Bug#425609: opengrok
Are you planning on uploading this (at least to non-free?). I'm using it and would love a packaged version. Do you have preview of your package on the net somewhere? -- sam clegg :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369 $superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#425609: opengrok
Are you planning on uploading this (at least to non-free?). I'm using it and would love a packaged version. Do you have preview of your package on the net somewhere? -- sam clegg :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369 $superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#425609: opengrok
Are you planning on uploading this (at least to non-free?). I'm using it and would love a packaged version. Do you have preview of your package on the net somewhere? -- sam clegg :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369 $superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#407253:
Ok, my ITP was a dup of this: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=448756 I'm still happy to package this if nobody else has come forward. My packages are good to go already. -- sam clegg :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369 $superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#448756: ITP: dmucs -- distributed compilation system for use with distcc
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: dmucs Version : 0.6.1 Upstream Author : Victor Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://dmucs.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : distributed compilation system for use with distcc DMUCS is a system that allows a group of users to share a compilation farm. Each compilation request from each user will be sent to the fastest available machine, every time. The system has the following features: * Supports multiple users compiling simultaneously, and scales well to handle the new loads. * Supports multiple operating systems in the compilation farm. * Uses all processors of a multi-processor compilation host. * Makes best use of compilation hosts with widely differing CPU speeds. * Guarantees that a compilation host will not be overloaded by compilations. * Takes into account the load on a host caused by non-compilation tasks. * Supports the dynamic addition and removal of hosts to the compilation farm. * Works with distcc, which need not be altered in any way. You can get my initial package from here: http://superduper.net/downloads/debian/dmucs_0.6.1-1_i386.deb -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#445866: ITP: perforce -- closed source revision control system
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 14:42 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seems to me that this depends on Perforce. D'oh. (I don't know anything about Perforce. Perhaps it's really dangerous software. But perhaps it's just non-free.) Perforce is an absolutely *excellent* VCS with the unfortunate distinction of being proprietary. SubVersion can do most (but not all) of what it does, albeit 10 times slower. Still, I've migrated all of my stuff over to subversion, because, well, subversion is free. Perforce is free (as in free beer) for open source developers, if you want more than 2 users on one VCS server, you have to sign a contract, get a license, give the perforce people full access to your repo, sign a new contract whenever you server's IP address changes, and renew each year Slightly off topic, but you don't need to give the perforce people access to you repo (unless you really want them to come in a fix something) and you don't need to renew each year (unless you want support from them). signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#445866: ITP: perforce -- closed source revision control system
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 05:41 +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:41:21PM -0400, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote: Given the great abundance of revision control systems already packaged for Debian, what is the point of adding another? Especially when it is non-free. How about people use it? There's plenty of installations of perforce; I think making it easier to use Debian with them is within the mandate for non-free. I'd say upload only the client to non-free. We should provide users a way to use their existent preforce servers but we should not encourage new installations of perforce. Sounds like a compromise to me :) Indeed, my primary aim was to make it easy for anyone wanting to run debian in an org that uses perforce (i.e. people like myself). I agree the server package is of less use in this respect, its simply there to make it easy for people to choose debian on the server side as well. Pending the legal conclusions I'll upload just the client package initially. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#445866: ITP: perforce -- closed source revision control system
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: perforce Version : 2007.2-2 Upstream Author : Perforce Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.perforce.com/ * License : proprietary Programming Lang: binary only (with bindings in Perl, Python, etc.) Description : closed source revision control system closed source, centralised source control system akin to CVS and subversion. You'll need a license to run a server with more than two users. Free licenses are granted to open source projects. I'm in talks with perforce to get explicit permission to distribute in non-free. Current license discussions are here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/09/msg00184.html My packages are here: http://superduper.net/downloads/debian/ I've created two packages: 'perforce' for the client and 'perforce-server' for the server. The 'perforce-server' package is a 'fat' package that contains many server binaries (since the users license if normally limited to a given version). The server package contains debian-friendly init scripts, etc. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#380190: ITP: sqliteodbc -- ODBC driver for SQLite embedded database
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: sqliteodbc Version : 0.69 Upstream Author : Christian Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.ch-werner.de/sqliteodbc/ * License : BSD-style Programming Lang: C Description : ODBC driver for SQLite embedded database This package allows you to connect to an SQLite database using ODBC, the Open Database Connectivity abstraction layer which is understood by a variety of database tools that may not be able to talk to SQLite directly. Experimental pacakge here: http://superduper.net/downloads/debian/libsqliteodbc_0.69-1_i386.deb Sources here: http://superduper.net/downloads/debian/sources/ (Include the long description here.) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#253735:
Any progress on getting this package into debian? I use it on several machines and it would be really useful. Also the unofficial package that I was using seems to have disappeared from http://debian.usefulinc.com/ If I can help then please let me know. -- sam clegg :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369 $superduper: .signature,v 1.14 2005/01/19 13:21:14 sam Exp $ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#310044: ITP: proguard -- java class file shrinker, optimizer, and obfuscator
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: proguard Version : 3.2 Upstream Author : Eric Lafortune [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://proguard.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : java class file shrinker, optimizer, and obfuscator ProGuard is a free Java class file shrinker, optimizer, and obfuscator. It can detect and remove unused classes, fields, methods, and attributes. It can then optimize bytecode and remove unused instructions. Finally, it can rename the remaining classes, fields, and methods using short meaningless names. The resulting jars are smaller and harder to reverse-engineer. This package builds just with jikes-classpath and runs with kaffe which are both in main. My provisional packages are available here: http://people.debian.org/~samo/experimental/ There is an archived ITP for proguard from over a year ago and I have checked with the original filer that he is no longer interested in this package. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304948: ITP: boo -- a python-like language and compiler for the CLI
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: boo Version : 0.5 Upstream Author : Rodrigo B. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://boo.codehaus.org/ * License : Custom. DFSG Compatible. Description : a python-like language and compiler for the CLI Boo is considered ready for general usage and runs fine on mono. In fact mono its the primary target platform. The licence is custom but looks DFSG compatible. My initial boo package is here: http://people.debian.org/~samo/experimental/ Long Description: Boo is an object oriented statically typed programming language for the Common Language Infrastructure (CLI) with a Python inspired syntax and a special focus on language and compiler extensibility. . This package includes the Boo libraries as well as a compiler, interpreter and interactive shell. The boo compiler and the programs it produces are 100% CIL and can be run on any compliant CLI virtual machine. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300095: madplay -- MPEG audio player in fixed point
Looks like I just missed this one. I would also like to adopt this package. I use it a lot and already maintain xmms-mad, the xmms plugin based on libmad. Kurt, since you got here first, you get the take the package I guess. I'd be happy to sponsor you. Are you in the NM queue? sam -- sam clegg :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369 $superduper: .signature,v 1.14 2005/01/19 13:21:14 sam Exp $ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#199358: ITP: gsoap -- The gSOAP Stub and Skeleton Compiler for C and C++
Hi Thomas, You still planning on packaging this? If you have packages to test I'd be happy to do so. -- sam clegg :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369 $superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#68243: linphone in debian
Any news on this? Its been almost 4 months since the last update. Martin, if Jeremy isn't interested, why don't you take over and upload? I'm interested in this package and available if you need assistance. sam -- sam clegg :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369 $superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
