Bug#243938: progress of rkhunter Debian package

2005-07-09 Thread Tommaso Moroni
Hi!

I'm tidying up the wnpp bugs on the Debian BTS by looking for "inactive" ITPs.
I see you own an ITP for rkhunter (bug #243938) and the last update you gave was
dated 15 Feb 2005, so I'd like to know if you still intend to package it.


Regards,
-- 
Tommaso Moroni
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#243938: Progress?

2005-02-15 Thread Micah Anderson
Sounds good -- this bug had just gone radio silent, so I wanted to see
if it had been dropped or something, nice to see there is good reason
behind it.

If you have a package that works, and is good it might be a good idea
to upload it so it gets a spot in the new queue, and as you may know
things in the new queue don't necessarily get processed in order.
Getting things in there, and then updating the package with a
different installer is an option.

Thanks for the update!
micah


Frederik Dannemare schrieb am Tuesday, den 15. February 2005:

> On Tuesday 15 February 2005 23:12, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Its been a month since the last viewable activity on this ITP. There
> > recently was a new release of rkhunter and I am very interested in
> > seeing it packaged for Debian, so I guess I am just being irritating
> > in asking whats going on, but I will offer my help if any is needed.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I emailed upstream author 3 weeks ago with some (rather big) patches to 
> suggest a much more flexible installer process.
> 
> When I saw the 1.2.0 release last week I yet again emailed upstream and 
> asked about my suggestion. He wrote back to me that he was a bit behind 
> on unread mails in his inbox, but he would let me know when he had had 
> time to review my patches.
> 
> Until then I'm a bit hessitating as to package rkhunter (I'm also very 
> busy with my NM process, atm). Anyways, the NEW queue is *huge* these 
> days, so an upload of rkhunter tomorrow most likely would be waiting in 
> the NEW queue for months, I estimate.
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare
> http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#243938: Progress?

2005-02-15 Thread Frederik Dannemare
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 23:12, Micah Anderson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Its been a month since the last viewable activity on this ITP. There
> recently was a new release of rkhunter and I am very interested in
> seeing it packaged for Debian, so I guess I am just being irritating
> in asking whats going on, but I will offer my help if any is needed.

Hi,

I emailed upstream author 3 weeks ago with some (rather big) patches to 
suggest a much more flexible installer process.

When I saw the 1.2.0 release last week I yet again emailed upstream and 
asked about my suggestion. He wrote back to me that he was a bit behind 
on unread mails in his inbox, but he would let me know when he had had 
time to review my patches.

Until then I'm a bit hessitating as to package rkhunter (I'm also very 
busy with my NM process, atm). Anyways, the NEW queue is *huge* these 
days, so an upload of rkhunter tomorrow most likely would be waiting in 
the NEW queue for months, I estimate.

Best regards,
-- 
Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare
http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#243938: Progress?

2005-02-15 Thread Micah Anderson
Hello,

Its been a month since the last viewable activity on this ITP. There
recently was a new release of rkhunter and I am very interested in
seeing it packaged for Debian, so I guess I am just being irritating
in asking whats going on, but I will offer my help if any is needed.

Thanks,
micah


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature