Bug#294990: ITP: bontmia -- backup over network to multiple incremental archives

2005-02-15 Thread Reto Schuettel
Hi Matthew

On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:40:36AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:49:44PM +0100, Reto Schuettel wrote:
  I made a mistake, I asked the author, created a package and AFTER that I
  filed an ITP.
 
 Oooh.  Did you check wnpp before you started, in case someone else was
 working on the package?

Of course :). But I didn't expect a 'hey, we already have that'-problem :). 
Next time...
 
  Hmm... I'll try to find a sponsor, with a pointer to this discussion
  here. The sponsor should decide if it's worth to upload the package. Do
  you agree with this procedure?
 
 I think that's a good idea.  A potential sponsor will hopefully look
 at bontmia with reference to the other alternatives available, and
 make a judgment call on whether it's sufficiently different.

Okay!

Thanks for your advices!

Regards
Reto Schüttel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#294990: ITP: bontmia -- backup over network to multiple incremental archives

2005-02-13 Thread Reto Schuettel
Hi Matthew

On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 09:25:15AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
  bontmia creates incremental snapshots of a list of given directories
  over the network by using rsync over ssh and hard links. Every snapshot
  looks for the user like a complete copy of all the files, but as a result
  of using hard links every unchanged copy of a file is stored only once on
  the hard disk.
 
 What advantages does this package have over, say, dirvish or backuppc?

I never used dirvish nor backuppc, so I can't really say what the
difference are. But it seems like bontmia is simpler than both
(especially backuppc). I can't really say if that's a reason for
creating a new package, I personally would like it, because it's already
running on several of my machines, but beside of that, it wouldn't be a
big problem for me to close my ITP.

What do you think?

Regards,
Reto Schüttel



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#294990: ITP: bontmia -- backup over network to multiple incremental archives

2005-02-13 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 03:49:45PM +0100, Reto Schuettel wrote:
 On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 09:25:15AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
   bontmia creates incremental snapshots of a list of given directories
   over the network by using rsync over ssh and hard links. Every snapshot
   looks for the user like a complete copy of all the files, but as a result
   of using hard links every unchanged copy of a file is stored only once on
   the hard disk.
  
  What advantages does this package have over, say, dirvish or backuppc?
 
 I never used dirvish nor backuppc, so I can't really say what the
 difference are. But it seems like bontmia is simpler than both
 (especially backuppc).

Simpler in terms of features available, or simpler in terms of configuration
for the same level of features?

 I can't really say if that's a reason for creating a new package, I
 personally would like it, because it's already running on several of my
 machines, but beside of that, it wouldn't be a big problem for me to close
 my ITP.
 
 What do you think?

It's a tricky one.  I'm a firm believer in not duplicating effort, and with
the existence of at least two other packages which appear to do a similar
job, I'm just worried that we'll end up with a lot of packages doing the
same thing, which does nothing except dissipate effort and fragment the user
base of all of the alternatives.  However, at the end of the day, you're the
one expending the effort, so if you think it's worthwhile, I've got no
reason to stop you.

- Matt


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#294990: ITP: bontmia -- backup over network to multiple incremental archives

2005-02-12 Thread Reto Schuettel
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reto Schuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED]


* Package name: bontmia
  Version : 0.14
  Upstream Author : John Enok Vollestad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://folk.uio.no/johnen/bontmia/
* License : GPL
  Description : backup over network to multiple incremental archives

bontmia creates incremental snapshots of a list of given directories
over the network by using rsync over ssh and hard links. Every snapshot
looks for the user like a complete copy of all the files, but as a result
of using hard links every unchanged copy of a file is stored only once on
the hard disk.

The user can specify how old backups should be stored/kept. For example it's 
possible
to keep the daily snapshots of the last 14 days, but also keep one
snapshot per month of the last 12 months. The used network bandwidth can
also be limited to avoid affecting production systems.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#294990: ITP: bontmia -- backup over network to multiple incremental archives

2005-02-12 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 10:07:10PM +0100, Reto Schuettel wrote:
   Description : backup over network to multiple incremental archives
 
 bontmia creates incremental snapshots of a list of given directories
 over the network by using rsync over ssh and hard links. Every snapshot
 looks for the user like a complete copy of all the files, but as a result
 of using hard links every unchanged copy of a file is stored only once on
 the hard disk.

What advantages does this package have over, say, dirvish or backuppc?

- Matt


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature