Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager
Hey,
- my github repo contains all branches the debian git repo has.
- when i build from the stable branch, files cointaining the name
"squeeze" are created - so i guess, it's a squeeze build.
But https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=wicd shows different
versions of wicd also for debian wheezy and debian jessie.
==> When the most current version of the stable brench produces the
squeeze build, where can i find the build for wheezy and jessie - or are
those two really not existent?
And why is the "stable" branch not named "oldoldstable" or sth similar?
- What are the "master", the "debconf-defaults" and the "nmu" branch
used for?
-
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?dist=unstable;package=wicd;include=tags%3Apatch
says, for #759884 is a patch available - but where can i find that one?
just to be sure: am i correct that i can't just add the tr.po file
directly to git?
- The former git commits are just containing a few files in the debian
dir. but when i build the version by myself, i get a whole lot of
changes: http://paste.debian.net/hidden/100ce554/
==> you surely had build the package when committing new patches or
changes - but obviously you diddn't added them (at least not that bunch
of files in the pastie).
Why? Or did i sth wrong?
@wookey: I'll use "gbp import-orig"; it seams to be a more seamless
integration.
Thanks :)
On 01/07/2016 08:17 PM, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hi,
toogley wrote:
Additionally I've set up the github repo
https://github.com/toogley/pkg-wicd - but i didn't make any changes
yet.
You should also push at least the "upstream" and preferably also the
"pristine-tar" branch to your repo. At least these are the three
branches which the git-buildpackage toolchain (see below) uses a lot.
Question: Jessie has currently this package
https://packages.debian.org/jessie/git-remote-bzr which would allow
us (since upstream uses bazaar) to fetch new upstream changes more
easily. But i don't know if its appropriate for debian packaging,
since it's an additional dependency for the process of maintaining
itself.
There's no real widely adopted workflow for incorporating upstream git
(or other repos) into the packaging repositories.
On the other hand, there's a very established workflow for importing
upstream tar balls ("gbp import-orig" from the git-buildpackage
package). This is also the one which has been used for the wicd
repository you cloned.
So unless you want to track upstream VCS snapshots, "gbp import-orig"
should suffice for nearly all cases.
Regards, Axel
Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager
Hi, short note to all those people in the Cc: On the next iteration, I'll drop all Cc except debian-ment...@lists.debian.org and the bug-report itself. Feel free to object, to subscribe to the bug report or to debian-mentors. :-) toogley wrote: > - my github repo contains all branches the debian git repo has. Great, looks much better now. > - when i build from the stable branch, files cointaining the name > "squeeze" are created Ah, you need to use the master branch. The stable branch was probably named a little bit short-sighted and should have been named "squeeze" instead. It contains updates to the wicd package in squeeze, i.e. back then they were "stable updates" which had backported fixes for severe bugs which were only found after a Debian Stable release. > ==> When the most current version of the stable brench produces the > squeeze build, where can i find the build for wheezy and jessie - or > are those two really not existent? In the master branch. There are no wheezy or jessie branches because there was no need for stable-updates during the Wheezy or Jessie release cycle yet. > And why is the "stable" branch not named "oldoldstable" or sth similar? "stable" is a suite name which always points to the _current_ stable release, i.e. moves on every time Debian does a stable release. That's why I think it would have been better to name that branch "squeeze". The code names for releases don't move on. But back then, "stable" and "squeeze" were the same. Nowadays, they are no more. > - What are the "master", the "debconf-defaults" and the "nmu" branch > used for? The master branch is where the main development pof the package happens. (That name is the default branch name, git uses if you don't explicitly request a different branch name.) I don't know about the debconf-defaults branch, but looking at it, it seems an ancient feature branch (from 2009) which has been merged back in the master branch, i.e. all changes from there are already included. The nmu branch is from me, because NMUs (non-maintainer uploads) usually reside for a week or so in the DELAYED upload queue to allow the maintainer to object. Since I didn't want to push these changes into the master branch while the uploaded packages waits in the DELAYED queue, because the package could have been rejected, I needed a different branch to push to until the package has been accepted. That was the NMU branch. I merged it into master after the NMU had been accepted. You migt > - > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?dist=unstable;package=wicd;include=tags%3Apatch > says, for #759884 is a patch available - but where can i find that one? Indeed, there's just a file, not a patch. Still the tag "patch" is valid since the data to apply is available. > just to be sure: am i correct that i can't just add the tr.po file > directly to git? In this case yes. Because it goes under debian/po/tr.po and not to po/tr.po. The subject says "debconf template translation" which means it's a translation for the questions debconf may ask upon installation or upgrade of the package. It's not a translation of the software. (If it would have been a translation update for the software itself, it would be probably the easiest to forward it to upstream, so that they include it in their next release -- at least if you have a responsive upstream. Otherweise you might want to add it as a quilt patch under debian/patches/.) > - The former git commits are just containing a few files in the > debian dir. but when i build the version by myself, i get a whole > lot of changes: http://paste.debian.net/hidden/100ce554/ Yeah, those files are artifacts of the build process and are cleaned up again afterwards if you invoke debian/rules' clean target, e.g. with "make -f debian/rules clean" (or "debuild clean" or "debclean" depending on your preference -- the latter two need "devscripts" installed). Especially the new debian// directories contain what has been put into the accordinly named .deb files. They're put together in these directories before being compressed into the .deb format. The debian/*debhelper* are helper files from the dh* commands from debian/rules. They're cleaned up again when debian/rules' clean target calls the "dh_clean" command. New files not under debian/ are built by wicd's build system and are cleaned up again when wicd's build system's clean target is called by debian/rules' clean target. I hope this helps. > ==> you surely had build the package when committing new patches or > changes - but obviously you diddn't added them (at least not that > bunch of files in the pastie). > Why? I'm sorry, I don't understand that paragraph. > Or did i sth wrong? Except having looked at the wrong branch: No. :-) P.S. to Toogley: I might do a short-term QA upload of 1.7.3 to Debian Unstable with what is currently in the master branch if the TODO in debian/changelog has solved itself via dependency fixes as Gianfranco suggested in on
Bug#693230: Fwd: Re: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]
Forward to ITP bug... -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA] Date: Tuesday, January 05, 2016, 06:08:55 PM From: Robert James Clay To: debian-ment...@lists.debian.org, Tobias Frost , 806...@bugs.debian.org On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > Am Montag, den 04.01.2016, 21:29 -0500 schrieb Robert James Clay: > > Some small review. Thanks! > > - Please do not introduce a dbg package -- they are now automatically > generated. That came out since my multimail package on mentors was put online at the mentors site. The package doesn't have any reverse depends; so no, it doesn't really need an explicit "-dbg" package anymore. > > - Is the patch forwarded to upstream? The non vendor specific parts of it, you mean? I plan to further discuss other aspects of it with him, yes... I have provided him with the results of package builds but he hasn't commented... > > - Please B-D on debhelper >=9 not debhelper >=9.0 > (The versioned depends could even go, as debhelper 9 is already in since > oldstable) I take your point about its setting, but I think I'd rather keep it explicitly noted... > - d/rules: Are the lines setting CPPFLAGS and friend really needed? As I recall, those were needed to clean up the hardening related lintian errors. > - also, with the drop of the dbg package some overrides can be removed "overrides"? You mean, in d/rules? > - please remove the comments from d/watch I sometimes have relevant info in d/watch file comments, but yes in this case there's really no need for them... RJ Clay j...@rocasa.us -
Bug#693230: Fwd: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA] Date: Thursday, January 07, 2016, 05:54:29 AM From: Tobias Frost To: 806...@bugs.debian.org Hi Robert, (btw, please configure your MTA to wrap your mails) On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:08:55 -0500 Robert James Clay wrote: > On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > - Is the patch forwarded to upstream? > >The non vendor specific parts of it, you mean? I plan to further > discuss other aspects of it with him, yes... I have provided him > with the results of package builds but he hasn't commented... The Makefile looks buggy to me, not vendor-specific: Hardcoded paths are bad. But ok, a patch will do it for now. However, please then set the patch headers appropiately, especially the Forwarded one with (if available) a link to more information. > > > > - Please B-D on debhelper >=9 not debhelper >=9.0 > > (The versioned depends could even go, as debhelper 9 is already in since oldstable) > >I take your point about its setting, but I think I'd rather keep it explicitly noted... OK > > > - d/rules: Are the lines setting CPPFLAGS and friend really needed? > >As I recall, those were needed to clean up the hardening related lintian errors. With debhelper 9 and compat 9 this is no longer needed. You can cleanup your d/rules even more: This is enough: #!/usr/bin/make -f %: dh $@ Why: - the dh_installchangelogs --keep HISTORY is not needed, Debian users know that they have to look on changelog.gz - dh_installdocs --link-doc=multimail just adds complexity, saving maybwe 10k. - dh_auto_install --destdir=debian/multimail destdir is automatically figured out by dh_auto_install. d/copyright: - The license is actually GPL-3+ - I saw a file with, 1996-1997 Kolossvary Tamas, (d/copyright: 1997 missing) - John Zero 1996-1997 - Toth Istwan seems also to have contributed 1997 - Ingo Brueckl is missing - The color files have certain authors, they should be added. - Are the years for your contribution right? It says 2013-16 but there is no changelog entry from after 2009 (beside the latest one) - bluewave.h... Well, that scares me. Because the license terms say read "THE BLUE WAVE STRUCTURE DOCUMENTATION". However, this document does not say that bluewave.h can be distributed, just that you are allowed to use the structs. Beside that (lets assume the header is covered), there is only right of use, that does not neccessarily include the right for distribution and the right for modification. (Please ask on debian-legal) More General: Your changelog is quite verbose, that is good, but you do not need to overdo it -- for example is would be enough to say "Add homepage" or "New Maintainer". (as said, not wrong, no need to change, just maybe something to reduce effort on your side) However, there are some changes where the "why has this changed" is not obvious. In this case you should spend a few words on the why, because the "what" is self-explained by the diff of the package. Example here is the line about the Makefile: The reader will not have an idea why this has been changed, which is very impportant purpose of a changelog. -- tobi -
Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]
Hi Tobias! On Thursday, January 07, 2016 05:54:29 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:08:55 -0500 Robert James Clay > wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > > - Is the patch forwarded to upstream? > > > >The non vendor specific parts of it, you mean? I plan to further > > discuss other aspects of it with him, yes... I have provided him > > with the results of package builds but he hasn't commented... > > The Makefile looks buggy to me, not vendor-specific: Hardcoded paths > are bad. But ok, a patch will do it for now. However, please then set > the patch headers appropiately, especially the Forwarded one with (if > available) a link to more information. I'll be discussing that with the author, but in the mean time will see about updating the patch headers more appropriately. > > > - d/rules: Are the lines setting CPPFLAGS and friend really needed? > > > >As I recall, those were needed to clean up the hardening related > lintian errors. > > With debhelper 9 and compat 9 this is no longer needed. According to my notes, I was still seeing hardening related errors, after changing the debhelper version to 9. I'll investigate that again. > > You can cleanup your d/rules even more: This is enough: > > #!/usr/bin/make -f > > %: > dh $@ I'll be looking into how it might be reduced to that, although there is at least one thing I'd want to keep... > > Why: > - the dh_installchangelogs --keep HISTORY is not needed, Debian users > know that they have to look on changelog.gz And those already familiar with the application (but not necessarily Debian) would expect to see the HISTORY file, so I'd rather keep that. (It only adds a sym link after all...) > - dh_installdocs --link-doc=multimail just adds complexity, saving > maybwe 10k. And not really needed any longer, when the dbgsym package is being used. I'll take care of that > - dh_auto_install --destdir=debian/multimail destdir is automatically > figured out by dh_auto_install. I'll check into that as well, as I don't recall why I explicitly still had that set. > > d/copyright: I'll investigate the issues you raised regarding the debian/copyright file and resolve as necessary. RJ Clay j...@rocasa.us
Processed (with 1 error): retitle 803092 to ITP: python-cookies -- RFC 6265-compliant HTTP cookie parser and renderer in Python
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 803092 ITP: python-cookies -- RFC 6265-compliant HTTP cookie parser Bug #803092 [wnpp] RFP: python-cookies -- RFC 6265-compliant HTTP cookie parser and renderer in Python Changed Bug title to 'ITP: python-cookies -- RFC 6265-compliant HTTP cookie parser' from 'RFP: python-cookies -- RFC 6265-compliant HTTP cookie parser and renderer in Python' > and renderer in Python Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 803092: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803092 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager
I don't mind - the rest of your email, i'll answer in the next days. again, thank you :) On 01/09/2016 03:57 PM, Axel Beckert wrote: P.S. to Toogley: I might do a short-term QA upload of 1.7.3 to Debian Unstable with what is currently in the master branch if the TODO in debian/changelog has solved itself via dependency fixes as Gianfranco suggested in one of the previous mails. I hope you don't mind.
Bug#757768: ITP: libjitsi -- advanced Java media library
[Damian Minkov] > Description : advanced Java media library Hi, what is the status of getting libjitsi into Debian? -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen
Bug#777064: O: surf -- Simple web browser by suckless community
Control: retiitle -1 ITA: surf -- Simple web browser by suckless community Control: owner -1 ! Hi! I intend to adopt this package. Kind regards, Reiner signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed (with 1 error): Re: O: surf -- Simple web browser by suckless community
Processing control commands: > retiitle -1 ITA: surf -- Simple web browser by suckless community Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > owner -1 ! Bug #777064 [wnpp] O: surf -- Simple web browser by suckless community Owner recorded as Reiner Herrmann . -- 777064: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777064 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: retitle 777064 to ITA: surf -- Simple web browser by suckless community
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 777064 ITA: surf -- Simple web browser by suckless community Bug #777064 [wnpp] O: surf -- Simple web browser by suckless community Changed Bug title to 'ITA: surf -- Simple web browser by suckless community' from 'O: surf -- Simple web browser by suckless community' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 777064: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777064 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: RFP: pd-purest-json -- pd library for working with JSON data and RESTful webservices
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 ITP: pd-purest-json -- pd library for working with JSON data and > RESTful webservices Bug #804490 [wnpp] RFP: pd-purest-json -- pd library for working with JSON data and RESTful webservices Changed Bug title to 'ITP: pd-purest-json -- pd library for working with JSON data and RESTful webservices' from 'RFP: pd-purest-json -- pd library for working with JSON data and RESTful webservices' -- 804490: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804490 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#804490: RFP: pd-purest-json -- pd library for working with JSON data and RESTful webservices
Package: wnpp Followup-For: Bug #804490 Owner: IOhannes m zmoelnig Control: retitle -1 ITP: pd-purest-json -- pd library for working with JSON data and RESTful webservices i intend to package this under the umbrella of the pkg-multimedia-maintainers team.
Bug#777064: marked as done (ITA: surf -- Simple web browser by suckless community)
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jan 2016 22:58:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#777064: fixed in surf 0.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #777064,
regarding ITA: surf -- Simple web browser by suckless community
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
777064: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777064
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
As I don't have enough time to take care of this package, I request an
adopter for the surf package.
The package description is:
surf is a simple web browser based on WebKit/GTK+. It is able to display
websites and follow links. It supports the XEmbed protocol which makes it
possible to embed it in another application. Furthermore, one can point surf to
another URI by setting its XProperties.
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyni...@samsargika.copyninja.info
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: surf
Source-Version: 0.7-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
surf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 777...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Reiner Herrmann (supplier of updated surf package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 22:14:48 +0100
Source: surf
Binary: surf
Architecture: source
Version: 0.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Reiner Herrmann
Changed-By: Reiner Herrmann
Description:
surf - Simple web browser by suckless community
Closes: 777064 790215
Changes:
surf (0.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release.
* New maintainer (Closes: #777064).
* Port to GTK+ 3.0 (Closes: #790215).
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6.
* Switch back to dh-style packaging.
+ enable all hardening flags
+ pass --as-needed to linker
* Update patches for new upstream release.
* debian/copyright: Move license to stand-alone paragraph.
* debian/gbp.conf: Rename deprecated fields and reorder.
Checksums-Sha1:
26946c4b2f47dd45dc1b084e6bdffafc519d0252 1802 surf_0.7-1.dsc
c2e129c0180a2a89726f55042166f13556c4e511 18792 surf_0.7.orig.tar.gz
7f892591f6252ab312a7d69a024793623510f824 8176 surf_0.7-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
4136134a3edeb0e957caaa0f957960f891858c7d6506b2aeed901e659e03b37c 1802
surf_0.7-1.dsc
95608546fb64d01c7a8153c356be0e284ebe120c3c596a94eb3f3ad47e1c494a 18792
surf_0.7.orig.tar.gz
dcf7dcaefabf70ce7da118263e37baa90aa655f43be395c6ac77f3944db237ae 8176
surf_0.7-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
12eb2837b208656ce7ae5eae59b52f3c 1802 web optional surf_0.7-1.dsc
45899435aeb5ce3af0a62909911b735f 18792 web optional surf_0.7.orig.tar.gz
5c1eb732c5fbece53aab2ad3afff50bd 8176 web optional surf_0.7-1.debian.tar.xz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWkYGlAAoJEEsEP825REVA/i4P/3c9/ryH/I/0hMdOHGCZ0MHw
MbG/YdOE5swV3HH0hqshAfkLTv4JhNPOqrWUpbx5UXgSxuUfQRZoV0VcA+en7uW+
8qhuzCC0cdoSZKqq2ndqbsAlarCOv0XPm2Ys9svq31HtxWNYKBrF543YXhpGfcV2
Z12+JuGBNFgmsl0Df5OBJL/jLiT3cQ/8ZxGrEfTxML36N9Hm1CVumAjzEqowH/rV
0LN6r6gvYQCgDML8btQ1ao8beYkjy0dPF7pAzv9qm167zMXR9DxDrdomKAeA0Jzu
hYsjN287f00Eby2o0yYbQyI+ZQchCbU9caIIA3/be2s2TYQxBpQBYqU4lUJU2Wvv
YPkpC7LkX2qAQQdu/ZSNdCCCgBi3JSx1esPJfX2hf5Jf5UmGd3WsNVkq1FeXWWaV
xC6FODBdtvr5X4wZF0rYMmc+mCuZmhyLNP3jfFIclNfWKWtFva3kH1WG7iuPIzip
EhUkziEkAGLckRl4koUqv66qPbB/NDv1FIgxly9v0ulXTa9+FWdAtrZU6q8hCkOa
SEkrxhVbo8uXSbOpszlzE8+D2+JO6GyrDfcX9Mzcs2lu8bGwbQkHqEaCiJD6PGJN
iyvM3NniQppUxHvFZssQR9dlXmuIgD1lwWiQOMsJS7DFpC6CINw5ajXqBjq/hvo5
S919eFHj6OwdrJy/gkKD
=SDqe
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---
Bug#810576: ITP: hail -- Efficiently extract arbitrary lines from a file or stream
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kevin Murray * Package name: hail Version : 0.1.1 Upstream Author : Kevin Murray * URL : https://github.com/kdmurray91/hail * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : Efficiently extract arbitrary lines from a file or stream Hail gets its name from a contraction of head and tail, the common alternative to this program. It extracts lines from a file, taken on stdin, and prints them on stdout. It's so simple that the Unix wizards of old never bothered. Hail will be co-maintained in the Debian Med team.
Bug#804827: marked as done (ITP: ros-bond-core -- Messages related to Robot OS bond_core - development)
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jan 2016 00:00:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#804827: fixed in ros-bond-core 1.7.16-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #804827, regarding ITP: ros-bond-core -- Messages related to Robot OS bond_core - development to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 804827: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804827 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist We (Robotics section of Debian Science team) are packaging ROS (Robot OS: http://www.ros.org/) for Debian. ROS uses many packages already in Debian, but also has a set of core/toolchain/build-system packages which are not yet uploaded. This package is part of that ROS system. Most of the packaging work is already done, and available at http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/ros/ Package name: ros-bond-core Version : 1.7.16 URL : http://www.ros.org/wiki/bond_core License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: C++,Python Description : Robot OS bond implementation This package is part of Robot OS (ROS). This is the 'bond' process state machine library development files. . Bond is a mechanism for checking when another process has terminated. A bond allows two processes, A and B, to know when the other has terminated, either cleanly or by crashing. The bond remains connected until it is either broken explicitly or until a heartbeat times out. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: ros-bond-core Source-Version: 1.7.16-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ros-bond-core, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 804...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jochen Sprickerhof (supplier of updated ros-bond-core package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 20:00:55 + Source: ros-bond-core Binary: libbond-dev python-bond cl-bond libsmc-dev python-smclib libbondcpp-dev libbondcpp0d python-bondpy Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1.7.16-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers Changed-By: Jochen Sprickerhof Description: cl-bond- Messages related to Robot OS bond_core - LISP libbond-dev - Messages related to Robot OS bond_core - development libbondcpp-dev - Development files for Robot OS bondcpp library libbondcpp0d - Robot OS bondcpp library libsmc-dev - Robot OS 'bond' State Machine Compiler interface python-bond - Messages related to Robot OS bond_core - Python python-bondpy - Python implementation of bond python-smclib - Robot OS 'bond' State Machine Compiler python package Closes: 804827 Changes: ros-bond-core (1.7.16-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #804827) Checksums-Sha1: f913cadee4a48d22d4b7f993331596af86890309 2905 ros-bond-core_1.7.16-1.dsc f5bc26982a68365bedd2ce9065594d034d79acf0 24943 ros-bond-core_1.7.16.orig.tar.gz 297c32424a60df4a9b6657c2b723bcee38f1f5a3 11156 ros-bond-core_1.7.16-1.debian.tar.xz dcc5cffbc65f8b4ea28c31a7ce52e1783edd8ded 12458 cl-bond_1.7.16-1_all.deb e4e7e98fdabbf0e7f628fcf7b43976b3a8732bf5 15428 libbond-dev_1.7.16-1_amd64.deb 965a4735ddfdc4ea73ee4e8186e5b3e9141ff449 15212 libbondcpp-dev_1.7.16-1_amd64.deb 5361ab6fa5d8974433187dcc594bd59a9fb7ed00 478576 libbondcpp0d-dbgsym_1.7.16-1_amd64.deb 52530d4567821546a2bf071f0402db9d5df0fac2 59414 libbondcpp0d_1.7.16-1_amd64.deb 00f80d08428914cbee2aa12b2a63d3c05ff54d54 16716 libsmc-dev_1.7.16-1_amd64.deb cc4274ddc138801964ff2e95a9d582ee240263f5 12404 python-bond_1.7.16-1_all.deb 4046de0396458da5878cdba55902ddd9e6ef86c5 15972 python-bondpy_1.7.16-1_amd64.deb 15f10ce678730ab297484d62357fbc14ea6ed7a8 11370 python-smclib_1.7.16-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 0a0b3b8d71d1fb8045a665ea3f6a9f4973dd2d95d55887de9d92cd755379163d 2905 ros-bond-core_1.7.16-1.dsc 676b1831a341672e711092dc311ae515401ff52a1dac81c728665833e26f2662 24943 ros-bond-core_1.7.16.orig.tar.gz 1ea61dc3a4e434418060640d50b102b2f62404d665e858257894e9f516
Bug#805334: marked as done (ITP: ros-pcl-conversions -- Robot OS library to convert from/to PCL data types)
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jan 2016 00:00:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#805334: fixed in ros-pcl-conversions 0.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #805334, regarding ITP: ros-pcl-conversions -- Robot OS library to convert from/to PCL data types to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 805334: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=805334 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist user: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org usertag: ros X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org We (Robotics section of Debian Science team) are packaging ROS (Robot OS: http://www.ros.org/) for Debian. ROS uses many packages already in Debian, but also has a set of core/toolchain/build-system packages which are not yet uploaded. This package is part of that ROS system. Most of the packaging work is already done, and available at http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/ros/ Package name: ros-pcl-conversions Version : 0.2.1 URL : http://www.ros.org/wiki/pcl_conversions License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: Python Description : Robot OS library to convert from/to PCL data types This package is part of Robot OS (ROS). It provides conversions between PCL (Point Cloud Library) data types and ROS message types --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: ros-pcl-conversions Source-Version: 0.2.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ros-pcl-conversions, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 805...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jochen Sprickerhof (supplier of updated ros-pcl-conversions package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 01:12:43 + Source: ros-pcl-conversions Binary: libpcl-conversions-dev Architecture: source all Version: 0.2.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers Changed-By: Jochen Sprickerhof Description: libpcl-conversions-dev - Robot OS library to convert from/to PCL data types Closes: 805334 Changes: ros-pcl-conversions (0.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #805334) Checksums-Sha1: 5ccbf6889c2ce94533a50e4bc751056ab3e51cc1 2299 ros-pcl-conversions_0.2.1-1.dsc ad5d92848e607fbd07d70211b37d59e9f6ae426f 8359 ros-pcl-conversions_0.2.1.orig.tar.gz 0f104026952033c84d57a50dbcc52cf287fb0252 2404 ros-pcl-conversions_0.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz 6ad44d9ff2cc4a3a7a6eae4022b12d080b8076fc 10496 libpcl-conversions-dev_0.2.1-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 428f48384b090ce86bbdb550530dc58ea5c5ae598fb8d0329e44b97899d4 2299 ros-pcl-conversions_0.2.1-1.dsc 1e14a7dd1329a8c96d73bb69d6cdbf421926ade8f11328d9b49e78fbcb59e3cc 8359 ros-pcl-conversions_0.2.1.orig.tar.gz 62771a851626a035010741e1f6980c712b0416457522f68613eff8b5098e5b96 2404 ros-pcl-conversions_0.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz e81c09984731fbbecb82b37ec69c767bce0e249a5c695b363fd0916702fc280c 10496 libpcl-conversions-dev_0.2.1-1_all.deb Files: 1579162ca021c63f24bdd818f0bb4baa 2299 libdevel optional ros-pcl-conversions_0.2.1-1.dsc 17fc07c7ad25936ba2367feea0eb744c 8359 libdevel optional ros-pcl-conversions_0.2.1.orig.tar.gz 26f772e82a0fbb3b424c5fe4e98b0e6f 2404 libdevel optional ros-pcl-conversions_0.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz c11dc2e7d33506840e7d5cdf53a36930 10496 libdevel optional libpcl-conversions-dev_0.2.1-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWfz7+AAoJEPuGMlGob55H5J4QAMJ+yiyX7EykFkNyFl+orPpW H66mHqKTnEuU9AarOKl9XTQzc/L6ru31FHvRD3DYWIKtpFMEe9WqZifu6TagQiBu DA+lyTItVwK/9pN2EnEp/Dhhu51YfRoMoBTmwvkJOKxvd7lxGNWYOjTdNP44oKtz kmqxbIxZTfXwO9B+SRmW6sg/cQQ0jBTXiexxukrePhcTndUCocvgbav+dZn1GUJY ZTMUV8Ktjh4tAz6R8WvD6yIwMLCzhmWau4AQa1XIL5ROUDAbvN9SLQlZ7+DvRzXl KPk3ofG4aQjfzoq05dxDe3zbE+Kqew12sKLGtdCFNFQDxAsDCu9g66k1f3VnyxO1 hi5pz8brRNtRF6QeL1xHXQqM+6soUumj+RclUAJCnoY87mBfJFQiqgHomWU9496I PuKq+6WoQRlZ/DDuQdVOpW2C8tzTDRWcpzxWK7hoMWywUdMRDyPyjzmgTuY22EdP zgshe8uOGbhrgBRTFsma60S4GROciY1aIn2WMHVazriV7pk8TLrBlZ5xKiAidlHR hQ
Bug#804924: marked as done (ITP: ros-ros-comm -- Robot OS comms-related libraries and tools)
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jan 2016 00:00:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#804924: fixed in ros-ros-comm 1.11.16-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #804924, regarding ITP: ros-ros-comm -- Robot OS comms-related libraries and tools to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 804924: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804924 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist user: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org usertag: ros We (Robotics section of Debian Science team) are packaging ROS (Robot OS: http://www.ros.org/) for Debian. ROS uses many packages already in Debian, but also has a set of core/toolchain/build-system packages which are not yet uploaded. This package is part of that ROS system. Most of the packaging work is already done, and available at http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/ros/ Package name: ros-ros-comm Version : 1.11.15 URL : http://www.ros.org/wiki/ros_comm License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: C++,Python Description : Robot OS comms-related libraries and tools Robot OS (ROS) communications-related packages, including core client libraries (roscpp, rospy) and graph introspection tools (rostopic, rosnode, rosservice, rosparam). --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: ros-ros-comm Source-Version: 1.11.16-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ros-ros-comm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 804...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jochen Sprickerhof (supplier of updated ros-ros-comm package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 16:59:36 + Source: ros-ros-comm Binary: libroscpp-dev libroscpp0d libroscpp-msgs-dev python-roscpp-msgs cl-roscpp-msgs python-rospy librosbag-dev librosbag0d python-rosbag librosbag-storage-dev librosbag-storage0d librosconsole-dev librosconsole0d python-rosgraph python-roslaunch python-rosmaster python-rosmsg python-rosnode rosout python-rosparam python-rosservice python-rostest librostest-dev python-rostopic libtopic-tools-dev libtopic-tools0d topic-tools python-topic-tools cl-topic-tools libmessage-filters-dev libmessage-filters0d python-message-filters python-roswtf libroslz4-dev libroslz4-0d python-roslz4 libxmlrpcpp-dev libxmlrpcpp0d Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1.11.16-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers Changed-By: Jochen Sprickerhof Description: cl-roscpp-msgs - Header for roscpp messages, LISP cl-topic-tools - LISP library for working with Robot OS topics libmessage-filters-dev - Development files for Robot OS message-filters libmessage-filters0d - Library for Robot OS message-filters librosbag-dev - Tools for recording from and playing back to Robot OS topics librosbag-storage-dev - Development files for librosbag_storage librosbag-storage0d - Robot OS library for rosbag_storage librosbag0d - Library for recording from and playing back to Robot OS topics librosconsole-dev - Development files for librosconsole librosconsole0d - library for librosconsole libroscpp-dev - Robot OS development files for libroscpp libroscpp-msgs-dev - Robot OS header for roscpp messages libroscpp0d - Robot OS client library libroslz4-0d - library implementing lz4 for Robot OS libroslz4-dev - development files for libroslz4 librostest-dev - Development files for rostest (Robot OS) libtopic-tools-dev - development files for libtopic-tools (Robot OS) libtopic-tools0d - library for messing with Robot OS topics libxmlrpcpp-dev - development files for Robot OS libxmlrpcpp libxmlrpcpp0d - Robot OS version of xml-rpc protocol library python-message-filters - Python library for Robot OS message-filters python-rosbag - Python tools for recording from and playing back to Robot OS topi python-roscpp-msgs - Header for roscpp messages, Python python-rosgraph - Command-line tool to print information about the Robot OS computa python-roslaunch
Bug#809403: marked as done (ITP: pagemon -- interactive memory/page monitoring tool)
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jan 2016 00:00:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#809403: fixed in pagemon 0.01.02-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #809403, regarding ITP: pagemon -- interactive memory/page monitoring tool to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 809403: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809403 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Colin Ian King * Package name: pagemon Version : 0.01.01 Upstream Author : Colin Ian King * URL : https://github.com/ColinIanKing/pagemon * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C Description : interactive memory/page monitoring tool pagemon is a ncurses based interactive memory/page monitoring tool allowing one to browse the memory map of an active running process on Linux. pagemon reads the PTEs of a given process and display the soft/dirty activity in real time. The tool identifies the type of memory mapping a page belongs to, so one can easily scan through memory looking at pages of memory belonging data, code, heap, stack, anonymous mappings or even swapped out pages. As the author of this tool, I am keen to maintain the Debian packaging. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: pagemon Source-Version: 0.01.02-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pagemon, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 809...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Colin King (supplier of updated pagemon package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 20:14:01 + Source: pagemon Binary: pagemon Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.01.02-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Colin King Changed-By: Colin King Description: pagemon- interactive memory/page monitoring tool Closes: 809403 Changes: pagemon (0.01.02-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial Debian release (Closes: #809403) * Makefile: remove -lm -g build flags, bump version * Manual: update date * Add VM statistics * Remove hard coded page size, fix up formatting fields in tab view * Access byte from bytes when appropriate, don't mask off top bit to early * Add some context Page/Memory view hint in status line * Add calloc failure checking * Add more comments, shift some globals around * Add some more comments for functions * Remove unused colour attribute pairs * Only show KEY info when in PAGE view mode * Perform line by line memory reads for more efficient reading * Use sigaction rather than signal for SIGWINCH handler * Add sscanf checking when reading maps * Replace hard coded hex format width with HEX_WIDTH * Replace hard coded address offset cursor position to ADDR_OFFSET * Fix memory view changing location bug when resizing * Set tick to ticks to force immediate load of dirty page info * Use PRI* format specifiers * Minor code clean up * Don't need panel library, update README . pagemon (0.01.01-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Makefile: bump version * Add Home key option to help * Make read on pages trigger on R and r keys * Check lseek errors with (off_t)-1 instead of < 0 * Fix some build warnings * debian: control: fix lintian warning * Fix some minor warnings as found by cppcheck . pagemon (0.01.00-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release Checksums-Sha1: a78a38711e565b928ec77556b07c2b28ea813dc1 1733 pagemon_0.01.02-1.dsc 9ec2af2a696e6ad2c45b60e48d51cc6d1244902f 15485 pagemon_0.01.02.orig.tar.gz aabb6e046f2dbbd076c0e407cf8504047e8d27ed 1748 pagemon_0.01.02-1.debian.tar.xz f97a2ffe6808db0c30c2d1304035b730d5f1e3af 19602 pagemon-dbgsym_0.01.02-1_amd64.deb f3897c2842863b292116b3a17ad825aba5564b58 12118 pagemon_0.01.02-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: c75d5977cc1de34d13657c5960508b43195a9889f9d2d9edacbac7d183504917 1733 pagemon_0.01.02-1.dsc 3b149e7c42990a1b078af6d9a4cc30ee1ef217bb010bb3e7e8e165921509664f 15485 pagemon_0.01.02.orig.tar.gz d9a291727e553b1cb
Bug#808680: marked as done (ITP: python-knockpy -- python tool designed to enumerate subdomains on a target domain through a wordlist)
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jan 2016 00:00:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#808680: fixed in knockpy 3.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #808680, regarding ITP: python-knockpy -- python tool designed to enumerate subdomains on a target domain through a wordlist to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 808680: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808680 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Owner: locutusofb...@debian.org Severity: wishlist * Package name: knock * Version: 3.0.0 * Upstream Author : Gianni Amato * URL: https://github.com/guelfoweb/knock * License: GPL-3+ * Programming Lang: Python * Description: Knockpy is a python tool designed to enumerate subdomains on a target domain through a wordlist. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: knockpy Source-Version: 3.0.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of knockpy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 808...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Gianfranco Costamagna (supplier of updated knockpy package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:25:09 +0100 Source: knockpy Binary: knockpy Architecture: source all Version: 3.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Gianfranco Costamagna Changed-By: Gianfranco Costamagna Description: knockpy- Python tool designed to enumerate subdomains on a target domain Closes: 808680 Changes: knockpy (3.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release (Closes: #808680). Checksums-Sha1: 83b0b3daae64bcf8102334c906c4c47877fe6ceb 1757 knockpy_3.0.0-1.dsc 11f5805a00a8955cb0f744cdd6f405ad799b0cb3 14479 knockpy_3.0.0.orig.tar.gz bc520bdc388b5abeaec71f4c92a9eb8371109c68 2028 knockpy_3.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz aa7003eb42f3e498ac0f4a992b99c916d4604525 15660 knockpy_3.0.0-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 16ec5eca267549ae746a403c9da97263a45ca11ba6af4b184d61b8aced8ad4f5 1757 knockpy_3.0.0-1.dsc aae6f3fff7973ad52d75a5e5eb9d06aa9565d79c4596066a4305a0eb0a4883da 14479 knockpy_3.0.0.orig.tar.gz ad92c6943a59f1d7d9c51f3a5d5cecab85f0c2cf1f2c8cfd8cf1020664247f8c 2028 knockpy_3.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz cd1cbf9c9f04df65a007fa1e8a901a3243ef8d784b36e66798e20d944665f54f 15660 knockpy_3.0.0-1_all.deb Files: 36d2e1950a5927ae08580321e2e014c3 1757 python optional knockpy_3.0.0-1.dsc 7c0f0cd53c32de82b3829eedf35a92b8 14479 python optional knockpy_3.0.0.orig.tar.gz ef16378d40ee54cdaa1110f61e1e8ae7 2028 python optional knockpy_3.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz d484433e6d329d1e0fc1d96be4bec573 15660 python optional knockpy_3.0.0-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWeSrGAAoJEPNPCXROn13Z5VYP/AvUmvemtxNQ9nb0/KlB3lw/ N+jUSo6i3oCCrUy09CvgaafJc1a4LK47vPcWdgcVnAfo5afpDlD5q7/xqX/0l8lu 5NQBTeMjOsZ9T/Y3b3P2YIwAKorbzE+fvV43UCmlF6tGpe5qKqtT9NuDRpmIYMc6 JpMJKGuTIzFBFQpY/uzXzzYb2uyQpec+YXds38jFyNkt8/E2kGw+7zAsT/wqO5jN wQwu5kTVbNI7+Gryc3rwScea9ppW3tSIJUWs4PRiBlVyP2oifJSpxyYFdCzB4sS9 +HLSJbQS8/3iaHmvPeTKbHNziXkUEN5zmB0qhulg4iyLWkgO31/chte1gjsOXdBb xFNkcdaEMiyk3M0vRNHPac4Ks07N2wyhYp0J8vgWYcu5jDoRixsHwv4n5CkO54gk EPKQHArmTejPOGIH5PhqlUQU8EJX1mFas2OtaeaRjOogucSlkcKB4EPc4JguZOOn vHr1d+8F3K8f+Y8GrQePGxYA3NWMRgP7J8RhDWgDVbSwWIxJ0EkZjDzKqNwifhmd VVT5MLg5JMU1Dt/KyUrtiPIaGMxpVlKMQvHrEP4hhpO3iaWy/dnwE/7UW+xDt+SH bgWa67DCLbgCmNCK7GepkkI5lMuAsEGGWMUzGmiritXyerKN8fUvhrMh/TBkIWHD 9IQKuMKGadN27VjeOpPW =Jq0a -END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---
Bug#757768: ITP: libjitsi -- advanced Java media library
I'm not aware of anybody working on it and there are no contributions or volunteers of doing it. We will do it at some point, but we do not have resources currently. On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Damian Minkov] >> Description : advanced Java media library > > Hi, what is the status of getting libjitsi into Debian? > > -- > Happy hacking > Petter Reinholdtsen
Bug#810576: marked as done (ITP: hail -- Efficiently extract arbitrary lines from a file or stream)
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jan 2016 04:20:15 + with message-id and subject line closing ITP: hail -- Efficiently extract arbitrary lines from a file or stream has caused the Debian Bug report #810576, regarding ITP: hail -- Efficiently extract arbitrary lines from a file or stream to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 810576: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810576 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kevin Murray * Package name: hail Version : 0.1.1 Upstream Author : Kevin Murray * URL : https://github.com/kdmurray91/hail * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : Efficiently extract arbitrary lines from a file or stream Hail gets its name from a contraction of head and tail, the common alternative to this program. It extracts lines from a file, taken on stdin, and prints them on stdout. It's so simple that the Unix wizards of old never bothered. Hail will be co-maintained in the Debian Med team. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Please retitle bug 694029 from RFP to ITP and set yourself as the owner.--- End Message ---
Bug#810576: ITP: hail -- Efficiently extract arbitrary lines from a file or stream
Hi, Kevin, على السبت 9 كانون الثاني 2016 15:17، كتب Kevin Murray: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Kevin Murray > > * Package name: hail > Version : 0.1.1 > Upstream Author : Kevin Murray > * URL : https://github.com/kdmurray91/hail > * License : GPL > Programming Lang: C > Description : Efficiently extract arbitrary lines from a file or stream > > Hail gets its name from a contraction of head and tail, the common alternative > to this program. It extracts lines from a file, taken on stdin, and prints > them > on stdout. It's so simple that the Unix wizards of old never bothered. > You might like to try getting this program into moreutils [1]. > Hail will be co-maintained in the Debian Med team. > 1. https://joeyh.name/code/moreutils/ regards Afif
Processed: python-bond: block ITP 809542 by RFS 810543
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 809542 by 810543 Bug #809542 [wnpp] ITP: python-bond -- transparent remote/recursive evaluation between Python and other languages 809542 was not blocked by any bugs. 809542 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 809542: 810543 > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 809542: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809542 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#810586: ITP: dumb-init -- minimal init system for Linux containers
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)" * Package name: dumb-init Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Yelp * URL : https://github.com/Yelp/dumb-init * License : Expat Programming Lang: C, Python Description : minimal init system for Linux containers dumb-init is a simple process supervisor and init system designed to run as PID 1 inside minimal container environments (such as Docker). It is a deployed as a small, statically-linked binary written in C. . Lightweight containers have popularized the idea of running a single process or service without normal init systems like systemd or sysvinit. However, omitting an init system often leads to incorrect handling of processes and signals, and can result in problems such as containers which can't be gracefully stopped, or leaking containers which should have been destroyed. . dumb-init enables you to simply prefix your command with dumb-init. It acts as PID 1 and immediately spawns your command as a child process, taking care to properly handle and forward signals as they are received. -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) Debian Developer (https://nm.debian.org/public/person/czchen) Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#810586: ITP: dumb-init -- minimal init system for Linux containers
On Jan 10, ChangZhuo Chen wrote: > dumb-init is a simple process supervisor and init system designed to run > as PID 1 inside minimal container environments (such as Docker). It is a > deployed as a small, statically-linked binary written in C. While I can see how distributing statically-linked binaries fits in the sad culture of ignorance that programmers improvising themselves sysadmins have developed over the last few years (AKA "devops"), I do not think that it would be appropriate for Debian (euphemism, see Policy 10.1): the program should be linked with glibc as usual. > However, omitting an init system often leads to incorrect handling of > processes and signals, and can result in problems such as containers > which can't be gracefully stopped, or leaking containers which should > have been destroyed. Yes, not having an init process is stupid... (See above. :-) ) -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: PGP signature
