Hi,
On Tuesday 14 December 2004 23:35, Josselin Mouette wrote:
First, please don't send mails to the BTS with a local address.
Le mardi 14 décembre 2004 à 20:06 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
Yes, how I cursed that one, once I realised it had got out.
I sent three ITPs, and one made it out wrong. I knew some one would spot it,
nonetheless ;)
snip
* Package name: libxbox-dev
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : David Pye [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.xbox-linux.org
* License : GPL
Description : Libxbox-dev provides the headers for libxbox0 and the
libxbox.so symlink
snip again
Why do you need to make it a separate source package?
Ah. So that's what I did wrong, maybe.
The two packages build from the same source. Does that mean a single ITP is
necessary? I have not raised ITPs before, so was not sure exactly.
One question this raises in my mind:
suppose I have a single source tar.gz, that I want to build into four debian
binary packages, with different names (obviously). If this should require
only one ITP, which package name should the ITP be made for?
David
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s-: a-- C++ UL P L+++ E--- W++ N+ o+ K- w---
O M V- PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP t 5- X+ R- tv+ b+ DI++ D+
G+ e++ h--- r++ y++
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
