Bug#277582: ITP: kwin-baghira -- A MacOSX-like theme for Apple junkies ;)
IMHO, the following names makes most sense since they 1) tell where the theme/style/icons/whatever is/are used 2) follow some current "naming schemes" [0] qt-styles-foobar kwin-decorations-foobar kde-icons-foobar The construction of these package names is pretty clear. [0] - Packages currently in the Debian archive: 2 - kde-icons-crystal - Crystal icon theme for KDE 21 - gtk-engines-begtk - BeOS-like theme for GTK+ 20 - gtk2-engines-cleanice - CleanIce themes for GTK+ 2.x ^ (Number of packages following this naming scheme) Yes, I'm aware of that this argument is not perfectly valid since some packages could be renamed to comply with a better naming scheme. - */ Christoffer Sawicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#277582: ITP: kwin-baghira -- A MacOSX-like theme for Apple junkies ;)
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 04:31:52AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > I would suggest a name like kde-$FOO-style to be used (e.g., > kde-baghira-style) for packages that provide a widget style for > QT/KDE, and include kwin decoration (if they exist) in the same > package. (*) For the sake of consistency, I would suggest kde-theme-$FOO. This is what enlightenment, jsboard, opie, and even previous incarnations of KDE itself use (kdeartwork-theme-*). -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#277582: ITP: kwin-baghira -- A MacOSX-like theme for Apple junkies ;)
* Dirk Eddelbuettel [Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:51:49 +]: > Jose Luis Tallon adv-solutions.net> writes: > > * Package name: kwin-baghira > > Baghira is a native style and kwin decoration for KDE >=3.2 > -- Will this transparently remove existing files via something like the >dpkg alternatives mechanism ? That would allow for easy installation and > >removal. what existing files? > -- The package name looks a bit odd. kwin-$FOO for a theme? Isn't there a >better kde convention you could use? the only packges in the archive which provide kwin decorations are kwin itself and kdeartwork-theme-window. however, the baghira style is provides both kwin decoration *and* widget style (like plastik does). this could be a good moment to standarize the name of these packages. I'm CC'ing debian-qt-kde for that purpose (and Ben Burton, who is the maintainer of kdeartwork). I would suggest a name like kde-$FOO-style to be used (e.g., kde-baghira-style) for packages that provide a widget style for QT/KDE, and include kwin decoration (if they exist) in the same package. (*) packages providing only kwin decorations could be named kde-$FOO-style-kwin, and icon themes could use kde-$FOO-icons. if anybody has concenrs with that naming, please speak (only to debian-qt-kde, if you consider that appropriate). (*) I am aware that this will make style packages depend on kwin via shlibs:Depends. I, however, frown upon the idea of spliting *each* style in two packages. thanks, -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 If you want the holes in your knowledge showing up try teaching someone. -- Alan Cox
Bug#277582: ITP: kwin-baghira -- A MacOSX-like theme for Apple junkies ;)
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: kwin-baghira Version : 0.5h Upstream Author : Thomas Lübking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://baghira.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : A MacOSX-like theme for Apple junkies ;) Baghira is a native style and kwin decoration for KDE >=3.2 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
