Processed: RFS: org-drill/2.7.0-1 [ITP] -- spaced repetition drills in Emacs for accelerated study/learning
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 947017 by 964164 Bug #947017 [wnpp] ITP: org-drill -- emacs self-learning mode with spaced repetition 947017 was blocked by: 953128 947017 was blocking: 954052 Added blocking bug(s) of 947017: 964164 > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 947017: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947017 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#964163: ITP: zim-tools -- various ZIM command-line tools
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kunal Mehta * Package name: zim-tools Version : 1.2.1 Upstream Author : openZIM/Kiwix developers * URL : https://github.com/openzim/zim-tools * License : GPL-3.0-or-later Programming Lang: C++ Description : various ZIM command-line tools ZIM tools is a collection of various command-line utilities for interacting with and working with the ZIM file format, which is primarily used to power Kiwix, an offline Wikipedia reader (among other things). Upstream plans to merge zimwriterfs into this codebase in the near future as well.
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 963566 pending Bug #963566 [wnpp] ITP: felix-scr -- Felix Service Component Runtime Added tag(s) pending. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 963566: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963566 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#796960: RFA: wordpress-shibboleth
Hi Dominic, On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:51:40 +0100 Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > > I no longer use this software, so am not in a position to test that > new versions work. It has a low popcon and no bugs currently, but there > is a new upstream release to package, so I'd be pleased to have someone > take over the package to integrate that. I think fully orphaning the package would give it more visibility and the QA Team could take care of it more easily. I've just NMUd the single RC bug, but I think QA uploads are preferred over NMUs. Cheers, Balint
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 859180 ITA: fonts-humor-sans -- Font that looks like handwritten text Bug #859180 [wnpp] O: fonts-humor-sans -- Font that looks like handwritten text Changed Bug title to 'ITA: fonts-humor-sans -- Font that looks like handwritten text' from 'O: fonts-humor-sans -- Font that looks like handwritten text'. > retitle 914665 ITA: fonts-tiresias -- Fonts for the visually impaired Bug #914665 [wnpp] O: fonts-tiresias -- Fonts for the visually impaired Changed Bug title to 'ITA: fonts-tiresias -- Fonts for the visually impaired' from 'O: fonts-tiresias -- Fonts for the visually impaired'. > owner 859180 henr...@debian.org Bug #859180 [wnpp] ITA: fonts-humor-sans -- Font that looks like handwritten text Owner recorded as henr...@debian.org. > owner 914665 henr...@debian.org Bug #914665 [wnpp] ITA: fonts-tiresias -- Fonts for the visually impaired Owner recorded as henr...@debian.org. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 859180: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859180 914665: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914665 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#919441: ITP: pyshacl -- A pure Python packages which allows for the validation of RDF graphs against Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) files.
Ashley Sommer wrote: > Jonathan told us he is happy to also sponsor pyshacl but we can't > really start looking at undertaking packaging pyshacl until the > process for OWL-RL has finished. FYI it is possible to prepare and release to NEW queue packages which depend on other packages still pending in NEW queue. ...but I am sure Jonathan can help with that, in case you want that faster parallelizing approach. Looking forward to having pyshacl in Debian, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#735597: marked as done (RFP: libjsonld -- library for w3c recommendation JSON-LD)
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jul 2020 13:15:40 +0200 with message-id <159368854003.2876772.3846194630268504...@auryn.jones.dk> and subject line Re: RFP: libjsonld -- library for w3c recommendation JSON-LD has caused the Debian Bug report #735597, regarding RFP: libjsonld -- library for w3c recommendation JSON-LD to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 735597: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735597 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libjsonld Severity: RFP URL: https://github.com/msporny/libjsonld from license file: This package is Free Software available under either the LGPL v2.1, GPL v2, or the Apache 2.0 license. Each license is an alternative, and if you select one license, that one alone applies. Jeff Cliff -- GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Apparently libjsonld is gone upstream. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature --- End Message ---
Bug#964123: ITP: greybird-geeko-gtk-theme -- Modified version of the Greybird theme with light/dark grey and green elements.
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Maurizio Galli * Package name: greybird-geeko-gtk-theme Version : 3.22.11 Upstream Author : Maurizio Galli * URL : https://github.com/shimmerproject/Greybird-Geeko * License : GPL, CC Description : Modified version of the Greybird theme with light/dark grey and green elements. Greybird-Geeko is the default Xfce theme in openSUSE and is based on Greybird, which is the default theme in Xubuntu 11.04 onwards. The Shimmer Project are the designers and developers of both themes. This GTK theme is in active development under the Shimmer project and offers an alternative with different colors to thealready packaged Greybird and Bluebird themes. I plan to maintain it directly since I already maintain it upstream and I already package it for openSUSE and flathub.
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Hi, Le jeu. 2 juil. 2020 à 10:34, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > > Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? > > > > If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I > > would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting > > situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in > > debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. > > I'm not the maintainer, but it is currently in NEW with d/changelog > fixed. Yep, I fixed it with the help of James Cowgill (he maintains aom with the same patent license) and re-upload the new version in January (~ 2 weeks after the reject). > > > When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into > > irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. > > I've done that repeatedly without any progress. > I did not ping them about this package but if Sebastian already tried to do it without any success, I guess I will not have more luck. Since the version 0.7.0 (the last version in NEW queue), there is no longer any files with Alliance-for-Open-Media-Patent-License-1.0 in their header. This AOM-Patent-License-1.0 is only provided in doc/PATENTS, so maybe this will simplify the approval. Best, Dylan
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Hi Sebastian! At the moment, kodi 18.7.1 is not blocked. Also, if there is no package the dav1d support is disabled in 19 either. However, I referred to the whole situation: the maintainers come to bring new packages and improve the existing ones, not waiting months & years without a feedback. FYI, kodi 19 benefits much from enabling dav1d on streams like Netflix, so I build Kodi for my testing repo with dav1d packaged. Same applies to shairplay & libudfread (I ITP'ed and packaged these under Mattia's mentorship and even persuaded the upstream lead developer Jean-Baptiste Kempf to make a new tag for libudfread after three years since the packaged tag was released) Jean-Baptiste expressed big wish to have dav1d and libudfread in Debian during our conversation related to udfread tagging, so I feel obliged to do everything I can to make it happen. -- Vasyl Gello == Certified SolidWorks Expert Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77 E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com Skype: vasek.gello == 호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다 July 2, 2020 8:41:38 AM UTC, Sebastian Ramacher написав(-ла): >Hi Vasyl > >On 2020-07-02 08:20:11 +, Vasyl Gello wrote: >> Hi Jonas! >> >> I also can volunteer uploading 0.7.1 as part of my kodi work. > >How is dav1d blocking kodi work? Once dav1d is in the archive in ffmpeg >is uploaded with dav1d support enabled, won't kodi also automatically >have dav1d support? If they kodi is using it directly, is there no >option to disable it until it is available? > >Cheers > >> Also, is it a good idea to reach Joerg Jaspert directly and kindly ask for >> review? >> >> Why am I asking this: I have two pending packages (libudfread & shairplay). >> At the same time, I am preparing full Kodi binary addon archive (84 source >> packages). >> >> I am carefully investigating copyrights and perform builds and tests in the >> publuc unofficial repo >> (see relevant d-multimedia discussiob). However, I don't want to wait YEARS >> after Kodi reaches >> release. Instead, I am using my sparevtime to keep packaging ready as >> development of Kodi upstream >> progresses. >> >> With such enormous waiting times and no understandingbof how to solve it >> gracefully, the whole project >> might become a waste of time and I obviously try avoiding it. >> -- >> Vasyl Gello >> == >> Certified SolidWorks Expert >> >> Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77 >> >> E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com >> >> Skype: vasek.gello >> == >> 호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다 >> >> July 2, 2020 8:11:03 AM UTC, Jonas Smedegaard написав(-ла): >> >Quoting Dylan Aïssi (2020-07-02 09:29:51) >> >> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 + Vasyl Gello >> >> wrote: >> >> > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. >> >> > Can you please package it? >> >> >> >> dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 >> >> year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last >> >> attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably >> >> convert this ITP to RFP... >> > >> >I guess the rejection is what you quoted in >> >https://bugs.debian.org/916333#25 >> > >> >Thanks, btw, for quoting like that to make conversations with ftpmasters >> >more transparent. Much appreciated! >> > >> >Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? >> > >> >If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I >> >would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting >> >situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in >> >debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. >> > >> >When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into >> >irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. >> > >> >If you haven't given up yet, then would you be interesting in >> >maintaining the package collaboratively? I can offer to help if you >> >would be interested in doing so e.g. in the Multimedia team. >> > >> >If you have given up already, then I can offer to take over. >> > >> >Kind regards, >> > >> > - Jonas >> > >> >-- >> > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt >> > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ >> > >> > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private > > > >-- >Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Hi Vasyl On 2020-07-02 08:20:11 +, Vasyl Gello wrote: > Hi Jonas! > > I also can volunteer uploading 0.7.1 as part of my kodi work. How is dav1d blocking kodi work? Once dav1d is in the archive in ffmpeg is uploaded with dav1d support enabled, won't kodi also automatically have dav1d support? If they kodi is using it directly, is there no option to disable it until it is available? Cheers > Also, is it a good idea to reach Joerg Jaspert directly and kindly ask for > review? > > Why am I asking this: I have two pending packages (libudfread & shairplay). > At the same time, I am preparing full Kodi binary addon archive (84 source > packages). > > I am carefully investigating copyrights and perform builds and tests in the > publuc unofficial repo > (see relevant d-multimedia discussiob). However, I don't want to wait YEARS > after Kodi reaches > release. Instead, I am using my sparevtime to keep packaging ready as > development of Kodi upstream > progresses. > > With such enormous waiting times and no understandingbof how to solve it > gracefully, the whole project > might become a waste of time and I obviously try avoiding it. > -- > Vasyl Gello > == > Certified SolidWorks Expert > > Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77 > > E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com > > Skype: vasek.gello > == > 호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다 > > July 2, 2020 8:11:03 AM UTC, Jonas Smedegaard написав(-ла): > >Quoting Dylan Aïssi (2020-07-02 09:29:51) > >> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 + Vasyl Gello > >> wrote: > >> > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. > >> > Can you please package it? > >> > >> dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 > >> year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last > >> attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably > >> convert this ITP to RFP... > > > >I guess the rejection is what you quoted in > >https://bugs.debian.org/916333#25 > > > >Thanks, btw, for quoting like that to make conversations with ftpmasters > >more transparent. Much appreciated! > > > >Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? > > > >If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I > >would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting > >situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in > >debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. > > > >When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into > >irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. > > > >If you haven't given up yet, then would you be interesting in > >maintaining the package collaboratively? I can offer to help if you > >would be interested in doing so e.g. in the Multimedia team. > > > >If you have given up already, then I can offer to take over. > > > >Kind regards, > > > > - Jonas > > > >-- > > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt > > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ > > > > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
On 2020-07-02 10:11:03 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Dylan Aïssi (2020-07-02 09:29:51) > > On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 + Vasyl Gello > > wrote: > > > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. > > > Can you please package it? > > > > dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 > > year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last > > attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably > > convert this ITP to RFP... > > I guess the rejection is what you quoted in > https://bugs.debian.org/916333#25 > > Thanks, btw, for quoting like that to make conversations with ftpmasters > more transparent. Much appreciated! > > Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? > > If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I > would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting > situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in > debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. I'm not the maintainer, but it is currently in NEW with d/changelog fixed. > When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into > irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. I've done that repeatedly without any progress. > If you haven't given up yet, then would you be interesting in > maintaining the package collaboratively? I can offer to help if you > would be interested in doing so e.g. in the Multimedia team. It's already maintained in the team: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/dav1d Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-07-02 10:11:03) > Quoting Dylan Aïssi (2020-07-02 09:29:51) > > On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 + Vasyl Gello > > wrote: > > > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. > > > Can you please package it? > > > > dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 > > year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last > > attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably > > convert this ITP to RFP... > > I guess the rejection is what you quoted in > https://bugs.debian.org/916333#25 > > Thanks, btw, for quoting like that to make conversations with ftpmasters > more transparent. Much appreciated! > > Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? > > If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I > would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting > situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in > debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. > > When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into > irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. > > If you haven't given up yet, then would you be interesting in > maintaining the package collaboratively? I can offer to help if you > would be interested in doing so e.g. in the Multimedia team. > > If you have given up already, then I can offer to take over. Ah, I see now that your original ITP mentioned maintaining it in the Multimedia team. So ignore my suggestion to move it there, but my other comments seem still valid. Also, you have the option of asking for help in the Multimedia team (I don't recall your doing that regarding this package - sorry if I am mistaken). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Hi Jonas! I also can volunteer uploading 0.7.1 as part of my kodi work. Also, is it a good idea to reach Joerg Jaspert directly and kindly ask for review? Why am I asking this: I have two pending packages (libudfread & shairplay). At the same time, I am preparing full Kodi binary addon archive (84 source packages). I am carefully investigating copyrights and perform builds and tests in the publuc unofficial repo (see relevant d-multimedia discussiob). However, I don't want to wait YEARS after Kodi reaches release. Instead, I am using my sparevtime to keep packaging ready as development of Kodi upstream progresses. With such enormous waiting times and no understandingbof how to solve it gracefully, the whole project might become a waste of time and I obviously try avoiding it. -- Vasyl Gello == Certified SolidWorks Expert Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77 E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com Skype: vasek.gello == 호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다 July 2, 2020 8:11:03 AM UTC, Jonas Smedegaard написав(-ла): >Quoting Dylan Aïssi (2020-07-02 09:29:51) >> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 + Vasyl Gello wrote: >> > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. >> > Can you please package it? >> >> dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 >> year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last >> attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably >> convert this ITP to RFP... > >I guess the rejection is what you quoted in >https://bugs.debian.org/916333#25 > >Thanks, btw, for quoting like that to make conversations with ftpmasters >more transparent. Much appreciated! > >Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? > >If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I >would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting >situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in >debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. > >When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into >irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. > >If you haven't given up yet, then would you be interesting in >maintaining the package collaboratively? I can offer to help if you >would be interested in doing so e.g. in the Multimedia team. > >If you have given up already, then I can offer to take over. > >Kind regards, > > - Jonas > >-- > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ > > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Quoting Dylan Aïssi (2020-07-02 09:29:51) > On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 + Vasyl Gello wrote: > > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. > > Can you please package it? > > dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 > year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last > attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably > convert this ITP to RFP... I guess the rejection is what you quoted in https://bugs.debian.org/916333#25 Thanks, btw, for quoting like that to make conversations with ftpmasters more transparent. Much appreciated! Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. If you haven't given up yet, then would you be interesting in maintaining the package collaboratively? I can offer to help if you would be interested in doing so e.g. in the Multimedia team. If you have given up already, then I can offer to take over. Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Hi, (Please keep #916333 in CC ;-) Le jeu. 2 juil. 2020 à 09:44, Vasyl Gello a écrit : > So you have no objection against me doing a team upload and picking it for my > kodi work? > Jean-Batiste Kempf from VideoLAN also is very motivated to have dav1d in > Debian, so I will talk with Mattia & maybe even reach Joerg > on that matter. Feel free to do a team upload, but dav1d is still not in Debian and I don't know if it will be accepted one day... So, an upload now will have no real effect (at least for Debian). This situation is annoying because the reject was only about the AOM patent license but we already have the aom package in Debian with the same license. Best, Dylan
Bug#964022: ITP: libdata-password-zxcvbn-perl -- Perl port of Dropbox's password strength estimation library, zxcvbn
Thanks intrigeri,I sent them a request. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 6:21 AM, intrigeri wrote: > Hi tous, > > I encourage you to join the Debian Perl Group and maintain this > package within this team: https://perl-team.pages.debian.net/ > > :) > > Cheers!
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Hi Vasyl, On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 + Vasyl Gello wrote: > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. > Can you please package it? dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably convert this ITP to RFP... Best, Dylan
Bug#964119: marked as done (ITP: ruby-semantic-puppet -- Puppet tools for working with Semantic Versions)
Your message dated Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:14:39 +0200 with message-id <0bbc-fd40-003a-951b-e6f2aae46...@infomaniak.com> and subject line Already in Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #964119, regarding ITP: ruby-semantic-puppet -- Puppet tools for working with Semantic Versions to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 964119: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964119 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: ruby-semantic-puppet Version : 1.0.2 Upstream Author : Jesse Scott * URL : https://rubygems.org/gems/semantic_puppet * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Puppet tools for working with Semantic Versions Library of tools used by Puppet to parse, validate, and compare Semantic Versions and Version Ranges and to query and resolve module dependencies. Note: this is a new dependency for the puppet agent, needed in version 6.x which the puppet team is currently packaging. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Already in Debian--- End Message ---
Bug#964119: ITP: ruby-semantic-puppet -- Puppet tools for working with Semantic Versions
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: ruby-semantic-puppet Version : 1.0.2 Upstream Author : Jesse Scott * URL : https://rubygems.org/gems/semantic_puppet * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Puppet tools for working with Semantic Versions Library of tools used by Puppet to parse, validate, and compare Semantic Versions and Version Ranges and to query and resolve module dependencies. Note: this is a new dependency for the puppet agent, needed in version 6.x which the puppet team is currently packaging.
