Bug#927454: ITP: towncrier -- compiler for project news file

2021-03-06 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Saturday, March 06 2021, Ben Finney wrote:

> On 05-Mar-2021, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>
>> How are you?
>
> Thanks for asking. I'm not great, but it's all relative; pretty much
> everyone has had a bad 12 months more more. Hope you're well.

Ouch, sorry to read that :-(.  I hope you take good care of yourself,
and please don't feel pressured to work on this package just because of
my message.

>> I have a friend (who is also my namesake) who is interested in
>> having towncrier in the archive. Maybe you can give us/him some
>> pointers on the current status of the package so that he can help
>> you with it?
>
> Thank you for the prompt. I will get back onto this and bring it up to
> date.

Thanks, I really appreciate it, but as I said, please don't feel like
you need to do that.  Sérgio Cipriano is interested in helping with the
package (he is still learning, but I can attest that he's good and picks
things up really fast), so if you want to give us the lay of the land we
can take it from here, no problems.

Otherwise, if you feel like finishing the package, please know that you
can ping us if you need any help!

Thank you very much.  Take care!

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
https://sergiodj.net/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#927454: ITP: towncrier -- compiler for project news file

2021-03-06 Thread Ben Finney
On 05-Mar-2021, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:

> How are you?

Thanks for asking. I'm not great, but it's all relative; pretty much
everyone has had a bad 12 months more more. Hope you're well.

> I'm writing to check on the status of the towncrier package. I
> noticed that you have an apparently complete package on
> https://salsa.debian.org/bignose/pkg-towncrier, but it hasn't been
> uploaded and I can't find why.

One of many things that slipped aside in 2020.

> I have a friend (who is also my namesake) who is interested in
> having towncrier in the archive. Maybe you can give us/him some
> pointers on the current status of the package so that he can help
> you with it?

Thank you for the prompt. I will get back onto this and bring it up to
date.

-- 
 \ “I was stopped by the police for speeding; they said ‘Don't you |
  `\   know the speed limit is 55 miles an hour?’ I said ‘Yeah I know, |
_o__) but I wasn't going to be out that long.’” —Steven Wright |
Ben Finney 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#984661: ITP: ruby-pg-query -- PostgreSQL query parsing and normalization library

2021-03-06 Thread Pirate Praveen

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pirate Praveen 

Packaging of https://rubygems.org/gems/pg_query

This will replace ruby-gitlab-pg-query (which is a fork). Dependency of 
gitlab 13.8.x




Bug#984497: weasels and doves

2021-03-06 Thread Geert Stappers


Preamble:
   Do know that having own priorities
   and working together IS possible.


On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 10:17:03AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 16:52 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> 
> > Finally the license statement is all about redistribution ... and
> > than upstream says:  Do not redistribute. 
> 
> They appear to be fine with redistribution,

OK


> just not with wide distribution by a popular Linux distribution,
> which has a stable release that is guaranteed to get out of date with
> documentation.

Rendering that to FUD does allow me to add more FUD.
Less agressive:
  The _possible_ burden on upstream
  should NOT block our wish to package it.

 
> Possibly they could be convinced by having the package only available
> in Debian unstable or experimental and guaranteeing to keep it up to
> date with the latest available upstream version.
 
Good relation with upstream is indeed preferred.
That relation will only exist when packaging is going on.
We are dealing with libre software.  It implies that
upstream is libre to express "we don't want that it happens",
we are libre to do packaging.
Restricting ourselfs to only unstable feels wrong.


> On the other hand they probably also don't want to deal with bug
> reports about a build that they did not produce.

Double you tee ef.
Please keep Fear Uncertainty and Doubt to yourself.
Now breaking that rule:

  Shady generated binaries are plain evil.



(Back to more reasonable)

It is not to us, Debian, to come with possible reasons
why upstream is "right" in blocking us.

We, Debian, are fully aware that packaging comes
with responsebilities to quality.


 
> Perhaps the right way is for Debian to distribute ExplosionAI software
> under different names with all documentation pointing at Debian to
> avoid upstream having to deal with bug reports from Debian users.


Same as was done with Iceweasel and Icedove.

Future history will tell which lessons were learnt.



Groeten
Geert Stappers
DD
-- 
Silence is hard to parse


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#840253: ITP: openqa: automated test tool to test the whole installation process of an OS

2021-03-06 Thread Philip Hands
Hi Hideki,

I seem to be getting a bit closer to having a viable version of OpenQA
that could be uploaded. (see https://salsa.debian.org/philh/openqa
'debian' and 'hands-com' branches)

Do you still want to be the maintainer if/when I get there?  or maintain
as a team, or I could be the maintainer, as you wish.

I've Cc:-ed Adam and Andrew as they're listed as Uploaders, so might be
up for a team maintainership.

BTW I've been running various version of my 'hands-com' branch of this
on openqa.debian.net for ages, mostly successfully. The one I'm building
as I type, which should get installed today, is (probably) able to use
salsa as an OAuth2 provider, at which point there will be some point
telling others about it. Holger just offered me the chance to run it on
a much bigger machine, at which point it should be possible to save more
disk images etc., making complicated pipelines of tests a possibility.

Anyway, I hope you're all well, and surviving life in these interesting
times.

Cheers, Phil.
-- 
|)|  Philip Hands  [+44 (0)20 8530 9560]  HANDS.COM Ltd.
|-|  http://www.hands.com/http://ftp.uk.debian.org/
|(|  Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34,   21075 Hamburg,GERMANY


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#984640: ITP: elpa-subed -- Emacs mode for editing subtitles while playing the corresponding video

2021-03-06 Thread Martin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin 
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-emac...@lists.debian.org

* Package name: elpa-subed
  Version : git master 49ddccc
  Upstream Author : Random User 
* URL : https://github.com/rndusr/subed
* License : GPL3+
  Programming Lang: Emacs-Lisp
  Description : Emacs mode for editing subtitles while playing the 
corresponding video

subed is an Emacs major mode for editing subtitles while playing
the corresponding video with mpv. At the moment, the only
supported formats are SubRip (.srt) and WebVTT (.vtt).



Processed: ITP: dnsperf

2021-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> owner 984535 Daniel Baumann 
Bug #984535 [wnpp] ITP: dnsperf -- accurate latency and throughput metrics for 
Domain Name Service (DNS)
Owner recorded as Daniel Baumann .
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
984535: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984535
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#920078: marked as done (ITA: colortest -- utilities to test color capabilities of terminal)

2021-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:33:23 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#920078: fixed in colortest 20110624-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #920078,
regarding ITA: colortest -- utilities to test color capabilities of terminal
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
920078: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920078
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp

The current maintainer of colortest, Jari Aalto ,
is apparently not active anymore.  Therefore, I orphan this package now.

Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.

If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#howto-o for detailed
instructions how to adopt a package properly.

Some information about this package:

Package: colortest
Binary: colortest
Version: 20110624-6
Maintainer: Jari Aalto 
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9)
Architecture: all
Standards-Version: 3.9.8
Format: 3.0 (quilt)
Files:
 3d7910f56eff232bd5863a0913aa7b61 1874 colortest_20110624-6.dsc
 524da34ae1c0be16ea9b5ad2dffab51e 8492 colortest_20110624.orig.tar.gz
 509768ecf535199765d81374a679db77 6324 colortest_20110624-6.debian.tar.xz
Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/colortest.git
Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/colortest.git
Checksums-Sha256:
 f1be684eec731f3dde4ec480d13580b1e6c639f53fca900951f3f2e2e264e686 1874 
colortest_20110624-6.dsc
 f86767675859032951d891f4417fd7180aa49c470fd00a9a3b696160ef24c6c3 8492 
colortest_20110624.orig.tar.gz
 e0e61c3496933640d2d609dae965f7172fcc4274c8ae5c9e61bd89ffc69b843c 6324 
colortest_20110624-6.debian.tar.xz
Homepage: ftp://invisible-island.net/xterm/
Package-List: 
 colortest deb utils optional arch=all
Directory: pool/main/c/colortest
Priority: source
Section: utils

Package: colortest
Version: 20110624-6
Installed-Size: 38
Maintainer: Jari Aalto 
Architecture: all
Depends: perl:any, bash (>= 3), perl (>= 5)
Description-en: utilities to test color capabilities of terminal
 Most terminals are capable of displaying 16 colors; 8 colors and 2
 different brightness values, some (like xterm) can display more, even
 256 colors.
 .
 The colortest package includes set of utilities to help test how many
 colors a terminal can show. These color settings depend on the $TERM
 environment variable and termcap entry and by adjusting or selecting
 correct values, higher colors may be available. The following numbers
 of colors can be tested for: 8, 16 and 256 colors.
Description-md5: 647a898b4902a7de25527f16b9567465
Homepage: ftp://invisible-island.net/xterm/
Tag: implemented-in::perl, implemented-in::shell, interface::commandline,
 role::program, scope::utility
Section: utils
Priority: optional
Filename: pool/main/c/colortest/colortest_20110624-6_all.deb
Size: 12742
MD5sum: fe7c39b03b4984c18c5aadcc66b29e97
SHA256: 99102b4c08dd3bcb56960683c5ff45f0e5bfc8f68c7bdd1b96651a5786d1b8bf
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: colortest
Source-Version: 20110624-9
Done: Micheal Waltz 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
colortest, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 920...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Micheal Waltz  (supplier of updated colortest package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 17:30:11 -0800
Source: colortest
Architecture: source
Version: 20110624-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Micheal Waltz 
Changed-By: Micheal Waltz 
Closes: 920078
Changes:
 colortest (20110624-9) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New Maintainer. (Closes: #920078)
   * Update standards, homepage, and multi-arch
   * Update watch file to include version
Checksums-Sha1:
 0b0e2dff4339992f31fa27ad9e900174fb95744a 1850 colortest_20110624-9.dsc
 568c2ce88e79bbf44baade3c6e751ddbaf7822b1 6800 
colortest_20110624-9.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 155d2350074755ba2da52c1d65801206ae91350cb93aeb36cda70badbfd64190 1850 
colortest_201

Bug#984497: upstream does not want debian to ship their free software (was: Re: python-cython-blis package)

2021-03-06 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić
Just one other example:

On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:19:01PM +0100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On 2021-03-05 16:52, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 09:52:47AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > 
> > > It seems unlikely that upstream will have changed their mind, it

> 
> So there's no legal (or technical) reason to not package, just
> the social reason that doing so will gain the ire of the author.
> 
> There is precedence: the author of cdrtools was extremely hostile to
> packaging,
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/08/msg00113.html
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/08/msg00320.html
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/08/msg00653.html
> 
> Eventually we had to just drop cdrtools (and consequently xcdroast)
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/08/msg00775.html

And there was
https://www.jwz.org/blog/2016/04/i-would-like-debian-to-stop-shipping-xscreensaver/
, 5 years ago.  We decided to ship it anyway.

Bye,

Joost