Bug#160444: Packages avaible

2004-04-12 Thread Alexander Schmehl 
Hi folks,

sorry for the long delay, but I finaly made some packages avaible at:
http://www.schmehl.info/linux/debian/packages/opencola-softdrinkformula/

I'll ask my old sponsor, if everything is okay.


Yours sincerely,
  Alexander

Bug#160444: Packages avaible

2004-04-13 Thread Martin Michlmayr 
* Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-13 04:19]:
> sorry for the long delay, but I finaly made some packages avaible at:
> http://www.schmehl.info/linux/debian/packages/opencola-softdrinkformula/

Do we really need this as a package in the archive?
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#160444: Packages avaible

2004-04-13 Thread Rene Engelhard 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-13 04:19]:
> > sorry for the long delay, but I finaly made some packages avaible at:
> > http://www.schmehl.info/linux/debian/packages/opencola-softdrinkformula/
> 
> Do we really need this as a package in the archive?

IMHO not.

Grüße/Regards,

René
- -- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
  
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAfCFp+FmQsCSK63MRAvPRAJ0Z/59JZypRuOImDldt7w8FDENI7QCeOzbS
ZhgsPfwTZy1iDvoCRZ/d69c=
=5Mg7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#160444: Packages avaible

2004-04-13 Thread Alexander Schmehl 
Good evening,

* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040413 19:20]:

> > > sorry for the long delay, but I finaly made some packages avaible at:
> > > http://www.schmehl.info/linux/debian/packages/opencola-softdrinkformula/
> > Do we really need this as a package in the archive?
> IMHO not.

I agree, we don't »need« it. I would say, it is a nice to have, which
doesn't hurt.


Yours sincerely,
  Alexander


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#160444: Packages avaible

2004-04-13 Thread Martin Michlmayr 
* Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-13 20:12]:
> I agree, we don't »need« it. I would say, it is a nice to have, which
> doesn't hurt.

Well, it does hurt.  It means Debian needs more CDs, the Packages file
gets bigger, etc.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]