Bug#230767: Update

2004-03-03 Thread Andrew Pollock
Just so people don't think this is being completely neglected...

I've built a preliminary package, and then discovered that it can't cope
with devfs. Super. 

I've sent a number of emails to upstream, ranging from "Hi, I'm going to
package up your software for Debian" to "Hey, this thing doesn't work with
devfs, I'll write a patch", without hearing a peep back.

I'm planning on writing a patch to allow it to work with devfs, but in the
meantime I'll probably enhance the current package to detect the presence of
devfs and do something intelligent (like fail elegantly), and then upload
it as is.

Andrew



Bug#230767: Update

2004-03-04 Thread Bernd S. Brentrup
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:31:23AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Just so people don't think this is being completely neglected...
> 
> I've built a preliminary package, and then discovered that it can't cope
> with devfs. Super. 

> I've sent a number of emails to upstream, ranging from "Hi, I'm going to
> package up your software for Debian" to "Hey, this thing doesn't work with
> devfs, I'll write a patch", without hearing a peep back.

> I'm planning on writing a patch to allow it to work with devfs, but in the
> meantime I'll probably enhance the current package to detect the presence of
> devfs and do something intelligent (like fail elegantly), and then upload
> it as is.

Devfs being deprecated in linux 2.6, IMHO writing a patch is a waste of effort.

Regards
. Siggy 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature