Bug#729781: ITP: subliminal -- Command-line tool to search and download subtitles
unblock 729781 by 698258 thanks Now that the dependencies are in unstable (charade not needed so unblocked), here is the package (WIP) on Alioth: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/subliminal/trunk/ -- Etienne Millon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140613092947.GA1294@klow
Processed: Re: Bug#729781: ITP: subliminal -- Command-line tool to search and download subtitles
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: unblock 729781 by 698258 Bug #729781 [wnpp] ITP: subliminal -- Command-line tool to search and download subtitles 729781 was blocked by: 729870 729868 698258 729872 729869 745488 729781 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 729781: 698258 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 729781: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729781 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.140265179621832.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#748383: [openstack-dev] Fwd: Fwd: Debian people don't like bash8 as a project name (Bug#748383: ITP: bash8 -- bash script style guide checker)
On 06/13/2014 06:53 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: Hi Thomas, I felt a couple sentences here were reasonable to add (more than “don’t care” from before). I understand your concerns here, and I totally get what you’re driving at, but in the packaging world wouldn’t this make sense to call it python-bash8? Yes, this is what will happen. Now the binary, I can agree (for reasons outlined) should probably not be named ‘bash8’, but the name of the “command” could be separate from the packaging / project name. If upstream chooses /usr/bin/bash8, I'll have to follow. I don't want to carry patches which I'd have to maintain. Beyond a relatively minor change to the resulting “binary” name [sure bash-tidy, or whatever we come up with], is there something more that really is awful (rather than just silly) about the naming? Renaming python-bash8 into something else is not possible, because the Debian standard is to use, as Debian name, what is used for the import. So if we have import xyz, then the package will be python-xyz. I just don’t see how if we don’t namespace collide on the executable side, how there can be any real confusion (python-bash8, sure pypi is a little different) over what is being installed. The problem is that bash8 doesn't express anything but bash version 8, unless you know pep8. On 06/13/2014 07:32 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: As a user, I hate to have to follow the abstruse reasoning of a random set of developers forcing a packager to pick a name for the package that is different than the executable. A unicorn dies every time `apt-get install sillypackage sillypackage` results in File not found. Dang! that was my favorite unicorn. I agree. Names are important. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/539acc97.1080...@debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: owner 728287 ! Bug #728287 [wnpp] ITA: iwatch -- realtime filesystem monitoring program using inotify Owner changed from louisw...@fastmail.fm to Joao Eriberto Mota Filho eribe...@eriberto.pro.br. tags 728287 - moreinfo Bug #728287 [wnpp] ITA: iwatch -- realtime filesystem monitoring program using inotify Removed tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 728287: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728287 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.140265592018237.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#748383: [openstack-dev] Fwd: Fwd: Debian people don't like bash8 as a project name (Bug#748383: ITP: bash8 -- bash script style guide checker)
On 06/13/2014 06:04 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 06/13/2014 06:53 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: Hi Thomas, I felt a couple sentences here were reasonable to add (more than “don’t care” from before). I understand your concerns here, and I totally get what you’re driving at, but in the packaging world wouldn’t this make sense to call it python-bash8? Yes, this is what will happen. Now the binary, I can agree (for reasons outlined) should probably not be named ‘bash8’, but the name of the “command” could be separate from the packaging / project name. If upstream chooses /usr/bin/bash8, I'll have to follow. I don't want to carry patches which I'd have to maintain. Beyond a relatively minor change to the resulting “binary” name [sure bash-tidy, or whatever we come up with], is there something more that really is awful (rather than just silly) about the naming? Renaming python-bash8 into something else is not possible, because the Debian standard is to use, as Debian name, what is used for the import. So if we have import xyz, then the package will be python-xyz. I just don’t see how if we don’t namespace collide on the executable side, how there can be any real confusion (python-bash8, sure pypi is a little different) over what is being installed. The problem is that bash8 doesn't express anything but bash version 8, unless you know pep8. Impinging on the bash namespace is something I'll almost buy, except that bash never ships with a version number. I'd be vaguely ameniable to renaming the package/binary to bashate, which is pronounced the same, but doesn't have the same namespacing problem. Will talk with Matt Odden about it today. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#750817: ITP: x265 -- x265 HEVC Encoder
I made some scripts and stuff a while ago to build proper (I guess, but I could be wrong) Debian packages. If you want to create a package from a current hg snapshot, it automatically patches the cmake file and adds all the version information. https://github.com/darealshinji/Debian/tree/master/x265 The source package builds an additional 10bit version under a different name (libx265-10b) too. It works fine on Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/~djcj/+archive/x265/+packages https://launchpad.net/%7Edjcj/+archive/x265/+packages Maybe you can use some of the stuff. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/539adada.7060...@gmx.de
Bug#751397: ITP: drmips -- Educational MIPS simulator - DrMIPS
I have uploaded a new package, version 1.2.2-1 (I also updated the upstream code). I had found that, when the package was compiled with JDK 7, it would not run in Java 6 (which seems to be the default in Debian stable). I have now added compile flags that fix this. Sorry, I uploaded the package in a hurry and didn't have time to test it in Debian (I use Ubuntu). I have tested it now using Debian stable. -- Bruno Nova
Bug#750817: ITP: x265 -- x265 HEVC Encoder
This version will store the 10 bit libs in a subfolder, like in the x264 package: https://github.com/darealshinji/Debian/tree/master/x265-new -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/539af6bf.5050...@gmx.de
Bug#751509: ITP: icinga2 -- host and network monitoring system
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Frosch mar...@lazyfrosch.de * Package name: icinga2 Version : 2.0.0~beta2 Upstream Author : Icinga Development Team i...@icinga.org * URL : http://www.icinga.org/ * License : GPL-2+ with OpenSSL exceptions Programming Lang: C++ with Boost Description : host and network monitoring system Icinga 2 is a general-purpose monitoring application and the next generation after Icinga 1.x - which was a Nagios fork. It should fit the needs of a small environment as well as big installations. Rewritten from scratch in C++, with multi-threading and cluster support. Features: * All common features of Icinga and Nagios * Much faster and more scalable than Icinga 1 and Nagios * New configuration format, more intuitive and template based * Monitoring several services by executing checks (see nagios-plugins*) for example ICMP/ping, SMTP, POP3, HTTP, NNTP, or other TCP port * Any small script can be used as a check plugin, when following the Nagios plugin API * Notifications about alerts with any custom script, or shipped examples * Native support for Livestatus and Graphite -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140613141858.30377.5756.report...@ceronia.lazyfrosch.de
Bug#751519: ITP: openjdk-9 -- OpenJDK 9 - Open source implementation of the Java Platform Standard Edition 9
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org * Package name: openjdk-9 Version : 9~b17 Upstream Author : Oracle Corporation * URL : http://openjdk.java.net * License : GPL-2 with Classpath Exception Programming Lang: Java, C++ Description : OpenJDK 9 - Open source implementation of the Java Platform Standard Edition 9 OpenJDK 9 is the open source implementation of the Java Platform Standard Edition 9. It contains the Java runtime and the developer tools necessary to create and execute Java 9 applications. The openjdk-9 package will remain in the experimental repository until Java 9 is officially released (expected in 2016). This will allow us to test the packages compatibility and prepare for the transition in Jessie+1. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/539b18a0.10...@apache.org
Processed: ITA-ing aclock.app
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 691819 ITA: aclock.app -- Analog dockapp clock for GNUstep Bug #691819 [wnpp] O: aclock.app -- Analog dockapp clock for GNUstep Changed Bug title to 'ITA: aclock.app -- Analog dockapp clock for GNUstep' from 'O: aclock.app -- Analog dockapp clock for GNUstep' owner 691819 Debian GNUstep maintainers pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Bug #691819 [wnpp] ITA: aclock.app -- Analog dockapp clock for GNUstep Owner recorded as Debian GNUstep maintainers pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 691819: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691819 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.140267397310503.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#711833: Preparing for RFS.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:14:09PM +0200, Yoann Gauthier wrote: Hello, Hei, I fixed lintian missing license error. I modified debian/copyright and debian/changelog, and pushed my modifications to postr repository. New task ? I have also fixed the autotools issues, but waiting to push until I have tested my changes on several machines. Have you looked at the bugs[0] and seen if they are resolved in the current version? Please keep in mind that some bugs are meant for upstream and it might be hard to distinguish feature request and bug report. PS: #637605 is probably already fixed. [0]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?dist=unstable;package=postr Regards, Yoann 2014-06-12 10:46 GMT+02:00 Yoann Gauthier yoann.gauthi...@gmail.com: Thanks for your answer :). Regards, Yoann 2014-06-12 10:25 GMT+02:00 Alexander Alemayhu alexan...@bitraf.no: On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:16:28AM +0200, Yoann Gauthier wrote: Hello, On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:22:25AM +0200, Yoann Gauthier wrote: Hei, Hei, I created the new patch to fix license error reported by lintian. With this new patch, I have an error during package-building : (sorry, it's in french) dpkg-source: info: construction de postr à partir de ./postr_0.13.orig.tar.gz patching file debian/copyright Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored dpkg-source: info: les décalages (« fuzz ») ne sont pas autorisés lors de l'application des correctifs dpkg-source: info: si le correctif « 05-fix_missing_license_paragraph.patch » est correctement appliqué par quilt, utiliser « quilt refresh » pour le mettre à jour dpkg-source: erreur: LC_ALL=C patch -t -F 0 -N -p1 -u -V never -g0 -E -b -B .pc/05-fix_missing_license_paragraph.patch/ --reject-file=- postr.orig.oMZtof/debian/patches/05-fix_missing_license_paragraph.patch a produit une erreur de sortie de type 1 Taking a quick look at your changes it looks like you have fuzz in the patches and according to dpkg fuzz is not allowed. Try updating the patch file. Okay I will fix the patch this evening by begin from scratch. Otherwise, what is the rule for create a patch vs modify directly a file ? Why are you using a patch file to update the debian/copyright? Remember you changed debian/changelog without a patch file. I think you can just modify it. patches are meant for the upstream source and the files in debian/ are not upstream but debian specific. Try not using a patch file for this. Good question. Please do not push changes which are obviosly broken to the repository! It is much better if you do things locally and only push when you see it works as expected. Sorry for the repository, I removed my new patches from repository this morning. The repository is clean (previous version before my commits). I don't understand why ? Do you have an idea ? Regards, Yoann 2014-06-11 14:55 GMT+02:00 Alexander Alemayhu alexan...@bitraf.no : On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 01:56:59PM +0200, Yoann Gauthier wrote: Hello, Hei, Okay, I will fix missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-3 during this week. To generate debian package you use : git-buildpackage ? And what is the complete lintian command ? Yes. git-buildpackage makes it easy to build a package. It also has some nice features like re-creating the upstream tarballs and much more. For lintian i run 'lintian -EvIL +pedantic'. I am not sure how mentors.debian.net does it. Thanks, Yoann 2014-06-10 23:04 GMT+02:00 Alexander Alemayhu alexan...@bitraf.no: On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:15:49PM +0200, Yoann Gauthier wrote: Hello, Hei, I updated the changelog file as asked. Thanks for the push access, it's easier for me to make changes now :). My changelog needs a review I think, because I am not familiar with changeLog conventions. It looks good IMO :) If you have new task to delegate, I am available. After running lintian today a new warning appears: W: postr source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-3 (paragraph at line 3) The warning does appear on earlier commits aswell. Maybe something has changed in lintian, could you look into it? I talked with a DD and was recommended to fix the autotools warnings reported by
Bug#729781: ITP: subliminal -- Command-line tool to search and download subtitles
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 5:29 AM, Etienne Millon m...@emillon.org wrote: unblock 729781 by 698258 thanks Now that the dependencies are in unstable (charade not needed so unblocked), here is the package (WIP) on Alioth: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/subliminal/trunk/ It seems dogpile is not available for python3. Also, I would argue that the command line binary should go in a package not named python-*. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caafdzj8e56eckcznnczicn0roohb7pbise6wg_801er51r5...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#741258: libre2 - next steps
Hi Stefano, Thanks for uploading libre2 - I notice it has now propagated to testing: http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/re2.html Would you consider releasing it to wheezy-backports? Is this the same package in Fedora/EPEL and is it up to date for libphonenumber to use? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868578 I notice GNOME's Evolution is supporting libphonenumber in some form now, hopefully the GNOME team will be able to enable this eventually in their packages for jessie: https://github.com/GNOME/evolution-data-server/blob/master/m4/evo_phonenumber.m4 Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/539b2f17.7020...@pocock.pro
Processed: limit package to wnpp, tagging 691819
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: limit package wnpp Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'wnpp' Limit currently set to 'package':'wnpp' tags 691819 + pending Bug #691819 [wnpp] ITA: aclock.app -- Analog dockapp clock for GNUstep Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 691819: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691819 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.140268749230110.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#244582: ITP: ufoai -- UFO: Alien Invasion - build your team and stop the aliens
I hope to see finally this beautiful game in Debian repositories. 2014-06-13 0:05 GMT+02:00 Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de: It's almost done now. License status is finally green. They just have to release 2.5 which I hope happens still in time for the freeze...
Bug#748906: marked as done (ITP: ruby-omniauth-wordpress -- Wordpress strategy for OmniAuth)
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jun 2014 22:00:07 + with message-id e1wvzw3-0007wq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#748906: fixed in ruby-omniauth-wordpress 0.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #748906, regarding ITP: ruby-omniauth-wordpress -- Wordpress strategy for OmniAuth to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 748906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748906 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Praveen Arimbrathodiyil prav...@debian.org * Package name: ruby-omniauth-wordpress Version : 0.2.1 Upstream Author : Magda Sikorska * URL : https://rubygems.org/gems/omniauth-wordpress * License : Expat Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Wordpress strategy for OmniAuth ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: ruby-omniauth-wordpress Source-Version: 0.2.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ruby-omniauth-wordpress, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 748...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Nitesh A Jain niteshjai...@gmail.com (supplier of updated ruby-omniauth-wordpress package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 21:55:06 +0530 Source: ruby-omniauth-wordpress Binary: ruby-omniauth-wordpress Architecture: source all Version: 0.2.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Nitesh A Jain niteshjai...@gmail.com Description: ruby-omniauth-wordpress - Wordpress strategy for OmniAuth. Closes: 748906 Changes: ruby-omniauth-wordpress (0.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release (Closes: #748906) Checksums-Sha1: 2eed6c987e408bb1f375d93b1100fdaad67b873c 2210 ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1.dsc 5831b71d9897caa51d5f43a2d4fceb56d7c3df90 3822 ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1.orig.tar.gz 5733f45afc37262263e7a0db58c3c3adb7e8aca7 2076 ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1.debian.tar.gz 588a12a7b106b4798a72c33f5f35879d3b1050f6 3430 ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: ae2a9fdb572d1dd837a2f8dda7a6b156d04821e137f112956f6b999c448eb3c5 2210 ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1.dsc ae2cf973be8f43510b23896a6a95b9d7f257ea86742af5b5d3cb139c1a0afbb7 3822 ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1.orig.tar.gz 5f033ac1f614c2d75284f6e28d979a249dccb4ec3a775de94c89e6a8c0f549ca 2076 ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1.debian.tar.gz a3f1688bee964a7bb37fe1630228de867f38b9e286a49321e4b23664304fec5c 3430 ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1_all.deb Files: 24430f386230806d9aea5d43a6e44850 2210 ruby optional ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1.dsc ea7f83f64dc9eb9922338ececf26a5fd 3822 ruby optional ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1.orig.tar.gz 145fe0bda44682439bbacbda6b07bb3f 2076 ruby optional ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1.debian.tar.gz 06e605cc6554c06e5440bcbfb48ee31b 3430 ruby optional ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTfjieAAoJEM4fnGdFEsIqucAP/3zGK8lCxp5XRVZiw1DORvup yb0PelWExWMgsZ8ySTuwWq9xpafDgTWftcTeO2rVJn++4kgqym5OkfVp6xkoxbVP ZYdBavWCDCj00oloyDO1Sf9OT6IgzI+xQicZcAO7KGb6e1RyWvOjMRPBuMWZwSrv OIef3c9hb5r6aZL1qsZOc8CI0kEvPw4lxVJA0ZM0gxcndg3JuGWpS116y6x3V1Za cot3k2YGQFERF/ZITbnStSCPj6Jb8LD3EWwkKvkF/ebAX05Z57vYxk6EqHkpqemz osfzgdP9NUHsl6iTyVheioSf/hdbsXyyNwVcfZzD524P2rQ4U9kHIFBZw4ulm1tO jzNx8fZCnAfrfcwUNE79enDbZ6xofZNwOChPELUaMGUpEJFvoTq5LhG17Z2rxGst FU+Ez+Eqp+TTf+XKu1K6C65816IjVqh48y/EjKuzklRQZ3JX6rUEd8a+OkIF5qe7 x0HxdwuKicUT2swIRlFkfBZqGML2UBghhBQ6IFgWjHG3LKNDykQC3JKBnz4XqJ/i zH3P4iii9vbJdqGoOArGAFfbMEwJhwQhA9FKe/IJ1rha0Z+Mndh/Wm12nFmZFHF8 zeqQAPO8L7Du6cPKxRRhD6QFShaWkTb5Vev2JD/CaSIP6ijCyZQbkiQdJnycrx2n Df7S8HmUqcywsp9b0eZq =nEHb -END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---
Bug#745378: marked as done (ITP: ruby-omniauth-wordpress -- Wordpress strategy for OmniAuth)
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jun 2014 22:00:07 + with message-id e1wvzw3-0007wq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#748906: fixed in ruby-omniauth-wordpress 0.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #748906, regarding ITP: ruby-omniauth-wordpress -- Wordpress strategy for OmniAuth to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 748906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748906 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Praveen Arimbrathodiyil prav...@debian.org * Package name: ruby-omniauth-wordpress Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : Magda Sikorska * URL : https://rubygems.org/gems/omniauth-wordpress * License : https://github.com/elrosa/omniauth-wordpress/issues/3 Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Wordpress strategy for OmniAuth ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: ruby-omniauth-wordpress Source-Version: 0.2.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ruby-omniauth-wordpress, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 748...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Nitesh A Jain niteshjai...@gmail.com (supplier of updated ruby-omniauth-wordpress package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 21:55:06 +0530 Source: ruby-omniauth-wordpress Binary: ruby-omniauth-wordpress Architecture: source all Version: 0.2.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Nitesh A Jain niteshjai...@gmail.com Description: ruby-omniauth-wordpress - Wordpress strategy for OmniAuth. Closes: 748906 Changes: ruby-omniauth-wordpress (0.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release (Closes: #748906) Checksums-Sha1: 2eed6c987e408bb1f375d93b1100fdaad67b873c 2210 ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1.dsc 5831b71d9897caa51d5f43a2d4fceb56d7c3df90 3822 ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1.orig.tar.gz 5733f45afc37262263e7a0db58c3c3adb7e8aca7 2076 ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1.debian.tar.gz 588a12a7b106b4798a72c33f5f35879d3b1050f6 3430 ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: ae2a9fdb572d1dd837a2f8dda7a6b156d04821e137f112956f6b999c448eb3c5 2210 ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1.dsc ae2cf973be8f43510b23896a6a95b9d7f257ea86742af5b5d3cb139c1a0afbb7 3822 ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1.orig.tar.gz 5f033ac1f614c2d75284f6e28d979a249dccb4ec3a775de94c89e6a8c0f549ca 2076 ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1.debian.tar.gz a3f1688bee964a7bb37fe1630228de867f38b9e286a49321e4b23664304fec5c 3430 ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1_all.deb Files: 24430f386230806d9aea5d43a6e44850 2210 ruby optional ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1.dsc ea7f83f64dc9eb9922338ececf26a5fd 3822 ruby optional ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1.orig.tar.gz 145fe0bda44682439bbacbda6b07bb3f 2076 ruby optional ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1.debian.tar.gz 06e605cc6554c06e5440bcbfb48ee31b 3430 ruby optional ruby-omniauth-wordpress_0.2.1-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTfjieAAoJEM4fnGdFEsIqucAP/3zGK8lCxp5XRVZiw1DORvup yb0PelWExWMgsZ8ySTuwWq9xpafDgTWftcTeO2rVJn++4kgqym5OkfVp6xkoxbVP ZYdBavWCDCj00oloyDO1Sf9OT6IgzI+xQicZcAO7KGb6e1RyWvOjMRPBuMWZwSrv OIef3c9hb5r6aZL1qsZOc8CI0kEvPw4lxVJA0ZM0gxcndg3JuGWpS116y6x3V1Za cot3k2YGQFERF/ZITbnStSCPj6Jb8LD3EWwkKvkF/ebAX05Z57vYxk6EqHkpqemz osfzgdP9NUHsl6iTyVheioSf/hdbsXyyNwVcfZzD524P2rQ4U9kHIFBZw4ulm1tO jzNx8fZCnAfrfcwUNE79enDbZ6xofZNwOChPELUaMGUpEJFvoTq5LhG17Z2rxGst FU+Ez+Eqp+TTf+XKu1K6C65816IjVqh48y/EjKuzklRQZ3JX6rUEd8a+OkIF5qe7 x0HxdwuKicUT2swIRlFkfBZqGML2UBghhBQ6IFgWjHG3LKNDykQC3JKBnz4XqJ/i zH3P4iii9vbJdqGoOArGAFfbMEwJhwQhA9FKe/IJ1rha0Z+Mndh/Wm12nFmZFHF8 zeqQAPO8L7Du6cPKxRRhD6QFShaWkTb5Vev2JD/CaSIP6ijCyZQbkiQdJnycrx2n Df7S8HmUqcywsp9b0eZq =nEHb -END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---
Bug#751543: ITP: r-cran-bbmisc -- GNU R Miscellaneous helper functions for B. Bischl
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org * Package name: r-cran-bbmisc Version : 1.6-1 Upstream Author : Bernd Bischl bernd_bis...@gmx.net * URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BBmisc/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: R Description : GNU R Miscellaneous helper functions for B. Bischl Miscellaneous helper functions for and from B. Bischl and some other guys at TU Dortmund, mainly for package development. Remark: This package is maintained by the Debian Med team as a pre-pre-dependency for some BioConductor upgrades at svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/R/r-cran-bbmisc/trunk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140613231235.11749.96257.report...@mail.an3as.eu
Processed: crunch: block ITP 608645 by RFS 751534
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 608645 by 751534 Bug #608645 [wnpp] ITP: crunch -- wordlist generator 608645 was not blocked by any bugs. 608645 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 608645: 751534 stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 608645: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608645 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14027198188368.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
