Bug#579509: ctpl version 0.3 available at m.d.n
Le Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:34:19 +0100, Evgeni Golov evg...@debian.org a écrit : On 10/17/2010 10:35 PM, Jonathan Michalon wrote: I've just uploaded a new package of ctpl on debian-mentors. It involves version 0.3, which introduces an ABI / API break. I've managed this the best way I can for now, but I'm not sure whether this is correct, especially for the symbols file. Hi Jonathan, first of all a HUGE sorry for not mailing you about ctpl before. Yes, I still want to upload it, and I think we can manage it in a breeze. :) Your symbols update looks good (as far as I can tell). Lintian told me (with --pedantic), that the packages did not have an upstream changelog and looking at the upstream tarball it seems the changelog is in NEWS for upstream, thus I added the following to debian/rules: override_dh_installchangelogs: dh_installchangelogs NEWS packaging-wise this is the only change I'd do before uploading, so you did a really good job here! I'd like to discuss some orga stuff before uploading though. ctpl is currently only needed for geany-plugins (in which you are interested IIRC). Thus I'd like to suggest you join pkg-geany on Alioth [1], we put your package into Git there and maintain with three pairs of eyes for two distributions from there. Oh, and I promise to upload fast from now on :) [1] https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-geany/ Hi, No problem for the delay. I was just a little fearing duplicate effort. As you can see on the ITP Chow Loong Jin already uploaded to ubuntu and corrected my package, so if the quality is high it's also thanks to him! About the NEWS / Changelog issue we discussed at that time (with upstream, he is a friend of mine) but concluded that the shipped NEWS was no true changelog as it is expected to be (in whatever reference we found) so I decided to let it as NEWS. If you think its worth as changelog, why not! Your orga stuff sounds pretty good to me. I was always lacking some git to update the package, for example to write the changelog a git diff is really interesting. Of course you will have to cope with a complete noob on alioth but I will try to avoid breaking thinks too quickly... I will ask for membership on the link you provided just now. Thanks, -- Jonathan Michalon Étudiant en informatique -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110316210009.0e55e...@runningpinguin.chalmion.homelinux.net
Bug#579509: ctpl version 0.3.2 available at m.d.n
Hi everybody ! I've uploaded a new version which takes Chow Loong Jin's remarks into account. Thanks to him! Le Thu, 20 Jan 2011 03:22:39 +0800, Chow Loong Jin hyper...@ubuntu.com a écrit : Hi Johnathan, I can't sponsor your package (I've already uploaded 0.3.2 to Ubuntu though), but I'd like to drop a few notes from what I've noticed while bringing ctpl up to date in Ubuntu. This may sound as duplicate work, but as I'm quite new to packaging so this way I learn a lot more. I don't know however whether this will make conflicts at Ubuntu sync time… in case this package get uploaded to main Debian. 1. libctpl2.symbols should not be copied from libctpl1.symbols. This is because libctpl1.symbols was for libctpl.so.1, but libctpl2.symbols is for libctpl.so.2. If you have a symbol that's versioned 0.2, for example, then what could happen is that you get a package that depends on libctpl2 (= 0.2), but libctpl2 did not exist prior to 0.3, when the SONAME bump took place. Understood and done. 2. Evgeni mentioned this to me sometime back, but I'm not sure if the message reached you -- static libraries shouldn't be packaged at all, so please drop /usr/lib/lib*.a from libctpl-dev.install Done. Effectivly I didn't know about that before. 3. ctpl is only built if gio-2.0 = 2.24 is found, and gio-2.0 is part of libglib2.0-dev, so you'll need to bump the version for that in the build-dep to 2.24 rather than leaving it at 2.16. Done too. Was a oops. 4. Why are you build-dep'ing on libglib2.0-doc? I'm not sure whether this is really needed. This is needed so that gtk-doc can create links to glib's pages in the html documentation . As libctpl heavily uses glib types and facilities I thought that this will greatly improve the doc's usability. 5. Drop the libctpl2 depends from ctpl in debian/control. dh_shlibdeps will pick it up on its own, with a more accurate dependency. Okay, done. 6. I'm not sure why libctpl-doc recommends libglib2.0-doc. Is that really necessary? This is related to 4). If we link to glib's doc, it's recommended (but not absolutely necessary) that libglib2.0-doc be installed. Apart from that, I think the package looks fine :-) Thanks! I'm waiting for Squeeze's release and end of deep freeze to seek for a sponsor. -- Jonathan Michalon Étudiant en informatique -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110122163959.1c738...@runningpinguin.chalmion.homelinux.net
Bug#579509: ctpl version 0.3.1 available at m.d.n
Hi ! Yet another release, yet another package. I've just uploaded ctpl 0.3.1 on m.d.n. This is just a small release, i.e. no break and nothing problematic. @Bhavani Shankar: I've seen you uploaded the 0.3 version in natty, so I'm thinking you may be interested by this news. You have been CC'ed as such. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ctpl - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ctpl/ctpl_0.3.1-1.dsc Best Regards Jonathan Michalon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101115191452.5a3e1...@runningpinguin.chalmion.homelinux.net
Bug#579509: ctpl version 0.3 available at m.d.n
Hi, I've just uploaded a new package of ctpl on debian-mentors. It involves version 0.3, which introduces an ABI / API break. I've managed this the best way I can for now, but I'm not sure whether this is correct, especially for the symbols file. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ctpl - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ctpl/ctpl_0.3-1.dsc Kind Regards Jonathan Michalon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101017223529.3fdec...@runningpinguin.chalmion.homelinux.net
Bug#579509: ctpl package ready, new version 0.2.2
Le Mon, 14 Jun 2010 04:41:42 +0800, Chow Loong Jin hyper...@ubuntu.com a écrit : Yes, it does appear that it is required by GeanyGenDoc, and I've taken a look at the package though I can't upload it. Some comments: * Please don't run autogen.sh, the configure script itself looks sufficient. Your debian/rules should just have the %: rule, then. * The stuff in README.Debian should be in README.source, but with reference to the previous point, please remove it. * With reference to the first point, please also drop autoconf/automake dependencies, but keep autotools-dev for config.guess and config.sub. * Drop debian/*.dirs, they're unnecessary. * Drop lintian-overrides, that's also unnecessary. I'm CC-ing Evgeni; he sponsors my geany-plugins packages and I'm sure he'd be interested to look at ctpl, especially if there will be no geany-plugins 0.19 binaries without ctpl. ;-) Hi, Thank you for your comments! I've followed all of your hints even if I'm very surprised that the advices from autotools-dev should no more be taken into account. New version available at the same URLs (no debian version bump as it didn't get upladed before). CC-ing you and our providential sponsor as I don't know whether you are subscribed to bug report or not. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100614101432.00240...@runningpinguin.chalmion.homelinux.net
Bug#579509: ctpl package ready, new version 0.2.2
Ctpl is uploaded to m.d.n (with version 0.2.2) and ready for review. It is required for GeanyGenDoc from next release of geany-plugins package. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ctpl - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ctpl/ctpl_0.2.2-1.dsc Best regards, Jonathan Michalon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100526131056.293ca...@runningpinguin.chalmion.homelinux.net
Bug#579509: ITP: ctpl -- A template engine written in C
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonathan Michalon johnde...@gmail.com Owner: Jonathan Michalon johnde...@gmail.com * Package name: ctpl Version : 0.2.1 Upstream Author : Colomban Wendling b...@herbesfolles.org * URL : http://ctpl.tuxfamily.org/ * License : GPLv3+ Programming Lang: C Description : A template engine written in C CTPL is a C template engine library allowing fast and easy computation of templates with precise control over the parsing environment. CTPL supports a wide range of input types through GIO like in-memory, files, FTP, HTTP and more. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100428065106.6191.91929.report...@localhost
Bug#548817: RFA: guessnet
Hi, I'm a newbie in packaging but highly motivated. I already know some basics and packaged some homebrew softwares. I'm interested in getting involved into Debian and it appears that to adopt a package is one good way. Now I've seen your RFA about guessnet and that you propose to help with code and patch review. The package seems to be quite simple with neither complicated rules nor hack. I use guessnet every day as I'm connected by wireless at home and at university and have setup an automatic switch with it. So I wouldn't suggest to assume a whole maintenance right now (I even don't know whether this is possible as a newbie, and I hope not) but I may help and learn all what needed if someone has the patience to initiate me. Best regards, -- Jonathan Michalon Étudiant en informatique -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100420105847.14042...@runningpinguin.chalmion.homelinux.net
Bug#577087: ITP: spim -- MIPS R2000/R3000 emulator
Hi, I'm also interested by SPIM reintegrating Debian, since I had to use it in my studying and was surprised to find it in Ubuntu and not Debian. I even thought I could start contributing to Debian by adopting this package, but I see all the work has already been done, great! May I help one way or another? Like testing something? Best regards, -- Jonathan Michalon Étudiant en informatique -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100419121403.4bf5f...@runningpinguin.chalmion.homelinux.net
