Bug#262706: O: log2mail

2004-08-01 Thread Enrico Zini
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 07:10:35PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:

> I would like to adopt log2mail.

Thanks!  log2mail is a nice and useful tool, and I was sorry for leaving
it alone.

You can retitle in ITA at any time, and please contact me for any
problems you might have.

In the meantime, I discovered that the previous upstream has changed
e-mail address.  I sent a mail to the previous DD asking if he still has
a path to him, which he should have.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] may be interested in helping with the maintenance:
he should jump in the discussion anytime soon, if he hasn't done it
already.


Ciao,

Enrico



Bug#262706: O: log2mail

2004-08-01 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hi,

I would like to adopt log2mail.

Greetings
Frederik Schueler

-- 
ENOSIG



Bug#262706: O: log2mail

2004-08-01 Thread Enrico Zini
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

log2mail is a daemon watching logfiles and mailing lines matching
patterns.  It server a purpose similar to logcheck but does it in
realtime, so it can be used as a nice way to implement alerts: programs
log things, and you can get a mail (or a sms via a mail-to-sms gateway)
as soon as bad things are spotted.

It's been a very useful tool for me in my past job, and I took over
maintenance from the previous maintainer.  log2mail has been quite a
critical application for us there.

More than a year ago I quit that job, and I'm not using log2mail
anymore.  The package is in a pretty good shape and does not usually
need much care: I did around one upload per year, and I just made one
upload fixing all bugs, bringing the whole build system up to date and
in line with the last standards-version, porting to cdbs.

At the time I took over the package, upstream was happy to hand also
upstream maintenance to me.  The code is simple, linear and quite well
written.  At that time, upstream told me if I couldn't maintain log2mail
anymore, he would take it back.  Time has passed from there, and I sent
him a mail asking him what he intends to do.

I'm orphaning the package not because it's a burden, but because my
other Debian activities are occupying most of my time already and I feel
I can't commit to being a good maintainer for it anymore.


Ciao,

Enrico

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686-smp
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]