Bug#797689: O: ssss
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I am no longer maintaining this package. It would be good to have someone else to take care of it. Thanks, James
Bug#797688: O: seccure
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I am no longer maintaining this package, so it would benefit from someone else taking care of it. Thanks, James
Bug#542789: ITP: ubuntu-dev-tools -- useful tools for Ubuntu developers
On Thu Oct 15 13:10:38 +0100 2009 Luca Falavigna wrote: Lucas Nussbaum ha scritto: - python-launchpadlib: still needs to be packaged (package available in Ubuntu, of course) - python-wadllib: still neds to be packaged (package available in Ubuntu) As I'm not really into packaging python modules, it would be better if someone from the Python modules team would package python-launchpadlib and python-wadllib. Any volunteers? Given that James Westby was working on those, I'd like to hear from him about his progresses. I could eventually take care of the two packages myself under DPMT hat if James had no time. I have been meaning to do this, but I haven't got round to checking the packages and finding a sponsor. Note that the full dependency set is python-launchpadlib python-lazr.restfulclient python-wadllib python-oauth python-lazr.uri (Someone else filed an ITP for python-oauth the other day). I would be happy for these to be taken over by DPMT as I know that you do great work. Thanks, James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#532703: ITP: lazr.uri -- library for parsing, manipulating, and generating URIs
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: James Westby james.wes...@ubuntu.com * Package name: lazr.uri (binary package python-lazr-uri) Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : lazr developers: https://launchpad.net/~lazr-developers * URL : https://launchpad.net/lazr.uri * License : LGPL (3 or later) Programming Lang: Python Description : library for parsing, manipulating, and generating URIs A self-contained, easily reusable, python library for parsing, manipulating and generating URIs. With it you can extract parts of a URL, compare URIs to see if one contains another, search for URIs in text, and many other things. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#387971: ITP: mod_gnutls -- uses the GnuTLS library to provide SSL v3, TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 encryption for Apache
noowner 387971 retitle 387971 RFP: mod-gnutls -- uses the GnuTLS library to provide SSL v3, TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 encryption for Apache thanks Hi, I am afraid I am having to return this bug to an RFP. There are two reasons for this. The first is that I am short on time, and so I don't want to take on another package. The second is that the software has not had a release in a long time, and there is no activity around it, however I am not sure that is an indication that the project is dead, or merely just having little interest. If anyone would like to take this package on I don't have much to offer. It does require relibtoolizing, and that was hampered by a broken libtool at the time. I have a patch to work around the latter if it still occurs (you get an error about missing tags). Apologies if I blocked anyone else from working on this. Thanks, James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385349: alternative: loggerhead
On (18/03/07 13:06), Michael Biebl wrote: Hi all, I just wanted to draw your attention to loggerhead [1]. I don't know bazaar-webserve well enough and also played only a little with loggerhead, so I can't make a fair comparison. Might be interesting for bzr.debian.org though. Hi, I know of loggerhead, and it is nice. However it is a turbogears application, making it harder to package, and perhaps not ideal for alioth, though that is the admins' call. A pkg-bzr team is currently forming, and we might package loggerhead as part of that. Thanks, James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#409563: ITP: thinkfinger -- library and utility for the SGS Thomson Microelectronics fingerprint reader
On (07/02/07 23:39), Luca Capello wrote: [2] I still have a problem, because e.g. PAM module for the SGS Thomson Microelectronics fingerprint reader is longer than the expected 60 characters for the short description. Suggestions welcome! Perhaps you can drop the word Microelectronics from the short description. Yes, this was my choice after Rafael Laboissiere privately suggested. Is it really manufactured by SGS Thompson? Is it not from ST Microelectronics? I didn't think the SGS Thompson name was used any more, even if it still exists. Thanks, James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325824: ITP: ninja -- Privilege escalation detection system for GNU\Linux
On (18/11/06 19:11), Christoph Berg wrote: noowner 325824 retitle 325824 RFP: ninja -- Privilege escalation detection system for GNU\Linux thanks Re: James Westby 2006-09-09 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you still interested in packaging ninja? I have reopened the bug, as if you are not, I will look in to packaging it myself. Hi, the submitter of this bug is MIA, retitling to RFP. Yeah, that's great, thanks. Just a note for the bug report that I do still intend to package this, but it may be a while before I do, and I'm quite happy for anyone else to do it in the mean time. James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#392904: ITP: bkhive -- dumps the syskey bootkey from a Windows NT/2K/XP system hive
On (14/10/06 07:16), Adam Cécile wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: bkhive Description : dumps the syskey bootkey from a Windows NT/2K/XP system hive This tool is needed by ophcrack, a Microsoft Windows password cracker using rainbow tables. Hi Adam, I don't know if this is going to be the description for the package, but it is more a description of another package. It would be good if you could explain what this package is. James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391770: RFP: libbotan -- C++ crypto library
On (08/10/06 18:28), Daniel Baumann wrote: retitle 391770 ITP: libbotan -- C++ crypto library owner 391770 Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] tags 391770 +pending thanks Hi, I made a package of botan some time ago, since there seems to be a demand for having it in Debian, I'll rebuild it on todays sid and upload it to NEW in a few minutes. There was some discussion the other day about patent issues surrounding the IDEA, and RC family of ciphers. This package includes implementations of these ciphers. Should there be some consideration of these issues? Will this happen on the trip through the NEW queue? James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385349: ITP: bazaar-webserve -- allow a bzr branch to be accessed via the web
On (22/09/06 11:44), James Westby wrote: Hi, The developer sent me the 0.10 release yesterday, so I have polished off the package to have something usable hopefully. I have placed packages (source and _all) at http://jameswestby.net/debian/ package bazaar-webserve. You want version 0.10-1. Arnaud is now co-maintainer, and he hasn't given me the thumbs up on the package yet, so it might change a little before upload, but hopefully not too much. I would appreciate it if you could try the package and let me know if you find any problems. I would also like to know if there is enough documentation, whether the configuration snippets are good enough, and whether your use case is catered for. If not then I can try and modify the package to support it. There has been a new upstream release, so now there are 0.11-1 packages at the same location. James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362216: Package available
On (02/10/06 10:49), Michal Čihař wrote: On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:07:14 +0100 James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am ignorant about this package, could you tell me whether the source is included? What do you exactly mean by source? Packaging only moves dictionary to correct location. The source tarball only contains those dictionaries. BTW: I'm also the one who provides dictionary data [1] which are converted from CSV data available from the project [2]. [1]: http://cihar.com/software/slovnik/ [2]: http://slovnik.zcu.cz/ Ok, so by source I probably meant these CSV files, what the GPL calls preferred form of modification. If the package is GPL (I forget) then this is required to be distributable. My concerns were raised due to the fact that the source package only contains binary files, so it is unlikely that is the format they are edited in. James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362216: Package available
On (22/09/06 10:19), Michal Čihař wrote: Package is available on mentors.debian.net, I'm looking for sponsor. I am looking for a sponsor for my package stardict-english-czech. * Package name: stardict-english-czech Hi, You should send this message to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org if you want to find a sponsor, more people will see it there. I cannot sponsor the package, but I have a couple of comments for you, I am ignorant about this package, could you tell me whether the source is included? You should add a copyright and license statement about the Debian packaging to debian/copyright. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html You don't need the configure target in debian/rules. James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385349: ITP: bazaar-webserve -- allow a bzr branch to be accessed via the web
On (03/09/06 20:19), Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Sun, 03 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote: I have spoken to the developer, and he says he will make releases, starting one for bzr 0.10 which is due out soon (tomorrow). I can wait at least the upcoming release, there's no hurry. :-) Hi, The developer sent me the 0.10 release yesterday, so I have polished off the package to have something usable hopefully. I have placed packages (source and _all) at http://jameswestby.net/debian/ package bazaar-webserve. You want version 0.10-1. Arnaud is now co-maintainer, and he hasn't given me the thumbs up on the package yet, so it might change a little before upload, but hopefully not too much. I would appreciate it if you could try the package and let me know if you find any problems. I would also like to know if there is enough documentation, whether the configuration snippets are good enough, and whether your use case is catered for. If not then I can try and modify the package to support it. Thanks, James -- James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
On (21/09/06 22:06), Mike Hommey wrote: On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:56:38PM +0200, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, still working on the final security patches. Its because my work-capacity has been significantly reduced during the last few weeks by severe private-life hazards. Please understand that I have to fix some real life issues first. I regret all this, but I did not choose this doom either. I would understand if you would not go ahead lifting this package as I have to admit that I will not be able to put much time into this any-time soon (at least not till nov). No problem, I'll try to do something with my own spare time. Good luck with your RL issues, whatever they are. Mike Hi all, Sorry to but in, but have you seen the log of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=350740 This guy seems pretty interested and active. It seems your work and his are uncoordinated at the moment though. Thanks, James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385437: RFH: loop-aes
Hi Max, I am willing to lend you a hand with the loop-aes packages. I'm not sure how much help I will be, as I've not done kernel related stuff before. I will also hopefully (???) have less free time soon. Get in touch if you are interested in my offer, and let me know if I can help. James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387612: RFP: python-debtags -- Access Debtags information from python
On (19/09/06 21:56), Enrico Zini wrote: [Hi Dato!] On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:15:05PM +0100, James Westby wrote: I have a basic package at http://jameswestby.net/scratch/python-debtags_0.1-1.dsc I am willing to finish the package off if you do not want to take it from here, but only if you add a license and copyright information. There are also a few other things that would be good, but I'll leave that for now. Let me know if you want me to continue, Thanks a lot, I've imported your changes in the debtags svn repo and added the missing license information. Now I'm wondering how to proceed: there are two options: one is I give you access to the svn repo on Alioth and you continue with the packaging. The other is that we merge Debtags.py into the work of the pkg-python-debian project. I've noticed from the list archives that you're involved there, too. Yes, I am, though I'm not too sure what dato's plans are for the package. I'll be happy with either solution. I've Cc-ed Adeodato to ask if he would like this work to be part of pkg-python-debian. Besides sorting out the place where this module belongs, I'd really like you to continue: that'd be of great help to me. That's fine. I'm happy to continue. Thanks for making the changes. James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387971: RFP: mod_gnutls -- uses the GnuTLS library to provide SSL v3, TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 encryption for Apache
retitle 387971 ITP: mod_gnutls -- uses the GnuTLS library to provide TLS encyption for apache owner 387971 ! thanks On (17/09/06 09:48), Jack Bates wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist mod_gnutls uses the GnuTLS library to provide SSL v3, TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 encryption for Apache HTTPD. It is similar to mod_ssl in purpose, but does not use OpenSSL. Homepage: http://www.outoforder.cc/projects/apache/mod_gnutls/ I'll take this. I'm not sure how quickly I can get it packaged though. If you want pre-release packages let me know, but they will come with the usual caveats. Also the web page says that it is not ready for use. I'm not sure how far away it is, but I might keep it out of etch in that case. I wish this module were in Debian, so I could use gpg keys for https. That would be cool. I can't see any mention of this in a quick reading of the webpage though. Is this just due to gnutls's support of OpenPGP keys? As always co-maintainers are welcome. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#387612: RFP: python-debtags -- Access Debtags information from python
On (15/09/06 13:43), Enrico Zini wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: python-debtags I'm looking for someone to package svn://svn.debian.org/debtags/python for me: it's simple enough python stuff (one Debian.py and a few runnable scripts, but they use set() and so they require at least python 2.4), but I don't want to learn the python policy just for it. I have a basic package at http://jameswestby.net/scratch/python-debtags_0.1-1.dsc I am willing to finish the package off if you do not want to take it from here, but only if you add a license and copyright information. There are also a few other things that would be good, but I'll leave that for now. Let me know if you want me to continue, James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385349: ITP: bzr-plugin-webserve -- web interface for bazaar-ng
On (12/09/06 15:15), Arnaud Fontaine wrote: I have merged this bug. Sorry for the noise. James: would you like to do co-maintaining ? Yes, that would be fine with me. Contact me in private to discuss it. James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387234: ITA: ssss -- Shamir's secret sharing scheme implementation
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I'll take this one. I package another piece of software by the same author. James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#386991: ITP: bzr-plugin-webserve -- web interface for bazaar-ng
owner 386991 ! merge 385349 386991 thanks On (11/09/06 16:05), Arnaud Fontaine wrote: Package: wnpp Owner: Arnaud Fontaine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity: wishlist * Package name: bzr-plugin-webserve Version : web interface for bazaar-ng Hi Arnaud, I already have an ITP open for this package under a different name. I have now merged the bugs. I have not finished the package yet as the author told me he would start making releases in a form that was easier to package. Let me know if you are still interested in packaging the software. James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325824: ITP: ninja -- Privilege escalation detection system for GNU\Linux
package wnpp reopen 325824 thanks Hi, Are you still interested in packaging ninja? I have reopened the bug, as if you are not, I will look in to packaging it myself. James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385349: ITP: bazaar-webserve -- allow a bzr branch to be accessed via the web
On (03/09/06 18:17), Raphael Hertzog wrote: Le mercredi 30 août 2006, James Westby a écrit : The upstream name of this software is bazaar-webserve, so I am going with that, but bzr-webserve would fit in better with the rest of the debian bzr naming scheme. Indeed. On the other hand, bazaar will quickly fade out and bzr will probably take over the bazaar word again. That's true. I have put version unknown as there have not been any releases as such. I am going to contact the author and ask whether he will be making releases. If he isn't then I will package appropriately named snapshots. Please, when you have a packaged ready, tell me. We want to deploy this software on http://bzr.debian.org and I'm reluctant to using non-packaged software. So I'd appreciate if you could create a first package even with a version 0~bzr166 which mentions only the bzr revision of the upstream repository. I have something pretty basic at the moment, but it's certainly not ready for upload (no copyright file for a start). I have spoken to the developer, and he says he will make releases, starting one for bzr 0.10 which is due out soon (tomorrow). His next release will include proper copyright/license information which will allow me to finish the package off. I slowed my work because of this, so the package is still a little raw. I can let you have an experimental version now though if you would like. James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385349: ITP: bazaar-webserve -- allow a bzr branch to be accessed via the web
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: bazaar-webserve Version : Unknown Upstream Author : Goffredo Baroncelli kreijack AT inwind DOT it * URL : http://goffredo-baroncelli.homelinux.net/bazaar-dev/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: Python Description : allow a bzr branch to be accessed via the Web bazaar-webserve provides both a plugin to bzr, and set of cgi scripts that allow a bzr branch to be accessed over the Web. It is similar in intent to websvn and gitweb. . It first provides a command (webserve) to bzr which starts up a server and receives HTTP requests. It can also work via CGI and so use a HTTP server to handle the requests. . It allows for browsing of the repository, and for browsing through revisions and viewing diffs between revisions. It can also be configured to provide a .tar.gz download of a requested revision, and to allow branching from the hosted branch. . Homepage: http://goffredo-baroncelli.homelinux.net/bazaar-dev/ The upstream name of this software is bazaar-webserve, so I am going with that, but bzr-webserve would fit in better with the rest of the debian bzr naming scheme. I have put version unknown as there have not been any releases as such. I am going to contact the author and ask whether he will be making releases. If he isn't then I will package appropriately named snapshots. James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#384474: ITP: weplab -- tool designed to break WEP keys
On (25/08/06 01:20), Nico Golde wrote: Btw, I have removed my current weplab package from mentors to reupload a fixed release but dupload say me the package is already present on mentors ftp ?!?!? How can I reupload it ? I dont know if there are any special package treatments for mentors.debian.net (I never used it) but it should be no problem to build a -2 revision and upload it. I don't think its necessary to upload a -2 for this (or even a good idea). m.d.n allows you to reupload the same version for this sort of reason. To the OP, is it saying it can't upload as the server wont let it, or is it saying it will not upload as dupload/dput thinks it has already uploaded that version (without asking the server). This will be the case if there is still an upload file in the directory. Delete this and it should work. James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#360524: Current package state
On (06/08/06 14:20), gandalf wrote: Hello, I'm still working of the packaging but I have some issues I don't know how to fix. Here's the linitian errors : W: audacious-plugins-extra: binary-without-manpage audacious-arts-helper W: audacious: binary-without-manpage audtool W: audacious: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/bin/audacious /usr/lib W: audacious: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/bin/audtool /usr/lib I'll write a manpage for audtool. audacious-arts-helper shouldn't be in path because it's an helper for the Arts output plugin. I should move it to /usr/lib/audacious/ but I don't know how to do it. May you help me ? [Apologies if this is a bit brief, it;s the third time of trying] Try usr/bin/audacious-arts-helper usr/lib/audacious/ in debian/audacious-plugins-extra.package. See dh_install(1) for more info. The two warning about rpath shouldn't exists too because I configured audacious with --disable-rpath. I don't knwo how to fix them. Apparently --disable-rpath doesn't work. It might be worth trying to work out why it thinks it needs it. What arch are you building on? A couple more points pkg-config is needed in Build-Depends. pbuilder can help to catch this sort of thing. libvisual is now libvisual-0.4-dev in sid (which you should be targetting). It looks like libtag1-dev should be preferred to libtagc0-dev, but I'm not entirely sure. James -- James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323420: Metasploit packaging - license issues
Hi Luciano, I hope you are well. So debian-legal helped point out the places where metasploit in its current state makes it undistributable, and the new license is not DFSG free. How would you like to proceed now? Do you want to conatact the developers to try and make an effort to sort all of this out? James -- James Westby -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#378987: ITP: seccure
Update - I have tidied up the packaging and I am now looking for a sponsor. The updated packages are available from mentors.debian.net. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/seccure/ James. -- James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jameswestby.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#378987: seccure packages available
Preliminary packages of seccure are available from http://jameswestby.net/debian/ Note that these are experimental packages, but I don't expect them to change significantly before upload. I have a couple of things to check and then I will ask for a sponsor. James -- James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jameswestby.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323420: License issues with metasploit-framework
likely to be discovered and read. Online Updates The Software includes the ability to download updates (i.e., additional code) from the Developer's server(s). These updates may contain bug fixes, new functionality, updated Documentation, and/or Extensions. When retrieving these updates, the Software may transmit the Software version and operating system information from Your computer to the update server. The server may record (store) this information, in conjunction with the IP (global Internet Protocol) address of the user, in order to attempt to maintain accurate end user / version statistics. By using the online update feature, You hereby agree to allow this information to be transmitted, recorded, and stored in any nation by or for the Developer. Proper Use As an express condition of this License, You agree that You will use the Software -solely- in compliance with all then-applicable local, state, national, and international laws, rules and regulations as may be amended or supplemented from time to time, including any then-current laws and/or regulations regarding the transmission and/or encryption of technical data exported from or imported into Your country of residence. Violation of any of the foregoing may result in immediate, automatic termination of this License without notice, and may subject You to state, national and/or international penalties and other legal consequences. Copyright and Trademark Product names, words or phrases mentioned in this License or the Software may be trademark(s) or servicemark(s) of the Developer registered in certain nations and/or of third parties. You may not alter or supplement the copyright or trademark notices as contained in the Software. License Termination This License is effective until terminated. This License will terminate immediately without notice from the Developer if You breach or fail to comply with any provision of this License. Upon such termination You must destroy the Software, all accompanying written materials, and all copies thereof. Limitations of Liability In no event will the Developer, any contributor, owner, or licensee, or any third party affiliated with Developer be liable to You or any third party for any consequential, incidental, indirect or special damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, loss of expected savings, loss of confidential information, presence of viruses, damages for loss of profits, business interruption, loss of business information and the like or otherwise) or any related expense whether foreseeable or not, arising out of the use of or inability to use or any failure of the Software or accompanying materials, regardless of the basis of the claim and even if the Developer or a Developer's representative has been advised of the possibility of such damage, and even in the event of the failure of an exclusive remedy. You hereby acknowledge, by using the Software, the reasonability of this liability limitation provision, that Developer would not offer the Software without the inclusion and enforceability of this provision, and that You (and not the Software) are solely responsible for Your network, data, and application security testing, planning , audits, updates, and training, which require regular analysis, supplementing, and expertise. No Warranty The Software and this License document are provided AS IS with NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING THE WARRANTY OF DESIGN, MERCHANTABILITY, TITLE, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Indemnification You agree to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the Developer and Developer's owners, contributors, agents, and business partners from and against any and all claims or actions including reasonable legal expenses that arise or result from Your use of or inability to use the Software. Developer agrees to notify You and reasonably cooperate with Your defense of any third party claim triggering such indemnification. Miscellaneous If any part of this License is found void and unenforceable, it will not affect the validity of the balance of the License, which shall remain valid and enforceable to the maximum extent according to its terms. Choice of Law; Venue The License will be construed, interpreted and governed by the laws of Texas, USA, without regard to its conflict of law rules. Any litigation related to this License must be filed and heard in the courts for Travis County, Texas. To download version 3.0 of the Metasploit Framework, you must acknowledge your acceptance of this license by clicking the 'Accept this License' button below. === The webpage requires a click through of this license to get the source. How does this license look? If it is DFSG-free, then the best option is probably to package this version. Apologies for dumping everything here, but I want to be clear about the legal issues before proceeding. Thanks, James -- James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED
Bug#374104: apt-listbugs
[Cced the bug again so that there is a record] On (09/07/06 19:09), Nigel Jones wrote: Hi, I have noticed your interest in Debian bug 374104 [1], the orphanage of apt-listbugs [2], and I am wondering if you are maybe planning to ITAing it yourself, if not, I will do so, and if that is the case, be really keen to fix certain bugs with you, i.e. the ones you have created patches for etc. As I said in my first mail to the bug I don't really plan to adopt it, just to tidy it up, as the whole package is RC-buggy in my opinion. I have sent patches to the BTS where a clean patch was possible for the bug report, but I have much more done in my local copy. I can let you have my latest source if you let me know how you want it. It is an svn repo that starts from the current unstable package at the moment. I would be interested in working with you until the packages are in a decent shape again, how do you feel about this? My current version (I think) fixes all the bugs that do not require a major overhaul of the code. It also leaves the version tracking etc. problems as it appears the problem is within the code that generates the files that apt-listbugs uses to get the bug states, and I do not have access to that code. I believe that it runs on merkel, so maybe a DD can access it and make it publically available. Also out of interest, are you a DD? No, unfortuanately not. I was going to get a QA upload done, but as you are adopting then you can seek out a proper sponsor. James -- James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jameswestby.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#374104: apt-listbugs
On (11/07/06 08:19), Nigel Jones wrote: So, far I have been attempting to incorporate your patches into the code, but I have decided to start from scratch again, and try and kill the RC bug (334697), I have been in contact with Aba (Andreas) and we should have some fresh data files built (based off the output of bts2ldap), I'm sure it can be easily phased by apt-listbugs with a bit of work. apt-listbugs shouldn't need much modification unless you modify the format or location of the files. I'm sure your work will go a long way to fixing all of the problems though. Again, I'll say that I have a complete source package with all of my modifications included that you could use as a base. The modifications are away form the version-tracking and bug-handling code for the most part, so changes should be easy to handle. I'm unsure about the wisdom of having the code that generates the files not publically accessible, as this to me seems like part of the source of apt-listbugs. I'm sure that there is no legal argument to that effect, but it seems to go against the spirit of the project. It also hinders contributions, as only a few people can see the code and so diagnose bugs in it, and provide patches that might have been able to fix the problem long ago. Perhaps this is something you could consider as maintainer of the package. The code which i've seen (on the qa.debian.org side), is just making a copy of all the .status files from the bts spool, which I believe sometime soon are going to be no more, which seems to suggest that a complete rewrite of the checking side of the program. This might be a good idea anyway. From what I have seen these files are the source of the bugs related to this, and the reason the package is RC buggy in the first place. In my opinion most of the important bugs should also be RC, but it's not my place to elevate them (though most will probably be fixed along with the RC one by the same changes). Sadly however, it may not be possible to run the code at say midnight when the archive gets updates, due to what I am told is already busy load on qa., so we may need a message in listbugs stating that the data may be upto 12/24 hours out of date, we'll get to that when we come to it. This makes sense, though I'm not sure it needs to be runtime output, it could just be in README and perhaps the package description. James -- James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jameswestby.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#376588: ITP: cryptmount
Please see #375008 and http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/06/msg00193.html James -- James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jameswestby.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#374104: O: apt-listbugs
Hi, I have been doing some work on solving the simple bug reports of apt-listbugs. I do not intend to adopt the package, but hopefully I can do enough to warrant a QA team upload. I have been sending my patches to the BTS so that they will not be lost at any rate. I am not adverse to anyone ITAing tis package, but can I suggest that if someone does they contact me so that my work does not go to waste, and they don't have to collect all the patches from the bts. Thanks, James -- James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jameswestby.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#375004: RFP: xmlroff - XSL-FO formatter
On (22/06/06 19:22), W. Borgert wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: xmlroff See #182445 James -- James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jameswestby.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323420: Status update?
Luciano Bello wrote: El Martes, 23 de Mayo de 2006 17:37, James Westby escribió: Could you please confirm the current status of this ITP? I'm was with much work. I'm still working on it. probably will be a release candidate in the next week. I would be interested in helping with this package if you agree. I have had an initial look and it does look difficult with lots of pitfalls. Could you let me know when you have a version together and I'll take a look. BTW, what's your opinion with metasploit v3.0? I think the license will have to go to debian-legal, I might do this in a week or so. I think the two versions should be packaged separately if they are both to be in. What do you think of setting up a metasploit alioth group to handle these packages? luciano James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309562: Dependencies
If reopens this bug, note that it depends on Math::Pari, which will be the more difficult of the two to package (it has quite an intimate relationship with the Pari/GP source. James -- James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jameswestby.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323420: Status update?
Could you please confirm the current status of this ITP? James -- James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jameswestby.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#201472: Dead upstream?
Are you still interested in this software? It hasn't been touched upstream in 3 years, and the code is in terrible shape. James -- James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jameswestby.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
