Bug#298381: progress
Are you still working on the package? If not, I would package and maintain LAT, because I need it for my daily work :) -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#298381: progress
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:06:48PM +0100, Mirco Bauer wrote: Hi, > Are you still working on the package? > If not, I would package and maintain LAT, because I need it for my daily > work :) > I'm interested in LAT in principle, but don't think it's ready to enter debian ATM, while it misses SSL/TLS connection support, which I think is a really important feature for a remote ldap manager... Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298381: progress
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 14:36 +0100, Guido Trotter wrote: > I'm interested in LAT in principle, but don't think it's ready to enter debian > ATM, while it misses SSL/TLS connection support, which I think is a really > important feature for a remote ldap manager... I agree with you, after I tested LAT a bit. Many parts are harcoded (the predefined user/group dialogs for example) and is without SSL not much useful, also it likes to crash. I was blended by the fact its version 0.7.x, thinking it's well developed already, I would say it's more like typical 0.2.x (beta stuff). So let's wait and see how it grows :) > > Guido > -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#298381: progress
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 05:15:35PM +0100, Mirco Bauer wrote: Hi, > > I'm interested in LAT in principle, but don't think it's ready to enter > > debian > > ATM, while it misses SSL/TLS connection support, which I think is a really > > important feature for a remote ldap manager... > > I agree with you, after I tested LAT a bit. Many parts are harcoded (the > predefined user/group dialogs for example) and is without SSL not much > useful, also it likes to crash. > I was blended by the fact its version 0.7.x, thinking it's well > developed already, I would say it's more like typical 0.2.x (beta > stuff). > So let's wait and see how it grows :) > Yeah, later on we can even comaintain it, if we both like it! :) For now let's leave this bug open, and see... Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
