Bug#536502: [PATCH] Implement runtime loading of RSA public keys
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Paul Fertser wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 02:54:14PM +0300, Paul Fertser wrote:
>> + if (!ok && (pubkey_dir = opendir(PUBKEY_DIR))) {
>> + while (!ok && (nextfile = readdir(pubkey_dir))) {
>> + if ((keyfile = fopen(nextfile->d_name, "rb"))) {
>
> Duh, of course it's wrong but i managed to have that key in the
> current directory during testing :(
>
> Amended version attached.
Nice, thanks, applied.
Luis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#220345: Status of this ITP?
Its been more than a year now. What's the status of this ITP? This is ridiculous. If you can't package it, then say so so others can come in and do the job. We deserve a freedesktop.org package by now in debian. Get off your ass. Luis -- GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84 A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E pgpTWtli2Jr8D.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#266071: [owner@bugs.debian.org: Bug#266071: Acknowledgement (ITP: grub-splashimages -- a collection of great GRUB splashimages)]
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 08:17:39PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:28:46PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 07:21:01PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:32:06PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > > > > Robert, > > > > > > > > Here is the ITP, and this is the package: > > > > > > > > http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grub-splashimages/ > > > > > > Hey. > > > > > > You should be closing the ITP in your debian/changelog :) > > > > I suck. Closed. Thanks, > > Uploading. This will take a while since it will sit in queue/new untill > ftp-masters process it. Definitely not in time for sarge :(. Not even if we ask nicely? :( -- GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84 A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E
Bug#266071: [owner@bugs.debian.org: Bug#266071: Acknowledgement (ITP: grub-splashimages -- a collection of great GRUB splashimages)]
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 07:21:01PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:32:06PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > Robert, > > > > Here is the ITP, and this is the package: > > > > http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grub-splashimages/ > > Hey. > > You should be closing the ITP in your debian/changelog :) I suck. Closed. Thanks, Luis -- GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84 A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E
Bug#266071: [owner@bugs.debian.org: Bug#266071: Acknowledgement (ITP: grub-splashimages -- a collection of great GRUB splashimages)]
Robert, Here is the ITP, and this is the package: http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grub-splashimages/ What else do you need? Luis - Forwarded message from Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Bug#266071: Acknowledgement (ITP: grub-splashimages -- a collection of great GRUB splashimages) X-Debian-PR-Message: ack 266071 X-Debian-PR-Package: wnpp X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. As you requested using X-Debbugs-CC, your message was also forwarded to debian-devel@lists.debian.org (after having been given a Bug report number, if it did not have one). Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (and *not* to [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) - End forwarded message - -- GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84 A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E pgpnMer6Sb9l7.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#266071: ITP: grub-splashimages -- a collection of great GRUB splashimages
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2004-08-16 Severity: wishlist * Package name: grub-splashimages Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Luis R. Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grub-splashimages/ * License : GPL Description : a collection of great GRUB splashimages -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux ruslug 2.4.18-1-686 #1 Sun Feb 1 03:55:30 MST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Bug#248555: Package status
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 04:22:45AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > > > http://www.gnome.org/~jdub/debian/ > > > Sure thing, Jeff. So should this package I'm working on be the one we'll > > work on debian? Or do you have some other work ready? > > See the URL, it's done, announced and already being tested. :-) Oh nice... :) If I get around to a manpage I'll send it over. Did you use the almighty cdbs -- mine does? Luis -- GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84 A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E
Bug#248555: Package status
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 08:26:03PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 02:04:55PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > Sure thing, Jeff. So should this package I'm working on be the one we'll > > work on debian? Or do you have some other work ready? > > I never heard of ximian-connector. Any URL? It's a plugin for evolution so you can talk to an exchange server. It was just recently released as GPL by Novell. Here's the slashdot news about it: http://tinyurl.com/2k3aa > > PS. I've CC'd Robert Millan, he's my Debian Sponsor. > > I'm your sponsor for GRUB stuff only. I can consider ximian-connector but > generaly I only sponsor packages for which I have some specific interest. > > You can tell me what ximian-connector is and try to convince me, but I > suggest you ask in [EMAIL PROTECTED] You're very likely > to find a sponsor there. Ahh ok. Oh well Jeff already has the package in the repository :) So I'll see if I just work on helping with the manpage. Thanks :) > > -- > Robert Millan > > "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the > thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he > gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new > work." > > -- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion) -- GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84 A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E
Bug#248555: Package status
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 03:59:29AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > > http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/debian/ximian-connector/ > > http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/debian/ximian-connector/ximian-connector-debian/ximian-connector_1.4.7-1_i386.deb > > > > It uses cdbs :) > > > > Lintian complains a bit, and I have no manpage ready. I'll be working on > > fixing that. > > http://www.gnome.org/~jdub/debian/ > > If you do a manpage, please send it over. No docbook->man crack though, > please. ;-) Sure thing, Jeff. So should this package I'm working on be the one we'll work on debian? Or do you have some other work ready? PS. I've CC'd Robert Millan, he's my Debian Sponsor. Luis -- GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84 A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E pgpLua5f5gpHH.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#248555: Package status
Is this package done? I forgot to check ITP list first, so I just started my own. Here's what I have so far: http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/debian/ximian-connector/ http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/debian/ximian-connector/ximian-connector-debian/ximian-connector_1.4.7-1_i386.deb It uses cdbs :) Lintian complains a bit, and I have no manpage ready. I'll be working on fixing that. Luis -- GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84 A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E pgpBI5joqRxjp.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#181429: grubconf ITP
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 06:18:43PM +0100, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luis R. Rodriguez) writes: > > > To be exact, here is the the output of dpkg-buildpackage > > > > checking for gcc... cc > > checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C > > compiler cannot create executables > > See `config.log' for more details. > > make: *** [config.status] Error 77 > > > There should be a failure message in config.log. It may be a little > bit hard to find, since configure dumps loads of settings before and > after the message. Here is the meaninful output: configure:2096: cc --version &5 /home/mcgrof/DEV/DEBIAN/grubconf-0.5/2/grubconf-0.5/./configure: line 1: cc: command not found configure:2099: $? = 127 It seems gcc nor gcc-3.3 set /usr/bin/cc ---> /usr/bin/gcc sym link. Anyway, after that, it didn't run into this problem but ran into a second one: -- config.status: creating po/Makefile make -C . make[1]: Entering directory `/home/mcgrof/DEV/DEBIAN/grubconf-0.5/2/grubconf-0.5' cd . && aclocal aclocal: configure.in: 15: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library make[1]: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mcgrof/DEV/DEBIAN/grubconf-0.5/2/grubconf-0.5' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 -- Luis
Bug#181429: grubconf ITP
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 04:46:49PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > Seems mostly fine now, I'm uploading it. > > > I think for now I'd like to stick to not using CDBS, but I will try to > > migrate. > > If I get some free time I'll write a template for grubconf so you can see how > it works. Ok great. Thanks. I've been trying to read more about it. > Btw, please fix the Description for next upload, it should be 80-row indented > and single-space between words. I've fixed this, sorry about that...: http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grubconf/grubconf-0.5-debian/ Luis
Bug#181429: grubconf ITP
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 01:22:28PM +0100, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luis R. Rodriguez) writes: > > > I've given CDBS rules files a shot without success. I'll keep trying > > though, unless you're happy with the latest package I've put up. > > > What are your problems? To be exact, here is the the output of dpkg-buildpackage checking for gcc... cc checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. make: *** [config.status] Error 77 Luis
Bug#181429: grubconf ITP
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 01:22:28PM +0100, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luis R. Rodriguez) writes: > > > > I've given CDBS rules files a shot without success. I'll keep trying > > though, unless you're happy with the latest package I've put up. > > > What are your problems? Oh .. it'd help if I showed what my rules looks like eeh 8)? Here it is: #!/usr/bin/make -f include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk Luis
Bug#181429: grubconf ITP
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 01:22:28PM +0100, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luis R. Rodriguez) writes: > > > I've given CDBS rules files a shot without success. I'll keep trying > > though, unless you're happy with the latest package I've put up. > > > What are your problems? Well it doesn't build right. I tells me a config.* something file is missing, I forget which one... something that autoconfg && automake seems to fix. Presumably using the autofile.mk (or whatever it's called, I forget) will run these no? Luis
Bug#181429: grubconf ITP
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 12:04:31AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 03:06:54AM -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > Hey Robert, > > > > OK, I've taken care of all the details you mention in this e-mail. > > > > New package: > > http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grubconf/grubconf-0.5-debian/ > > Hi! Hey! > > You had some oversights: > > - Again, you don't need to build-depend on gcc-3.3 Well I actually do need to depend on at least gcc-3.2, since I know for sure it definitely doesn't build with gcc 2.95. Therefore, I've added the depends: gcc (>= 4:3.2) > - Does it compile when autoconf2.13 is installed? if it doesn't, add >autoconf2.13 to build-conflicts Yeap, it does compile when autoconf2.13 is used. 8) > - Automake versions are commonly incompatible. Which automake version do you >need? Build-Depend on a particular version (e.g, automake1.8) instead. OK, automake1.4 seems to be the requirement. It won't work with automake1.8. I've added this requirement. > - You removed the build dependency on the following libraries i mentioned, >but didn't replace them with their corresponding -dev packages. Does the >package really build without them? > > > > libxml1 > > > libglade0 > > > libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.2.1-3 ) > > > libncurses5 (>= 5.3.20021109-2 ) > > > libgnome2-0 Yes it does 8). New package: http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grubconf/grubconf-0.5-debian/ I think for now I'd like to stick to not using CDBS, but I will try to migrate. Luis
Bug#181429: grubconf ITP
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 03:10:53PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 03:56:48AM -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > Robert, > > > > thanks I'll be redoing the package. > > Ok. Btw, you might want to use CDBS in debian/rules to ensure your package > is more standards-compliant. > > Since your debian/rules is pretty straightforwarded, you propbably just need > to replace it with a CDBS-style one. The e2tools and grub2 packages are good > examples. I've given CDBS rules files a shot without success. I'll keep trying though, unless you're happy with the latest package I've put up. Luis
Bug#181429: grubconf ITP
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 03:10:53PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 03:56:48AM -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > Robert, > > > > thanks I'll be redoing the package. > > Ok. Btw, you might want to use CDBS in debian/rules to ensure your package > is more standards-compliant. It's late (3:07am) here, and I just finished with your first e-mail. Let me know if this is still going to be required. If so I'll have to work on this tomorrow (or today rather ;) Thanks, Luis > > Since your debian/rules is pretty straightforwarded, you propbably just need > to replace it with a CDBS-style one. The e2tools and grub2 packages are good > examples. > > -- > Robert Millan > > "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the > thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he > gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new > work." > > -- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion)
Bug#181429: grubconf ITP
Hey Robert, OK, I've taken care of all the details you mention in this e-mail. New package: http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grubconf/grubconf-0.5-debian/ -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) mQGiBEAoeKARBADIM1QtErPwjNSkzJmpTFY4IDzxdp3PPH1h6W4KkfwLVqr04fxX ZnesXNhBBwFLg5F1qWA8vB9moDfExFYSmTyjLvvRs0dcqvOSpnWZJ4Lg0Lk6Kt/I 9D9FhWx4s+0MSyDhYJyefu0RMM1zPb8A1JGapDCM49PQSRX1V7dOzWvLxwCgsqjX T3r/7TQ+vOTq0mSqOLThGt8D/3yO1HXfRrEUs9B30WVDuDgrrbT0TtUCm9Eg8L4I b6rbol16AeBXgk2AIWnZuMretkLfS122C1TJeZzk/Hlp3l7REhBxUdB+xizGf5Jf 69PfqnX+BmS4AKSguIl2pb1m9tzBabs5D43fjSgsFYVWDupTVmoybcshA2H0ud6D Li3/A/0auXXCcq4C1yO+NrGlq4K48f8zfFpXfTKp81wOZ64ZuOKvIu4othihvKvi T7jsJzQVDeXu8en0otvMxxYx10RFY+Wq9ar+RKy6MjS/jgwTF3VD6ZBYg47yAUw1 iY2zcLzM28IPOAtq9u+v5uPpCnUy84Q983WbibRQQMkSVjEQurQtTHVpcyBSLiBS b2RyaWd1ZXogPG1jZ3JvZkBydXNsdWcucnV0Z2Vycy5lZHU+iF4EExECAB4FAkAo eKACGwMGCwkIBwMCAxUCAwMWAgECHgECF4AACgkQat1JN+IKUl6/GgCeJh8Omi5O bjX8MCtqnnNovuI/MKYAoKjKUF3DR3pOZlcfXGpmIxywB/XQuQENBEAoeKIQBACF NvU0H/1tieVHDUCY+3BAcHXKfMSb2ikcRrTlKXQF5FHnarwczwH68tFncFxXHusi mKtWDeHIb8JqTsxMXGnD/ixxt1iPNImvisqW3RAS8ClG1iwCJwtFwGAuidWGsj9k 5DjDn2JAAbq6qS3QGZqICW7UDOgOyTLQPWjrs5bNlwADBQP/RSCqJNTJY9djHi/3 m0wqoYhq8j5Pg1LKJYN90ztvbVgzKGMEPmEkNhwZwUwRKCAklQGQ7pP0CIPQbgwb 2UEH7O/EKUaAJ5M86SZeS24/24DkTL/igrpLGXsC7Y35POL7iTNs0uedT7NlcH8a tzCfI7hzGk1iddFlX+M7/QBtq1qISQQYEQIACQUCQCh4ogIbDAAKCRBq3Uk34gpS Xi68AJ98C2f71XfTcyxEyBFMTcqzaulLpgCgpqb8QYsh6tqkdmIvbYS85390PcA= =STjm -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Luis On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 01:38:53PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 06:00:19PM -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > Hey gang, I've fixed the package. Here's the new one: > > http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grubconf/grubconf-0.5-debian/ > > > > Let me know how this one is. > > In debian/control: > > Build-Depends: > > - These packages are always part of the base system. Unless you need a >particular version of them you don't need to build-depend: > > base-files (>= 3.0.8 ) > libc6 (>= 2.3.1-16 ) > coreutils (>= 4.5.10-1 ) > grep (>= 2.5.1-4 ) > > - These packages are already in the Build-Essential set, you don't need to >build-depend on them, either (unless you need a particular version): > > binutils (>= 2.13.90.0.18-1.3 ) > gcc-3.3 > libc6-dev (>= 2.3.1-16 ) > perl-base (>= 5.8.0-17 ) > perl-modules (>= 5.8.0-17 ) > > > - The following packages are shared libraries. You don't need these in > build-depends. If you need the development files (headers and object > archives) > for compiling your package, build-depend on their correspondant -dev packages > instead: > > libxml1 > libglade0 > libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.2.1-3 ) > libncurses5 (>= 5.3.20021109-2 ) > libgnome2-0 > > - Do you really need version >= 2.57-2woody1 of autoconf? If you're running > autoconf at build time, probably any of the 2.5x series is enough, which > means you just need to build-depend on unversioned autoconf, and > build-conflict with autoconf2.13 (to avoid it from setting a > /usr/bin/autoconf > divert) > > autoconf (>= 2.57-2woody1 ) > > - You don't need to depend on shared libraries, dpkg-shlibdeps already takes > care of adding it: > > Depends: libgtk2.0-0 > > - Also remember to indent the Description field. > > > In debian/copyright: > > - The "It was downloaded from sourceforge.net" doesn't suffice to refer > someone for downloading it. > > P.S: Remember to run lintian on your .dsc and .deb for automatic evaluation > of your package before uploading it. > > P.P.S: please sign your source package next time (just install gnupg and > create a key, it'll be signed automaticaly by dpkg-buildpackage) and > publish your gpg key. > > -- > Robert Millan > > "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the > thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he > gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new > work." > > -- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion)
Bug#181429: grubconf ITP
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 03:10:53PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 03:56:48AM -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > Robert, > > > > thanks I'll be redoing the package. > > Ok. Btw, you might want to use CDBS in debian/rules to ensure your package > is more standards-compliant. > > Since your debian/rules is pretty straightforwarded, you propbably just need > to replace it with a CDBS-style one. The e2tools and grub2 packages are good > examples. Great, thanks. I hope to have something ready by tonight. Luis
Bug#181429: grubconf ITP
Robert, thanks I'll be redoing the package. Luis On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 01:38:53PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 06:00:19PM -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > Hey gang, I've fixed the package. Here's the new one: > > http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grubconf/grubconf-0.5-debian/ > > > > Let me know how this one is. > > In debian/control: > > Build-Depends: > > - These packages are always part of the base system. Unless you need a >particular version of them you don't need to build-depend: > > base-files (>= 3.0.8 ) > libc6 (>= 2.3.1-16 ) > coreutils (>= 4.5.10-1 ) > grep (>= 2.5.1-4 ) > > - These packages are already in the Build-Essential set, you don't need to >build-depend on them, either (unless you need a particular version): > > binutils (>= 2.13.90.0.18-1.3 ) > gcc-3.3 > libc6-dev (>= 2.3.1-16 ) > perl-base (>= 5.8.0-17 ) > perl-modules (>= 5.8.0-17 ) > > > - The following packages are shared libraries. You don't need these in > build-depends. If you need the development files (headers and object > archives) > for compiling your package, build-depend on their correspondant -dev packages > instead: > > libxml1 > libglade0 > libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.2.1-3 ) > libncurses5 (>= 5.3.20021109-2 ) > libgnome2-0 > > - Do you really need version >= 2.57-2woody1 of autoconf? If you're running > autoconf at build time, probably any of the 2.5x series is enough, which > means you just need to build-depend on unversioned autoconf, and > build-conflict with autoconf2.13 (to avoid it from setting a > /usr/bin/autoconf > divert) > > autoconf (>= 2.57-2woody1 ) > > - You don't need to depend on shared libraries, dpkg-shlibdeps already takes > care of adding it: > > Depends: libgtk2.0-0 > > - Also remember to indent the Description field. > > > In debian/copyright: > > - The "It was downloaded from sourceforge.net" doesn't suffice to refer > someone for downloading it. > > P.S: Remember to run lintian on your .dsc and .deb for automatic evaluation > of your package before uploading it. > > P.P.S: please sign your source package next time (just install gnupg and > create a key, it'll be signed automaticaly by dpkg-buildpackage) and > publish your gpg key. > > -- > Robert Millan > > "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the > thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he > gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new > work." > > -- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion)
Bug#181429: grubconf ITP
Hey gang, I've fixed the package. Here's the new one: http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grubconf/grubconf-0.5-debian/ Let me know how this one is. Regards, Luis On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:32:25PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > Hi! > > I'm one of the grub co-maintainers in debian. The pkg-grub project at alioth > is set for maintainance of grub and grub-related packages (grub2, etc). > > Andreas, if you want to sponsor Luis' package, please do it within pkg-grub. > Set Maintainer to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and everyone who > applies in Uploaders. If you're otherwise too busy to sponsor grubconf, > I can do it too (and probably Jason either). > > Luis, you made a debian-native package by mistake. This way we can't > distinguish or keep track of the changes you made to upstream sources. Could > you please fix that? > > -- > Robert Millan > > "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the > thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he > gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new > work." > > -- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion)
Bug#181429: grubconf ITP
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:32:25PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > Luis, you made a debian-native package by mistake. This way we can't > distinguish or keep track of the changes you made to upstream sources. Could > you please fix that? Sure thing, it had actually been a while since I packaged that first grubconf package. I'm re-doing it. I'll let you know once I'm done. Thanks! Luis
Bug#181429: retitle 181429 ITP: grubconf -- Gnoretitle 181429 ITP: grubconf -- Gnome2 based GRUB configuration editor
Grubconf 0.5 debian package: Sorry for the long delay. I had to graduate, and get a job. Anyway, here is a tarball of all the sources: http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grubconf/grubconf-0.5-debian.tar.bz2 Anything else required? I promise to be more attentive now 8) Luis On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 09:06:07PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luis R. Rodriguez) writes: > >> > >> > Grubconf must be run as ROOT. This is to gain access to the > >> > grub configuration file. > >> > > >> My 2 cent to upstream: It would be nice to have a non-root mode > >> where the config file is simpy written out to a file, for the relly > >> paranoid ones of us ;-). > > > > I'll pass this idea along to the upstream source > > mantainers. Hopefully it's not a dead project since I see the > > sources haven't been touched in a while. > > > >> > Notes: I need a sponsor. The package is ready. > >> > > >> I could sponsor you, but I'll have to try out the package first. > > > > You can retrieve my first version of the package here: > > http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grubconf > > > I need the source code (.orig.tar.gz, .diff.gz, .dsc), the .deb is > secondary. > > Regards, Andy > -- > Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc > Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 > > This reality is really just a fucked-up dream -- Papa Roach
Bug#181429: retitle 181429 ITP: grubconf -- Gnoretitle 181429 ITP: grubconf -- Gnome2 based GRUB configuration editor
Oh yeah, and of course, if you just want to view/DL each file separately you can just visit: http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grubconf/grubconf-0.5-debian/ Luis On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 09:06:07PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luis R. Rodriguez) writes: > >> > >> > Grubconf must be run as ROOT. This is to gain access to the > >> > grub configuration file. > >> > > >> My 2 cent to upstream: It would be nice to have a non-root mode > >> where the config file is simpy written out to a file, for the relly > >> paranoid ones of us ;-). > > > > I'll pass this idea along to the upstream source > > mantainers. Hopefully it's not a dead project since I see the > > sources haven't been touched in a while. > > > >> > Notes: I need a sponsor. The package is ready. > >> > > >> I could sponsor you, but I'll have to try out the package first. > > > > You can retrieve my first version of the package here: > > http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grubconf > > > I need the source code (.orig.tar.gz, .diff.gz, .dsc), the .deb is > secondary. > > Regards, Andy > -- > Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc > Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 > > This reality is really just a fucked-up dream -- Papa Roach
Bug#181429: retitle 181429 ITP: grubconf -- Gnoretitle 181429 ITP: grubconf -- Gnome2 based GRUB configuration editor
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luis R. Rodriguez) writes: > > > Grubconf must be run as ROOT. This is to gain access to the > > grub configuration file. > > > My 2 cent to upstream: It would be nice to have a non-root mode where > the config file is simpy written out to a file, for the relly paranoid > ones of us ;-). I'll pass this idea along to the upstream source mantainers. Hopefully it's not a dead project since I see the sources haven't been touched in a while. > > Notes: I need a sponsor. The package is ready. > > > I could sponsor you, but I'll have to try out the package first. You can retrieve my first version of the package here: http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/grubconf There I have a small patch too that I made. I already submitted it to the upstream source guys too. Luis
Bug#181429: retitle 181429 ITP: grubconf -- Gnoretitle 181429 ITP: grubconf -- Gnome2 based GRUB configuration editor
retitle 181429 ITP: grubconf -- Gnome2 based GRUB configuration editor thanks * Package name : grubconf Version : 0.5 Upstream Author : Joseph Monti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ryan Scotka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://grubconf.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL ABOUT Grubconf is a Gnome2 based GRUB configuration editor. It provides an easy to use interface allowing effortless modification of OS's and the flexibility to configure the most obscure options. Designed to require minimal user interaction while providing tools for the most adventurous user. Grubconf must be run as ROOT. This is to gain access to the grub configuration file. Notes: I need a sponsor. The package is ready.
