module authors have anything to do with this as long as they are clearly stating their code is released under the artistic license. This is my position, stated somewhat more clearly. The particular license of the module does not matter as long as it follows DFSG. Should Debian concern itself (too much) with the authority of such a claim? Is it debians task to mediate between all open source forges around the world and their claims for licensing? In this case, Debian could ask for a clarification from or a suitable agreement (as Apple has done) with OpenSSL. The problem for Debian is that Debian is not just distributing the source code from CPAN and OpenSSL has a weird clause (#5) in their license. Apologies if this is in the debian policy. -- --gh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1340834109.26197.98.ca...@cray.home.cotef.net
Bug#587062: RFS: exactimage/0.8.7-1 [QA] -- fast image manipulation programs
Small patch in attachment.diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright index 44293b6..1f7a47d 100644 --- a/debian/copyright +++ b/debian/copyright @@ -29,8 +29,9 @@ License: GPL-2 can be found in /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2 file. Files: codecs/agg* -Copyright: 2002-2005, Maxim Shemanarev -License: BSD or other +Copyright: 2002-2005, Maxim Shemanarev (http://www.antigrain.com) +Comment: http://www.antigrain.com/license/ +License: BSD-3-clause or other The Anti-Grain Geometry library is dual-licensed under the BSD license and its own license. . @@ -68,9 +69,9 @@ Files: codecs/agg_svg_parser.* codecs/agg_svg_path_renderer.cc codecs/agg_svg_path_tokenizer.cc Copyright: - 2002-2005, Maxim Shemanarev + 2002-2005, Maxim Shemanarev (http://www.antigrain.com) 2008, René Rebe r...@exactcode.de -License: BSD or other +License: BSD-3-clause or other The Anti-Grain Geometry library is dual-licensed under the BSD license and its own license. . @@ -106,25 +107,19 @@ License: BSD or other Files: codecs/dcraw.h Copyright: 1997-2008, Dave Coffin dcof...@cybercom.net -License: GPL-2+ | other +License: GPL-2+ or other The Dave Coffin's raw photo decoder is dual-licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL), and its own license. . - In Debian, the Anti-Grain Geometry library is distributed under BSD. - . - This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or - modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License - as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 - of the License, or (at your option) any later version. - . - This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, - but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of - MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the - GNU General Public License for more details. + In Debian, the Dave Coffin's raw photo decoder is distributed under GPL-2+. . - You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License - along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software - Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. + No license is required to download and use dcraw.c. However, + to lawfully redistribute dcraw, you must either (a) offer, at + no extra charge, full source code* for all executable files + containing RESTRICTED functions, (b) distribute this code under + the GPL Version 2 or later, (c) remove all RESTRICTED functions, + re-implement them, or copy them from an earlier, unrestricted + Revision of dcraw.c, or (d) purchase a license from the author. . On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public License can be found in /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2 file.
Bug#679336: ITP: qemplayer -- File-manager-like GUI front-end to MPlayer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: William Brana wbr...@gmail.com * Package name: qemplayer Version : 12.5 Upstream Author : William Brana wbr...@gmail.com * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/qemplayer/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C++ Description : File-manager-like GUI front-end to MPlayer File-manager-like GUI front-end to MPlayer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJ7jCmmzHmeH6G+5j52quJzLk-Qt7EfzO9iqnk4OP+u=jmp...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#534338: OpenSSL bindings for Perl -- licensing questions
Kai Storbeck k...@xs4all.nl writes: I'm a bit perplexed that the module authors have anything to do with this as long as they are clearly stating their code is released under the artistic license. The license of the perl module is not the concern. The concern is that we are violating the license of the openssl software. Should Debian concern itself (too much) with the authority of such a claim? Yes. Is there any reason to think that The OpenSSL Project does not have a valid claim on the headers in /usr/include/openssl? Is it debians task to mediate between all open source forges around the world and their claims for licensing? It is Debian's task to make sure that our software archive is legal. We can help upstream here by getting them to where it is legal to redistribute functional builds of their software. We can also just stop distributing this software, or we can go through the process of renaming the software in Debian. Of all these options, having this problem fixed upstream seems to clearly be in the interest of not only Debian, but of many other users of this software. Apologies if this is in the debian policy. It should be implicit that debian cannot ignore the software licenses terms for the software we are distributing. pgpfxGvTFbWs1.pgp Description: PGP signature
