Processed: your mail

2021-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> unblock 729816 by 989348
Bug #729816 [wnpp] ITP: elementary-icon-theme -- Official elementary icon theme.
729816 was blocked by: 989348
729816 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 729816: 989348
> block 989348 by 729816
Bug #989348 [wnpp] ITP: elementary-planner -- Task manager with Todoist support
989348 was blocked by: 989349 989350
989348 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 989348: 729816
> merge 989349 729816
Bug #989349 [wnpp] ITP: elementary-icons -- Set of vector icons originally 
designed for elementary OS
Bug #729816 [wnpp] ITP: elementary-icon-theme -- Official elementary icon theme.
Merged 729816 989349
> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
729816: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729816
989348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989348
989349: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989349
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed (with 3 errors): your mail

2021-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> unblock 729819 by 989348
Failed to set blocking bugs of 729819: Not altering archived bugs; see 
unarchive.

> block 989348 by 729819
Bug #989348 [wnpp] ITP: elementary-planner -- Task manager with Todoist support
No valid blocking bug(s) given; not doing anything
Failed to set blocking bugs of 989348: Unknown/archived blocking bug(s):729819.

> merge 989349 729816
Bug #989349 [wnpp] ITP: elementary-icons -- Set of vector icons originally 
designed for elementary OS
Unable to merge bugs because:
blocks of #729816 is '' not '989348'
blockedby of #729816 is '989348' not ''
Failed to merge 989349: Did not alter merged bugs.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
729816: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729816
989348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989348
989349: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989349
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed (with 1 error): your mail

2021-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 729816 by 989348
Bug #729816 [wnpp] ITP: elementary-icon-theme -- Official elementary icon theme.
729816 was not blocked by any bugs.
729816 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 729816: 989348
> merge 989349 729816
Bug #989349 [wnpp] ITP: elementary-icons -- Set of vector icons originally 
designed for elementary OS
Unable to merge bugs because:
blocks of #729816 is '' not '989348'
blockedby of #729816 is '989348' not ''
Failed to merge 989349: Did not alter merged bugs.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
729816: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729816
989349: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989349
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#954176: WIP snowflake package

2021-06-09 Thread meskio
I'm working on the snowflake package. I have a package that works:
https://gitlab.torproject.org/meskio/snowflake-debian

Looking for a mentor to review it and a place to put it in salsa, I'm asking 
the 
go-team to see if it will fit under their umbrella.


-- 
meskio | https://meskio.net/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 My contact info: https://meskio.net/crypto.txt
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Nos vamos a Croatan.

signature.asc
Description: signature


Processed: tagging 974696, bug 974696 is forwarded to https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/reuse_0.12.1-1.html

2021-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 974696 + pending
Bug #974696 [wnpp] ITP: reuse -- tool for compliance with the REUSE 
recommendations
Added tag(s) pending.
> forwarded 974696 https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/reuse_0.12.1-1.html
Bug #974696 [wnpp] ITP: reuse -- tool for compliance with the REUSE 
recommendations
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/reuse_0.12.1-1.html'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
974696: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974696
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#989629: ITP: elementary-code -- Essential code editor with tab support

2021-06-09 Thread Francisco M Neto
Hello!

Thanks for your comment!

On 6/9/21 9:19 AM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Cool :-)  By the way, how is Elementary Code, an IDE?  Upstream calls
> it a "[code-specific] text-editor" here (
> https://medium.com/elementaryos/scratch-is-now-code-2838e03134c7 ),
> and it sounds like Code is intended to be like Atom, "a hackable text
> editor" ( https://atom.io ), rather than something like GNOME Builder
> or XCode ( 
> https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/7oi8nf/scratch_text_editor_is_now_elementary_code/dsafxmb/?utm_source=reddit_medium=web2x=3).

If I had to compare it I'd say it's more like Atom, yes. I have never
heard of XCode, so I can't really say anything about it, but GNOME
Builder is pretty much targeted at people developing for GNOME. Not that
it's not useful elsewhere, but it really focuses on it, having
"official" support only for the languages they use the most with GNOME
(like C/C++, Python or Rust). And it behaves a lot more like an IDE with
a lot of extra features.

> If you'd like to use "IDE" in the long description to make it
> discoverable with keyword or regex searches, maybe something could be
> written about how Code is more than a text editor, but that it's for
> people who don't want a full-featured IDE?  Does it support templates,
> macros, code folding, any kind of linting or language server-based IDE
> features (LSP), tab completion of variable, function, or class names,
> etc?  More simply, does it have an LSP plugin like
> https://github.com/atom-community/atom-languageclient or is one
> planned?  Ideally it'd be nice if upstream could make a statement
> about their vision and objectives for Code on its homepage
> https://github.com/elementary/code

That's a good point. In fact, in their original description for it,
they mention that it _can_ become a full featured IDE if the user wants
it to. But it's designed with minimalism in mind, and has basic
features. It doesn't have all the features GNOME Builder has but, in
their words, one can "install extensions to turn Code into a full-blown
IDE".

> Because you use the keyword "minimalist", I wonder if the authors of
> this software (and perhaps yourself) believe that full-featured IDEs
> are not the best way to work ;-)  Not being an IDE can be a desirable
> feature, after all!

I don't know about the authors; as far as I'm concerned, I've coded
with emacs for 20+ years so I'm still trying to decide which way to go.
I guess it depends on project/language. But I do like Code's
minimalistic approach.

-- 
[]'s,

Francisco M Neto 
www.fmneto.com

3E58 1655 9A3D 5D78 9F90
CFF1 D30B 1694 D692 FBF0


OpenPGP_0xD30B1694D692FBF0.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#989629: ITP: elementary-code -- Essential code editor with tab support

2021-06-09 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Francisco!

On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 23:51, Francisco M Neto  wrote:
>
> Elementary Code earlier called Scratch, is an IDE
> designed with simplicity in mind. It offers essential functionalities
> such as git support, multi-panel and miniview support and extensions
> for integration with the Terminal and web visualization.
>
> It is written from scratch, with support for plugins. Its purpose is
> to be lightweight and extensible, with plenty of customization
> options. It support syntax highlighting for a wide range of
> programming languages.
>
> It is a minimalist, extensible GTK-based IDE that is not dependent
> on GNOME. It follows the Elementary Human Interface Guidelines.

Cool :-)  By the way, how is Elementary Code, an IDE?  Upstream calls
it a "[code-specific] text-editor" here (
https://medium.com/elementaryos/scratch-is-now-code-2838e03134c7 ),
and it sounds like Code is intended to be like Atom, "a hackable text
editor" ( https://atom.io ), rather than something like GNOME Builder
or XCode ( 
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/7oi8nf/scratch_text_editor_is_now_elementary_code/dsafxmb/?utm_source=reddit_medium=web2x=3
).

If you'd like to use "IDE" in the long description to make it
discoverable with keyword or regex searches, maybe something could be
written about how Code is more than a text editor, but that it's for
people who don't want a full-featured IDE?  Does it support templates,
macros, code folding, any kind of linting or language server-based IDE
features (LSP), tab completion of variable, function, or class names,
etc?  More simply, does it have an LSP plugin like
https://github.com/atom-community/atom-languageclient or is one
planned?  Ideally it'd be nice if upstream could make a statement
about their vision and objectives for Code on its homepage
https://github.com/elementary/code

Because you use the keyword "minimalist", I wonder if the authors of
this software (and perhaps yourself) believe that full-featured IDEs
are not the best way to work ;-)  Not being an IDE can be a desirable
feature, after all!

Regards,
Nicholas



Processed: BTS 985678 - owner

2021-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> owner 985678 taihsian...@ubuntu.com
Bug #985678 [wnpp] "ITA: rasdaemon -- utility to receive RAS error tracings"
Owner changed from Taihsiang Ho  to taihsian...@ubuntu.com.
> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
985678: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985678
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Re: BTS 985678

2021-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> owner 985678 taihsian...@ubuntu.com
Bug #985678 [wnpp] "ITA: rasdaemon -- utility to receive RAS error tracings"
Owner recorded as taihsian...@ubuntu.com.
> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
985678: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985678
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Re: BTS 985678

2021-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> owner 985678 !
Bug #985678 [wnpp] "ITA: rasdaemon -- utility to receive RAS error tracings"
Owner changed from taihsian...@ubuntu.com to Taihsiang Ho .
> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
985678: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985678
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: BTS 985678

2021-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 985678 "ITA: rasdaemon -- utility to receive RAS error tracings"
Bug #985678 [wnpp] "ITA: rasdaemon -- utility to receive RAS error tracings"
Ignoring request to change the title of bug#985678 to the same title
> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
985678: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985678
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: BTS 985678

2021-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 985678 "ITA: rasdaemon -- utility to receive RAS error tracings"
Bug #985678 [wnpp] O: rasdaemon -- utility to receive RAS error tracings
Changed Bug title to '"ITA: rasdaemon -- utility to receive RAS error 
tracings"' from 'O: rasdaemon -- utility to receive RAS error tracings'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
985678: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985678
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#866502: ITP: element-web: web-based matrix client

2021-06-09 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Robbi,

Quoting Robbi Nespu (2021-06-09 05:11:47)
> Hello! Is there any update for this ITP?
> If there is pending issue, where I can take a look the existing work?

Preparations was done privately till now.  Thanks to your sharing 
interest in it, I have now pushed my (still preliminary) work and will 
from now on maintain it publicly at 
https://salsa.debian.org/matrix-team/matrix-element

As is common for Node.js projects, the pending issues are a range of 
Node.js libraries not yet packaged for Debian - see e.g. the commented 
out lines at 
https://salsa.debian.org/matrix-team/matrix-element/-/blob/debian/latest/debian/control

In case you (or others reading this) want to help, then concretely the 
most urgently needed library is cpx - but you are welcome to dive in and 
package any of the missing libraries, of course :-).


Kind regards,

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

signature.asc
Description: signature


Bug#989641: ITP: simplematch -- Minimal, super readable string pattern matching for Python

2021-06-09 Thread Frédéric Bonnard
Package: wnpp
Owner: Frédéric Bonnard 
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: simplematch
  Version : 1.3
  Upstream Author : Thomas Feldmann 
* URL : https://github.com/tfeldmann/simplematch
* License : Expat
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description : Minimal, super readable string pattern matching for Python

simplematch aims to fill a gap between parsing with str.split() and
regular expressions. It should be as simple as possible, fast and
stable.
The simplematch syntax is transpiled to regular expressions under the
hood, so matching performance should be just as good.

This small library is a dependency of "organize" tool that I intend to
package as well.

--
F.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#989639: ITP: organize -- File management automation tool

2021-06-09 Thread Frédéric Bonnard
Package: wnpp
Owner: Frédéric Bonnard 
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: organize
  Version : 1.10.1
  Upstream Author : Thomas Feldmann 
* URL : https://github.com/tfeldmann/organize
* License : Expat
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description : File management automation tool

organize is a command line utility to automate file organization tasks.
A list of folders containing files to organize are provided in a
configuration file.
A list of filters can be applied to those files : filtering can be done by
file extension, last modified date, regular expressions and many more.
And a list of actions will be applied to the filtered files : they can
put them into the trash, move them into another folder and many more.

--
F


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#964074: Status?

2021-06-09 Thread Julien Puydt
Le mercredi 09 juin 2021 à 08:56 +0200, Adam Cecile a écrit :
> It's actually packaged but not uploaded:
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-jose
> If you're interested in sponsoring the upload, please let me know so
> I can first make a quick refresh of packaging.

I found this packaging after I filed the report. We're in deep freeze,
so I won't upload anything yet, but you can still work on it :

1. lintian finds quite a few things to complain about (I ran lintian -I
--pedantic on the .dsc) ; some might require a source repack to get
around (the RFC licensing issue) ;

2. lintian didn't complain but standards-version isn't up to date
either ;

3. a new upstream is out.

Cheers,

JP



Bug#964074: Status?

2021-06-09 Thread Adam Cecile

Hello,

It's actually packaged but not uploaded:

https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-jose

If you're interested in sponsoring the upload, please let me know so I 
can first make a quick refresh of packaging.


Regards, Adam.

On 6/9/21 8:43 AM, Julien Puydt wrote:

Hi,

I stumbled on a project where I would need python-jose -- what's the
status of this ITP?

JP


Bug#964074: Status?

2021-06-09 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi,

I stumbled on a project where I would need python-jose -- what's the
status of this ITP?

JP