Bug#512360: RFH: openldap -- OpenLDAP server, libraries, and utilities

2020-12-05 Thread Ryan Tandy
I'm still looking for help with the OpenLDAP packages. I'm not an 
OpenLDAP user any more, and I would like to eventually hand off the 
package to a new maintainer.


The current 2.4 package is in OK shape. It's up-to-date in unstable and 
backports, and I'm able to handle the low volume of security updates and 
bug reports. I'm also responding to Debian-specific issues on the 
upstream support channels (lists/bugs/IRC). The status quo will probably 
be fine for bullseye; however, I'm not making much progress on 
developing or improving the package.


Here are some of the major projects that I would appreciate help with:

* Updating to OpenLDAP 2.5.

 The first 2.5 alpha has been released already. I hope the final 
 release will happen in time that we can transition to it for bookworm. 
 This will include a SONAME transition, which should be mostly painless 
 as the library API has not changed much.


 The bulk of the work will be to support slapd upgrades. The biggest 
 change is that the Berkeley DB backends (BDB and HDB) have been 
 removed. These were the default for Debian installations for a long 
 time and I know not all users have migrated to LMDB yet. We should 
 provide an automated migration from BDB/HDB to LMDB, as was done for 
 LDBM previously. There are also some old bugs in the maintainer 
 scripts for upgrading databases, which still need to be addressed.


 Upstream still supports both slapd.conf and cn=config configuration 
 (though slapd.conf is considered deprecated), so any upgrade path has 
 to support both.


* Overhauling the debian/copyright file.

 The copyright file is old and not in DEP5 format yet. We basically 
 need to do a full copyright review of the upstream source in order to 
 write a complete and correct DEP5 copyright file, and then commit to 
 maintaining it going forward.


 I don't know at all what the license of debian/* is supposed to be. We 
 might have to do some legwork of contacting previous maintainers and 
 trying to obtain copyright statements from them.


* Replacing the slapd init script with a systemd service.

 This is a smaller project, but still not as trivial as it sounds. The 
 init script supports a number of configuration variables, and it also 
 picks up some information dynamically from the slapd configuration. 
 This probably requires extracting some of the init script code to a 
 wrapper script for executing slapd with appropriate arguments.


 Supporting both slapd.conf and cn=config adds complexity here as well.

* Working with upstream on GnuTLS support.

 Upstream still supports GnuTLS, but reluctantly. They expect the 
 Debian maintainer to be actively involved with triaging and fixing 
 GnuTLS issues upstream.


 The autoca overlay is new in 2.5 and only supports OpenSSL right now. 
 Upstream are not likely to work on GnuTLS support; if we want to 
 include it in Debian, we probably have to add GnuTLS support 
 ourselves.


* Evaluating a possible switch back to OpenSSL.

 Upstream would prefer to drop the GnuTLS support, and have asked me to 
 investigate what issues on the Debian side are blocking it.


 I don't fully understand Debian's current position on OpenSSL 
 licensing and hope ftp-master will provide a more detailed statement 
 soon. This might require auditing the reverse-depends of libldap in 
 Debian and checking whether there is still GPL- or GPL2-only code 
 linking with libldap; I'm not sure.


 In any case, a switch to OpenSSL is likely to be a disruptive event 
 for all users (for example, the TLS cipher suite configuration is 
 completely incompatible) and must be approached with caution.


 If there are no blockers on the Debian side, dropping GnuTLS support 
 upstream could happen as soon as OpenLDAP 2.6.


* Working with Ubuntu to reduce their delta.

 The Ubuntu maintainers would like to reduce the delta in their 
 package. There are some changes that can be dropped during the 
 transition to 2.5 (such as the legacy GSSAPI support). There are also 
 some pieces that could be adopted in Debian (such as the apparmor and 
 ufw profiles), if we can determine the license and copyright for them.



I'm happy to provide mentoring or reviews, and to sponsor uploads, for 
anyone who would like to work on the package. If you have an interest in 
the future of OpenLDAP in Debian, please get in touch!




Bug#922568: ITA: jcc -- code generator producing a Python extension from Java classes

2019-11-14 Thread Ryan Tandy

Dear Emmanuel,

I was looking at the 'jcc' package and saw that your RFS bug (#925998) 
was closed, but it doesn't look like an updated jcc was ever uploaded to 
unstable.


What's the status of jcc, please?

Thank you,
Ryan



Bug#888748: ITP: enki-aseba -- Enki is a fast 2D physics-based robot simulator written in C++

2018-01-30 Thread Ryan Tandy

Hi Georges,

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 03:19:31PM +0100, Georges Khaznadar wrote:

Enki is able to simulate cinematics, collisions, sensors and cameras

^^

possible typo: kinematics? with a K?

thanks,
Ryan



Bug#512360: offer to help with openldap

2013-09-24 Thread Ryan Tandy
Hi,

I'd like to volunteer to help with OpenLDAP in Debian.

As part of my day job I run OpenLDAP on 16 (give or take) Ubuntu
servers and follow openldap-technical. We currently run customized
OpenLDAP packages based on the Ubuntu packaging. I have the freedom to
test packages in staging and production.

I maintain one small package in Debian, and several private ones for
my employer. I'm not a DD or DM.

I would really like to see the OpenLDAP packages in Debian and Ubuntu
brought up to date and improved.

How could I make myself useful to this team? What would be an
effective way to spend some effort?

Thanks
Ryan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/camxh3qbgbk5cha-wjnw1m8nygip9pjcoyfazlqztjg8zhra...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#661275: ITP: meh -- a simple, minimalist, super fast image viewer

2012-02-25 Thread Ryan Tandy
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ryan Tandy r...@nardis.ca

* Package name: meh
  Version : 0.3
  Upstream Author : John Hawthorn john.hawth...@gmail.com
* URL : http://www.johnhawthorn.com/meh/
* License : MIT
  Programming Lang: C
  Description : a simple, minimalist, super fast image viewer

meh is a small, simple, super fast image viewer using raw XLib. It is
similar to feh, but faster and simpler.
.
meh can use ImageMagick's convert to view almost 200 file formats,
though it is slower for these formats. Built in formats are JPEG, PNG,
BMP, and netpbm.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120225210844.4902.5179.report...@kiwi.nardis.ca