Your message dated Sun, 25 May 2003 16:07:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#171072: fixed in openjade 1.4devel1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Nov 2002 00:01:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 26 18:01:54 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fl-mta05.durocom.com [216.53.195.247] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18GpeM-0003El-00; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:01:54 -0600
Received: from blubber ([216.53.202.90]) by fl-mta05.durocom.com with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
          Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:01:53 -0500
Received: from cmiller by blubber with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 18GpeH-00029o-00; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:01:49 -0500
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:01:49 -0500
From: Chad Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFA: openjade, opensp
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-key-info: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Chad Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.4 required=5.0
        tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
              USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

package: wnpp

On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:32:57AM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> You may have noticed I also NMU'd opensp 1.5release, to be able to
> build recent openjade1.3.
> 
> Do you still work on opensp/openjade ?

No, I never even have occasion to use them these days, which is a shame -- I
really liked it.

I'm offering these for adoption.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 171072-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2003 20:08:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 25 15:08:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19K1nc-00071c-00; Sun, 25 May 2003 15:08:57 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19K1lm-0000HW-00; Sun, 25 May 2003 16:07:02 -0400
From: Neil Roeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $
Subject: Bug#171072: fixed in openjade 1.4devel1-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 16:07:02 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openjade, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libostyle-dev_1.4devel1-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openjade/libostyle-dev_1.4devel1-10_i386.deb
libostyle1_1.4devel1-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openjade/libostyle1_1.4devel1-10_i386.deb
openjade_1.4devel1-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/openjade/openjade_1.4devel1-10.diff.gz
openjade_1.4devel1-10.dsc
  to pool/main/o/openjade/openjade_1.4devel1-10.dsc
openjade_1.4devel1-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openjade/openjade_1.4devel1-10_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Neil Roeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated openjade package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 12:20:13 -0400
Source: openjade
Binary: libostyle-dev libostyle1 openjade
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4devel1-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Neil Roeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Neil Roeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libostyle-dev - OpenJade libraries, developer support
 libostyle1 - Runtime libraries for OpenJade
 openjade   - Implementation of the DSSSL language
Closes: 171072
Changes: 
 openjade (1.4devel1-10) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Make new maintainer effective by actually changing Maintainer field in
     control file. (closes: #171072)
Files: 
 9d238172426eba5d2cf771994e304c6e 664 text optional openjade_1.4devel1-10.dsc
 5f23a4db69e02f3a9389ab084ce3b68e 200056 text optional 
openjade_1.4devel1-10.diff.gz
 b7e4c00ea583a4206cb4037e4587bbd9 361236 text optional 
openjade_1.4devel1-10_i386.deb
 052e97ccd387361731550cb3f6a918f9 791450 libs optional 
libostyle1_1.4devel1-10_i386.deb
 211cbfea02cacd156360cb485e8d321e 961600 devel optional 
libostyle-dev_1.4devel1-10_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+0Q5Q6j+skPrutKkRAs1eAKDAesf2VVwXzKzZEjvVOgWcDKO8JwCgwpC4
Kn69isIZ29ZkOYHXz6cbojw=
=lVs0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to