Bug#195948: Change to standard makefile?

2004-12-07 Thread Jesus Climent
Hi!

I have been discussing about the different target's option with Guillem Jover,
and it seems rather difficult to create a package which needs several
recompilations to obtain the different targets we want to obtain
(dspam-libdb4, dspam-pgsql, dspam-mysql and dspam-sqlite).

Is there any objection if we move to a standard makefile?

Otherwise, we need a makefile expert to put some time in the package.

J
-- 
Jesus Climent  info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.4.27|Helsinki Finland
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429  7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69

Look at my fingers: four stones, four crates. Zero stones? ZERO CRATES!
--Zorg (The Fifth Element)



Bug#195948: Change to standard makefile?

2004-12-07 Thread José Luis Tallón

Jesus Climent wrote:


Hi!

I have been discussing about the different target's option with Guillem Jover,
and it seems rather difficult to create a package which needs several
recompilations to obtain the different targets we want to obtain
(dspam-libdb4, dspam-pgsql, dspam-mysql and dspam-sqlite).
 

Hmm... it's not really that much of a problem. I have already done it 
with Bacula.
The real problem here is providing some sort of auto-configuration for 
users for this i am awaiting bdconfig-common to be uploaded, so that 
we can start testing.



Is there any objection if we move to a standard makefile?
 


Please, elaborate on this.


Otherwise, we need a makefile expert to put some time in the package.
 


No problem. I can do it.
I will start putting quite some work on this as soon as i get back from 
my vacation.



J
 


Best,
   J.L.





Bug#195948: Change to standard makefile?

2004-12-07 Thread Jesus Climent
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:41:05PM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote:
 and it seems rather difficult to create a package which needs several
 recompilations to obtain the different targets we want to obtain
 (dspam-libdb4, dspam-pgsql, dspam-mysql and dspam-sqlite).

 Hmm... it's not really that much of a problem. I have already done it 
 with Bacula.
 The real problem here is providing some sort of auto-configuration for 
 users for this i am awaiting bdconfig-common to be uploaded, so that 
 we can start testing.

Sorry. It seems to be a real problem using CDBS, which i seem i failed to
mention.

Of course using debhelper plus standard targets is much easier. Which was my
point.

 Otherwise, we need a makefile expert to put some time in the package.

 No problem. I can do it.
 I will start putting quite some work on this as soon as i get back from 
 my vacation.

I will start working on it, too. Not to duplicate work but to get some
experience, too.

J

-- 
Jesus Climent  info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.4.27|Helsinki Finland
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429  7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69

Don't Sir me young man, you have no idea who you're dealing with.
--Kay (Men in Black)